Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Vigilant E. Rodent, Esq. ([info]vigilanterodent) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2006-12-29 14:13:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:positively chuffed
Entry tags:baleetion, community: fanficrants

Auld Lang Wank, My Dear
[Previously seen starring in Clairvoyant Wank, but it's so awesome I have to take it to the big time. Some people are just autowank. Placed here because [info]ladybirdsleeps told me so, and also because of an awesome FW shoutout in the context of the wank.]

So, you know that little piece of the internets called [info]fanficrants?

There's wank there again. I know, I know, I was shocked too!

It starts when the lovely and beyond overworked moderators strike back for the proletariat by modifying rule seven to read as follows:

7. These things are not allowed: disabling comments, deleting comments (including your own, unless it's to post a quick fix), screening comments, freezing comments, and deleting your own posts. Violators will be banned. Contact the moderators if you believe something needs to be taken down.

(Those of you who follow [info]clairvoyantwank will understand how needed this rule totally was. So many wanks, cut down in their prime by oversensitive wankers! It brings a tear to the eye, it really does.)

BUT ALL IS NOT WELL IN RANTSVILLE. Because our old friends [info]shadsie and Millyfan (now known as [info]pretentioustfu and, on JF, tsuzukilove) are in there (see: the Fandom Wank wiki for more information, my nosy kindred). As is our newer friend, [info]kari_izumi, who I know has appeared in a wank at least once – can anyone help a wanka out and point her to the link? Plzkthx.

Choice excerpts to wet your whistle with:

SHADSIE DISSENTS with the mod ruling. Her comment is best summed up by mod [info]kutsuwamushi (our own [info]ladybirdsleeps): Sometimes I post something that I realize later is stupid, and I want to be able to take it down to save face. Also, I hate Fandom Wank.

(Also, one can hardly fail to mention the reason I'm posting this here instead of [info]oft_wank anyway – Shadsie hates us!: ... and for the benefit of Fandom_Wank? Let's just say I'm not a fan. There's absolutely *no way* to win with them once a "wank" has begun. You leave a post up - they think a target is continuing in stupidity or perpetuating a wank. A "wanker" tries to defend themselves, and again, it's perepetuating wank. A "wanker" tries to lock down the wank, or just scraps the whole thing, they say "Oh, they're covering up evidence!" It's like - one cannot go back in time and stop a "wank" (so being able to get rid if it completely might be the next best thing, in my opinion, even if they think it's wanky - because, to them, everything is wanky). Of course, she's jumped in the CW post anyway. Hate just isn't what it used to be, is it? We love you too, ducklingcakes!)

And her "conjoined drooling fat twin of wank" (hey, I didn't say it) Millyfan is in there, too. She brings us both strange analogies and Shadsie hate. It's so tragic when siblings grow apart, isn't it?

Plus, as a special bonus, kari_izumi thinks GAFF >>>>> FFR. Because OH NOES someone cat macroed her or something, and now she is a WARRIOR FOR CENSORSHIP FREE SPEECH. Oh, baby, you so oppressed.

ETA: Your daring young reporter must take some time from admiring her great gams and moxie to focus attention on one aspect she forgot to highlight before, and also two new additions to the fun.

First, to highlight what I previously failed to draw attention to: Shadsie outright admits she is a tr-tr-tr-troll (really, there's a lot of heartwarming self-revelation going around these days, have you noticed?).

Secondly: because the rules do not apply to her, Millyfan breaks a rule in FFR, which isn't big news but is kind of funny in context considering it's like five posts after the mod post. And she wonders why they don't like her.

Thirdly, and totally my favorite so I'm drawing attention to it: over on GAFF's LJ group, a post with some comic or another gets invaded by kari_izumi letting us know how she feels. Can you believe I prefer your trolling to the complete hypocrisy and attitude of Fanfiction Rants? Seriously, that place makes me appriciate your schilck. Oh, pumpkinhead. Single tear!

