Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Caito Potato ([info]caito) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2009-04-21 18:42:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Prettiful
Entry tags:author entitlement, books that should be burned, can't escape the screencaps, conspiracy theories, crazy people, enormous clusterfuck, entitlement, fandom failures, fandom war, fandom: twilight, hypocrisy, i wanted to be wanked, i'm just here for the recipes, in ur wank - swapping our foodz, internet lawyers, internet psychologist, interrogating from the wrong perspective, look how much i don't care, not good with criticism, not very subtle at all, not you again, oh christ here we go again, omgwtf, oppression, persecution, person: laura hale, plucky girl detective, raised by hyenas, recipes in comments, self-publishing, she admitted it!, she's on a mission guys!, sockpuppets, taking it too seriously, thinks we're fandom police, this is the wank that never ends, this was no chicken, too many fucking tags, wankers who will not shut up, we love jf tags, whut, wikipedia, yay screencaps!, yummeh foodz

The Russet Doom Saga, Part IV
In Part III, we saw what happened when Lady Sybilla tried to tangle with the Twilight Lexicon mods for the last time (they banned her), and watched in awe as Wikipedia users worked "around the clock" to get her Russet Noon article deleted. You can still find "The Wikipedia Wars" linked on the Russet Noon website, but you'll have to scroll down past...

The FanHistory Wars.
A long, long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away....

Artistic revolution (who, for reasons which will become blatantly obvious, is a suspected sockpuppet of Lady Sybilla) edited the shit out of the Russet Noon fanhistory page. Artistic revolution has a pretty one-track mind, it would appear. Or two-track, if you count Lady Sybilla as a separate topic.

In the midst of all those edits, there was no shortage of information about me, Sybilla's own favorite "stalkarazzo." (I know I'm her favorite, she says so herself on the Russet Noon website.) The following information is culled from the Revision as of 00:27, 21 April 2009 version of the page.
Although Caito posted the email text on one of her many Journalfen pages, her only acknowledgment of Sybilla's concerns was: "I'm totally over this email business. I have a spam filter and I intend to use it. If someone wants to continue discussing this shiz, she can do so in the comments like everybody else." Strange reaction given that Caito's Whois record for her site openly discloses her gmail address:
At this point, Artistic revolution somehow thought it was appropriate to include my mailing address and contact information. Yes, in the middle of the article for Russet Noon. But that's not all! She did go on. I bolded my favorite parts!
More recently, Caito provided us with a video example of how the attention-whoring for which she mocks Sybilla is more contagious than a disease. Ironically, while she spends her valuable time making fun of the ''Russet Noon'' author for trying to exploit Stephenie Meyer's popularity, Caito, too, seems to be riding the wave of the ''Russet Noon'' obsession. And she does so quite gracefully. If it weren't for Caito, ''Russet Noon'' would have never achieved taboo status.

... On April 3, 2009, LadySybilla emailed Caito and asked her to stop her "online stalking activities." On this email, Sybilla warned, "If you don't, I will notify as many administrators as I have to until they take action." Sybilla then contacted the Journalfen technical support team to ask how she could contact an administrator in order to report libelous accusations posted by some of their users. But, instead of responding to Sybilla's concerns, the JournalFen support team (if, in fact, there is one) forwarded a copy of the email to Caito. This incident may or may not prompt internet users to wonder about the legitimacy of Journalfen. Is Journalfen an actual company? If it is, who are the tech support staff and/or administrators behind it?

... Judging by the look of things, it won't be Sybilla who will be profiting off of ''Russet Noon'' sales after all. Let's see what happens when Caito and her BFFs at Twilight Lexicon get their hands on a copy of the novel in September.
All that has since been nuked from the actual FanHistory page, and replaced with more evenhanded material. People here at FW went a little flaily for a bit, as a software snafu made it appear as though FH mod Sidewinder had been the one to add my personal info when she'd really just meant to take it down.*

Then the mods brought the hurt down on Artistic revolution, who has been banned from editing the wiki for two whole weeks! She's really sorry, though, guys. Please stop throwing stones at her, and let her catapult boulders at others in peace.

