Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Sep (lord of all I survey) ([info]sepiamagpie) wrote in [info]fandom_court,
@ 2006-06-23 16:43:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
THE CASE OF FANDOM VS MSSCRIBE
Here ye, here ye! Court is now in session!

The Honourable Septimus Magpie will now hear the arguments against one MsScribe also known as Clarabelle also known as Sporkify also known as Pottersginny also known as Karma_Bitch also known as I didn't fucking care enough to remember any of the others.

And new rule: Don't be boring. I want to see tears! laughter! weddings! CUTE LITTLE PUPPY DOGS.

Fandom_court will decide how this ends.



Present arguments for and against.



do not worry, Rotten


SCREW THIS JUDICAL FARCE. YOU'RE ALL SENTENCED TO FIVE YEARS IN THE IP MINES, HIPPIES
















OKAY, YOU ALL GET A SECOND CHANCE. BUT I'VE GOT MY EYE ON YOU, PYRATE.



Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]phosfate
2006-06-23 09:58 pm UTC (link)
For: Has never actually killed a human being. That anyone can prove. (Pseucide doesn't count.)

(Reply to this)


[info]luckdragonfujur
2006-06-23 10:00 pm UTC (link)
CUTE LITTLE PUPPY DOGS</i>

Not exactly a puppy, but she's is cute.

That's all the evidence I can offer to The Cabal Court.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 10:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2006-06-23 10:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 10:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-06-24 12:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-06-24 01:34 pm UTC

sharonapple
2006-06-23 10:07 pm UTC (link)
Objection! What about teh kitties your honor? TEH KITTIES?

The kitties need love too, damnit!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 10:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - sharonapple, 2006-06-23 10:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]breecita, 2006-06-23 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miharu, 2006-06-23 10:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]breecita, 2006-06-23 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2006-06-23 10:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2006-06-24 12:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-06-24 03:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2006-06-24 05:05 am UTC

[info]ashenmote
2006-06-23 10:09 pm UTC (link)
Your Honor, I need to file a complaint at this point. The witch borrowed my calling card, charged with a remaining credit of 2 Dollars and 9 Cents. That was two hours ago and I'm still waiting for it to be returned!

She's guilty! I mean, pro. Whatever. Burn her already!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2006-06-23 10:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2006-06-23 10:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]figgy, 2006-06-23 11:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]angura23, 2006-06-27 10:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2006-06-24 12:29 am UTC

[info]zaliesiren
2006-06-23 10:16 pm UTC (link)
The puppy says eat! hang 'er, but the kitty declines to comment. the kitty that isn't mine says the bitch is craaaaaaaaazy.

(Reply to this)

Guilty! Think of the baby socks
[info]narcissam
2006-06-23 10:21 pm UTC (link)
AGAINST. MsScribe/Clarabella/Pakistani Lady/Fermatojam/Fandom Scruples/Potterginnyetc. is complicit in the mysterious disappearance of Clarabella's two baby socks.

These two children were well attested to by various of the involved socks, but then disappear entirely from the public record, only for their mother Clarabella to brazenly announce as of today that she has one kid and is pregnant with another.

What did this conspiracy of socks do with these two innocent baby socks? How can they be allowed to have the custody of more socklings when the suspicion of foul play hovers over their previous sockspring's disappearance?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Guilty! Think of the baby socks - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 10:27 pm UTC
Re: Guilty! Think of the baby socks - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 10:28 pm UTC
Re: Guilty! Think of the baby socks - [info]maexle, 2006-06-23 10:46 pm UTC
Re: Guilty! Think of the baby socks - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 10:47 pm UTC

[info]tekenduis
2006-06-23 10:24 pm UTC (link)
I'm afraid I don't have anything to add that hasn't already been said, Your Honour, but my cat Tabby wishes to present her case, thusly:

tfrrrrrrrrrfdddddddd
bv z6bhnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn0

It should be noted to the judge that she then proceeded to put my computer into sleep mode.

I rest my case.

(Reply to this)

If it pleases the court...
(Anonymous)
2006-06-23 10:27 pm UTC (link)
Image

We, an unassociated and totally neutral viewpoint, would like to offer a counter argument!

