Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



The Pink Marauder ([info]thepinkmarauder) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2007-05-24 19:31:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:comics, interrogating from the wrong perspective, misogyny soup

as if the hole couldn't be dug any deeper
Laundrygate continues!

Adam Hughes, the artist behind the infamous Mary Jane statue, says that we're interrogating it from the wrong perspective.
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]munchkinott
2007-05-25 02:47 am UTC (link)
*strokes chin*

Can I interrogate it from the perspective that it's STILL one very weird-looking croquet hoop?

(Reply to this)


[info]airawyn
2007-05-25 02:48 am UTC (link)
Well, that’s how I end up looking at this – is it really a sexist or misogynistic act if it wasn’t intended that way on the part of the people doing it?

Yes.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]omnicrom, 2007-05-25 06:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2007-05-25 04:17 pm UTC

[info]puipui
2007-05-25 02:54 am UTC (link)
Well, that’s how I end up looking at this – is it really a sexist or misogynistic act if it wasn’t intended that way on the part of the people doing it?

YES, YOU FUCKTARD! THAT MAKES IT FUCKING WORSE. BECAUSE IT IS INTERNALIZED. YOU DIPSHIT.

God, what an asshat.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]crysiana, 2007-05-25 03:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wrongly_amused, 2007-05-25 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2007-05-25 01:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mercutia, 2007-05-26 08:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2007-05-25 04:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-05-25 07:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2007-05-26 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2007-05-26 07:58 pm UTC

[info]shakeandbake
2007-05-25 02:54 am UTC (link)
I was on the news talking about Wonder Woman’s haircut. I mean – Wonder Woman’s haircut. That was around the same time the US invaded Iraq, and people wanted to talk to me about Wonder Woman’s haircut.

"...which is SO WEIRD, given that international politics is obviously my area of expertise."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - janegray, 2007-05-25 10:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tigerlily, 2007-05-25 04:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shakeandbake, 2007-05-25 07:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mercutia, 2007-05-26 08:59 am UTC
(no subject) - janegray, 2007-05-26 10:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]greenling, 2007-05-26 10:39 am UTC
(no subject) - janegray, 2007-05-26 11:01 am UTC

[info]semtex
2007-05-25 02:55 am UTC (link)
Awwwww is someone's artistic vision being attacked by ZOMG FEMINISTS?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hellespont, 2007-05-25 07:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2007-05-25 07:23 am UTC

[info]haunted
2007-05-25 03:01 am UTC (link)
Adam Hughs: Well, Mary Jane isn’t a superhero, so you can’t really do anything with her that’s not some version of her just standing there.

'Cause yeah, we all know normal people don't do anything but stand around.

You know what? Fuck it. I was going to pick out a few more things to point and laugh at, but it appears Adam Hughs has the reasoning skills of a common troll. The whole interview is a joke.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-25 04:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 04:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2007-05-25 05:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 05:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]missm, 2007-05-25 05:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 05:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2007-05-25 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 05:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kittenmommy, 2007-05-25 09:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 09:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]carlanime, 2007-05-25 12:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 09:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]arionhunter, 2007-05-25 06:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kittenmommy, 2007-05-25 09:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-05-25 09:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2007-05-25 01:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]capsulekei, 2007-05-25 05:47 pm UTC
Your icon - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-05-25 12:49 pm UTC
Re: Your icon - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 09:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]missm, 2007-05-25 05:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-25 06:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2007-05-25 01:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 01:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]capsulekei, 2007-05-25 05:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 01:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]missm, 2007-05-26 03:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 09:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-26 02:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 09:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2007-05-26 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 09:14 am UTC
Regarding the statue in question...
[info]kadath
2007-05-25 03:04 am UTC (link)
You'd think he'd be upset that something so hideous is associated with his name.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Regarding the statue in question... - [info]bigbigtruck, 2007-05-25 04:11 am UTC
Re: Regarding the statue in question... - [info]dreamoflife02, 2007-05-25 04:21 am UTC
Re: Regarding the statue in question... - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 05:39 pm UTC

[info]evilsqueakers
2007-05-25 03:05 am UTC (link)
I read this on the wank report the other day, and the only comment I had for Hughes was "Missed the forest for the trees, didn't you, Bubba?" From what I remember, people actually thought his art was cute, and not some vapid moron like the statue.

After I read it, I felt vaguely dirty for being one of the Catwoman covers he did. What? I was lost all fuck any way, so I got four or five of the most recent to start off in.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 05:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-25 06:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 06:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2007-05-25 08:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 08:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2007-05-25 09:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 09:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2007-05-25 09:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 09:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2007-05-25 09:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 09:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2007-05-25 10:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 09:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 01:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-26 01:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-26 01:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-26 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 01:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-26 01:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 01:42 am UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-26 01:46 am UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 09:19 am UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-26 07:02 pm UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-27 05:19 pm UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-28 02:55 am UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-28 08:15 am UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-28 08:18 am UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-28 08:29 am UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-28 08:33 am UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-28 10:25 am UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-28 08:02 pm UTC

[info]frequentmouse
2007-05-25 03:10 am UTC (link)
I see the commentors on the thread have not gotten less stupid since the wank report was posted.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 03:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2007-05-25 04:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 04:44 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-05-25 03:18 am UTC (link)
Now, would the right perspective be the one where we're staring down her pearl-bedecked cleavage, or is up at her ass through the hole in her jeans better? Because I would hate to be misinterpreting his iconic homage from the wrong angle.

