Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



seiberwing ([info]seiberwing) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2007-05-27 00:17:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:comics, in the closet, penis

Dong-gate
In the wake of recent boob wank and tentacle wank, I bring you a slightly stale...penis wank!

Christopher Butcher makes a post to his blog entitled Afraid of Cock concerning the recent reaction to a picture of Citizen Steel with a larger than comics-normal package.

Not me, of course, but take a trip around the internet lately and you’ll find that the poor, put-upon fanboy is being subjected to higher-than-normal ammounts of cock by the unfeeling bastards in charge of the comics industry. How’s that for the antithesis of the typical complaints about homosexuality and even male sexuality in comics?

He goes on to provide complaints from other sources and counterarguements to those complaints. People are nonplussed, even when Butcher posts pictures of men in underwear to show that with great genitals come great packages. Arguements continue on whether it's oversexualized or not, if Steel is having an erection, and if people are complaining too much or not.

And finally the Joker gives his opinion.




Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]chibikaijuu
2007-05-27 07:01 am UTC (link)
...why on earth is he dressed in cellophane?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]radiotrash, 2007-05-27 08:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2007-05-27 08:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]suzycat, 2007-05-27 01:09 pm UTC
from wikipedia - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 04:09 pm UTC
Re: from wikipedia - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 02:28 am UTC
Re: from wikipedia - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 03:07 am UTC
Re: from wikipedia - [info]catslash, 2007-05-28 04:48 am UTC
Re: from wikipedia - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-05-28 12:34 pm UTC
Re: from wikipedia - [info]digigirl132, 2007-05-28 06:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-05-27 03:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]radiotrash, 2007-05-27 10:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]unctuous, 2007-05-27 08:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stinksap, 2007-05-27 12:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 05:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kittenmommy, 2007-05-28 06:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]queencallipygos, 2007-05-29 06:20 pm UTC

flightstothesea
2007-05-27 07:14 am UTC (link)
The package is pretty amusing, but mostly I'm really impressed by the metallic effect of his costume.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 08:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2007-05-27 08:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kosaginolegion, 2007-05-27 03:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 03:32 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-05-27 07:17 am UTC (link)
Citizen Steel looks aroused...by his own shinyness...

...but seeing as there's no tentacle reaching up from/for his nethers, and no translucent goop in odd places, I can't really sympathize with this guy on the sexualization of dudes in comics! XD

k_may_li@LJ

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - pastri_archy, 2007-05-27 05:07 pm UTC

[info]gorogoro
2007-05-27 07:38 am UTC (link)
I'd hit it.

But only because he's so shiny. (Ooooh, shiny...)

(Reply to this)


[info]dez_chan
2007-05-27 07:39 am UTC (link)
Objects in mirror shiny costume may appear closer larger than they are.

(Reply to this)


[info]nlb_muffin
2007-05-27 07:42 am UTC (link)
As a commenter at Newsarama points out, the artistic focus of the piece is clearly the face and chest of the character, not the cock

Is it just me, or does the very design of the costume point down to the man's penis?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2007-05-27 07:45 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 04:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 11:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sandyclaws68, 2007-05-27 06:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2007-05-27 07:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2007-05-28 07:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2007-05-28 08:44 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-05-27 07:48 am UTC (link)
What intrigues me is that there are a lot of fold-lines pointing to that area. They're quite emphatic. I'm not sure that a tight, form-fitting superhero costume should behave that way; if you look at the male underwear models, their briefs aren't showing quite the same strain.
We'd better get Edna Mode on the problem. She'd be just about eye-level with the situation anyway!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 09:35 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 10:38 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 06:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cythraul, 2007-05-28 12:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sairobi, 2007-05-27 01:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 08:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nom_nom, 2007-05-29 01:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-05-27 07:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 09:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2007-05-28 09:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2007-05-27 10:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - pastri_archy, 2007-05-28 05:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]laerwen, 2007-05-29 06:01 am UTC

[info]greenling
2007-05-27 08:05 am UTC (link)
That’s just a good-sized soft cock looks like. I’m… I’m very sorry that you can’t tell the difference between the two.

