Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



lovecoconuts ([info]lovecoconuts) wrote in [info]fandom_lounge,
@ 2012-01-03 00:17:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:happy

Wanted: Sherlock S02E01 Thoughts
Edit 7: I think this matter was a big enough issue since Stephen Moffat himself addressed it. Was/Is there similar controversy for Sherlock Holmes 2: A Game of Shadows? (I have no more energy to trawl through the SH movies fandom.)

When I found out what happened to Irene Adler in Sherlock Holmes 2: A Game of Shadows, I point-blank refused to watch the movie/am still not watching it, irregardless that I had been looking forward to it since last last year.

Let's just say that (currently, most probably because of above movie) I can't help but feel touchy about how this particular SH character is portrayed these days or what happens to said character. Even reminding myself that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle may have killed her off in the books is not helping.

So, my question is to people who already saw Sherlock S02E01. In your opinion, is the character treated okay-ish? I've already spoiled myself over at Wikipedia and TVTropes, and the early reviews seem to indicate characterization was done well though there are already complaints about how the character was butchered.

Advisory: Comments most likely will contain spoilers.

Edit 1: Have found out that Steven Moffat (and others) are trying to kill the Ho Yay with Irene Adler. My brain is currently broken.

Edit 2: Have finally seen S02E01.

Edit 3: Okay.

Edit 4: Sherlock writer Steven Moffat furious with sexist claim

Edit 5: Found this piece of awesome. Now happy.

Edit 6:

https://twitter.com/#!/steven_moffat/status/155210107397996545
"@Meunda She outsmarts him TWICE- kept photos, derailed Mycroft's plan. He outsmarts her ONCE, and by saving her admits he's equally smitten."

https://twitter.com/#!/steven_moffat/status/155220504721104896
"@JonathanAngwin And that Sherlock is played for a fool thoughout the episode and has to be TOLD what's going on by his big brother."

https://twitter.com/#!/steven_moffat/status/155240523848880128
"@Meunda Ah, we shall agree to differ. Cos if needing rescued makes you a damsel, I'm one too. And Sherlock certainly is. Twice in that show."

I guess this means that Irene/Sherlock is canon.


Edit 7: I think this matter was a big enough issue since Stephen Moffat himself addressed it. Was/Is there similar controversy for Sherlock Holmes 2: A Game of Shadows? (I have no more energy to trawl through the SH movies fandom.)



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Re: Maybe it's a guy thing.
[info]lovecoconuts
2012-01-10 03:21 am UTC (link)
Just to avoid ship-related misunderstandings and such, I like the Sherlock/Irene ship. I definitely do not have "Die for our ship" ulterior motives for why I'm (somewhat) resisting the idea of mutual love S/I being canon (in Moffat's version).

I'm just feeling very reluctant/suspicious/confused. S/I was mutual love canon in the Hollywood movies as well, and they killed her off. (sighs) Considering that Mary passed away in canon, I don't expect her to survive Hollywood's approach as well.

Heh. I think I prefer to ship Sherlock/John, simply because I don't have to worry about either getting killed off (for real).

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map