But it's not like Artistic revolution has been the only one tooling with it, either. Some anons got in and tweaked it ever so slightly, like changing the story summary simply to "OH JOHN RINGO NO!" Editing the Russet Noon article is temporarily locked to admins, due to anon vandalizing and a neutrality dispute.

Personal notes:
  1. I do not know what end anyone would hope to achieve by posting my address.
  2. I'm not BFFs or even BFs or even just Fs with the TwiLex mods, but I sure do like them more than I like Lady Sybilla.
  3. I have no clue how I would stand to profit from anything having to do with Russet Noon.
  4. I have no idea who Lee Thomas even is.
*Aside to FanHistory folks: Thanks. I really appreciate what you did. Do me one more solid? I did respond to Lady Sybilla's concerns about my "accusations", but I guess it got lost in the epic wave of comments. Like I said before, Lady Sybilla is welcome to come engage me in comments, but as far as I know she has yet to do so. Muchos gracias.

ETA
: Artistic revolution rides forth on teal deer to appeal to Laura's professionalism.

ETA 2: Laura responds!

ETA 3: The Russet Noon website is now basically a hate shrine dedicated to me and FH mod Sidewinder, complete with Photoshopped screencaps of me interacting with people I've never actually interacted with. Oh, and also my contact information.

You know, I'm starting to get the feeling that she doesn't take criticism very well.

ETA
4: From Artistic revolution's usertalk page:
I'm not interested in antagonizing you. You have been objective, but I still have to insist that Sidewinder, whoever she is, hasn't been. She might not have the same IP address as Caito, but her editing patterns are dubious. I have listed the evidence on my website because I'm blocked from doing so here. If I'm not allowed to edit the article, then at least Sidewinder should also be prevented from tampering with it any further.

All in all, as I said before, I'm not interested in antagonizing you. Based on your reasons for why Wikipedia blacklisted FH, I know you can understand how I feel in regards to Russet Noon. I have seen that your procedures reflect professionalism. This is why I appealed to that.

I sincerely apologized to both you and Tikatu, but never received a reply. At least at Wikipedia they lifted the ban. Sure, they deleted the article, but they were reasonable enough to lift the ban. I'm sorry if the procedure I followed to try to negotiate with you guys was not what you expected.

I would much rather have you delete the Russet Noon article altogether than to continue with this conflict.
Once again, it is not my intention to antagonize you.
So, yeah, Artistic revolution is almost certainly Lady Sybilla.

ETA 5
: The hate shrine is now down from the Russet Noon site. It's been replaced with a paragraph about how "the wars have ceased" and the rest is now ostensibly about the fanfic again.

ETA 4-24 7:22am Tokyo time
: In case anyone was wondering how Lady Sybilla was taking the news about Peter David's community parody-in-progress, here's the reaction from her twitter:
# it's an honor even though it's a satire, because Peter David is a very seasoned writer
4 minutes ago from web

# many fanfic writers of the net will be uniting to write Potato Moon. The creator is comic book author Peter David
4 minutes ago from web

# let's hope this communal novel will inspire many more to come. I'd love to see a serious thriller or drama like this
7 minutes ago from web

# communal novels are a new genre, there are not many of them that I know of. I'm very curious to read Potato Moon.
8 minutes ago from web

# I'm very proud to announce that Russet Noon has inspired a very unique parody, Potato Moon. It's a communal novel
8 minutes ago from web
The Russet Noon website has also changed. It no longer makes mention of any "wars" whatsoever.

ETA 7: "You are invited to read our latest press release, "Lady Sybilla: The Darth Vader of Fandom."* It appears that Russet Noon has already achieved taboo status without having even been released yet. That's what happens when a Darth Vader figure like Lady Sybilla is created. And now she's found a worthy opponent: Peter David."

*That link goes to a c&p in my journal. To view the original (and give LS more hits) click here.