*snicker*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - janegray, 2007-05-27 11:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 04:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2007-05-28 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stopthatgirl7, 2007-05-28 11:04 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-05-27 08:31 am UTC (link)
Is... is his cock growing out of his hip?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lukita, 2007-05-27 09:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-05-27 09:58 am UTC

[info]chibikaijuu
2007-05-27 08:33 am UTC (link)
It’s sort of like that old lady/young lady optical illusion, only with junk.

I think I need to find a way to work this phrase into my everyday life.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cythraul, 2007-05-28 12:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-29 01:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-29 01:53 pm UTC

[info]sepiamagpie
2007-05-27 08:43 am UTC (link)
From the comments:

“Chris Butcher’s got a point, but look, there’s nothing wrong with that instinctual feeling of squeamishness at a naturalistic, unexaggerated, not especially sexualized depiction of cock. Sometimes a guy doesn’t want the fact that other men have penises too just…shoved in his face, you know? Er, so to speak. Kind of an aesthetic preference, like how some people don’t like asparagus. Something about the elongated shape, I guess.”


I... well, if we're meant to not blink an eye at tentacle groped heaving nandyboodles, I fail to see why a normal covered penis that's only crime is 'yo! I do exist' is less acceptable.

But then, I don't cry when I'm in the shower, which I am beginning to wonder about some of those guys.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2007-05-27 09:00 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-29 06:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2007-05-29 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - flightstothesea, 2007-05-27 09:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-05-27 09:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-27 08:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]makeshyft, 2007-05-27 08:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jerel, 2007-05-29 11:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vinylgrrl, 2007-05-31 10:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2007-05-27 09:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-05-27 09:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-27 12:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-05-27 05:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-27 06:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-05-27 06:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-27 06:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-05-27 08:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-27 09:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2007-05-27 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-28 12:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-05-27 11:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-28 12:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-05-28 12:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-28 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-05-28 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-05-28 01:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catslash, 2007-05-28 05:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-28 07:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jabberwockypie, 2007-05-29 05:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2007-05-28 06:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-28 07:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-05-28 06:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-28 08:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-28 08:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-05-28 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-28 08:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2007-05-28 06:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-05-28 06:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-05-28 03:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-05-28 05:42 pm UTC
*FACEPALM* - [info]aerobot, 2007-05-30 03:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 02:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysphinx, 2007-05-28 04:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-05-28 04:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2007-05-28 02:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 07:38 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 08:07 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 08:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2007-05-28 12:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-29 11:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]msmongi, 2007-05-28 04:57 pm UTC

[info]urpletastic
2007-05-27 08:46 am UTC (link)
the poor, put-upon fanboy is being subjected to higher-than-normal ammounts of cock by the unfeeling bastards in charge of the comics industry.

As opposed to the amounts of improbably pneumatic boobs the rest of us have been subjected to in recent years, you mean? Right.

Seriously (?!?) - that's pretty art, of a delicious-looking guy obviously extremely turned-on by looking at his own reflection in the mirror.

Oddly enough, I don't have a problem with that ...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - janegray, 2007-05-27 11:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2007-05-28 07:59 am UTC
(no subject) - janegray, 2007-05-28 11:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2007-05-28 05:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-30 03:07 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-30 03:08 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-30 03:09 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-30 03:09 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-30 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-30 03:11 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-30 03:12 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-30 04:05 am UTC

ealusaid
2007-05-27 08:46 am UTC (link)
Back before Superman Returns came out, there were articles with the film's costume designer about how she made Superman's package look less distracting. Maybe for the next movie, she won't have to go to the trouble!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-05-27 09:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2007-05-27 09:30 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 10:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-27 12:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2007-05-28 01:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2007-05-28 06:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2007-05-28 11:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 12:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-05-27 12:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 04:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-05-27 06:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 02:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-05-28 06:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tiye, 2007-05-27 04:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - pastri_archy, 2007-05-27 05:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tiye, 2007-05-27 06:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - pastri_archy, 2007-05-27 07:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cinnamonical, 2007-05-27 10:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2007-05-28 09:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marumae, 2007-05-28 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-05-28 04:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2007-05-28 08:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ennui, 2007-05-28 06:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dante_the_mouse, 2007-05-28 08:22 pm UTC

[info]blackjackrocket
2007-05-27 08:47 am UTC (link)
You know, it's a damn good thing Harley Quinn wasn't around when Joker went on about "boners". You just know Dini would have worked in an off-color line or two for her.