ETA Again!: Shadsie says she's sorry! HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYBODY.

But somebody hasn't hopped on the enlightenment bus! A troll - named [info]millyfansucks, how creative - appears! Ladies and gentlemen, start the betting now on [info]millyfansucks' true identity now! (ETA YET AGAIN: Deliciously ironic baleetion! Anyone have screencaps?)




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]phosfate
2006-12-29 10:17 pm UTC (link)
A "wanker" tries to lock down the wank, or just scraps the whole thing, they say "Oh, they're covering up evidence!"

No, honey, that's [info]fandom_court.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ilpalazzo, 2006-12-29 10:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dwib, 2006-12-29 11:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ilpalazzo, 2006-12-29 11:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dwib, 2006-12-29 11:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2006-12-30 12:04 am UTC
(no subject) - verthandi, 2006-12-30 12:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jetwolf, 2006-12-30 11:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]soupspooks, 2006-12-30 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dejla, 2006-12-30 10:07 pm UTC

[info]kadath
2006-12-29 10:23 pm UTC (link)
A+++ wank writeup, would LOL again.

(Reply to this)


[info]black_spot
2006-12-29 10:42 pm UTC (link)
If kari_izumi thinks being a member of GAFF makes she/he Teflon coated, (handbags at dawn anyone?) its got another thing wrong. We all make idiots of ourselves occasionally and making an idiot of yourself on the internet is NOT SERIOUS. That was some feeble attempt at intimidating a mod.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2006-12-29 10:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]black_spot, 2006-12-29 10:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-12-29 11:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]black_spot, 2006-12-29 11:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ayezur, 2006-12-29 11:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]southerngaelic, 2006-12-30 12:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ayezur, 2006-12-30 12:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-12-30 12:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2006-12-30 05:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thexphial, 2006-12-30 01:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-12-30 12:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thesilentsenshi, 2006-12-31 07:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-12-30 06:26 am UTC

[info]ladybirdsleeps
2006-12-29 10:47 pm UTC (link)
*thumbs up*

I'm not sure what I like more, Millyfan posting a community promo in violation of the rules immediately afterward, or Shadsie posting the brilliant defense of "I was just trolling!"

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]faultypremise, 2006-12-29 11:34 pm UTC

[info]ashenmote
2006-12-29 10:52 pm UTC (link)
Shadsie and Millyfan, sitting in a tree...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]airborne_rodent, 2006-12-29 11:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2006-12-29 11:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]catslash, 2006-12-29 11:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faultypremise, 2006-12-29 11:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]catslash, 2006-12-29 11:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarky_bix, 2006-12-29 11:47 pm UTC

[info]tehrin
2006-12-29 11:04 pm UTC (link)
It's like - one cannot go back in time and stop a "wank"

O rly? We can't?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2006-12-29 11:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mochibuni, 2006-12-29 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2006-12-29 11:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]black_spot, 2006-12-29 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2006-12-30 12:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vinylgrrl, 2006-12-29 11:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]catslash, 2006-12-29 11:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarracenia, 2006-12-30 03:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vigilanterodent, 2006-12-30 03:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarracenia, 2006-12-30 03:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-12-30 07:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lillyv, 2007-01-02 03:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]footsie, 2006-12-30 07:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]confluence, 2006-12-31 12:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2006-12-30 02:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2006-12-30 06:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]grand_sealink, 2006-12-30 09:54 am UTC

[info]smo
2006-12-29 11:07 pm UTC (link)
Dear Shadsie and Millyfan,

Think twice, post once.

Hell, I'll even settle for "think once."

Kthxbai.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]southerngaelic, 2006-12-29 11:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-12-29 11:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]txvoodoo, 2006-12-29 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-12-30 12:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2006-12-30 12:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]txvoodoo, 2006-12-30 12:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]txvoodoo, 2006-12-30 12:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thesilentsenshi, 2006-12-30 07:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankismyfandom, 2006-12-30 05:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2006-12-30 12:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]digigirl132, 2006-12-30 12:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2006-12-30 02:19 am UTC
your write-up = WIN AND LOVE
[info]puipui
2006-12-29 11:13 pm UTC (link)
It's so tragic when siblings grow apart, isn't it?