ETA 8: Her tweeting continues, c&ped here.

ETA 9: The first part of Potato Moon is up... I have a FanHistory page now, and actually I kind of like it, especially the graphic and its caption... and yes, my little lolcats, you can has more ONTD.

ETA 10: She just updated the Russet Noon site again (screencapped here), linking to the articles that appeared on Comicmix and IMDB. (Except her IMDB link actually goes here, where you have to scroll down halfway down the page the relevant blurb.)

ETA 11
: Peter David's Potato Moon has its own Wikipedia page! It is a thing of true beauty and you will never, ever guess who started it. But to avoid the situation that occurred the last time she wrote articles on Wikipedia, she's asked another user to edit the Potato Moon article for her. And he is (adding links to the Potato Moon blog entries, at least)! He just wants to know more about who AV Paranormal is. This should go well, I think.

ETA 12: She's linked to something on the Wall Street Journal site now. What the lemonfresh hell?



Page 13 of 16
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
[12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
>>

(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-24 05:56 pm UTC (link)
So. How long is it going to take for Lady Psychobilla to figure out Peter David and everyone involved in the parody are laughing at her, not with her?

If she's so smart like she claims she is, she should be more than capable of telling the difference between someone paying tribute to her and someone pretty much saying, "You're a bloody idiot and here we are, mocking that pile of shit you call a book that you haven't even finished because you're too busy masturbating to your own idiocy."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-24 07:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faeryfroggy, 2009-04-24 07:11 pm UTC

[info]faeryfroggy
2009-04-24 07:10 pm UTC (link)
My brain. She hurts. I'd offer you a Zima, but they don't sell them here anymore. Will you settle for cookies?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 05:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-04-26 05:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]faeryfroggy, 2009-04-26 05:36 am UTC

[info]duraniedrama
2009-04-24 07:43 pm UTC (link)
First installment of Potato Moon is up.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ilinana, 2009-04-24 07:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]uldihaa, 2009-04-24 07:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-24 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep_n_wolf, 2009-04-24 08:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-24 09:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2009-04-24 11:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-24 10:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-04-24 11:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seca, 2009-04-25 03:39 am UTC
So what's the model for?
(Anonymous)
2009-04-24 07:56 pm UTC (link)
Here's what I don't get (um, among many other things): if she intends for the cover to be some piece of *~*symbolic*~* digital art, why's she looking for a model? Publicity shots? Personal gratification?

-Laughing Mouse

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: So what's the model for? - mockygogo, 2009-04-24 08:11 pm UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - [info]melkahb, 2009-04-24 09:31 pm UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - tetradecimal, 2009-04-24 09:37 pm UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - [info]scribacious, 2009-04-24 09:25 pm UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - (Anonymous), 2009-04-24 09:35 pm UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - tetradecimal, 2009-04-24 09:38 pm UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - mockygogo, 2009-04-24 09:52 pm UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - [info]sumire, 2009-04-24 10:31 pm UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - mockygogo, 2009-04-24 10:45 pm UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - [info]alcesx2, 2009-04-25 12:25 am UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - [info]seca, 2009-04-25 03:27 am UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - [info]alcesx2, 2009-04-25 03:37 am UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - [info]tephra, 2009-04-25 03:02 am UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - [info]scribacious, 2009-04-24 10:34 pm UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - [info]charamei, 2009-04-24 11:09 pm UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 03:40 am UTC
Re: So what's the model for? - [info]harukami, 2009-04-25 08:14 am UTC

[info]alcesx2
2009-04-24 09:29 pm UTC (link)
Holy crap. I leave for 16 hours and miss all sorts of goodies!


How can something I'm merely observing take over my life like this?!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]melkahb, 2009-04-24 09:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-24 09:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alcesx2, 2009-04-25 12:26 am UTC

[info]helenahandbag
2009-04-24 09:32 pm UTC (link)
Is it wrong that ever edit to one of these posts has filled me with such glee? 'Cause Sibby's batshittery is so epic, it could be a D&D prestige class.

