Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Miss Georgia ([info]vitalitat) wrote in [info]fandom_lounge,
@ 2009-01-27 10:49:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:deathwatch 2009

John Updike, Author, Dies at 76
I think this belongs here, over [info]deathwatch. :(((

NEW YORK (AP) -- John Updike, the Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist, prolific man of letters and erudite chronicler of sex, divorce and other adventures in the postwar prime of the American empire, died Tuesday at age 76.

Updike, a resident of Beverly Farms, Mass., died of lung cancer, according to a statement from his publisher, Alfred A. Knopf.




A literary writer who frequently appeared on best-seller lists, the tall, hawk-nosed Updike wrote novels, short stories, poems, criticism, the memoir "Self-Consciousness" and even a famous essay about baseball great Ted Williams. He was prolific, even compulsive, releasing more than 50 books in a career that started in the 1950s. Updike won virtually every literary prize, including two Pulitzers, for "Rabbit Is Rich" and "Rabbit at Rest," and two National Book Awards.

Although himself deprived of a Nobel, he did bestow it upon one of his fictional characters, Henry Bech, the womanizing, egotistical Jewish novelist who collected the literature prize in 1999.

His settings ranged from the court of "Hamlet" to postcolonial Africa, but his literary home was the American suburb. Born in 1932, Updike spoke for millions of Depression-era readers raised by "penny-pinching parents," united by "the patriotic cohesion of World War II" and blessed by a "disproportionate share of the world's resources," the postwar, suburban boom of "idealistic careers and early marriages."

He captured, and sometimes embodied, a generation's confusion over the civil rights and women's movements, and opposition to the Vietnam War. Updike was called a misogynist, a racist and an apologist for the establishment. On purely literary grounds, he was attacked by Norman Mailer as the kind of author appreciated by readers who knew nothing about writing.

But more often he was praised for his flowing, poetic writing style. Describing a man's interrupted quest to make love, Updike likened it "to a small angel to which all afternoon tiny lead weights are attached." Nothing was too great or too small for Updike to poeticize. He might rhapsodize over the film projector's "chuckling whir" or look to the stars and observe that "the universe is perfectly transparent: we exist as flaws in ancient glass."

In the richest detail, his books recorded the extremes of earthly desire and spiritual zealotry, whether the comic philandering of the preacher in "A Month of Sundays" or the steady rage of the young Muslim in "Terrorist." Raised in the Protestant community of Shillington, Pa., where the Lord's Prayer was recited daily at school, Updike was a lifelong churchgoer influenced by his faith, but not immune to doubts.

"I remember the times when I was wrestling with these issues that I would feel crushed. I was crushed by the purely materialistic, atheistic account of the universe," Updike told The Associated Press during a 2006 interview.

"I am very prone to accept all that the scientists tell us, the truth of it, the authority of the efforts of all the men and woman spent trying to understand more about atoms and molecules. But I can't quite make the leap of unfaith, as it were, and say, 'This is it. Carpe diem (seize the day), and tough luck."'

He received his greatest acclaim for the "Rabbit" series, a quartet of novels published over a 30-year span that featured ex-high school basketball star Harry "Rabbit" Angstrom and his restless adjustment to adulthood and the constraints of work and family. To the very end, Harry was in motion, an innocent in his belief that any door could be opened, a believer in God even as he bedded women other than his wife.

"The tetralogy to me is the tale of a life, a life led an American citizen who shares the national passion for youth, freedom, and sex, the national openness and willingness to learn, the national habit of improvisation," Updike would later write. "He is furthermore a Protestant, haunted by a God whose manifestations are elusive, yet all-important."

Other notable books included "Couples," a sexually explicit tale of suburban mating that sold millions of copies; "In the Beauty of the Lilies," an epic of American faith and fantasy; and "Too Far to Go, which followed the courtship, marriage and divorce of the Maples, a suburban couple with parallels to Updike's own first marriage.



Again :(((



(Post a new comment)


[info]sarracenia
2009-01-27 10:17 pm UTC (link)
I think this belongs here, over [info]deathwatch. :(((

