Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Caito Potato ([info]caito) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2009-04-21 18:42:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Prettiful
Entry tags:author entitlement, books that should be burned, can't escape the screencaps, conspiracy theories, crazy people, enormous clusterfuck, entitlement, fandom failures, fandom war, fandom: twilight, hypocrisy, i wanted to be wanked, i'm just here for the recipes, in ur wank - swapping our foodz, internet lawyers, internet psychologist, interrogating from the wrong perspective, look how much i don't care, not good with criticism, not very subtle at all, not you again, oh christ here we go again, omgwtf, oppression, persecution, person: laura hale, plucky girl detective, raised by hyenas, recipes in comments, self-publishing, she admitted it!, she's on a mission guys!, sockpuppets, taking it too seriously, thinks we're fandom police, this is the wank that never ends, this was no chicken, too many fucking tags, wankers who will not shut up, we love jf tags, whut, wikipedia, yay screencaps!, yummeh foodz

The Russet Doom Saga, Part IV
In Part III, we saw what happened when Lady Sybilla tried to tangle with the Twilight Lexicon mods for the last time (they banned her), and watched in awe as Wikipedia users worked "around the clock" to get her Russet Noon article deleted. You can still find "The Wikipedia Wars" linked on the Russet Noon website, but you'll have to scroll down past...

The FanHistory Wars.
A long, long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away....

Artistic revolution (who, for reasons which will become blatantly obvious, is a suspected sockpuppet of Lady Sybilla) edited the shit out of the Russet Noon fanhistory page. Artistic revolution has a pretty one-track mind, it would appear. Or two-track, if you count Lady Sybilla as a separate topic.

In the midst of all those edits, there was no shortage of information about me, Sybilla's own favorite "stalkarazzo." (I know I'm her favorite, she says so herself on the Russet Noon website.) The following information is culled from the Revision as of 00:27, 21 April 2009 version of the page.
Although Caito posted the email text on one of her many Journalfen pages, her only acknowledgment of Sybilla's concerns was: "I'm totally over this email business. I have a spam filter and I intend to use it. If someone wants to continue discussing this shiz, she can do so in the comments like everybody else." Strange reaction given that Caito's Whois record for her site openly discloses her gmail address:
At this point, Artistic revolution somehow thought it was appropriate to include my mailing address and contact information. Yes, in the middle of the article for Russet Noon. But that's not all! She did go on. I bolded my favorite parts!
More recently, Caito provided us with a video example of how the attention-whoring for which she mocks Sybilla is more contagious than a disease. Ironically, while she spends her valuable time making fun of the ''Russet Noon'' author for trying to exploit Stephenie Meyer's popularity, Caito, too, seems to be riding the wave of the ''Russet Noon'' obsession. And she does so quite gracefully. If it weren't for Caito, ''Russet Noon'' would have never achieved taboo status.

... On April 3, 2009, LadySybilla emailed Caito and asked her to stop her "online stalking activities." On this email, Sybilla warned, "If you don't, I will notify as many administrators as I have to until they take action." Sybilla then contacted the Journalfen technical support team to ask how she could contact an administrator in order to report libelous accusations posted by some of their users. But, instead of responding to Sybilla's concerns, the JournalFen support team (if, in fact, there is one) forwarded a copy of the email to Caito. This incident may or may not prompt internet users to wonder about the legitimacy of Journalfen. Is Journalfen an actual company? If it is, who are the tech support staff and/or administrators behind it?

... Judging by the look of things, it won't be Sybilla who will be profiting off of ''Russet Noon'' sales after all. Let's see what happens when Caito and her BFFs at Twilight Lexicon get their hands on a copy of the novel in September.
All that has since been nuked from the actual FanHistory page, and replaced with more evenhanded material. People here at FW went a little flaily for a bit, as a software snafu made it appear as though FH mod Sidewinder had been the one to add my personal info when she'd really just meant to take it down.*

Then the mods brought the hurt down on Artistic revolution, who has been banned from editing the wiki for two whole weeks! She's really sorry, though, guys. Please stop throwing stones at her, and let her catapult boulders at others in peace.

But it's not like Artistic revolution has been the only one tooling with it, either. Some anons got in and tweaked it ever so slightly, like changing the story summary simply to "OH JOHN RINGO NO!" Editing the Russet Noon article is temporarily locked to admins, due to anon vandalizing and a neutrality dispute.

Personal notes:
  1. I do not know what end anyone would hope to achieve by posting my address.
  2. I'm not BFFs or even BFs or even just Fs with the TwiLex mods, but I sure do like them more than I like Lady Sybilla.
  3. I have no clue how I would stand to profit from anything having to do with Russet Noon.
  4. I have no idea who Lee Thomas even is.
*Aside to FanHistory folks: Thanks. I really appreciate what you did. Do me one more solid? I did respond to Lady Sybilla's concerns about my "accusations", but I guess it got lost in the epic wave of comments. Like I said before, Lady Sybilla is welcome to come engage me in comments, but as far as I know she has yet to do so. Muchos gracias.

ETA
: Artistic revolution rides forth on teal deer to appeal to Laura's professionalism.

ETA 2: Laura responds!

ETA 3: The Russet Noon website is now basically a hate shrine dedicated to me and FH mod Sidewinder, complete with Photoshopped screencaps of me interacting with people I've never actually interacted with. Oh, and also my contact information.

You know, I'm starting to get the feeling that she doesn't take criticism very well.

ETA
4: From Artistic revolution's usertalk page:
I'm not interested in antagonizing you. You have been objective, but I still have to insist that Sidewinder, whoever she is, hasn't been. She might not have the same IP address as Caito, but her editing patterns are dubious. I have listed the evidence on my website because I'm blocked from doing so here. If I'm not allowed to edit the article, then at least Sidewinder should also be prevented from tampering with it any further.