Caito, like many others in this thread, my hat's off to you. Please accept this icon of boobies as a token of my appreciation.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]melkahb, 2009-04-24 09:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]helenahandbag, 2009-04-24 09:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]melkahb, 2009-04-24 10:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]helenahandbag, 2009-04-24 10:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]uldihaa, 2009-04-25 12:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]helenahandbag, 2009-04-26 10:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]helenahandbag, 2009-04-26 10:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-27 12:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 05:54 am UTC

[info]ari_o
2009-04-24 09:44 pm UTC (link)
GIANT PHOTO OF DARTH now on russet-noon.com

ACK!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-24 09:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-24 09:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]melkahb, 2009-04-24 10:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-24 10:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 02:50 am UTC
Via Twitter
[info]scribacious
2009-04-24 10:45 pm UTC (link)
"taking a stab at Obama? How dare he offend the President of the US??about 15 hours ago from web "

She's googling PeterDavid.net to get dirt on him! It appears to be the same 'ol game she's been playing to work up on attacking those she thinks are attacking her.

For fun, I was reading up on his latest posts (after reading the first installment of Potato Moon) to see that there was a brief problem with google not listing his site a while ago. After reading the comments, I made a connection to what Lady Sybilla may have been talking about in her latest twitter post. I googled PeterDavid.net and found the same search result, but couldn't get to the article for some reason. The title is "Soooo...electing Barack Obama was an act of cowardice?". This is listed on an unrelated site as being Peter David's content. It's mostly taken out of context, I don't know.

Sorry that's so long winded.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Via Twitter - [info]duraniedrama, 2009-04-24 11:23 pm UTC
Re: Via Twitter - [info]scribacious, 2009-04-24 11:37 pm UTC
Re: Via Twitter - [info]duraniedrama, 2009-04-25 12:23 am UTC
Re: Via Twitter - [info]fashi0n_mistake, 2009-04-25 12:27 am UTC
Re: Via Twitter - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 04:42 am UTC
Re: Via Twitter - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-04-26 10:09 pm UTC
Re: Via Twitter - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 05:53 am UTC
Reposted due to HTML cock-up...
[info]eilisliana
2009-04-24 10:46 pm UTC (link)
Screencapped & uploaded the Darth Vadered Russet-Noon website, so to reduced our traffic to her website.

Link

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Reposted due to HTML cock-up... - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 02:46 am UTC
Re: Reposted due to HTML cock-up... - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 10:18 am UTC

[info]eilisliana
2009-04-24 11:08 pm UTC (link)
whispers4kisses posted the Darth Vader press release to ONTD.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-24 11:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-04-24 11:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-25 12:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-25 12:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-04-25 01:14 am UTC

[info]darkecology
2009-04-25 12:55 am UTC (link)
Awwwww, the RN page is no longer "oficial"! I'm sad! And there's a sunset picture which makes a lot of sense with the "noon" thing, y/y?

And WTF is that on the right side of the new picture?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]wuthers, 2009-04-25 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-25 03:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-04-25 03:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-25 04:53 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 09:17 am UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-04-25 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 10:20 am UTC

[info]caito
2009-04-25 01:17 am UTC (link)
This is the IM conversation I had immediately upon signing on this morning:
[info]theropicus: ... dude, did you sign me up for JF?
[info]caito: No.
[info]theropicus: Then who did?
[info]caito: No one?
[info]theropicus: Then why, when I got back from lunch, did I get an email that was all, "Congratulations, you have a new JournalFen account!"
[info]caito: Someone must have mistakenly thought you wanted one? I have been posting icons you made, saying "theropicus on lj made these!" But I never asked for an account for you, though I did ask for an account for another friend.
[info]theropicus: I... should maybe contact JF admins. Because that is really weird.
[info]caito: ... do you need their direct number?
(She just wants to make sure someone didn't request an account for her when they meant to request for someone else.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-04-25 01:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-25 01:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]theropicus, 2009-04-25 10:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-04-25 11:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkeyes, 2009-04-25 07:59 am UTC
Question
(Anonymous)
2009-04-25 02:57 am UTC (link)
Isn't that picture of Darth Vader also supposed to have a copyright on it? I'm not sure how you go from having to take two copyrighted images off your website (including the Jacob one), because you didn't have permission to use them, then you turn right around, and stick another larger copyrighted image on it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Question - [info]caito, 2009-04-25 03:49 am UTC
Re: Question - [info]jedi_dwh, 2009-04-25 05:49 am UTC
Re: Question - [info]white_tean, 2009-04-25 09:38 am UTC

