Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Cleolinda Jones ([info]cleolinda) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2008-09-08 13:25:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:entitlement, fandom: harry potter, jkr doesn't know harry potter like i do, lawyerism, persecution, plagiarism, someone is wrong on the internet!, suck it up and deal, this is the wank that never ends

Lexicongate is over... for certain values of "over"
Breaking: Judge rules for Rowling in 'Lexicon' book case.


Note: My understanding is that SVA will not be appealing anything, because SVA is not the one named in the suit. RDR is. No word as to what he'll do.

(Watch That Page for ETAs.)

ETA: From [info]dorothy1901: WSJ posts a PDF of Judge Patterson's ruling.

From [info]faithwood: More articles, and the revelation that JKR/WB won $6,750 in damages.

ETA 2: JKR Statement Regarding Trial Ruling.

Via [info]wieimmer: Epic ONTD post is epic.

Commentary and reactions: NYTSmart Bitches; Galley Cat; Dear Author.

ETA 3: Via [info]diane_duane: RDR's statement.

foresthouse on LJ breaks down the ruling; Tom Spurgeon: "Generation Entitlement"; The Best Week Ever weighs in.

Current URLs for the Lexicon.

More Actual Lawyer commentary; Gothamist takes SVA's side.

ETA 4: Stanford Law: "Finally, remember that avada kedavra -- the killing curse -- is not always fatal. One wizard survived it. Three times. And it was he who cast the spell (and won't be named here) that ultimately suffered for it. Maybe someday the Lexicon will be known as The Book That Lived."

The Lexicon updates; Steve Vander Ark talks about the Verdict; Rowling Bitch-Slaps Potter Fans; Lee Goldberg chimes in (with now-deleted reference to the OTW).

Via rattlesnakeroot: Bluestocking: The Verdict in the WB/JKR Case is In and It's Confusing; J. K. Rowling and the Petty Victory; Ars Technica: Judge Waves Gavel - Says Avada Kedavra to Harry Potter Lexicon; TechDirt: Terrible Ruling: Judge Halts Publication of the HP Lexicon.

THUS SPAKE NORA ROBERTS.

One of Wired's blogs weighs in.

Gawker: J.K. Rowling Prevails Over Superdumb Harry Potter Encyclopedia.

Discussion at the Straight Dope boards.

ETA 5: Prof. Derek Bambauer at Info/Law discusses the case; praetorianguard goes over the case as well; "Beware of Bad Internships" by a former RDR intern ("So a man I regularly sold milk to and the publisher I was interning with were being sued by the creator of Hogwarts. Amazing and weird, but what took away from this drama's charm was the fact that I was still beating my laptop over my head wondering how to make Muskegon sexy").

ETA 6: Mark le Fanu at the Guardian weighs in; aaaaand here's Slashdot.

ETA 7: JKR's agents want to see SVA's new book, with bonus comment wank at Mugglenet (OH GOD NO PLEASE DON'T BE INFRINGING I CAN'T GO THROUGH THIS AGAIN); Dear Author comment wank, with bonus Nora Roberts; NPR's audio coverage; clearly, Diane Duane is using the Leaky Lounge lawsuit thread for her own nefarious purposes.

ETA 8: And the appeals begin. Also of note: "Rapoport said the legal tangle has boosted business for his company."



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

link to the judge's opinion
[info]dorothy1901
2008-09-08 08:05 pm UTC (link)
The Wall Street Journal has put up a .PDF of Judge Patterson's opinion here.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: link to the judge's opinion
[info]sockpuppeteer
2008-09-08 08:06 pm UTC (link)
And I am so glad that they did. Makes for an interesting read since the judge was so careful to make it ONLY about this case rather than a more general ruling.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: link to the judge's opinion
[info]seanchaigirl
2008-09-08 08:16 pm UTC (link)
It gives less for them to appeal that way, and may take the fight out of those fair use project guys who were trying to win more ground on a larger scale. Go Judge RPattz!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: link to the judge's opinion
[info]tavella
2008-09-08 08:23 pm UTC (link)
Yes, I've very pleased about that. It reduces the potential harm to other reference works, which can indeed be tremendously useful. I'd hate to see things like Encyclopedia of Arda get whacked with this.

It's what I hoped for in the first place; a careful circumscribed opinion that protected the author's rights (so that authors don't feel compelled to attack websites to protect their future rights) while giving minimal ammunition to future attacks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: link to the judge's opinion
[info]miraba
2008-09-08 08:30 pm UTC (link)
Going to read it right now. Thanks!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: link to the judge's opinion
[info]rusty_halo
2008-09-08 09:32 pm UTC (link)
I just read that whole freaking thing. It's kind of fascinating.

I'm surprised the judge didn't find bad faith on the part of RDR. The chronicle of RDR's activities in the beginning seems pretty damning!

The judge seems to characterize SVA as a misled innocent rather than the lazy entitled ass that he is. Ah well.

I'm also surprised how much comes down to the two companion books. The judge seems to find the copying from those more damning than the copying from the novels (which he considers more transformative). I wonder how this case would've turned out if Rowling hadn't written those two encyclopedia-type books. There's still all the verbatim stealing of her language from the novels, of course.

I've learned way more about copyright law than I ever expected thanks to this case...!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: link to the judge's opinion
[info]cbm
2008-09-08 11:29 pm UTC (link)
The lexicon book would be much shorter as he took every single entry from Fantastic Beasts, in fact, some of them are hard to tell apart.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map