Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Emby Quinn ([info]embyquinn) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2006-11-26 23:17:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Fan-Fucking-tastic
Entry tags:community: bad_rpers_suck, rp

Grudgewanksplosion at BRPS
Tired of being outdone by [info]fanficrants, [info]bad_rpers_suck brings a whole new level of wank to the yard.

It starts when [info]tiakall posts the following clip from an as-yet-unidentified RPer's personal journal:

"One of the most annoying things about being a female online roleplayer is when your estrogen levels start rising, your single or active characters start nagging you to let them get laid."

The initial responses are what would you would normally anticipate: laughter, sarcasm, scorn, even a bit of devil's advocacy...

Until the mod and the admin from the quoted player's current RP show up.

Hey! Don't you have anything better to do then trolling other people's journals?

[info]water_rose and [info]kenderbard are here to rip a few people brand spanking new assholes, particularly [info]tiakall. In the responses it is revealed that [info]tiakall has been in a prior RP with the person she quoted in the original post and had, evidently, less than great experiences with her.

Hmm...is that grudgewank I smell?

Still, water_rose and kenderbard prove to be plenty wanky in their own right in their unabashed, balls-out defense of their precious player. A few gems:

memento_lucifera: I think you fail to realize that, while your darling player may have said it, it also applies to many other people who have said the same thing and MEANT it in the context that it was posted under.

Quit making this a personal attack on you and your friends.

water_rose: When it's taken directly from my players journal, it IS an attack on her. If it's a general complaint, it can be ranted about in a generalised post without hunting through someone else's LJ for a quote that makes them look bad.

And I'm perfectly entitled to defend my player if I wish to.

kenderbard: Indeed - it is an attack on her, saying that she is a player who can't distinguish the line between IC and OOC. That couldn't be farther from the truth. Now people are laughing at her, when it isn't deserved. She is my friend, my player, and I hold the right to defend my players from malicious snarks.

nymosy: So does she "belong" to you or to water_rose? I'm hella confused now.

water_rose: Both of us. I'm the board mod, Kender's the admin. We're staff of the same game.

nymosy: Oh, so that would be why she's following you around the threads like a drooling puppy.


And that's just one part of one thread. It's just gotten started, and this promises to be a lot of fun to watch.

ETA: Some misapprehensions about the source of the quote and the location of the RP have been corrected. Thanks, water_rose, for that and for being such a good sport!



(Post a new comment)


[info]logicalmob
2006-11-27 08:17 am UTC (link)
Slightly OT, but is the age of [info]x_palimpest going to be an issue? Or is her part in this too small to matter?

Not trying to narc, I just wanted to know for future reference. I saw this one earlier today, but wasn't sure if it was kosher.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]embyquinn
2006-11-27 08:21 am UTC (link)
Oh, man, I totally missed that. I plead sleep-deprivation.

If the mods rule that this should be deleted, please feel free. I will remove the comments she made from the OP right away.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]redcoast, 2006-11-27 08:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]embyquinn, 2006-11-27 08:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redcoast, 2006-11-27 08:50 am UTC
(no subject) - ealusaid, 2006-11-27 09:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2006-11-27 08:09 pm UTC

verthandi
2006-11-27 08:17 am UTC (link)
Oh, man. I missed seeing that wank unfold by fifteen minutes.

(Reply to this)


[info]lottelita
2006-11-27 08:45 am UTC (link)
OMG! Someone, somewhere, is disagreeing with something one of my friends said!

Quick! To the wankmobile!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]thesilentsenshi
2006-11-27 04:50 pm UTC (link)
Oooh! I want a wank mobile! How can I get hooked up with one?
that comment was so full of WIN

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-11-27 08:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jat_sapphire, 2006-11-28 07:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-11-27 08:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jat_sapphire, 2006-11-28 07:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-11-28 12:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vigilanterodent, 2006-11-28 04:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ninja_stripper, 2006-11-28 05:24 am UTC
(no subject) - janegray, 2006-11-28 08:18 pm UTC

[info]ilpalazzo
2006-11-27 09:18 am UTC (link)
That post, about ovaries causing bad online sex, goes really well with this post on [info]fanficrants about ovaries having bad online sex.

GOD DAMN THOSE OVARIES.
they're in ur abdomen, makin u wank

(Reply to this)(Thread)


ealusaid
2006-11-27 10:00 am UTC (link)
Waugh. That's just... um...

*crosses legs*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ilpalazzo, 2006-11-27 10:41 am UTC

[info]thesilentsenshi
2006-11-27 04:53 pm UTC (link)
Ahh, yes... ffrants totally tops bad_rpers_suck(on the bizarre scale anyways). Mmmm... lj comm smut. xD

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]thoms
2006-11-27 05:47 pm UTC (link)
OWWWW.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]southerngaelic, 2006-11-27 07:08 pm UTC

[info]plazmah
2006-11-27 06:53 pm UTC (link)
Aiiee, that's just laughably wrong.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]demonbean
2006-11-27 09:25 pm UTC (link)
... I wondered when someone would bring that one up.

It still makes me laugh. And cross my legs.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tez
2006-11-27 10:20 pm UTC (link)
I saw that. It hurt me. It hurt me bad and I want to collect damages.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]semirecluse
2006-11-28 05:07 am UTC (link)
At least it doesn't feature chicken wings in the vagina...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]isa
2006-11-27 09:30 am UTC (link)
Yay! A wank that doesn't make me want to kill all of humanity WITH A HAMMER! Thank you, Embyquinn, for helping me not explode all over the Michael Richards wank like a sploogey cyclone of invective with a regiment of masturbating porn stars caught in my turbulent, turgid vortex.