- nonny bee

(Reply to this)(Thread)

I lol'd. - [info]slackeremeritus, 2007-05-25 03:22 am UTC
Re: I lol'd. - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 04:09 am UTC
Re: I lol'd. - [info]slackeremeritus, 2007-05-25 04:18 am UTC
Re: I lol'd. - [info]jat_sapphire, 2007-05-25 02:43 pm UTC
Re: I lol'd. - [info]slackeremeritus, 2007-05-25 07:37 pm UTC
I yummed. - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 04:14 pm UTC
Re: I lol'd. - [info]rosalita, 2007-05-26 02:42 am UTC
Re: I lol'd. - [info]influencethis, 2007-05-28 03:58 am UTC
Re: I lol'd. - [info]slackeremeritus, 2007-05-28 04:26 am UTC
Re: I lol'd. - [info]influencethis, 2007-05-28 05:01 am UTC
Re: I lol'd. - [info]slackeremeritus, 2007-05-28 05:06 am UTC
Re: I lol'd. - [info]influencethis, 2007-05-28 09:02 pm UTC
Re: I lol'd. - [info]slackeremeritus, 2007-05-28 10:48 pm UTC

[info]brown_betty
2007-05-25 03:20 am UTC (link)
The best part is how he hits Godwin on his way to moaning about how he's being ZOMG oppressed because he can't use the N-word for all the non-racist things he really wants to say that require it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]melyanna, 2007-05-25 07:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]melyanna, 2007-05-25 07:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]melyanna, 2007-05-25 07:44 am UTC

[info]wrongly_amused
2007-05-25 03:23 am UTC (link)
Based on the reaction you would think that.

1. This is the first ever piece of pinup art ever created in the history of art.
2. Women never ever in the history of women did their husband's or boyfriend's laundry.
3. Women never ever in the history of women try to look sexy for the their husbands or boyfriends.
4. This if the very first piece of art in the history of art, that has ever shown a woman's cleavage.
5. Women never ever wear pearl necklaces.
6. Models aren't hot and never flaunt it.

Really, everyone that is offended needs to get over themselves and never connect to the internet, watch tv, see a movie, or read a magazine ever again, because they are simply not bright enough to process the images.


Wow...just wow.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2007-05-25 03:40 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-25 04:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]isa, 2007-05-25 11:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-26 05:51 am UTC
wtf? - (Anonymous), 2007-05-26 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2007-05-26 04:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]churri, 2007-05-26 05:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2007-05-25 08:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2007-05-26 09:33 am UTC

[info]rachel_pi
2007-05-25 03:29 am UTC (link)
I especially loved the part where he ventures into "Why can Dave Chappelle say the 'n-word' but I can't?!?" territory.

That interview is just all kinds of him not getting it.

(Reply to this)


[info]sepiamagpie
2007-05-25 03:32 am UTC (link)
Your icon is perfect for this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2007-05-25 08:47 am UTC

[info]lady7jane
2007-05-25 03:37 am UTC (link)
I work next to a High School and when I go into work at 3:30pm school is just letting out and all the girls, every one, dresses at least like this statue if not worse. Not that I'm complaining mind you.

Holy shit, but that's creepy.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

D: - [info]semtex, 2007-05-25 03:42 am UTC
(no subject) - verthandi, 2007-05-25 04:13 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mousy_345e4, 2007-05-25 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady7jane, 2007-05-27 08:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2007-05-25 07:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2007-05-25 08:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2007-05-25 09:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dez_chan, 2007-05-25 09:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cythraul, 2007-05-25 01:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 05:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2007-05-25 04:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]churri, 2007-05-26 05:52 am UTC

[info]jumble
2007-05-25 03:46 am UTC (link)
Yeah, she’s sexy, yeah, she’s dressed like a sexy chick…but look at her history – that’s how she’s been portrayed for years, even when she’s not doing chores. Mary Jane is a bit of a bimbo. She’s been a supermodel and a dancer, an actress and a model…so I gave her a cute, sexy moment.

Oh hey, it's ok everybody, the statue was of a bimbo anyway. No misogyny here! This is sure to clear everything up.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-25 04:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-05-25 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 05:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-25 06:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thebratqueen, 2007-05-25 03:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 01:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2007-05-25 08:57 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 04:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]derryderrydown, 2007-05-25 09:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-26 01:06 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 02:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyofviolets, 2007-05-25 01:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 10:07 pm UTC
SNARL (while hopefully avoiding a TalkToMyGPAFuckers Moment) - [info]isa, 2007-05-26 12:00 am UTC
Re: SNARL (while hopefully avoiding a TalkToMyGPAFuckers Moment) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-26 02:15 am UTC
Re: SNARL (while hopefully avoiding a TalkToMyGPAFuckers Moment) - [info]isa, 2007-05-26 02:18 am UTC
Re: SNARL (while hopefully avoiding a TalkToMyGPAFuckers Moment) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-26 05:41 am UTC

[info]sluggirl
2007-05-25 03:49 am UTC (link)
Self-censorship would be us looking at the plans for Aunt May cleaning Uncle Ben’s toilet in a teddy for the next statute, and then change that to her doing something assertive, and not doing chores.