We argue that the entities Pyratejenni, NarcissaM, and CharlotteLennox are the true criminals here! Yes, fair fandom court, we ask that these three rabblerousers be labled disturbers of the peace.

They have knowingly and deliberately interfered with the tranquility of HP fandom, ruining friendships, perhaps driving people into hiding in Mexico, and grainy icons.

This cannot be tolerated. I humbly request that the lovely and completely innocent MsScribe be cleared of all charges and that some sort of punishment is meted out to... to rapscallions.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 10:31 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-06-23 10:34 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 10:35 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]puipui, 2006-06-23 10:40 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 10:50 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 10:51 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - (Anonymous), 2006-12-30 04:29 am UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-06-23 10:38 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 10:42 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - sharonapple, 2006-06-23 10:47 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 10:49 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - sharonapple, 2006-06-23 10:58 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]smo, 2006-06-24 12:54 am UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:55 am UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]smo, 2006-06-24 01:39 am UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]smo, 2006-06-24 02:06 am UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 02:07 am UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]smo, 2006-06-24 02:10 am UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 02:10 am UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 02:11 am UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]freezer, 2006-06-24 01:37 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - [info]mindset, 2006-06-23 10:57 pm UTC
Re: If it pleases the court... - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 11:21 pm UTC
http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_court/1050.html?thread=91930#t91930 - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:24 am UTC
Re: http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_court/1050.html?thread=91930#t91930 - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:26 am UTC
Re: http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_court/1050.html?thread=91930#t91930 - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:39 am UTC
Re: http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_court/1050.html?thread=91930#t91930 - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:40 am UTC
Re: http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_court/1050.html?thread=91930#t91930 - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:48 am UTC
Re: http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_court/1050.html?thread=91930#t91930 - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 12:58 am UTC
Re: http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_court/1050.html?thread=91930#t91930 - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 01:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 01:02 am UTC

[info]pyratejenni
2006-06-23 10:33 pm UTC (link)
Against:

This puppy clearly symbolizes the psychic rug pulled out from all of HP fandom by msscribe.

How can anyone let that happen to a puppy?!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 10:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 10:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 10:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-06-23 10:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2006-06-23 10:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-06-23 11:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2006-06-24 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-06-24 12:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 01:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2006-06-24 01:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 01:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 01:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 01:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 01:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 02:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 02:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2006-06-24 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 02:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]saralina25, 2006-06-23 10:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maexle, 2006-06-23 11:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]major_dallas, 2006-06-24 08:50 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 11:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 07:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mustbebunnies, 2006-06-26 03:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 11:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 11:26 pm UTC

[info]kijikun
2006-06-23 10:42 pm UTC (link)
Empress Matilda her worshipful and royal kittenness would like to enter this statement: wafdsklfdfNbklj

Her court jester Pumpkin-the-climbing/roof-cat refuses to take interst on the grounds that his mama won't let him catch birds.

(Reply to this)


[info]puipui
2006-06-23 10:42 pm UTC (link)
Against. [info]pyratejenni has a very convincing puppy picture.

(Reply to this)


[info]sashenka
2006-06-23 10:45 pm UTC (link)
Against. My socks have penguins on them *points to feet*. Hers are suspiciously bland. I can't trust anyone with mundane socks.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]maexle, 2006-06-23 10:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-23 11:13 pm UTC

[info]wankprophet
2006-06-23 10:51 pm UTC (link)
In the interest of fairness, I move for a separation of the cases. Each individual sockpuppet is accused of a different crime, and thus deserves a separate trial with a separate jury, lest their case be tainted by association with the others.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2006-06-23 10:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2006-06-23 11:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2006-06-24 04:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 11:21 pm UTC

[info]pyratejenni
2006-06-23 11:06 pm UTC (link)
I my defense, I offer tits and ass:

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tekenduis, 2006-06-23 11:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 11:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 11:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-06-24 01:12 am UTC

