Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Nomes ([info]onaga) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2007-04-14 13:41:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:pixel-stained technopeasant

Pixel-stained Technopeasant Wretches unite!
Howard Hendrix, current VP of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America writers' association, posts via proxy a lengthy explanation of why he is not running for VP in this year's board elections. His reasons basically boil down to being a grumpy mountain man who hates the internet. There's a lot of rambling about how awesome it is living in a cabin in the woods and how many books he's written, but the relevant portion is this:

I think the ongoing and increasing sublimation of the private space of consciousness into public netspace is profoundly pernicious. For that reason I don't much like to blog, wiki, chat, post, LiveJournal, or lounge in SFF.net. A problem with the whole wikicliki, sick-o-fancy, jerque-du-cercle of a networking and connection-based order is that, if you "go along to get along" for too long, there's a danger you'll no longer remember how to go it alone when the ethics of the situation demand it.

I'm also opposed to the increasing presence in our organization of webscabs, who post their creations on the net for free. A scab is someone who works for less than union wages or on non-union terms; more broadly, a scab is someone who feathers his own nest and advances his own career by undercutting the efforts of his fellow workers to gain better pay and working conditions for all. Webscabs claim they're just posting their books for free in an attempt to market and publicize them, but to my mind they're undercutting those of us who aren't giving it away for free and are trying to get publishers to pay a better wage for our hard work.

Since more and more of SFWA is built around such electronically mediated networking and connection based venues, and more and more of our membership at least tacitly blesses the webscabs (despite the fact that they are rotting our organization from within) -- given my happily retrograde opinions, I felt I was not the president who would provide SFWAns the "net time" they seemed to want at this point in the organization's development, or who would bless the contraction of our industry toward monopoly, or who would give imprimatur to the downward spiral that is converting the noble calling of Writer into the life of Pixel-stained Technopeasant Wretch.


Reactions, as one might imagine, are not positive. There's also some additional wank at [info]nihilistic_kid's journal here and a post by the 500-pound-gorilla of SF on the internet, John Scalzi.

ETA: Hendrix digs hole deeper. Er, "attempts to clarify his position." Also, [info]papersky declares April 23d International Pixel-Stained Technopeasant Day. (Thanks to [info]dragoness_e and anon "dhole" for the links.)




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]seppuku
2007-04-14 08:10 pm UTC (link)
jerque-du-cercle

I lol'd.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]soupspooks, 2007-04-14 11:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 12:04 am UTC

[info]limyaael
2007-04-14 08:28 pm UTC (link)
A scab is someone who works for less than union wages or on non-union terms; more broadly, a scab is someone who feathers his own nest and advances his own career by undercutting the efforts of his fellow workers to gain better pay and working conditions for all.

Why, yes, because putting it up for free on the net MUST mean that the writer involved hates all other writers and wants them to die, instead of, y'know, hoping for a wider audience. And every time someone looks at his webpage, God kills an idea in a paid writer's mind.

Off-topic: If some published authors feel this way at bottom, I can say why fanfiction drives some of them absolutely nuts.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kalika_maxwell, 2007-04-14 09:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]priestesspadfoo, 2007-04-15 01:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amyheartssiroc, 2007-04-15 06:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-04-15 10:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]threegoldfish, 2007-04-15 03:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2007-04-15 04:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]runrunmarch, 2007-04-16 02:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maureenlycaon, 2007-04-17 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lindentreeisle, 2007-04-16 03:42 pm UTC
Edited to add a line.
[info]gusty
2007-04-14 08:52 pm UTC (link)
So... in short...

He don't want no scabs? A scab is a guy that can't get no love from him?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Edited to add a line. - (Anonymous), 2007-04-14 09:21 pm UTC
Re: Edited to add a line. - [info]dark_puck, 2007-04-14 09:21 pm UTC
Re: Edited to add a line. - (Anonymous), 2007-04-14 09:23 pm UTC
Re: Edited to add a line. - [info]dark_puck, 2007-04-14 09:26 pm UTC
Re: Edited to add a line. - (Anonymous), 2007-04-14 09:51 pm UTC
Re: Edited to add a line. - [info]gusty, 2007-04-14 09:35 pm UTC
Re: Edited to add a line. - [info]ashu, 2007-04-14 09:49 pm UTC
Re: Edited to add a line. - [info]cookie_love, 2007-04-15 12:45 am UTC
Re: Edited to add a line. - [info]soy_latte, 2007-04-15 02:50 am UTC

[info]slothrop
2007-04-14 08:59 pm UTC (link)
Are you ready for your close-up now, Ms. Desmond?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-04-15 02:58 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 06:34 am UTC

[info]dwib
2007-04-14 09:04 pm UTC (link)
...the downward spiral that is converting the noble calling of Writer into the life of Pixel-stained Technopeasant Wretch

But 'Pixel-stained Technopeasant Wretch' sounds so much more fun!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-14 09:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - nam_jai, 2007-04-14 09:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dwib, 2007-04-14 09:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 12:01 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-14 09:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2007-04-14 09:29 pm UTC
OT, but I loved this - [info]jat_sapphire, 2007-04-14 10:47 pm UTC
Re: OT, but I loved this - ealusaid, 2007-04-14 11:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wrenlet, 2007-04-14 09:32 pm UTC

[info]pokecheck
2007-04-14 09:16 pm UTC (link)
Pixel-stained Technopeasant Wretch

Is that corporate speak for "geek?"

