Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



loquaciousquark ([info]loquaciousquark) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2007-11-10 13:34:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:tired
Entry tags:community: fandom secrets, fandom: death note, mod wank, rp

Fandom Secrets wank!
Note: In the interests of full disclosure and neutrality, much of this report is directly taken from [info]volitioned's wank report here as far as links and such with my thanks and apologies because she did a huge amount of the footwork. I have only edited it for impartiality and added some background of my own.

Let's get started.

For anyone who has not heard of [info]fandomsecrets, people anonymously submit images with secrets related to fandom on them (e.g., I think this pairing sucks, I can't stand this series but everyone thinks I love it, etc.). Since roleplaying is included under fandom, there's a fairly steady influx of roleplaying secrets: people falling in love with their RP partner, thinking someone in an RP sucks, or just RP wank in general. It makes for some lulz in the opinions of many and creates a fair amount of wank (for even more lulz) from people who think RP secrets belong in a different comm, but in the end most people get over it.

Secret posting seems to tend toward cycles, and lately, the majority of RP secrets seemed to be about a fanon-adored pairing from the series Death Note; people saying how much they loved the pairing, even more RP secrets about people playing as them, shitty fic authors for the pairing. You name it, someone wrote about it.

In the latest secret post, another secret about this pairing was made with an RPer wanting to be the Matt to someone's Mello ("I want to be the _____ to your ______" is a phrase commonly seen in the comm.) After only a few hours of the secret post being up, various threads were made (more, more, more, more, more, and one more) in complaint to there being too many pairing secrets for these two characters.

So the OP of secret 10 (yes, the original secret that is causing wank) commented anonymously to several of those threads, whining/wanking/etc. about the comments telling people to stfu over this pairing and the secrets. Eventually, wank ensued that was deleted by a moderator. Although he did not do the deleting, [info]technophile was called a bad mod for laughing about the secret.

Eventually, more people step forth under the all-knowing "Anonymous", stating that Case ([info]technophile) is irresponsible, and that he is loathed for making a community that caused him and his friends to be "BNF"'s. The anonymouse has also decided that [info]technophile had a "difficult adolescence" and was constantly stuffed into lockers.

Some people think the secret shouldn't even have been allowed through the screening process, while others point out that the secret did not violate any rules (i.e., it's a secret and it's related to fandom) and the mods had no grounds to prevent its posting.

So it continues. Anonymice continue to insult the mods, both for deleting the secret (at the request of the OP) and laughing about the wank. Some people defend the mods, only to be told by anonymous that the community is mean-spirited and shouldn't even exist. It is also of note that this anonymouse is apparently friends with the OP of Secret #10 and felt like she was being attacked.

So while the mods continue to laugh it off and joke around, another thread is created that asks that [info]technophile be removed as a moderator for his immaturity. [info]benightedfate, another mod, treats it as a serious question and answers it, although most responses to that comment tend along the lines of "LOL wtf."

Most of the wank in the community dies down after the secret is removed at the request of the OP.

BUT THAT'S NOT ALL, FOLKS!

As I mentioned before, [info]volitioned posted most of the above in her LJ in a FW-styled report due to lack of JF account. Most of the comments are loling at the wank, but all of a sudden, ironically-named [info]serenesanity appears to object to [info]volitioned's post!

"Sorry for the wank, my ass. Sorry for the wank? Then tun around and pull shit like this. You really are a two faced Bitch.


Go too hell. I hate you MORE."


I didn't even see her in the original wank, and her name did not appear in [info]volitioned's report, so I don't know where she came from. But she's apparently the ex of [info]volitioned, the report poster (bonus confirmation on wank_report!), and feels like [info]volitioned is personally attacking her even though she was never mentioned by name. Volitioned disagrees and thinks [info]serenesanity is overreacting. Serenesanity also knows she's coming across as a bitch, and she just doesn't care, darn it! Finally, [info]serenesanity refuses all attempts at apology by anyone ever and once again refers obliquely to [info]volitioned having it out for her:

"It was definitely uncalled for.

And I'm sure anon #1 and #2 aren't the only ones thinking you all handled the situation poorly.

The point was to stop the wank, not spawn something else.