And difficult, too, I would imagine, when they are conjoined.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: your write-up = WIN AND LOVE - [info]an_igor, 2006-12-29 11:36 pm UTC
Re: your write-up = WIN AND LOVE - [info]altoidsaddict, 2006-12-30 12:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2006-12-30 12:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2006-12-30 12:09 am UTC

[info]faultypremise
2006-12-29 11:24 pm UTC (link)
lol thank you for the funny write up!

(Reply to this)


[info]wal_lace
2006-12-29 11:25 pm UTC (link)
When you're dumb, you're dumb. Throwing good logic after bad is a waste of time. Trying to pretend your stupidity never happened, on the other hand, is what I would call cowardice.

You know what's not wanky? Saying, "whoops, I made a mistake", and moving on. But I guess wankers are like politicians.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]t_boy, 2006-12-30 11:56 am UTC

[info]harrylovesron
2006-12-29 11:35 pm UTC (link)
I'm a little astounded by the people in the mod post who don't understand that there's an edit button for posts if you make a little spelling or HTML boo-boo.

I also love how Shadsie went on about how there's no way to "win" at f_w. If you wind up on a wank community it's because you have already lost, game over, no mulligans or takey-backeys. Besides, what would you "win" from us? Some kitten macros, a spanking, some good recipes? I don't get what she thinks people "win".

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]airborne_rodent, 2006-12-29 11:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-12-30 12:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thesilentsenshi, 2006-12-30 07:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-12-30 11:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhosyn_du, 2006-12-29 11:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-12-30 12:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2006-12-30 12:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-12-30 02:00 am UTC
(no subject) - janegray, 2006-12-30 11:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-12-30 11:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2006-12-30 03:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-12-30 03:50 am UTC
What?! - [info]windex_junkie, 2006-12-30 08:23 am UTC
Re: What?! - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-12-30 11:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marsdragon, 2006-12-30 12:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-12-30 11:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]slackeremeritus, 2006-12-31 12:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marsdragon, 2006-12-31 02:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slackeremeritus, 2006-12-31 07:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marsdragon, 2006-12-31 08:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slackeremeritus, 2006-12-31 10:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marsdragon, 2006-12-31 11:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]autumnyte, 2006-12-30 07:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-12-30 11:53 pm UTC

[info]snarky_bix
2006-12-29 11:41 pm UTC (link)
Oh my, and I thought we'd never see wank from the Wank Twins again! :D It's like Christmas, all over again!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-12-30 05:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aaron_agonistes, 2006-12-30 05:38 am UTC

[info]southerngaelic
2006-12-29 11:55 pm UTC (link)
Ohhh XD

And all just before New Year's!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]innsmouth_eyes, 2006-12-30 02:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxydosic, 2006-12-30 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2006-12-30 04:59 pm UTC

[info]herongale
2006-12-30 12:47 am UTC (link)
I AM ABOUT TO REVEAL A STATE SECRET.

It is possible to "game" f_w and "win" it.

There is a very difficult trick this entails, but try to bear with me.

It involves.... are you ready?

RECOGNIZING when you are being wanky, APOLOGIZING to anyone whose feelings you might have hurt while being wanky, and IGNORING anyone who seems to be bent on baiting you/extending the wank despite your sudden return to a cooler head.

