Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Hexnut ([info]tunxeh) wrote in [info]fandom_lounge,
@ 2007-08-24 20:23:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Cassie Clare up for deletion
The Wikipedia article for Cassandra Clare (or, if you prefer, Claire) is up for deletion. As is the article about her books. I foresee legions of fanpoodles spamming the !vote...

ETA: Finally getting a little bit wanky? VivianDarkbloom (in both AfDs) is now claiming that it's a bannable offense for wankas to participate in the AfD. If it's trolling the wank, it's certainly bannable here, but she seems to be implying that it's bannable there as well.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]tunxeh
2007-08-25 04:54 am UTC (link)
I think their usual standard is that someone has to have published a review of the book. But this one was prominently marketed enough that I'd expect that to be true...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ealusaid
2007-08-25 05:03 am UTC (link)
But there have been published reviews. Someone posted one to a wank-related community because the reviewer said the book sounded like a cheap ripoff of Buffy and a few other shows and everyone wondered who the reviewer's fandom name was.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sashenka
2007-08-25 05:03 am UTC (link)
That makes sense. It would keep vanity publishers who've sold three books from writing articles about themselves.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map