Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Hexnut ([info]tunxeh) wrote in [info]fandom_lounge,
@ 2007-08-24 20:23:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Cassie Clare up for deletion
The Wikipedia article for Cassandra Clare (or, if you prefer, Claire) is up for deletion. As is the article about her books. I foresee legions of fanpoodles spamming the !vote...

ETA: Finally getting a little bit wanky? VivianDarkbloom (in both AfDs) is now claiming that it's a bannable offense for wankas to participate in the AfD. If it's trolling the wank, it's certainly bannable here, but she seems to be implying that it's bannable there as well.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]ciceronianus
2007-08-25 05:13 am UTC (link)
Not to be too big of a Wiki stickler, but the grounds for book notability include the book having won an important award of some kind, having been adapted (film, play, television etc.), or the author being so significant that anything they do automatically warrants a mention (there's other stuff, but I don't remember what it is).

I think the article would probably survive the nomination if it had sources that were outside of Cassandra Claire's control listed.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sashenka
2007-08-25 05:28 am UTC (link)
According to here several reviews or media articles warrant an entry on wikipedia, though I don't actually know if she's attained that, but if she has, she meets the requirements. I wish I hadn't been bored enough to look that up.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]isobelsomething
2007-08-25 05:44 am UTC (link)
I love your icon! <3 Futurama.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]purplepopple
2007-08-25 02:14 pm UTC (link)
Alas, she does. She's been mentioned in New York Times as she is a New York Times best selling author. See? and her book was mentioned in DeathRay Magazine. She was interviewed by Jive Magazine. She's been a guest at DragonCon. I know she got mentioned in Locus magazine. Um. There is a decent list.

The article has patrolling problems. Occassionally people have edited in links to FanHistory.Com and they've been edited right back out. Then, FanHistory.Com is listed as not a credible source. (Really, I understand that. Other sources are better and they exist... Except FanHistory.Com is viewed as credible for at least three other articles... but I digress.)

On an unrelated note, her popularity seems to be on the decline! At least in terms of interest from the general public so yeah! Maybe. I hope. I keep getting more traffic but Google is saying she's not as popular in terms of just searching as she was in the past, rank wise. And it looks that way on blog pulse too.

People are also writing fan fiction based on her work and posting it to FanFiction.Net. This is one. The other story seems to have been deleted.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrbimble
2007-08-25 03:00 pm UTC (link)
She was at a panel for Holly Black, as the questioner. Not really a GUEST in terms of having her own panel, or having a signing table or anything.

Not that I attended Holly's panel just to see Cassie. NO! I DIDN'T! Why would you think that?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]purplepopple
2007-08-25 03:06 pm UTC (link)
It was mentioned on this community at the time that she was there... and there were a couple of LiveJournal posts about how she and Holly Black had been tippling a bit on stage and how that was unattractive and not very cool for a panel on Children's Literature.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]janegraddell
2007-08-25 03:17 pm UTC (link)
Wait, are you talking about her panel at DragonCon? I was there, too. We seriously need some kind of fandom_wank dress code for these things...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrbimble
2007-08-27 04:14 pm UTC (link)
I was at the YA Holly Black panel that Cassie "moderated". Which basically meant she asked Holly stupid inane questions and Holly pontificated at length about how it's right to write about drugs and sex for 11-12 yr old kids and how she, as a teenager, would ride the subway to New York and sleep on the streets.

Um... yeah. I wasn't impressed with either of them. Cassie was... less than impressive and extremely coy when I approached the podium to take a picture. (Yeah, I WAS trying to get a picture of her, but I was taking a picture of both of them and why she felt it was necessary to keep shielding her face from my camera... Sorry, if you're "important" enough to be on a Dragon*Con panel, you can suck it up and get your picture taken. UGH. /rant) I heard tell that Holly's drink was adult in nature and certainly it's inappropriate at a Young Adult panel to be tibbling...,

Oh, and I was in costume - I think I was wearing Eowyn that day. (In case you remember) Are you going this year? I am and I'd love to say hi over coffee if you're so inclined!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]janegraddell
2007-08-27 07:22 pm UTC (link)
I was at a different panel, alas. I went to the first one, on Friday. All things considered, I'm not sorry I missed that one.

And yep, I'll be there this year, and coffee sounds like a good thing. :) I'm coming in Thursday night and leaving Tuesday morning. My e-mail is janegraddell at gmail dot com if you want to arrange a time and place.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]naeelah
2007-08-30 01:37 pm UTC (link)
I'll be at D*C this year and probably check out one of CC's panels and not just because I'm hoping someone will heckle. I'll have to make a pin with F_W on it or something. ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map