Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Absolutely Mortified! ([info]bitch_bot) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-07-30 20:22:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Bitch Slapped

You should just call us Punch, for we are fools.
Fallout from RPF wank, and it's Fandom_Wank wank! Meta Fire in the hole!

[info]kaylarudbek is very upset about RPS, but even more pissed at [info]fandom_wank (say it ain't so!): I'm gonna eat fandom_wank for dinner!

"And hello, fandom_wank. I don't think you'll be able to follow the big words I'll be using in this discussion, and I know you won't follow my philosophical/moral/theological arguments at all, but for you and yours I'll break my rule of "not getting into a battle of wits with an unarmed person."

[info]resmiranda: Ouch. That hurt! *wanks about F_W*.

[info]kaylarudbek gets all Biblical on her ass: RPS is against the Old Testament and F_W obviously can't grasp the complexities of the argument [info]ajhalluk put forth. Anyway, I haven't seen F_W because it's been suspended.. And then, on to poison the well of discourse before it's even begun: Not to mention, F_Wers could never understand my superior arguments, and add to that my exposure to and delight in Jesuit-style, legalistic, subtle, complicated reasoning; I'd probably really confuse the hell out of everyone if they attempted to get into a flame war on this with me.

[info]resmiranda proceeds to uphold fine [info]fandom_wank tradition: Whatevah, bitch! SEEN IT.

And on it goes.: It's certainly not much of a step from "This group regards the application of serious thought to fun as worthy of ridicule" to "This group is composed of people who don't enjoy thinking."

OW. BRAIN HURT.


(Post a new comment)


[info]yadda
2003-07-31 04:43 am UTC (link)
Ack! I know there's wank there but I just can't seem to find it under ALL TEH BIG WORDS! If only I knew Jesuit-style, legalistic, subtle, complicated reasoning!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sorchar
2003-07-31 04:56 am UTC (link)
Ouch. Brain hurts.

RAGE

SORCHA SMASH!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]darkrose
2003-07-31 07:20 am UTC (link)
Well, I went to a Jesuit high school, but I was too busy writing Duran Duran slash to pay much attention in class.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-07-31 07:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2003-07-31 07:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 12:08 pm UTC

[info]embitca
2003-07-31 04:47 am UTC (link)
This just gets funnier and funnier.

(Reply to this)


[info]sorchar
2003-07-31 04:54 am UTC (link)
*reads*

*adjusts village idiot hat, drools, falls off fence*

Hey, [info]kaylarudbek, did that help bolster your feelings of intellectual superiority? If not, I could probably arrange for someone to fall into a horse trough or something.

That is, of course, assuming that she ever actually managed to FIND the right journal service to read this.

Let this be a lesson to you, children: Before trying to use the "battle of wits with unarmed person" snark, one should make sure one's own weapons are loaded, and that one can actually find the battlefield.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]telesilla
2003-07-31 05:06 am UTC (link)
*falls in a horse trough*

Ooo ... it's all cool and wet in here! *splashes [info]sorchar*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 05:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telesilla, 2003-07-31 05:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 06:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telesilla, 2003-07-31 06:11 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 06:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telesilla, 2003-07-31 06:26 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 06:30 am UTC
Go me! - [info]telesilla, 2003-07-31 06:38 am UTC
Re: Go me! - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 06:43 am UTC
Re: Go me! - [info]rann, 2003-07-31 10:48 am UTC
Re: Go me! - [info]schoenschoen, 2003-08-01 02:14 am UTC
Re: Go me! - [info]rann, 2003-08-01 02:22 am UTC
Re: Go me! - [info]schoenschoen, 2003-08-01 02:27 am UTC
Re: Go me! - [info]rann, 2003-08-01 02:30 am UTC

[info]ereshkigal
2003-07-31 05:08 am UTC (link)
Indeed. That does make it so marvelously perfect now doesn't it?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]prettypinkkitty
2003-07-31 05:10 am UTC (link)
Let this be a lesson to you, children: Before trying to use the "battle of wits with unarmed person" snark, one should make sure one's own weapons are loaded, and that one can actually find the battlefield.

Does a bazooka work?

Yeah, that's sort of irrelevant. I just kinda wanted to say bazooka. It's a funny word.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 05:34 am UTC

[info]telesilla
2003-07-31 04:55 am UTC (link)
Ouch! Big Words! Scary!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 04:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telesilla, 2003-07-31 05:16 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 05:34 am UTC

[info]nekoneko
2003-07-31 05:21 am UTC (link)
. . . And all I hear is blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Will this ever die? x_0 Or is it the Neverending Wank? The immortal, Highlander-style wank?
Old wank never dies, it just fades away...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-07-31 05:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rikoshi, 2003-07-31 10:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-08-01 12:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telesilla, 2003-07-31 05:41 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]milkshake, 2003-07-31 10:34 pm UTC

[info]ingrid
2003-07-31 05:21 am UTC (link)
I am a Jesuit-trained almost-lawyer

Nothing is scarier than an almost-lawyer.

::: shivers in shoes ::::

At least she's a full-time WANKER. Do they give diplomas for that?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2003-07-31 05:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ingrid, 2003-07-31 05:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pradaloz, 2003-07-31 05:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ueuecoyotl, 2003-07-31 05:19 pm UTC

[info]snacky
2003-07-31 05:22 am UTC (link)
a Jesuit-trained almost-lawyer

Ooo, I'm trembling in my boots! She will be the end of us all!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 05:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ingrid, 2003-07-31 05:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 06:03 am UTC
Pretentious, ain't they?
[info]raisedbyhyenas
2003-07-31 05:34 am UTC (link)
*shaking my head* They don't get it and they never will. Sad, really.

