Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



I wish I was boning vampires. ([info]tehrin) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2008-07-28 16:51:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:authors, books that should be burned, can't escape the screencaps, creator wank, fan rage, fandom: twilight, i see stupid people, illegality, internet lawyers, lawyerism, mary sues, omgwtf, religion, spoilers- noooo! you bitch! you bitch!!!, think of the fictional children, wanking inside the house, whut, writers are often pompous douches

Epilogue Wank, Twilight Style
Mucho gracias to the folks over on [info]wank_report. AND A SPOILER WARNING WITH EXTRA SPARKLES FOR TWILIGHT FANS. I suggest Twilight fans who actually care that much about being spoiled avoid this post like the plague.


With the upcoming release of Breaking Dawn, the final installment of the Twilight series that has fans breaking out in hives for its August 2nd release, possible spoilers have begun to be leaked all over the net (which also concerns an epilogue- is anyone else getting deja vu or is it just me?). Not only that, but Stephenie Meyer was unable to contain her bursting excitement and has leaked a very, very special spoiler. CUE SHIPPING WANK FROM STAGE RIGHT! Some people are pleased. Others are not pleased, not only with Meyer but the tone of the article.

ETA2: The Yahoo!Answers thread was deleted, but I was able to cap the first page of comments from the tab I had opened. [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11]

ETA: Fixed the tag on the last link. Sorry, folks.
ETA3: A support request was entered by someone claiming to be from a law firm, claiming to represent the publishing group with a pretty much standard letter that has been going around like a strain of herpes to people leaking the book or even discussing spoilers (julian_black explains exactly why here). I don't think intellectual property laws work that way.


July 28, 2008

BY E-MAIL:

Re: BREAKING DAWN by Stephenie Meyer (the “Intellectual Property”) –
Unauthorized Posting

Dear Site Administrator:

I am authorized to act on behalf of the author, Stephenie Meyer, the owner of copyright in the Intellectual Property, and Hachette Book Group USA, Inc., the exclusive US publisher of the Intellectual Property (collectively, the "IP Owner"). I have a good faith belief that the individual who posted the material on the site listed below may have had unauthorized access, directly or indirectly, to the Intellectual Property which has not yet been published and is embargoed until August 2, 2008. Accordingly, we hereby request that you please remove and/or disable access to the materials located on your website at:

http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1170411.html#cutid1


http://www.journalfen.net/community/wank_report/518.html?page=42comments


Sincerely,

s/RR



Other posts concerning the leaks can be found here and a twilight_news (thanks to [info]hooloovoo_too). Possible confirmation of some of the spoilers has also sparked more wank over here.

There's some more fun over at ontd (the macros start on page 2). The OP itself only concerns the movie, but that doesn't stop people from wanking over the spoilers.

ETA4: system is love.


As previously pointed out, no material from this author was posted on our site; the breaking of the embargo on this book did not take place on this site. I will not prevent our users from discussing what had been posted elsewhere or from posting links to other sites where the information was originally disclosed.

Besides which, is the fact that we did not enter into an embargo agreement regarding this book.

I'm sympathetic to your client's plight and to the possible economic repercussions of someone having leaked contents of your client's material before it was supposed to have been available.

However, I am not pleased by the drive-by intimidation tactic intended to make us believe we had any sort of legal obligation to remove specific posts and content from our site. The request was obviously ill-informed, as well, since the only content on this site relating to your client's book is discussion of elements of the book that were posted elsewhere. Our site does not have the most flattering discussion with regard to your client's material, but such is the way with opinions, and I will not interfere with my users' rights to express them.


And there's now been blurry confirmation on spoilers (thanks to [info]miraba).

ETA5: Ok, guys, lay off the Mormons or I'm going to have to ask you to get out of the pool. I really, really, REALLY hate to quote [info]mcity but plz no Mormon bashing. Let's have some class.

ETA6: SMeyer allegedly wrote a parody version of Breaking Dawn according to this EW article (thanks to [info]greenconverses).



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]lexin
2008-07-29 11:44 am UTC (link)
First I discover is that I get a support request in my inbox. I'm gobsmacked by the whole thing, not least that a lawyer (after having read the comments I'm convinced it is a lawyer) deems this game worth the candle. And hasn't read the discussion before sending out silly emails.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]khym_chanur
2008-07-29 12:31 pm UTC (link)
... not least that a lawyer (after having read the comments I'm convinced it is a lawyer) deems this game worth the candle.

Probably just a way to increase the billable hours (or whatever they're called) that they charge to their client. All in all, signing up for a free journal account and copy-pasting a boiler-plate complaint into a request form isn't a bad way to make some money.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]julian_black
2008-07-29 03:14 pm UTC (link)
When Stephenie Meyer requested that all fan forums go on hiatus for the last two weeks befre the book release she also supplied an email address to her publisher's legal department so TwilightMoms suffering withdrawal concerned fans could snitch on anyone so horrible as to violate the embago and/or post spoilers.