All fine and dandy you all find THIS post funny, but Being that I'm involved in some of the things listed and wasn't even approached about it is pretty shitty, considering the apology she gave me before.

But that's okay, I didn't believe her fake sympathy. I never will.:
(Note: I believe the fake sympathy referred to is this.
Also, apparently [info]serenesanity is talking about [info]volitioned in her flocked LJ.

And that's where we're at right now!

SO, TO SUM UP:
Anonymous secret with extremely common sentiment is posted at [info]fandomsecrets.
Several commenters object to the secret as overdone and the pairing as unrealistic.
Secret poster responds to comments, telling them to shut up and sit down. Mostly they ignore her.
When one thread gets super wanky, one of the mods deletes it and the secret at the request of the OP.
Mods laugh at wank.
Anonymous commenters object to deletion, wank, and laughing.
Anonymous calls for removal of [info]technophile as mod for being immature.
[info]volitioned posts a wank report in her LJ with a focus on [info]technophile's involvement in the wank.
[info]serenesanity shows up and takes a personal objection to the links that may or may not link to her comments. I'm not quite sure.
Arguments ensue. Volitioned says it's not about Serenesanity. Technophile continues to laugh.

And the wankas win!

EDIT FOR GREAT JUSTICE: [info]volitioned has deleted her journal! Color me shocked!

EDIT FOR SLIGHTLY LESSER JUSTICE: Undeleted!e




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]eldritch
2007-11-11 04:22 am UTC (link)
... I hate fandomsecrets. It's such a big pile of ridiculousness.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]marumae, 2007-11-11 04:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eldritch, 2007-11-11 04:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]digigirl132, 2007-11-11 08:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eldritch, 2007-11-11 10:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]digigirl132, 2007-11-12 01:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eldritch, 2007-11-12 02:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]digigirl132, 2007-11-13 03:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sashenka, 2007-11-11 07:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eldritch, 2007-11-11 07:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 03:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eldritch, 2007-11-11 10:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-12 02:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chash, 2007-11-11 05:54 pm UTC
HAHAHAHA - [info]loquaciousquark, 2007-11-11 10:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eldritch, 2007-11-11 10:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chash, 2007-11-11 11:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]b_jellybean, 2007-11-12 04:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2007-11-11 10:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eldritch, 2007-11-11 10:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]quietladybirman, 2007-11-12 12:39 am UTC

[info]gelasius
2007-11-11 04:38 am UTC (link)
And volitioned bahleets?

::frowns::

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loquaciousquark, 2007-11-11 04:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gelasius, 2007-11-11 04:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrbimble, 2007-11-11 07:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loquaciousquark, 2007-11-11 07:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gelasius, 2007-11-11 04:53 pm UTC

iwanttobeasleep
2007-11-11 04:38 am UTC (link)
That Heroes secret is the best thing ever. "I do agree that Mohinder deserves better than a sociopathic serial killer." Perfect.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

NOOOO! MOLAR 4EVR! - [info]gelasius, 2007-11-11 04:41 am UTC
Re: NOOOO! MOLAR 4EVR! - [info]the_sun_is_up, 2007-11-11 11:47 am UTC
Re: NOOOO! MOLAR 4EVR! - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 03:54 pm UTC
Re: NOOOO! MOLAR 4EVR! - [info]grapefruitzzz, 2007-11-14 08:30 pm UTC
Re: NOOOO! MOLAR 4EVR! - [info]gelasius, 2007-11-11 04:55 pm UTC
Re: NOOOO! MOLAR 4EVR! - [info]daylightsparks, 2007-11-12 04:04 am UTC
Re: NOOOO! MOLAR 4EVR! - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-11-11 12:34 pm UTC
Re: NOOOO! MOLAR 4EVR! - [info]gelasius, 2007-11-11 04:52 pm UTC
Re: NOOOO! MOLAR 4EVR! - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-11-11 09:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sashenka, 2007-11-11 07:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-11-11 12:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sashenka, 2007-11-11 07:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gelasius, 2007-11-11 04:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 03:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 04:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gelasius, 2007-11-11 05:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 05:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gelasius, 2007-11-11 05:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 05:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gelasius, 2007-11-11 05:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaina, 2007-11-11 06:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 06:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2007-11-11 10:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-11-11 10:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-12 02:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-11-12 08:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_mouse, 2007-11-12 08:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-11-12 09:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-12 10:36 pm UTC
Yeah. - [info]author_by_night, 2007-11-11 07:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]velvet_mace, 2007-11-12 08:35 am UTC

[info]marumae
2007-11-11 04:39 am UTC (link)
Heh, I usually just skip over the secrets about fandoms I don't care about. I didn't even notice all the Matt/Mello secrets until said wankers started bitching about it.

