Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



lidane ([info]lidane) wrote in [info]fandom_lounge,
@ 2008-12-07 17:11:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:awake
Entry tags:twilight lounge

Oh, this should be fun...
I'm not sure if there's wank over this anywhere, so I'm posting this here instead of [info]clairvoyantwank.

Courtesy of ONTD, it looks like Catherine Hardwicke has been fired from the Twilight franchise:

http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/30413178.html

I hated the book and have no interest in seeing the film, but still, that seems a bit harsh. Didn't the film do well at the box office?

ETA: Via [info]holyheadharpy in the comments, an official announcement of Hardwicke's departure is here.

ETA #2:Now comes an article from Variety that is starting to make the fandom nervous. According to Variety, part of the reason for Hardwicke's departure is serious creative differences over the story for New Moon. Namely, Summit want more RPattz in the film, and Hardwicke disagreed. Also, they want the next film out ASAP:

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117997013.html?categoryid=13&cs=1

The problem that stalled negotiations was that Hardwicke had strong opinions about what to do with the next installment, and so did Summit. The debate was how to focus the adaptation of the second book, which deals more with giant werewolves than vampires, as well as the long depression of Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart), after her vampire lover (Rob Pattinson) leaves her. One issue was how to get more of teen heartthrob Pattinson into the film. (Rosenberg has figured out a device to achieve this.) But Hardwicke, burned out from her "Twilight" labors, simply wasn't willing to jam this movie with a script that still needed months of development.

[info]lion_lamb react to the news. Depending on how this all goes, it might be time to move this up to one of the wank coms soon. Anyone brave enough to go looking for how this is playing out in the fandom?



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]huehau
2008-12-08 04:59 am UTC (link)
The first HP movie made over $900 million but it had a bigger budget, is a family picture, based on better material, and probably had a better trailer. If I were to judge Twilight just from the trailer, I'd say this was going to be a bad movie--the acting was bad, the special effects were laughable, and everyone was blue. There was nothing in the trailer that would have persuaded me to see the movie even if I wasn't aware of it from the Internet.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]vzg
2008-12-08 05:02 am UTC (link)
Oh, I completely agree. The movie I thought was hysterically bad, but the trailer was worse. My supervisor at work has no interest in the film, except that as soon as he saw the trailer he had a dozen bad things to say about it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]vzg
2008-12-08 05:02 am UTC (link)
Oh, but, yeah— our conversation started as being about RPattz (I share all his glorious exploits with her); she thinks he ought to have known about Twilight before signing on, because it's "as big as Harry Potter." I could not convince her otherwise.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map