...come to think of it, I want to see that happen. Shame current Joker won't likely be saying anything like that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2007-05-27 09:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2007-05-27 11:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2007-05-28 06:48 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-05-27 09:20 am UTC (link)
Anything's larger than comics-normal. Witness Liefeld and Captain Kendoll:

http://robliefeld.net/images/ons4/ons4b.jpg

Admittedly, that's a Liefield. Still.

I've noticed more "hey, there's something there!" discussion among fans in recent years. (For some reason, Superman is most commonly gifted with something that actually takes up space. Deathstroke was also provided a package once that I recall.) However, the attitude is more one of surprise than the typical fanboy's reaction to yet another spine-snapping rack.

It's only worth comment because it's rare. And that doesn't make sense. It's frickin' spandex.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 09:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 09:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]omega, 2007-05-27 10:19 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 03:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]enoh, 2007-05-27 04:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - pastri_archy, 2007-05-27 05:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 09:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-27 10:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 07:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 02:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]influencethis, 2007-05-28 09:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]influencethis, 2007-05-28 09:22 am UTC
(no subject) - pastri_archy, 2007-05-28 05:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2007-05-28 02:55 pm UTC
OT - [info]jerel, 2007-05-29 11:23 pm UTC

janegray
2007-05-27 11:39 am UTC (link)
I’m taking issue with unnecessary sexualization of characters in comics.

My argument was that sexualizing these characters — female and male — contributes to a negative image of comics fans and the industry.


I don't see the industry stop oversexualizing female characters though.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]risha, 2007-05-27 04:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lessis, 2007-05-28 06:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-05-28 12:49 pm UTC

[info]napalmnacey
2007-05-27 12:14 pm UTC (link)
Oh, Alex Ross. You adorable, accurate-peen-rendering man!

No seriously - I freakin' LOVE that picture. It's so SHINY and and points RIGHT to the peen! A man realising his powah! Very nice!

(Reply to this)


[info]criticalcricket
2007-05-27 12:33 pm UTC (link)
Ah, I needed a good giggle after all the other sexism in comics wank.

(Reply to this)


[info]stella_polaris
2007-05-27 01:08 pm UTC (link)
Shiiiiinyyyy!



...

(Reply to this)


dracothelizard
2007-05-27 01:18 pm UTC (link)
Look, the recent F Word episode taught me that eating cock is a test of manliness, so clearly looking at cock is a test of manliness as well, so clearly the comic-fans can't handle the manliness test.

(Reply to this)

I can't be the only one thinking this -
[info]lavenderfrost
2007-05-27 02:10 pm UTC (link)
...does it vibrate?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: I can't be the only one thinking this - - [info]rustybitch, 2007-05-28 12:25 pm UTC
Re: I can't be the only one thinking this - - [info]ghostmaster, 2007-05-28 05:37 pm UTC
Re: I can't be the only one thinking this - - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 09:29 pm UTC

[info]rogueunit
2007-05-27 02:34 pm UTC (link)
Mmm... Shiny, bulgy and ridgedy!

Wait, what were we talking about again?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cat_mcdougall, 2007-05-27 07:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamer_marie, 2007-05-27 07:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-05-27 08:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-29 02:49 am UTC

[info]ladyofviolets
2007-05-27 02:35 pm UTC (link)
* insert your joke about the Ultimate Summers Money-shot aka "Wow, is *every* male in that family so.. well-hung, huh?" *

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-29 07:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyofviolets, 2007-05-29 09:50 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-05-27 04:10 pm UTC (link)
Dong-gate wank! Finally!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - pastri_archy, 2007-05-27 05:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-05-27 06:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - pastri_archy, 2007-05-27 07:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]monsley, 2007-05-28 10:32 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-05-27 04:51 pm UTC (link)
...I didn't know you could make garments out of mylar.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bemysty, 2007-05-27 05:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stopthatgirl7, 2007-05-27 06:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bemysty, 2007-05-27 07:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stopthatgirl7, 2007-05-28 12:49 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 01:37 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-28 08:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2007-05-28 02:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]braidedbaka, 2007-05-28 12:08 am UTC


Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map