Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Becky ([info]ruffwriter) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2008-08-08 20:54:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:authors, entitlement, fandom: twilight, haxxorz, interrogating from the wrong perspective, smart bitches trashy books, this is the wank that never ends

Sparkledammerung: The Continuation
Since [info]cleolinda has had more than enough Twilight, it seems, I thought I'd take her up on her offer to move the growing wank to a new post.

Previously, on the Sparkledammerug: People weren't happy.

Entertainment Weekly, previously best known in the Twilight fandom for its extensive coverage of the hype and for this monstrosity of a cover, reviewed Breaking Dawn in the issue released today. The overall grade was a D.

The review was posted to [info]lion_lamb, the Edward/Bella comm. Commenters quickly divide on the issue: some agree with the review, some find it "too harsh," and some think EW missed the point entirely.

A few hours later, this interview with Stephenie Meyer is posted.

EW: Fan reaction to Breaking Dawn has been wild in both directions - they have been like "I love this book" and some people were like "I have questions about this book" Why do you think that is?

SMeyer: Well, I've actually named it the "Rob Effect." For some reason, it seems like the fans take a couple days to get used to something. And it was most obvious when they announced who was gonna be playing Edward and everyone freaked out, and there was all this online controversy and now everyone completely loves Rob. So, I knew that it was gonna be an interesting ride for a lot of people, they had their idea of what was going to happen, and if the book didn't match up they were gonna have a problem with that, and of course the book didn't match up to what everyone imagined, so I was expecting. And I'm hoping that after they have a chance to think about the ending I wrote, it'll grow on them.


Most fans roll their eyes at SMeyer, and others agree that the "haters" will probably love the books in a few weeks. Unfortunately, this mod post prompted comments to be disabled, but this exchange was saved (thank you, [info]greenconverses!):

vip4321: People, it's HER BOOK. She will write it however she likes it and if you have a problem, DONT SAY ANYTHING. Frankly, nobody cares. I like the book and so do a lot of people.

poetrytoprose: Please don't be so condescending and generalizing. It really hurts my brain when any criticism towards the book degrades any fan to anything less than "a true fan."

vip4321: Oh so you think being a true fan means putting the author and her work down? Wow, what's with the world? I know people are entitled to their own opinion and congrats to them, but im just so tired of all the SM, BD and Robert bashing. It's about time to get over it. Seriously. Don't you agree? All this negativity over stuff you can't change is stupid.

Most of the deleted comments were along those lines, with the mods vainly trying to tell everyone to be respectful.

[info]lion_lamb isn't the only place where the wank is, though.

SMeyer tells MTV.com that the backlash "hurts." Most comments run along the lines of "LEAVE STEPHENIE ALONE!!!!"

The Twilight Lexicon takes a position on BD, and disallow character-bashing, expressing disapproval at SMeyer's writing, and calling Jacob a pedophile.

And if you're tired of the wank, have an extended Twilight parody in which Edward is turned into a cranky, scrapbooking virgin?

It's going to be a long August.

EDIT THE FIRST: Nora Roberts smash!

EDIT THE SECOND: Dissapointed 'Breaking Dawn' fans organize protest. Twilighters in the comments claim that the haters only make up 10% of the reader base.

EDIT THE THIRD: The Twilight Lexicon is hacked! EDIT THE THREE-POINT-FIFTH: One of the Lexicon mods posts about it on her journal. Is the Lexicon no more? ETC: Screencaps of a troll post made to the Lex shortly before the hacking. ETC THE RECKONING: The hacker speaks? ETA SQUARED: Lexicon admin claims it's not an inside job, posts messages from the hacker. ARE YOU KIDDING ME: And the hacker speaks again! (deleted) THIS DESERVES ITS OWN POST: Amazon.com boards on the hacking, with a surprise guest appearance by Laurel K. Hamilton's personal assistant?

EDIT THE FOURTH: ... off-topic, but were we just deleted for a bit?