[info]fl_watermelon
2006-06-23 11:08 pm UTC (link)
I vote for a change of venue on the grounds that this courtroom is clearly biased against those of us who don't actually exist.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 11:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shaggydogstail, 2006-06-23 11:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fl_watermelon, 2006-06-24 12:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shaggydogstail, 2006-06-24 12:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fl_watermelon, 2006-06-24 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-06-24 01:14 am UTC

[info]bunny
2006-06-23 11:34 pm UTC (link)
The socks are INNOCENT! FREE THE SOCKS! OBSERVE MY CAPSLOCK OF TRUTH!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jail, 2006-06-24 01:58 am UTC

[info]puipui
2006-06-23 11:37 pm UTC (link)
May it please the court, if I may present additional evidence:



This is Chewbacca.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-23 11:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maexle, 2006-06-23 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 11:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 12:48 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:53 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:54 am UTC

[info]shaggydogstail
2006-06-23 11:49 pm UTC (link)
I move that grand theft be added to the list of charges. MsScribe's sockpuppet army is clearly the reason I haven't been able to find a pair of socks for the last five years.

Also, I request the sum of $1 million dollars, payable in chocolate buttons, for the emotional distress done to all my remaining socks when their partners were kidnapped from my washing machine and sold into sock slavery.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-23 11:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shaggydogstail, 2006-06-23 11:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]karet, 2006-06-24 01:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shaggydogstail, 2006-06-24 01:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]karet, 2006-06-24 02:11 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-06-24 12:04 am UTC (link)
Against. She's the sort that would put a kitten in a blender (http://www.deviantart.com/view/18947745/) if it guaranteed her internet fame.

—hobbit-kicking mouse (not a sock; lj name is kickthehobbit)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:06 am UTC

[info]chaimonkey
2006-06-24 12:10 am UTC (link)
Pardon your honor, but the dog will not get off the damn couch. I move for recess.

(Reply to this)


[info]spawn_of_kong
2006-06-24 12:18 am UTC (link)
Members of the court:
Might I inquire as to why the record lists my statements as taking place during the early morning hours of June the 24th, when I have the current time listed elsewhere at around 20:00 (alternatively 8 PM) of June the 23rd? Might there be any way by which the individual members of this courtroom could be able to synchronize the record to their particular time zones?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-06-24 02:11 am UTC

[info]photosinensis
2006-06-24 12:22 am UTC (link)
I say drag her up and make her confess to all her crimes. Then, I'll pass judgment.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 12:28 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 12:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]livii, 2006-06-24 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]livii, 2006-06-24 12:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 01:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 01:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 01:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 01:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]livii, 2006-06-24 01:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nam_jai, 2006-06-24 12:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-06-24 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 01:36 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2006-06-24 12:33 am UTC (link)
Against. She should be punished for here crimes by desecreting the Potter Fandom which never has conflicts (sic). But seriously, her extortion of the differently real should be brought to trial. She has given sock.err. Diferently Real people a bad name with her trolling.

For her crime of using multiple names to make herself BNF, she should be stripped of her name (and her clothes), and be thrown in the forced anon of 4chan /b/ (http://img.4chan.org/b/imgboard.html) where she shall nameless and nude for all enternity!

Anonymous does not forgive!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:36 am UTC

[info]nam_jai
2006-06-24 12:43 am UTC (link)
This llama and dog would like to file jointly an amicus curiae brief pointing out that while llamas are not sheep and sheltie mixes really don't know how to herd and there's a fence between them, the mutual pastoral attempt is more edifying than sockpuppeting, therefore, in their view, the judgment should be against.

(Reply to this)


[info]doctoraicha
2006-06-24 12:46 am UTC (link)
She sux! All her socks suck! And I don't mean cox! But I vote to convict! She is not logical! Plus she LIES. I don't like lies and the lying liars who lie them!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 12:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doctoraicha, 2006-06-24 12:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 12:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doctoraicha, 2006-06-24 12:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doctoraicha, 2006-06-24 12:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shaggydogstail, 2006-06-24 01:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhiannonmr, 2006-06-24 06:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doctoraicha, 2006-06-24 12:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2006-06-24 12:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doctoraicha, 2006-06-24 12:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-06-24 01:27 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-06-24 01:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doctoraicha, 2006-06-24 12:59 am UTC



Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map