(Reply to this)


[info]gelasius
2007-11-11 04:39 am UTC (link)
I'm way too amused by this icon. Carry on.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]the_sun_is_up, 2007-11-11 11:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gelasius, 2007-11-11 05:09 pm UTC

[info]marluxia
2007-11-11 04:42 am UTC (link)
[info]fandomsecrets just takes the secrets and puts them up. People taking things super personally and wham. Wank-a-thon.

Geez, if no one's realized that that place is for joking around more than anything, then whose fault is it I wonder?

(Reply to this)


[info]sarajayechan
2007-11-11 04:52 am UTC (link)
And it finally ends up here.

Man, demanding someone be removed as a mod for daring to laugh at the truly ridiculous. That's some serious butthurt there. XD

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]saralina25, 2007-11-11 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2007-11-11 07:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]saralina25, 2007-11-11 08:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2007-11-11 09:24 am UTC

[info]loki
2007-11-11 04:56 am UTC (link)
You've really reminded us all what it is to be a BNF.

And here I'm thinking it was ipods and laptops. Maybe the BNF Rewards program differs from fandom to fandom.

Because seeing the mods of a community use their power to point at laugh at someone I like makes me angry. I consider it bullying, and that always makes me angry.

Someone she doesn't like or know though? It's all good.

(Reply to this)


[info]sticks
2007-11-11 05:25 am UTC (link)
If you're reading fandomsecrets for the lulz, you're doing it wrong.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2007-11-11 05:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sticks, 2007-11-11 05:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2007-11-11 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2007-11-11 07:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sticks, 2007-11-11 07:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2007-11-11 08:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyofviolets, 2007-11-11 12:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bemysty, 2007-11-11 12:30 pm UTC
since I can't comment in the OP
[info]chaimonkey
2007-11-11 05:27 am UTC (link)
#29. Omigawd, #29. I never thought I'd see the day - it's so true!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: since I can't comment in the OP - [info]squib, 2007-11-11 06:49 am UTC

[info]photosinensis
2007-11-11 05:46 am UTC (link)
Teal deer.

*hands an lj-cut*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loquaciousquark, 2007-11-11 06:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]photosinensis, 2007-11-11 06:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loquaciousquark, 2007-11-11 06:07 am UTC

[info]wolfsamurai
2007-11-11 05:49 am UTC (link)
Oh man, that's a whole herd of teal deer.

(Reply to this)


[info]rekall
2007-11-11 06:02 am UTC (link)
[info]fandomsecrets + scroll = OTP

It's amazing how easy it is to scroll by secrets you don't want to or can't (seriously is it that difficult to make secrets readable?) read.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]marluxia, 2007-11-11 06:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2007-11-11 06:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]marluxia, 2007-11-11 06:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2007-11-11 06:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2007-11-11 06:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2007-11-11 06:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ilpalazzo, 2007-11-11 06:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2007-11-11 07:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 04:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2007-11-11 09:20 pm UTC
gip - [info]dramedy, 2007-11-11 08:27 am UTC

[info]dunc
2007-11-11 06:11 am UTC (link)
I'm amused the comm exists but I expect it would have more meaning for me if I could identify more than a teeny-tiny handful of fandoms in each post.