[info]darth_buttocks
2009-04-25 03:04 am UTC (link)
The earlier talk about models reminded me of the fact that a convention is bringing the Twilight hand model in as a guest.

Kind of a "Third Stormtrooper on the left" level of guest, and definitely not worth a $30 autograph...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-25 05:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]boomstickjones, 2009-04-26 06:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigbigtruck, 2009-04-25 06:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2009-04-25 08:33 am UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-25 09:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darth_buttocks, 2009-04-25 03:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mercorir, 2009-04-26 04:35 am UTC

[info]ari_o
2009-04-25 03:11 am UTC (link)
I made them delete my FH page ages ago. UGH. >_>

Also if you want yours to stay up we should totally give you an AWARD. Someone gave you a purple cross somewhere in this wank right?

Also the Sugitichi army shows up in chapter 12.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-25 04:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-04-25 08:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-26 08:47 pm UTC

[info]seca
2009-04-25 03:14 am UTC (link)
# thanks FH for creating a separate section for him, this is turning out to be quite interestingabout 4 hours ago from web

Is she talking about the Potato Moon page here? Unless she's gotten confused in her insanity and is talking about caito's FH page, but I'm sure she's made reference that she knows caito is female.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-25 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2009-04-26 11:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seca, 2009-04-26 12:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2009-04-27 12:19 am UTC
Tally keeping update!
[info]tehrin
2009-04-25 03:37 am UTC (link)
As of now, we have 6423 comments on all Russet Noon wanks (including mine). That is 319 comments short of Snape's Wives, counting all three wanks. Look, I can use a calculator for basic addition! :)

And I totally need to dig through and get me a Caito Support icon.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]darth_buttocks, 2009-04-25 03:55 am UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]fashi0n_mistake, 2009-04-25 04:23 am UTC
Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]negativecosine, 2009-04-25 05:02 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]caito, 2009-04-25 05:05 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]negativecosine, 2009-04-25 05:08 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 05:07 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]negativecosine, 2009-04-25 05:09 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 05:12 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]negativecosine, 2009-04-25 05:17 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 05:19 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]negativecosine, 2009-04-25 05:19 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 05:23 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-25 06:01 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]negativecosine, 2009-04-25 06:05 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-25 06:11 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]negativecosine, 2009-04-25 06:12 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-25 06:13 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 09:35 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]issendai, 2009-04-25 07:58 pm UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-25 08:13 pm UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]kaesa, 2009-04-29 08:54 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]sumire, 2009-04-25 05:44 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-25 06:00 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]negativecosine, 2009-04-25 06:05 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-25 06:09 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-04-30 05:34 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]negativecosine, 2009-04-30 05:35 am UTC
Re: Declaration of Intent to Knit the Wank! - [info]jaseroque, 2009-04-25 07:29 pm UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]seca, 2009-04-25 05:42 am UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-25 06:01 am UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]tehrin, 2009-04-25 09:38 pm UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]istaerlus, 2009-04-25 07:24 am UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]caito, 2009-04-25 08:05 am UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]ilinana, 2009-04-25 07:29 pm UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 12:18 am UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]issendai, 2009-04-25 07:59 pm UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 01:34 am UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]istaerlus, 2009-04-26 04:52 am UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - mockygogo, 2009-04-26 08:52 am UTC
Re: Tally keeping update! - [info]issendai, 2009-04-26 10:55 pm UTC
Why is this the thing that bothers me most?
[info]malleo
2009-04-25 05:42 am UTC (link)
Did... Did she just say "very unique"?