(Reply to this)


[info]sagralisse
2003-07-31 05:36 am UTC (link)
[As the scene opens, we see Sagra rushing in to fandom_wank in order to participate in the debate. On the way, she inadvertantly steps in doggie poo.]

Of course, I'm coming out of a philosophical/religious/moral tradition that most people probably don't: (1) have clue one about, (2) understand, (3) agree with

*Sagra sniffs*

Oh yay! I love Catholic moral superiority!

*Sagra sniffs again... frowning at fellow wankers*

And Driving someone into shutting down the conversation because they're getting the email equivalent of graffitied, bombed, etc. is not funny and is not good manners.

*Sagra looks disgusted*

I know that my basic sense of decency is severely hampered by my lack of a Catholic education, but I thought that's why we kept the snarking over here instead of trolling over there. As in, like f_w doesn't graffiti or bomb.

*Sagra finally looks at her shoe* Oh for Pete's sake!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]darkrose, 2003-07-31 07:23 am UTC

[info]esorlehcar
2003-07-31 05:55 am UTC (link)
Methinks we need a corollary to Snacky's Law:
The first party to declare that the opposing party in a disagreement is:

a) incapable of understanding the brilliance of their argument; and/or
b) incapable of understanding "big words"

shall be declared the de facto loser.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ingrid, 2003-07-31 06:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-07-31 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]embitca, 2003-07-31 07:06 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 07:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2003-07-31 07:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2003-07-31 07:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esorlehcar, 2003-07-31 07:49 pm UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-07-31 07:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esorlehcar, 2003-07-31 09:17 pm UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-07-31 10:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esorlehcar, 2003-07-31 10:56 pm UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-08-01 12:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]guildenstern, 2003-08-04 10:19 pm UTC

[info]shoiryu
2003-07-31 07:02 am UTC (link)
It just gets better when they take shots at us, doesn't it? Like we're out to flame and terrify the internet as a whole.

(Reply to this)

It's like a STD confined to those that wank heavily, and hard
[info]musicdiamond
2003-07-31 08:24 am UTC (link)
RPF: the gift that keeps on giving.

(Reply to this)


[info]veuki
2003-07-31 10:29 am UTC (link)
I'm sorry, but what the shit is this? *boggles* I despise people who just randomly spew off to their muses. What on earth makes this chick think that [info]resmiranda wants to read one line of her mindless bullshit? I read a few sentences and my eyes fucking glazed over.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-07-31 12:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]veuki, 2003-07-31 07:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2003-07-31 07:46 pm UTC
Re: - [info]veuki, 2003-07-31 07:50 pm UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-07-31 07:56 pm UTC
Re: - [info]veuki, 2003-07-31 08:05 pm UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-07-31 08:23 pm UTC

[info]nevadafighter
2003-07-31 11:09 am UTC (link)
Not to mention, F_Wers could never understand my superior arguments, and add to that my exposure to and delight in Jesuit-style, legalistic, subtle, complicated reasoning; I'd probably really confuse the hell out of everyone if they attempted to get into a flame war on this with me.

I graduated from a Jesuit university with a BA in English and rhetoric! Bring it! ;)

Wow . . . that's just . . . she doesn't see how utterly wanky that is? She's smart enough to throw big words around but not smart enough to realize that good argument implies the evaluation of counterarguments and then a rebuttal? Falling back on "Well, if you disagree that's just because you don't understand" won't cut it in any intellectual forum with which I'm familiar.

/cuts short own almost-wankiness

(Reply to this)


[info]jar
2003-07-31 12:22 pm UTC (link)
Guuuuuuuuh… I dun understand… (You know because I’m a brainless fandom_wanker)

[Wank] Seriously, this offended me >_<. The mass fucking generalization!

But I suppose she has the right to do that, because she’s obviously THE MOST INTELLECTUAL PERSON EVER so smart that NO ONE can POSSIBLY understand her logic!!! And all that, which is kinda true, because I don’t understand how she can generalize a whole group of people and think she’s completely right!

Well, better drag myself back to the ol’ cave and drool and point at he computer some more. [/Wank]

Honestly she was “channelling Snape” o_O lady, take your pills!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

This is ironic. Really. - [info]hugsnkisses, 2003-07-31 01:21 pm UTC
Re: This is ironic. Really. - [info]rikoshi, 2003-07-31 01:35 pm UTC
Re: This is ironic. Really. - [info]hugsnkisses, 2003-07-31 01:47 pm UTC
Re: This is ironic. Really. - [info]cimorene111, 2003-07-31 07:47 pm UTC

[info]phosfate
2003-07-31 04:41 pm UTC (link)
Can we have a big pie fight now, like in The Great Race?

I love that movie.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-08-01 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-08-01 05:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-08-01 06:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-08-01 04:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-08-01 10:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-08-01 10:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-08-01 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-08-01 10:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-08-02 02:07 am UTC

[info]feenix
2003-07-31 07:07 pm UTC (link)
This isn't happening.

NO ONE MAKES A STATEMENT ABOUT THE HIVEMIND.

Also: underpants.

/brought to you by F_W: We're like a huge vagina in a way.

(Reply to this)


[info]sajasma
2003-08-01 02:25 am UTC (link)
Okay so on the heels of basically calling us drooling morons, she begins babbling to her Snape-muse?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

(Reply to this)


[info]anriko
2003-08-01 03:38 am UTC (link)
...My Sephiroth-muse wants to flay this girl alive and throw her into boiling Mako. Along with her eunuch-Snape.

(Reply to this)

Is late to the party, but....
[info]loki
2003-08-01 05:39 am UTC (link)
Damnit! Why can't I use my religion and my fictional muse to automatically win every argument?

I wonder if this woman's figured out yet that we wouldn't understand her because we don't speak teh cRaZy.

(Reply to this)

  
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map