I'd so get that on my business card.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-14 09:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 04:03 am UTC

[info]magnolia_mama
2007-04-14 09:33 pm UTC (link)
His position and argument may be wanky, but I am so in love with the way he phrased it. "The ongoing and increasing sublimation of the private space of consciousness into public netspace is profoundly pernicious" had me twitterpated with delight.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]solar_type_star, 2007-04-14 10:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fuzzybluelogic, 2007-04-14 11:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2007-04-14 11:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2007-04-15 04:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2007-04-15 05:41 am UTC

[info]greenling
2007-04-14 09:33 pm UTC (link)
OW. That was my BRAIN, you fuck.

(Reply to this)


[info]pokecheck
2007-04-14 09:46 pm UTC (link)
I guess that means he won't be storming into any blogs or forums to defend his position.

(Reply to this)


[info]rotten_fish
2007-04-14 10:03 pm UTC (link)
*finally wikis Scalzi*

Oh, that's who that guy is. Okay. Why does he keep showing up in wanks? Like, I get this one, because under that definition he is a "webscab" but he showed up in the CC plagiarism wank, and well - wtf? Why is he kind of a big deal?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]limyaael, 2007-04-14 10:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 01:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cookie_love, 2007-04-15 12:56 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 03:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thekiwiwhoflew, 2007-04-15 03:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2007-04-15 08:57 pm UTC

[info]tehrin
2007-04-14 10:07 pm UTC (link)
I take it he isn't fond of fanfiction then?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 03:56 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-04-14 10:13 pm UTC (link)
the whole wikicliki, sick-o-fancy, jerque-du-cercle

Huh. I guess he really hasn't been on the internet that long. Where I hang out we still call it sycophancy and circle-jerking. But jerque-du-cercle does have such a nice ring to it!

loquaciousquark on LJ

(Reply to this)


[info]doomsday
2007-04-14 10:42 pm UTC (link)
I'd rather be chopping wood for my woodstove, maintaining my own well, and working endlessly on our twelve acres of pines, oaks, and cedars than futzing with these electrons.

It amuses me that for all his five-dollar words, he misuses electron. Unless his magical wilderness land is made up entirely of protons and neutrons.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-14 10:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]soupspooks, 2007-04-14 11:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2007-04-14 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashes, 2007-04-15 12:01 am UTC
(no subject) - janegray, 2007-04-15 12:21 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 12:55 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 05:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2007-04-14 11:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2007-04-15 02:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-04-15 06:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catman, 2007-04-15 03:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yotz_fen, 2007-04-16 11:38 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-04-14 11:17 pm UTC (link)
Soooomebody's awfully fond of their thesaurus!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - [info]vigilanterodent, 2007-04-14 11:36 pm UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - [info]hallidae, 2007-04-14 11:53 pm UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - [info]threegoldfish, 2007-04-15 12:05 am UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - janegray, 2007-04-15 12:28 am UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - [info]qem_chibati, 2007-04-15 01:26 am UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - janegray, 2007-04-15 09:31 am UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - pastri_archy, 2007-04-15 03:35 am UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - [info]xturtle, 2007-04-15 12:08 am UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - [info]zorro, 2007-04-15 02:55 am UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - [info]gunshou, 2007-04-15 05:14 pm UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 08:17 pm UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - [info]onaga, 2007-04-15 06:03 am UTC
Re: I bet he hates RPF a lot <3 - [info]puipui, 2007-04-15 06:51 am UTC

[info]innsmouth_eyes
2007-04-14 11:21 pm UTC (link)
Eh, I have no problem with his attitude towards the internets in general and his desire to extricate himself (I can use big words too!) but then he goes and takes a swipe at people who do their own business and advertising, because, that's a totally new innovation of the internet, I guess. Nobody ever used to give free samples away to stir up business.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

antidisestablishmentarianism - [info]lexin, 2007-04-16 11:42 pm UTC

[info]ravenscanary
2007-04-14 11:27 pm UTC (link)
This just begs for a Dramatic Reading.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 01:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2007-04-15 03:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thekiwiwhoflew, 2007-04-15 03:51 am UTC

[info]waterfront
2007-04-14 11:35 pm UTC (link)
No! Not self-promotion! What is this industry coming to, etc, etc.

Darn kids and their electrons.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2007-04-14 11:47 pm UTC (link)
...wikiclicki?

My god, man, why not start complaining about those damn uppity women wanting to wear bloomers.

Seriously, the world should be grateful that technophobes are not trying to represent Science Fiction writers.

~Davind

(Reply to this)


[info]ayezur
2007-04-15 01:23 am UTC (link)
Technophobe scifi writer?

