|
| |||
|
|
*sigh* I get that he probably got carried away when he wrote the original description. That doesn't excuse the fact that it was a rather lame-brained and badly thought-out comparison. Seems to me the man ought to take his lumps re the phraseology and move on, because there's no good to be done trying to justify it in any way. *facepalms* Post a comment in response: |
||||
|
Privacy Policy -
COPPA Legal Disclaimer - Site Map |