Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Loopywafflehead ([info]loopywafflehead) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2008-09-29 23:46:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:credits, fandom: supernatural, flouncing, stop sharing your thoughts, this is not funny

Acknowledge my C+P skillz!
Thank you to the good people at wank_report for this small but delightful Supernatural wank.

[info]agt_spooky posts the ratings for last week’s Supernatural episode to the supernatural_tv community, telling everyone to “feel free to repost this information, but if you do, please credit me, as it takes me awhile [sic] each week to compile all of this. Thank you!”.

[info]saerie mocks the idea that the reposting of ratings should be credited. [info]agt_spooky immediately overreacts and flounces, and the lone voice of reason is drowned out by a sea of people telling her not to be mean.

I don't think you get something. She's not "sharing", she's making. She doesn't copy paste these numbers from somewhere.

It turns out that copying-and-pasting is exactly what she does, as the numbers are directly taken from this forum. The flounce continues in agt_spooky’s lj, along with a promise to never ‘compile’ ratings for anyone ever again. One respondent politely asks what exactly it is that she compiles. The answer: “I go to Marc's site to get the preliminary numbers for every show then check back to get the finals as well. Does that not count as compiling?”

It doesn’t, but that’s okay because [info]saerie has clearly learned the error of her ways. With the dissenters browbeaten into submission and everyone believing that copying and compiling are the same thing, the internet was once again a really nice place to be.

ETA: [info]agt_spooky claims she had to turn off anon commenting in her lj due to people dropping by and calling her a bitch. Did anyone see any of these anon flames? [Answer: yes.]

ETA 2 (a relevant one this time!) [info]agt_spooky's problems with the concept of ownership extend to selling pirated DVD's for a profit.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]croik
2008-09-30 05:03 pm UTC (link)
I saw one anon comment that was along the lines of "saerie may not think you're a bitch, but I do" but I didn't think to cap it B: She took it down awfully fast.

I wouldn't call her a bitch myself. Hypocrite, sure.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]loopywafflehead
2008-09-30 10:39 pm UTC (link)
Thanks for confirming. I couldn't find any comments and wasn't sure if anything had actually happened or if everything were over by the time I woke up.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Has anon been trolling the wank?
[info]littlebittysami
2008-10-01 05:46 am UTC (link)
There was a mouse claiming to have been the one who "attacked" [info]agt in the wank report. I'm wondering if they trolled the wank after reading about it here.

We don't troll the wank, it's against the rules here,

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Has anon been trolling the wank?
[info]littlebittysami
2008-10-01 05:47 am UTC (link)
agt spooky. God, I hate rich text...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map