Out of cheese error, redo from start.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]makeshyft, 2007-04-15 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-04-15 08:04 am UTC

[info]sunqist
2007-04-15 01:36 am UTC (link)
Splooge ahoy!

I wouldn't care about this, except for the fact that last semester I had a class (called "Cities and Citizenship," incidentally) where the prof decided that the class was going to be about how terrible cities are, how they kill your soul, how we young'ns (I think I was older than her) didn't understand how living in a city was rotting our humanity, and how pop culture, especially TV and internet culture, turns our imaginations into pulpy sludge by its very nature. So now whenever someone gets all morally superior about how his life is richer than mine because he chops his own firewood, or something, I Hulk out.

HULK ANGRY! HULK SMASH PUNY SCF-FI WRITER! HULK... oops. Hulk sticky.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-04-15 03:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]xturtle, 2007-04-15 04:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-04-15 07:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yashahime, 2007-04-15 04:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2007-04-15 05:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-04-15 06:47 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 06:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2007-04-15 05:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lukita, 2007-04-15 08:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]threegoldfish, 2007-04-15 03:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]provetheworst, 2007-04-15 07:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]threegoldfish, 2007-04-16 06:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hristaesir, 2007-04-16 06:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]provetheworst, 2007-04-16 01:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-04-15 11:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luthe, 2007-04-16 05:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lindentreeisle, 2007-04-16 03:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]funwithrage, 2007-04-16 05:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lindentreeisle, 2007-04-16 05:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-04-17 05:52 am UTC

[info]singe
2007-04-15 03:15 am UTC (link)
No one's said it yet? Okay.

Someone shoot an email to Neil Gaiman and call him a scab Pixel-stained Technopeasant Wretch!

The damned, dirty hack.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2007-04-15 03:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-04-15 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - pooka, 2007-04-15 03:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-04-15 03:30 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 03:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-04-15 03:31 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 03:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-04-15 04:00 am UTC
GIP - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 04:33 am UTC
Re: GIP - [info]plazmah, 2007-04-15 08:58 am UTC
Re: GIP - [info]singe, 2007-04-15 07:08 pm UTC
Re: GIP - (Anonymous), 2007-04-16 06:47 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-17 03:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-04-18 03:55 am UTC

pooka
2007-04-15 03:25 am UTC (link)
jerque-du-cercle

Okay, so, I saw that as cirque-du-jerque at first for some reason. And then my mind went to Cirque du Soleil. And now the mental images, they burn me.

Mr. Hendrix: Kindly quit your bitching and go tap me some maple syrup.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 03:34 am UTC
(no subject) - pooka, 2007-04-15 03:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-04-15 11:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2007-04-15 05:11 am UTC
(no subject) - pooka, 2007-04-15 05:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyvyola, 2007-04-17 04:40 pm UTC
Also...
[info]singe
2007-04-15 03:28 am UTC (link)
A problem with the whole wikicliki, sick-o-fancy, jerque-du-cercle of a networking and connection-based order is that, if you "go along to get along" for too long, there's a danger you'll no longer remember how to go it alone when the ethics of the situation demand it.

Hmmm, yeah, I know for a fact that looking at too many Baaaaabyanimals on LJ made me into a spineless noodle with no moral center.

And this entire thing smacks of "This culture doesn't appreciate me! I'm flouncing off to my hermitage, so THERE!" Dude, don't blame the MEDIUM that you use to express yourself for making you unpopular.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Also... - [info]nevadafighter, 2007-04-15 06:19 am UTC
Re: Also... - [info]singe, 2007-04-15 07:04 pm UTC

[info]blackjackrocket
2007-04-15 03:40 am UTC (link)
there's a danger you'll no longer remember how to go it alone when the ethics of the situation demand it.

I think he's proving that the opposite is also true, that he's "gone it alone" for so long that his ethics in dealing with other people have vanished.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2007-04-15 03:42 am UTC (link)
I know there are people on here with webcomics. I eagerly await their responses with (cheesy)popcorn and candies. -munches-

Also, has anyone actually seen a full novel available online for free? I've seen one's e-published (self or otherwise), and ones where you can subscribe to the author's site to read their work, and free ones updated weekly, but...
Besides, one writer writing for free isn't going to stop me from buying another author's book. You don't buy a book because it's a book, you buy it to read the story. And besides, there are some places where you can't access the internet or take a computer.
If any publishing company seriously expects sales to go down because of online fiction, they can't be very good.

-Lin

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]threegoldfish, 2007-04-15 04:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-04-15 03:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 04:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ailidh, 2007-04-15 04:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-04-15 06:10 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-16 05:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 05:09 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 08:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-16 05:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-15 06:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-04-15 06:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-04-15 06:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-04-15 11:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2007-04-15 05:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-17 08:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-04-17 07:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]isntitironic, 2007-04-15 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2007-04-15 10:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luthe, 2007-04-16 06:05 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-04-16 08:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]diane_duane, 2007-04-19 08:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oddplaces, 2007-05-20 07:33 am UTC


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map