...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]catslash, 2007-05-25 08:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2007-05-25 09:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2007-05-25 09:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2007-05-25 02:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]annabelle_lee, 2007-05-25 07:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jat_sapphire, 2007-05-25 02:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fionnabhair, 2007-05-25 04:31 pm UTC

[info]slackeremeritus
2007-05-25 03:50 am UTC (link)
But by that argument – if we take bending over to be a sign of sexual availability, every woman who bends over to pick up something should be chastised, while any woman who eats an ice cream cone or banana in public should have it smacked out of their hand because it’s far too suggestive, and people will be hurt if they see it.

I know I certainly try to eat my ice cream cones as provocatively as possible for maximum damage. The libido is weak point, I'm told.

This is a beautiful homage to the cheesecake art of the 50s and it's very cheeky, there's notnhing more to it.

The cheekiest thing about the statuette can be seen through the rips in her jeans. Lili St. Cyr was classier than that "homage" even while nude. And infinitely more attractive with all her internal organs intact.


For the record, the Emma Frost statuette makes me wince in sympathy for her breasts. Just… ow.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]slackeremeritus, 2007-05-25 03:52 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 04:21 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 02:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 07:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2007-05-25 10:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hickorydickory, 2007-05-25 07:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-05-26 07:44 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-05-25 03:55 am UTC (link)
I'm still stuck at, "But feminists love me!" as a defense for why the statue can't possibly be offensive.

-Lyss

(Reply to this)


[info]syncopation
2007-05-25 04:07 am UTC (link)
As far as I'm concerned, the thread has too many TL;DRs, some more accusations of "feminazis", and MJ's body is still stupid looking.

That last observation is not the wrong perspective. But his anatomic perspective is wrong. Dig your hole a little deeper, buddy.

:sigh: Next wank!

(Reply to this)


[info]dreamoflife02
2007-05-25 04:25 am UTC (link)
I especially love how he basically says "But women are always oppressed in comics! That's just how it is! Get over it!" FAIL.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2007-05-25 04:31 am UTC (link)
... What's amusing is that I was looking at classic pinups today and the only thing that you compare the MJ statue to is this one:

http://scandolls.com/runci/image006.htm

And somehow, dispite wearing technically wearing nothing at all other then a pair of long gloves, looks classier/flirtier then MJ (whose legs look like they might snap if she bends over anymore.)

He should just admit that MAYBE he should've had her doing something else besides looking through the laundry for apparently no good reason.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-05-25 07:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kahteh, 2007-05-25 03:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-26 12:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-26 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-05-26 07:49 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-05-25 04:39 am UTC (link)
I really feel like I'm not getting something.

I'm a girl. I saw this statue, I thought "Wow, that's a pretty risque for spider-man. Huh, she's barefoot and everything, that's a bit sexist." and then that was that.

Why is this such a big deal? Yeah, it's a little offensive, but there's far more indignation in here then one statue merits. What's the giant evil monster that everyone else is seeing and that I'm missing?

I'm really trying hard not to sound trollish, and I'm not trying to argue for apathy. Just honest curiosity and the hope that someone will enlighten me.

- confused anonymouse

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-25 04:44 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 04:51 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 06:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-26 02:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladylance, 2007-05-25 07:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-26 02:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladylance, 2007-05-26 02:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stopthatgirl7, 2007-05-26 10:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladylance, 2007-05-26 08:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stopthatgirl7, 2007-05-27 01:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladylance, 2007-05-27 04:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2007-05-25 04:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cork118, 2007-05-25 04:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-05-25 05:20 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 05:22 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 06:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2007-05-25 07:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lukita, 2007-05-25 07:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-26 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2007-05-26 02:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-26 05:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]greenling, 2007-05-25 08:14 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 08:37 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 08:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2007-05-25 04:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 04:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 04:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-05-25 08:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-26 03:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-05-26 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-26 09:10 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - rachelthedemon, 2007-05-25 08:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-26 12:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-26 02:22 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-26 03:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-26 05:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-05-26 07:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2007-05-26 08:45 pm UTC
A+ - wolfie_thu, 2007-05-27 03:57 am UTC

[info]arionhunter
2007-05-25 04:40 am UTC (link)
If only you'd bitched about women in skirts and men being unrealistic, Adam, I could have had a bingo!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cythraul, 2007-05-25 01:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 02:57 pm UTC

[info]pots13
2007-05-25 04:45 am UTC (link)
I'm thinking this has stopped being funny and is now just turning into rant time...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-25 04:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2007-05-25 06:00 am UTC
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map