I fail at metaphor, but I like to think I'm okay at imagery.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]chrome327
2006-11-27 04:40 pm UTC (link)
Imagery was good for me too - Off for cigarette now.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]cheezdanish
2006-11-27 09:51 am UTC (link)
Oh, man, and here I thought the one about the use of a racist epithet was gonna be the wank fodder today.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]hallidae
2006-11-27 05:12 pm UTC (link)
Oh, the one about someone whining over an 1800s RP using slurs instead of being PC? That one amused me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cheezdanish, 2006-11-27 05:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2006-11-27 05:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cheezdanish, 2006-11-27 05:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vigilanterodent, 2006-11-27 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cheezdanish, 2006-11-27 08:58 pm UTC

[info]skarrow
2006-11-27 01:24 pm UTC (link)
It is tiny and disappointing. I was all set up to be bummed that I missed a big blowup while I was doing schooly stuff, and it's all bitty and passive aggressive yet.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2006-11-27 02:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]embyquinn, 2006-11-28 12:42 am UTC

[info]caffeine_fairy
2006-11-27 01:33 pm UTC (link)
Am I alone in finding them referring to this unknown person as "My player" the teensiest bit creepy?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]icedark_elf, 2006-11-27 01:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]t_boy, 2006-11-28 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2006-11-27 02:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-27 02:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thesilentsenshi, 2006-11-27 04:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]verpon, 2006-11-27 05:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thesilentsenshi, 2006-11-27 04:55 pm UTC

[info]limyaael
2006-11-27 02:02 pm UTC (link)
Now people are laughing at her, when it isn't deserved. She is my friend, my player, and I hold the right to defend my players from malicious snarks.

Sounds like someone hasn't learned that someone on the Internet can always laugh at you and, guess what, it won't affect your life in any lasting way. These snarks don't exactly come hunting their victims.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]icedark_elf, 2006-11-27 02:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]quettaser, 2006-11-27 04:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2006-11-28 05:11 am UTC

[info]kayla
2006-11-27 03:21 pm UTC (link)
Nymosy is winning my heart. Such lovely snark, she should be over here with us.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dhaunea, 2006-11-27 04:46 pm UTC

[info]dhaunea
2006-11-27 04:48 pm UTC (link)
Honestly, the carrying on by kenderbard and water_rose smacks to me of a player who is having conniptions behind the scenes but is too upset/timid to fight her own battles and immediately went crying to someone else to raise a stink.

... which sort of gives me the creepy-crawlies, really.

I honestly can't think why else these two would be making themselves and their mysterious player look like so much of a fool in a public forum. If they'd kept their mouths shut, no one would care.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-27 06:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dhaunea, 2006-11-27 06:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-27 06:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dhaunea, 2006-11-27 07:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-27 08:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dhaunea, 2006-11-27 08:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-27 08:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dhaunea, 2006-11-27 08:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-27 08:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dhaunea, 2006-11-27 09:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-27 09:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dhaunea, 2006-11-27 09:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-27 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dhaunea, 2006-11-27 10:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-27 10:16 pm UTC
*dead of appropriate verse* - [info]dhaunea, 2006-11-27 10:37 pm UTC
Re: *dead of appropriate verse* - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2006-11-27 11:05 pm UTC
Re: *dead of appropriate verse* - [info]ldymusyc, 2006-11-28 12:11 am UTC
Re: *dead of appropriate verse* - [info]embyquinn, 2006-11-28 12:24 am UTC
Re: *dead of appropriate verse* - [info]catslash, 2006-11-28 03:49 am UTC
Re: *dead of appropriate verse* - [info]dhaunea, 2006-11-28 03:54 am UTC
Re: *dead of appropriate verse* - [info]isa, 2006-11-28 04:15 am UTC
Re: *dead of appropriate verse* - [info]dhaunea, 2006-11-28 04:32 am UTC
Re: *dead of appropriate verse* - [info]isa, 2006-11-28 04:13 am UTC
Re: *dead of appropriate verse* - [info]semirecluse, 2006-11-28 05:12 am UTC
Re: *dead of appropriate verse* - [info]ladysphinx, 2006-11-28 07:00 am UTC

[info]smo
2006-11-27 10:02 pm UTC (link)
That you have a tendency to break down the esteem of players and that you are, in short, a very terrible person to play with.

Oh noes! She's not just terrible, she's VERY terrible!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-11-27 11:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-11-28 12:53 am UTC

[info]ladysphinx
2006-11-28 06:56 am UTC (link)
I nearly wrote this up when it was a wee little wank of only twelve comments. The flutter in my tummy told me it would grow. Somebody stop me before I sing "Sunrise, Sunset".

(Reply to this)


janegray
2006-11-28 08:28 pm UTC (link)
"One of the most annoying things about being a female online roleplayer is when your estrogen levels start rising, your single or active characters start nagging you to let them get laid."

I don't know why, but the line made me giggle, it sounds definitely tongue-in-cheek to me. I could understand if somebody took it seriously and scorned her, but most of them?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]embyquinn, 2006-11-29 06:34 am UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map