Not that the rest of this isn't batshit, mind you. This is just the one little piece of stupid I can actually comprehend.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Why is this the thing that bothers me most? - [info]jinxymcdeath, 2009-04-25 06:10 am UTC

[info]twinno
2009-04-25 07:23 am UTC (link)
I added some of your favorite ships to the FH page for you!

You're welcome.

<3 your sister.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ilinana, 2009-04-25 07:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-25 08:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-25 08:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]twinno, 2009-04-25 10:06 pm UTC

[info]harukami
2009-04-25 08:23 am UTC (link)
You know, I keep thinking that in a strange, twisted way, this whole thing is, in her mind, actually almost complementary to you, Caito. In a horrible, backwards, Bizarro World way, but she seems to think you're infinitely capable of all kinds of multimedia, being everywhere at once, managing to post in all kinds of forums at the same time, and keep track of everything while you do it. Your many talents, multitasking skills, your ambitions... I believe she even mentioned your looks at one point.

It's kind of freaking me out, actually. I can't imagine how it'd be to be the subject of it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]harukami, 2009-04-25 08:40 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 11:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harukami, 2009-04-25 10:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 11:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harukami, 2009-04-25 11:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 05:29 am UTC
Civil War Buffs Unite
(Anonymous)
2009-04-25 09:00 am UTC (link)
you're an USS Monitor fan?! holy crow, me too! 8DDD

*is thwapped*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Civil War Buffs Unite - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 05:27 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-04-25 11:57 am UTC (link)
This was originally posted on absolutewrite, but I thought I'd copypasta it here since the Russet Loon loves to read the comments.

"The ease of infringement on the Internet was the primary reason for criminalizing noncommercial infringement as well as recognition of other motivations a nonprofit defendant might have such as anti-copyright or anti-corporate sentiment, trying to make a name in the Internet world and wanting to be a cyber renegade.

...a noncommercial willful infringer is subject to up to a one-year prison term and $100,000 in fines. The prison term maximum for repeat infringers is up to 10 years for commercially motivated ones and up to six years for noncommercial infringers."


http://www.unc.edu/~unclng/copy-corner66.htm

I'm sure she'd find a way to post press releases from jail, with all her spunk.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-25 02:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 04:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-04-25 08:04 pm UTC
I Think Sybilla's Identity Comes to the Fore - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 11:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-04-26 02:09 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-04-25 06:47 pm UTC (link)
Attention Artists: AV Paranormal is looking for a new cover image for Russet Noon. If you think your digital art captures the meaning behind Russet Noon, submit your pictures to blah blah blah...

Would someone please explain how we're supposed to know the meaning behind Rusty Moon Russet Noon without having read the damn thing.

And how exactly does one capture delusions of grandure and idiocy in the same image? Suggestions on a postcard please.

Cat1977

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 08:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-26 08:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]charamei, 2009-04-25 09:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 11:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-25 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-26 09:27 am UTC
WAIT WAIT WAIT
[info]ara
2009-04-25 06:56 pm UTC (link)
[info]caito IS A GUY?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Or not.. - [info]ara, 2009-04-25 06:58 pm UTC
Re: WAIT WAIT WAIT - [info]charamei, 2009-04-25 09:14 pm UTC
Re: WAIT WAIT WAIT - [info]twinno, 2009-04-25 10:10 pm UTC
Re: WAIT WAIT WAIT - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 01:26 am UTC
Russet =/= Russert
(Anonymous)
2009-04-25 08:23 pm UTC (link)
So I have to confess I am days late to the party because I ignored the previous entries thinking the internet was crazy for still carrying on about Tim Russert. How many other delightful things have I missed because me no read good?

c_boo

(Reply to this)



Page 13 of 16
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
[12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
>>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map