I imagine there are at least a few righteous Twilight fans who have made it their mission to seek out and report us godless, amoral, baby-eating, spoiler-spreading heathens, thus making more busy-work for lawyers. Oh well. As long as it keeps them off the streets, maybe that's not such a bad thing. (The Twilight Vigilante Squad, I mean--not the lawyers.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ari_o
2008-07-29 04:43 pm UTC (link)
I believe [info]ontd_twatlight had at least one NARC.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]arien
2008-07-29 05:22 pm UTC (link)
That is just SUCH a disgusting thing to do, I can't get over it. Using her fans to police the internet? Asking fan sites to shut down so fans can't speculate or share their excitement? HP was way more popular -- seriously, Twilight fandom is a fraction of the side of HP fandom -- and JKR didn't pull a stunt like this.

I think Meyer knows her book sucks and didn't want people to find out before they spent the money.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]platedlizard
2008-07-29 08:17 pm UTC (link)
That would be because JKR has class. Stephanie Meyer, apparently not so much.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ladylance
2008-07-30 07:47 am UTC (link)
JKR not only has class, but also a brain.

She and her publishers did everything humanly possible to keep the book under lock and key. They also understood a very basic truth about human nature: people will do what they are explicitly told not to and so didn't go bat-shit when the inevitable spoilers did begin to surface.

(Well that, and I don't think she NEEDED to do much. HP fandom had the real epilogue several days before and it was a long time before people accepted it as real)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]bienegold
2008-07-30 11:26 am UTC (link)
Frankly, I think the best way to admit that the spoilers are true are to freak out!

Because the spoilers for this book are so cracky that I would think they were fanfic without all the hubub.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ladylance
2008-07-30 03:18 pm UTC (link)
Very true. If they aren't true, why bother?

I saw the spoilers and IMHO, it makes AS/S look like a work of genius.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]julesnoctambule
2008-08-01 03:03 am UTC (link)
'I saw the spoilers and IMHO, it makes AS/S look like a work of genius.'

Now that is disturbing.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]the_mouse
2008-07-30 08:45 am UTC (link)
That infuriated me too. Who the hell do these people think they are? Fandoms aren't a right, they're a gift- I'm sure it doesn't seem that way when you have rabid insane fangirls, but that $700,000* advance didn't earn itself. Getting fansites to shut down and fans to report on each other because someone MIGHT post spoilers is insane. Shit happens. Get over it.


*Yep, that's the actual advance she got for the 3 books. That or $750,000; I'm not sure which. Breaking Dawn earned her a $400,000 advance.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrbimble
2008-08-01 05:21 am UTC (link)
::cries::

::looks at the WIPs currently cluttering my harddrive::

::considers reworking one of them into submissable form. hell, if this piece(s) of shit could do it...::

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]phosfate
2008-07-29 08:32 pm UTC (link)
Stephenie Meyer requested that all fan forums go on hiatus for the last two weeks befre the book release

How is that in any way legal, and who would even tolerate such a thing?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]khym_chanur
2008-07-30 01:03 am UTC (link)
As far as I know she was just asking, not threatening to sue, which is legal. As to who would tolerate it, the rabid fangirls running the sites, apparently.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]julian_black
2008-07-30 05:35 am UTC (link)
SMeyer has made occasional appearances on fan forums to answer questions, including that teeming Hive o' Crazy, TwilightMoms.

If they didn't shut down, it's possible SMeyer would refuse to ever come back again--and I think that's why some forums complied. Because seriously? The only "protection" against spoilers is making a personal decision to stay the hell away from fansites, LJ, and social networking sites altogether.

But that would demand acting on one's own free will, instead of top-down, authoritarian decision-making. And given the themes I've seen throughout Meyer's books (including the latest batch of spoilers), it's no surprise SMeyer's chosen this course of action.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


janegray
2008-07-30 07:57 pm UTC (link)
The only "protection" against spoilers is making a personal decision to stay the hell away from fansites, LJ, and social networking sites altogether.

And even that doesn't always work. Even freaking newscasts spoiled the ending of Harry Potter!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lovelypoet
2008-07-29 10:39 pm UTC (link)
Uh-huh... because the internet is so good at shutting up and going away when there is something interesting to speculate about.

So... she's a bad writer and delusional too?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tofuknight
2008-08-05 02:06 am UTC (link)
I'm just here to love on your icon.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tehrin
2008-07-29 07:38 pm UTC (link)
Well, they are getting paid for it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jupiterpluvius
2008-07-30 01:53 am UTC (link)
Hey, someone could have been naive enough to fall for it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map