How come?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]vitalitat
2009-01-27 10:25 pm UTC (link)
Because he's a very prolific author, and more people read here than in [info]deathwatch.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sarracenia
2009-01-28 06:32 pm UTC (link)
Makes sense, I suppose. It's not against the rules, even if I do have an irrational dislike of death posts in here. I just don't get the logic of ignoring a community designed for these posts and then specifically mentioning it in the post.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]phosfate
2009-01-28 01:38 am UTC (link)
Haven't you seen all those Rabbit slashfic communities on LJ?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sarracenia
2009-01-28 06:30 pm UTC (link)
It's too early in the morning to deal with the results of googling rabbit slash. If I'm going to look at explicit pictures of dickgirl rabbits, I'd rather do it when fully awake so I can be properly horrified!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]charmian
2009-01-27 10:25 pm UTC (link)
Er.... just why? I think it belongs in Deathwatch too, unless you are arguing that he didn't die or something.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]vitalitat
2009-01-27 10:29 pm UTC (link)
A while ago when deathwatch was created I'm pretty sure it was asked that for deaths of (how do I put this nicely) people who are less known in any fandom, or whatever, were posted over there, however big named people/celebrities/etc etc etc could be posted about here. He was someone very important to literature that's why I posted it here.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]charmian
2009-01-27 10:34 pm UTC (link)
I think deathwatch was created because actually, people were tired of hearing about deaths that they would have heard about anyway, through other outlets. John Updike's death is on the front page of the New York Times website. It's the big story on CNN international. What is the point of having it here?

To me it would make more sense if deaths of people who were well known ONLY in fandom, say prominent fans, were posted here, rather than the other way around.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]vitalitat
2009-01-27 10:40 pm UTC (link)
Well then, sorry that I thought people here would have wanted to discussed him. I guess I was wrong. Pardon my post then, and my added comment within.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]charmian
2009-01-27 10:39 pm UTC (link)
Also, is literature a "fandom"? Has fandom evolved to mean ANYTHING in the arts? If a famous sculptor, poet, painter dies, should I post it here too? Personally speaking... I wouldn't even post something on Deathwatch if it was a top story in the mainstream media.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]vitalitat
2009-01-27 10:42 pm UTC (link)
Also, is literature a "fandom"?


Really? REALLY?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]charmian
2009-01-27 10:45 pm UTC (link)
I'm curious... We don't usually speak of people who read mainstream literature as "a fandom" on JF. The whole social network of writing workshops, reading groups, that reads writing like Updike's, IME, does not refer to itself as "fandom." Now, you can say that socially it isn't that different from scif-fi/fantasy fandom, but to me it's debateable.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]vitalitat
2009-01-28 01:51 am UTC (link)
Yeah. Okay.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]white_serpent
2009-01-28 01:18 am UTC (link)
Okay. I created [info]deathwatch.

To my understanding, Updike is probably famous enough to qualify for inclusion in [info]fandom_lounge (if you think it's fandom-related material). After all, a random person at a bus stop probably knows the name. (Though I'm not a [info]fandom_lounge mod, so take up the question with one of them.)

Yes, [info]deathwatch has a smaller readership than [info]fandom_lounge. That's why, in general, it's probably a better idea to post deaths there than here. You have an audience there that's actually interested in seeing obituary posts. You have an audience here that might be interested in a specific death, but probably is more interested in yelling at you for posting yet another death post.

A while ago when deathwatch was created

[info]deathwatch was created prior to things being banished there. I was talking with [info]kadath about creating a community and encouraging death posts to go there instead of [info]fandom_lounge, and we talked each other into doing it. I never got around to announcing it had been created, because I'm extremely lazy. I told her that either she could announce it existed or I could the next time there was a death post on f_l.

So, in terms of why [info]deathwatch exists, it's to get death posts off of [info]fandom_lounge and bring them to the attention of interested parties. I can't address the question of what is or isn't allowed to be posted here. Just consider your audience; being technically allowed doesn't mean you won't get jumped on.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]vitalitat
2009-01-28 01:27 am UTC (link)
Thanks for the clarification on your community. I don't mind the jumping, keeps me feeling young.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jaythenerdkid
2009-01-27 11:02 pm UTC (link)
*Makes a note to find some of his stuff and read it*

Also, as far as I recall, when [info]deathwatch was created, they did say that deaths of people like...well, John Updike, I guess, could be posted here still.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]white_serpent
2009-01-27 11:54 pm UTC (link)
Deathwatch was created prior to things being banished there, FYI. We just didn't bother to do anything with it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]doomsday
2009-01-28 12:29 am UTC (link)
*Obligatory comment expressing outrage that 2009 is following in 2008's murderous footsteps*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2009-01-28 01:39 am UTC (link)
My God, a year in which people DIE?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]msilverstar
2009-01-28 02:10 am UTC (link)
ya think? could it be, a trend?!???

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]doomsday
2009-01-28 06:43 am UTC (link)
I thought this year would be different, man.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]snacky
2009-01-28 01:55 am UTC (link)
Hi, I'm a mod and I think this is fine.

(Reply to this)


[info]caffeine_fairy
2009-01-28 01:55 pm UTC (link)
It now appears that the only point of [info]deathwatch is so that people can make a point about how the announcement is OMGTOOSPESHUL for [info]deathwatch...

(Reply to this)


[info]frequentmouse
2009-01-30 06:39 pm UTC (link)
I think what may be needed is a community called [info]bitch_n_moan specially for people who want to complain about things being misposted.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map