EDIT THE FIFTH: Twilight Moms have possibly gone underground. FIVE-POINT-FIFTH: Confirmation! YEAH, WE'RE STILL GOING: The TwiMoms have returned, and ready to stroke Steph's ego all over again!

EDIT THE SIXTH: The Washington Post review of BD. Not wanky, just hilarious.

EDIT THE SEVENTH: Smart Bitches, Trashy Books weighs in. Smug Twilighter alert in the comments.

EDIT THE EIGHTH: Twatlympics?

EDIT THE NINTH: The haters draft a petition!

EDIT THE TENTH: You don't know the history of Twilight. Darla Cook does. TEN-POINT-FIVE: And she keeps on going, too.

DOES IT EVER END: Publishers' Weekly article on the protest. They think Twilight's audience consists entirely of teenagers. Ahahaha... ha.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]stele3
2008-08-09 04:39 am UTC (link)
ACK, so sorry. It's this one: http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/08/05/review-breaking-dawn-by-stephenie-meyer/#comments. Her exchange starts at about comment #59 or so, and continues on.

The other one was to ANOTHER part of the ongoing wank. Massive, it is.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ruffwriter
2008-08-09 04:42 am UTC (link)
No problem! I have copy+paste mishaps every other day.

And wow, I really have to read a Nora Roberts book one of these days. I'm not much of a romance fan, but that woman is awesome.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]miss_eponine
2008-08-09 05:11 am UTC (link)
Seconded. I'm much more open to her books now that I know how kick ass she is.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]breecita
2008-08-09 06:31 am UTC (link)
I fangirl La Nora so hardcore, and I've never read any of her books.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]jumble
2008-08-10 04:53 am UTC (link)
I've read some of her JD Robb stuff and, well, it's shit; but in a digestible, actually written way, as opposed to someone's high school fantasy journal splooging into a plotless tetralogy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]breecita
2008-08-10 04:54 am UTC (link)
Well, I write paranormal erotica, so I try not to throw stones at other people's digestible shit. :p

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]jumble
2008-08-10 05:18 am UTC (link)
I'm sorry, I should have qualified: it's unenjoyable shit. Just not on the level of "how did you even think this was not horribly a horribly embarrassing display, Stephe--I mean random writer?"

Personally, I am all for digestible fun that might be qualified, otherwise, as "shit". Maybe we need a shit graph.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]breecita
2008-08-10 05:27 am UTC (link)
Hahaha. Okay, yes. There are levels of hack. :D

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]scorpio20
2008-08-09 06:50 am UTC (link)
May I suggest Midnight Bayou? It has mpreg on an astral plane.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ruffwriter
2008-08-09 07:38 am UTC (link)
... oh dude, there's no way I could stay away. It is now on my reading list.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]cinnabar
2008-08-09 08:46 am UTC (link)
...wait, what? I haven't read that one.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]scorpio20
2008-08-09 05:33 pm UTC (link)
It's about past lives wherein the hero(of the present) was the heroine of the past and the ghost of the past makes him relive her giving birth. A bit confusing, but oh so cracktastic.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]honorh
2008-08-10 10:09 am UTC (link)
You can also read J.D. Robb. She and Nora Roberts share a home, a dog and a husband, as a co-written book of theirs says.

Okay, being that this is the Internet, I suppose I should clarify that to say that J.D. Robb is the redoubtable Ms. Roberts's mystery-writing pseudonym.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lysana
2008-08-13 12:45 am UTC (link)
I have to give her credit for making a book as predictable, poorly researched and all-around fluffy as Morrigan's Cross an entertaining read. Vampires. In Ireland. With a 12th-century wizard knocked out of time to rescue the world under the protection of The Morrigan.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]damien
2008-08-09 07:38 am UTC (link)
http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/08/05/review-breaking-dawn-by-stephenie-meyer/#comment-168923

You can actually link to the comment itself. ♥

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]stele3
2008-08-09 08:23 am UTC (link)
.....but that would be too easy. >.>

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]randomsome1
2008-08-10 12:01 am UTC (link)
That's it. I'm sending Nora Roberts something shiny.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map