I know, it's complicated. It might seem like crazy talk, this "apologizing" that I advocate. But it works. It really, really works. It's CRAZY but it WORKS.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sunhawk, 2006-12-30 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vigilanterodent, 2006-12-30 12:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2006-12-30 12:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2006-12-30 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2006-12-30 12:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vigilanterodent, 2006-12-30 01:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkeyes, 2006-12-30 01:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2006-12-30 02:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marsdragon, 2006-12-30 01:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2006-12-30 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2006-12-30 04:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2006-12-30 08:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady7jane, 2006-12-30 03:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2006-12-30 01:18 am UTC

verthandi
2006-12-30 12:53 am UTC (link)
Looks like kari_izumi is trying to blow a troll in the gaff_lj comm here.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]digigirl132, 2006-12-30 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vigilanterodent, 2006-12-30 01:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clichemoth, 2006-12-30 01:57 am UTC

[info]dustmotes
2006-12-30 01:00 am UTC (link)
I suppose there might be some words involved in this wank but all I can see is "WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH"

Suck it up, just because you want to erase whatever evidence there is that you're an idiot and a coward, doesn't mean that perfectly good wank material should be kept from me.

(Reply to this)


[info]waterfront
2006-12-30 01:09 am UTC (link)
"I was trolling" is the new sociology experiment, eh?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2006-12-30 01:55 am UTC

[info]puckity
2006-12-30 01:10 am UTC (link)
You know what I think just sweetens the pot that is the 'Vry Intelligent and Totally-Not-Missing-The-Point' comment?

That little passive-aggressive emoticon ^__^. One per comment, if you want to be subtle ^__^. But I think that ending each sentence with it really drives the point home ^__^. And what is that point?

You are a fucktard. ^__^ XD ^__^ XD ^__^ kawaii!!111!11!

(Reply to this)


[info]rekall
2006-12-30 01:20 am UTC (link)
Millyfan: I'm very thankful you've put this rule in place, because trolls/wankers shouldn't be allowed an "out" like deleting their posts because they don't want to get on f_w/don't want people to see how stupid they are/want to dish it out but not take it.

I cracked a rib from laughing so hard at that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-12-30 01:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]michmatch, 2006-12-30 08:38 am UTC

[info]l_s_q
2006-12-30 02:18 am UTC (link)
This has got to be fallout from the this wank. Probably will be serious fapping in the comments eventually, if you want to edit in a link to it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]vigilanterodent, 2006-12-30 02:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dustmotes, 2006-12-30 02:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]influencethis, 2006-12-30 05:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kahteh, 2006-12-30 12:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thesilentsenshi, 2006-12-30 06:11 pm UTC
shenanigans! - [info]marysrose, 2007-01-01 08:50 pm UTC

[info]innsmouth_eyes
2006-12-30 02:55 am UTC (link)
Eh, in real life when you say stupid shit you don't get to take it back, I see no reason why the internets should be any different. That's why you should maybe think about what you say before you say it, and don't expect everybody to agree with you, and don't cry when they don't. That's how you have to act in real life if you want to get along with people, right?

It is fun to see Millyfan again, as I've been deprived of her special brand of wankery these last few months.

(Reply to this)


[info]mpoetess
2006-12-30 03:29 am UTC (link)
I know it's a typo, but I choose to pretend [info]oft_wank is the special comm we set up just for FFR wank.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2006-12-30 05:03 pm UTC

[info]haunted
2006-12-30 04:28 am UTC (link)
But the troll post on FFR wasn't her! Look, she's enraged about it! See how pisse doff the little bouncing mood indicator is? That's how angry millyfan is at this audacious impostor!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jat_sapphire, 2006-12-30 08:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kahteh, 2006-12-30 12:34 pm UTC

[info]redcoast
2006-12-30 04:55 am UTC (link)
Some people are just autowank.

Isn't that what Shadie was complaining about?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]vigilanterodent, 2006-12-30 05:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redcoast, 2006-12-30 05:26 am UTC

[info]guilty_as_sin
2006-12-30 05:05 am UTC (link)
Ah, Shadsie and Millyfan, what good is one without the other? I say they are the new WonderTwins...

"Wank powers, activate! Power of... trolling! Form of... spooge!"

(Reply to this)



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map