|
| |||
|
|
Mini-finale, mini-wank Warning: This wank features disappearing ABC decided to go out on a limb this year with its OMGWTFSOPHOMORESLUMP hit Lost by breaking the 22-episode season into two mini-seasons, each running without repeats, separated by a hiatus in the middle. Naturally, and in a manner entirely undesired by ABC executives, this daring television innovation has attracted media attention. And wank. The NYT runs a piece on the strange Lost scheme, and quotes the show's producers and studio VPs to explain why things are happening as they are. Fans' senses of entitlement being what they are, these explanations fail to satisfy. Nothing too intense yet. But if I've learned anything from Lost, it's that moments of peace and calm like this are short-lived and always followed immediately by a rain-soaked handgun showdown. Another user apparently posts a comment similar to Uhh, did you read the article? They didn't say they couldn't start the show in January. [quoting from the NYT article]Fox solves the problem by not putting “24” on the air until January, then running the show for 24 weeks straight, without interruption or repeat. Mr. Bader said that ABC considered that, but other factors worked against it. “We knew this would be a risky fall for us,” he said. “Monday Night Football” moved from ABC to ESPN this year, leaving a hole in the network’s prime-time schedule. The network also moved “Grey’s Anatomy” from Sunday nights to Thursday and, uncertain what the results of that move would be, decided that it could not afford to keep another signature franchise, “Lost,” off the fall schedule, he said. The pursuant reply from an anonymous reader: Quit being such a cunt. The following thread is a tasty wank-snack delightfully lacking in TL;DR. If there's one thing these Losties know how to do, it's cut to the point. From "OMG DUN BE MEEN" to "GOODBYE CRUEL INTERNETS" in 4.7 seconds: I laugh because people aren't read the article and are basically just upset that LOST isn't on. That's all. Disagree with the program schedule - that's fine. But to say it's for nefarious reasons is silly. I don't see any rudeness in his comments. Maybe you are being sensitive to his remarks, but they aren't rude, especially for a messageboard/livejournal on the internet. Oh, and to say someone is being rude and *not* calling out the person calling him a "cunt" kinda shows some bias. Just an FYI. Heckling is when you prod someone just to get them riled up. You stated something false and I corrected you. That's called being in a public forum. And now that you mention it, I do rather enjoy correcting people. (Italics mine.) Is Post a comment in response: |
||||||||||||||
|
Privacy Policy -
COPPA Legal Disclaimer - Site Map |