Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Marty ([info]life_on_mars) wrote in [info]fandom_lounge,
@ 2011-07-28 11:17:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
There are smart people here, right?
I was watching an old episode of a TV show called The Hotel Inspector, which for those who don't know is basically a makeover show for failing hotels and accommodation businesses. One guy in particular had cluttered up his hotel with a strange collection of memorabilia, which included a Dalek. When the trailer was shown, the Dalek could be clearly seen - but in the episode itself they'd used ... I don't know, an anonymity filter or something; scrambled the picture so you couldn't see it, anyway, although they referred to it clearly as a Dalek. This was shown on a UK TV station (Channel 5) which is a competitor of the BBC.

So my question is ... does the BBC, or some other organisation, have such strong image rights on Daleks that nobody else can ever show them even incidentally? And would this work for all such images? For example if you had your picture taken with a Dalek in 1965, would the Dalek's identity have to be erased before you could show that picture on TV?

If anyone can shed any light on this I would very much appreciate it!


(Post a new comment)


[info]notbulgarian
2011-07-28 10:52 am UTC (link)
It's not the BBC but Terry Nation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Nation), to the point that for a long time even the BBC couldn't afford to use the Daleks regularly.

(Reply to this)


[info]twinno
2011-07-28 11:30 am UTC (link)
Maybe it has something to do with the product placement ban in the UK, which was only lifted a few months ago. I doubt the BBC would have been paying a competitor to advertise Doctor Who, but it might have been a preemptive measure on the part of the Hotel Inspector producers.

(Reply to this)


[info]pfeffermuse
2011-07-28 04:04 pm UTC (link)
Agreeing with the other poster re Terry Nation and the Dalek licensing agreements.

For the magazine I was working on, we used to bend so far over backwards as far as not showing anything (store names, a parking lot sign that had a trademark logo, etc) that we used to practically neuter location shots.

A few years back, IIRC, there was even some discussion that theoretically you could be sued for trademark infringement if you stood on the Jersey side of the Hudson and took a picture of the Manhattan skyline, didn't get legal releases for trademarked buildings (Empire State, Pan Am MetLife Building, Chrysler Building, etc), and used the picture in a commercial enterprise.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map