<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!---->
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:lj="http://www.journalfen.net">
  <id>urn:lj:journalfen.net:atom1:atouchofbadness</id>
  <title>A Touch of Badness</title>
  <subtitle>A Touch of Badness</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>A Touch of Badness</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.journalfen.net/community/atouchofbadness/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="http://www.journalfen.net/community/atouchofbadness/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2008-08-11T00:08:41Z</updated>
  <lj:journal username="atouchofbadness" type="community"/>
  <link rel="service.feed" type="application/x.atom+xml" href="http://www.journalfen.net/community/atouchofbadness/data/atom" title="A Touch of Badness"/>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:lj:journalfen.net:atom1:atouchofbadness:1233</id>
    <author>
      <name>Charmian</name>
    </author>
    <lj:poster user="charmian"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.journalfen.net/community/atouchofbadness/1233.html"/>
    <title>The Merits of Harry Potter:  what are they?</title>
    <published>2008-08-11T00:08:41Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-11T00:08:41Z</updated>
    <content type="html">Harry Potter:  Many have discussed its flaws. But what is it about the series that makes it so overwhelmingly popular, from a writing perspective? (In other words, besides things like publicity in the media, the influence of the movies, etc.) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What do aspiring writers have to learn from JKR?</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:lj:journalfen.net:atom1:atouchofbadness:988</id>
    <author>
      <name>Charmian</name>
    </author>
    <lj:poster user="charmian"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.journalfen.net/community/atouchofbadness/988.html"/>
    <title>Besides Twilight, what are the other Worst Best books and authors?</title>
    <published>2008-08-07T00:39:45Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T00:39:45Z</updated>
    <content type="html">The title says it all. Or Best Worst books, if there is any difference. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I notice in the interests list we also have Dan Brown, Eragon, and Cassandra Clare (huh, so what is her secret? Besides stealing the lines of more talented authors?), as well as Harry Potter. (Although I am not sure if I would consider HP objectively an outstandingly awful series. Possibly if it hadn't become so popular, it would be more respected, or at least, less disliked.)</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:lj:journalfen.net:atom1:atouchofbadness:718</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.journalfen.net/community/atouchofbadness/718.html"/>
    <title>Is there such a thing as too much wish fulfillment?</title>
    <published>2008-08-06T04:49:39Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-06T04:51:09Z</updated>
    <category term="wish fulfillment"/>
    <category term="twilight"/>
    <category term="books that failed"/>
    <content type="html">The &lt;i&gt;Twilight&lt;/i&gt; series built its fandom on huge, pulsating, throbbing, shiny shiny heaps of ethically twitchy girly wish fulfillment. The "final" book, &lt;i&gt;Breaking Dawn&lt;/i&gt;, was the biggest, shiniest, most pulsating heap of wish fulfillment of all, a professionally written version of the eternal, deathless "happy family" fanfic.* And yet the readers rejected it. Why? Where did the book's emotional appeal go wrong?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a name="cutid1"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="ljcut" text="* footnote"&gt;* You know the one--two random canon characters fall in wuv, get married, and proceed to fill their house with babies, adopted kids, traumatized war orphans, assbabies, and a menagerie of pets. Cooking, sex, and wacky hijinx ensue. The most important question is: Which of Family A's children (who are carbon copies of their parents) will fall for which of Family B's children (ditto)? Often involves masterpieces of the "assbaby labor scene" genre.&lt;/div&gt;</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:lj:journalfen.net:atom1:atouchofbadness:302</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.journalfen.net/community/atouchofbadness/302.html"/>
    <title>Welcome!</title>
    <published>2008-07-29T17:01:38Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-29T17:01:38Z</updated>
    <category term="welcome"/>
    <category term="mod post"/>
    <content type="html">Welcome! Please feel free to start discussions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One organizational point I'm interested in is: Do you want this to be both a writing group and a discussion group, or would you prefer to have the writing group split off? I founded it to be both types of group because I didn't know what kind of demand there would be, but if there's enough demand, I'll make a bad_writing community as well.</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