Ahh well.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-11-11 07:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pandonkey, 2007-11-11 07:56 pm UTC

[info]ianthefira
2007-11-11 07:06 am UTC (link)
I think the one time that comm did make me overwhelmingly happy was when someone posted a Planescape: Torment secret. <3<3<3<3

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]melancthe, 2007-11-11 09:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ianthefira, 2007-11-11 09:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]melancthe, 2007-11-11 11:16 am UTC

[info]dragonfangirl
2007-11-11 07:08 am UTC (link)
This is actually the first time I've been over to fandomsecrets, and I'm finding it surprisingly cute. Because although some of the secrets are really wanky and bitter, the majority of them are actually very sweet -- people who really love something, or are really affected by something, and are embarrassed to admit it. D'aww.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mistress_mab, 2007-11-11 08:23 am UTC

[info]khym_chanur
2007-11-11 09:28 am UTC (link)
Ah, [info]fandomsecrets. A while ago there was this mini-wank where a member of the CFUD RP had an issue with the way new mods were being selected. S/he was afraid of retaliation if s/he talked with the mods directly, but rather than set up a brand new and untraceable email account with which to talk with them, s/he stated his/her case via a secret in [info]fandomsecrets. And then didn't reply when the mods came over to say "WTF, couldn't you have handled this privately?"

(Reply to this)


[info]imp
2007-11-11 09:35 am UTC (link)
[my wanky thoughts on Matt]I'll never understand why Matt is all of a sudden such a popular character. I mean, in the last fifty or so multi-fandom RPs I've looked at, he'd the first Death Note character people take. I feel like it has to be a sort of "Woo, he's in only three panels, so I can copy-paste whatever personality I want on him!" thing.[/wanky thoughts]

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ket_makura, 2007-11-11 12:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 04:25 pm UTC

[info]amxjm
2007-11-11 09:43 am UTC (link)
17 makes me want to look into this "Kaikan Phrase" thing.

I'm also glad I'm not the only one that feels the way 28 does.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lollercoaster, 2007-11-11 03:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]reeve, 2007-11-11 04:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lollercoaster, 2007-11-11 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amxjm, 2007-11-11 09:43 pm UTC

[info]drakyndra
2007-11-11 09:49 am UTC (link)
HUZZAH DEATH NOTE WANK!

...Sorry, but it's the first time it's been wanked since I got into the fandom. Now I can hang around FW trying to find amusing Death Note icons.

(Reply to this)


[info]hilohello
2007-11-11 10:03 am UTC (link)
*click*

Oooh, hey, someone else remembers the Salamandastron Dance!

*click*

*click*

*click*

*click*

...Wait, wasn't there a wank or something...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - pastri_archy, 2007-11-11 07:18 pm UTC

[info]anonyrat
2007-11-11 10:53 am UTC (link)
LOL Fandomsecrets.

I've been using that place like a small-fandom Bat Signal.

Spent like twelve comments shooting the breeze with the OP of an Exalted secret recently.

Of course, lolling at the big fandoms is kind of a bonus.

(Reply to this)


[info]deadspeaker
2007-11-11 11:28 am UTC (link)
DEATH NOTE wank! That isn't about Death Note! And is actually about....


...actually, I have no idea what this wank is actually about. Buh?

(Reply to this)


[info]ryuutchi
2007-11-11 12:29 pm UTC (link)
Oh, 15 makes me want to smack the writer. Dude, don't diss the book series unless you've done your research. There's a reason the series won one Newbery and was nominated for a second.

Also, 26 makes me snicker with glee. Matt/Mohinder is so very close to canon, yes, so when the pairing squicks people I can't help the schadenfruede.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-11-11 03:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pipssister, 2007-11-11 04:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-11-11 09:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 04:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chash, 2007-11-11 05:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 05:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chash, 2007-11-11 05:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 05:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chash, 2007-11-11 05:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-11 05:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-11-11 09:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-11-12 02:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2007-11-11 09:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-11-11 09:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luckdragonfujur, 2007-11-11 09:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waitwut, 2007-11-11 04:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-11-11 09:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]memlu, 2007-11-11 10:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-11-11 10:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]coyotegirl, 2007-11-11 11:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]waitwut, 2007-11-12 05:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]daughterofhelen, 2007-11-16 04:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waitwut, 2007-11-16 04:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]daughterofhelen, 2007-11-16 04:18 am UTC

[info]ladyofviolets
2007-11-11 12:39 pm UTC (link)
This almost makes me want to go back to FS. =/ *hugs [info]sarajayechan*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2007-11-11 08:36 pm UTC


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map