Nobody made a fuss when you banned fpb because they, like me, probably thought that you were banning him for the "continuing to do so" part, not the "arguing about this with me" part. Also, again, he is a known troll, and vanceone has shown a marked preference for trollish behavior, as well. Nobody made a fuss because we know what they are like.

People are making a fuss now because we also know what darkrose and telesilla are like. I do not know either of them outside of our interactions on JF, and neither of them is on my flist, but I know damn well that they are not prone to trollish behavior. They seemed to have an honest disagreement with your opinion, and they expressed it. They did not spam the post with it, and while they may have gotten a little heated, so did you. Telesilla called you stupid, you called her stupid back. You told telesilla to shut the fuck up, darkrose told you that she thought you were full of shit. The score was pretty damn even there, from what I can see, and neither of them trolled. Neither of them even condoned trolling. They merely argued the definition of trolling in cases that they thought to be a grey area.

So, again, unless your rule is that nobody is allowed to disagree with you on your own comm, I'm still not seeing where either telesilla or darkrose broke any rules before you banned them, and if you're saying that they think they're above the rules because they're not respecting their banning then I would very greatly appreciate it if you could point me to the rule that they broke to get banned in the first place.