All in all, as I said before, I'm not interested in antagonizing you. Based on your reasons for why Wikipedia blacklisted FH, I know you can understand how I feel in regards to Russet Noon. I have seen that your procedures reflect professionalism. This is why I appealed to that.

I sincerely apologized to both you and Tikatu, but never received a reply. At least at Wikipedia they lifted the ban. Sure, they deleted the article, but they were reasonable enough to lift the ban. I'm sorry if the procedure I followed to try to negotiate with you guys was not what you expected.

I would much rather have you delete the Russet Noon article altogether than to continue with this conflict.
Once again, it is not my intention to antagonize you.
So, yeah, Artistic revolution is almost certainly Lady Sybilla.

ETA 5
: The hate shrine is now down from the Russet Noon site. It's been replaced with a paragraph about how "the wars have ceased" and the rest is now ostensibly about the fanfic again.

ETA 4-24 7:22am Tokyo time
: In case anyone was wondering how Lady Sybilla was taking the news about Peter David's community parody-in-progress, here's the reaction from her twitter:
# it's an honor even though it's a satire, because Peter David is a very seasoned writer
4 minutes ago from web

# many fanfic writers of the net will be uniting to write Potato Moon. The creator is comic book author Peter David
4 minutes ago from web

# let's hope this communal novel will inspire many more to come. I'd love to see a serious thriller or drama like this
7 minutes ago from web

# communal novels are a new genre, there are not many of them that I know of. I'm very curious to read Potato Moon.
8 minutes ago from web

# I'm very proud to announce that Russet Noon has inspired a very unique parody, Potato Moon. It's a communal novel
8 minutes ago from web
The Russet Noon website has also changed. It no longer makes mention of any "wars" whatsoever.

ETA 7: "You are invited to read our latest press release, "Lady Sybilla: The Darth Vader of Fandom."* It appears that Russet Noon has already achieved taboo status without having even been released yet. That's what happens when a Darth Vader figure like Lady Sybilla is created. And now she's found a worthy opponent: Peter David."

*That link goes to a c&p in my journal. To view the original (and give LS more hits) click here.

ETA 8: Her tweeting continues, c&ped here.

ETA 9: The first part of Potato Moon is up... I have a FanHistory page now, and actually I kind of like it, especially the graphic and its caption... and yes, my little lolcats, you can has more ONTD.

ETA 10: She just updated the Russet Noon site again (screencapped here), linking to the articles that appeared on Comicmix and IMDB. (Except her IMDB link actually goes here, where you have to scroll down halfway down the page the relevant blurb.)

ETA 11
: Peter David's Potato Moon has its own Wikipedia page! It is a thing of true beauty and you will never, ever guess who started it. But to avoid the situation that occurred the last time she wrote articles on Wikipedia, she's asked another user to edit the Potato Moon article for her. And he is (adding links to the Potato Moon blog entries, at least)! He just wants to know more about who AV Paranormal is. This should go well, I think.

ETA 12: She's linked to something on the Wall Street Journal site now. What the lemonfresh hell?



Page 14 of 16
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
[12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
>>

(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-25 10:36 pm UTC (link)
Don't know if you're still updating the blog page on this, but I saw another entry from Why Is This Popular: http://whyisthispopular.com/2009/04/25/russet-noon-continued-continued/

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 05:23 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-26 09:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-27 12:09 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 12:21 am UTC

[info]emiweebee
2009-04-26 04:18 am UTC (link)
Man, it's disconcerting to see all the Sugitchis running around.

(Reply to this)


[info]darkecology
2009-04-26 05:44 am UTC (link)
PAD's spoof made it to iMDB News and Comicmix and LS updated russet-noon.com with it (OMG TOO MUCH SPLOOGE COLLIDING). I capped her page here for those who don't want to give her hits. (It is not a good cap; Photobucket is being poopy.)

Here is the iMDB article.

Here is the Comicmix article.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 05:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkecology, 2009-04-26 05:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 05:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkecology, 2009-04-26 05:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jedi_dwh, 2009-04-26 07:27 am UTC

tetradecimal
2009-04-26 05:55 am UTC (link)
I guess we weren't paying enough attention to her?

But since she hasn't brought out any real crazy yet, have some Space Invaders.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]melkahb, 2009-04-28 03:11 am UTC

[info]wuthers
2009-04-26 06:02 am UTC (link)
The timeline doesn't exactly match, but I thought Sybs claiming that Russet Noon will come out in September (originally wasn't she saying August?) was interesting, considering that's when all of the Big Bang fics are supposed to come out.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 06:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkecology, 2009-04-26 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 06:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkecology, 2009-04-26 07:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 07:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkecology, 2009-04-26 07:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 07:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkecology, 2009-04-26 07:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 07:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkecology, 2009-04-26 07:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wuthers, 2009-04-26 07:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 07:33 am UTC

[info]darth_buttocks
2009-04-26 06:51 am UTC (link)
Isn't utterly fitting that her IMDB screencap happens to features a banner ad for "Obsessed"?

Isn't it also interesting that her novel is getting next to no coverage within Twilight fandom? Just from Caito's link collection it's pretty obvious nobody whose an actual Twifan is paying this any attention.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 06:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darth_buttocks, 2009-04-26 07:38 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-26 07:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fern_on_fen, 2009-04-26 09:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-04-26 10:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-27 12:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darth_buttocks, 2009-04-27 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vzg, 2009-04-28 09:07 am UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-26 11:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-27 12:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-27 02:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-26 11:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-26 12:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-26 12:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-27 01:40 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 07:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-27 08:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-27 08:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-28 12:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-28 12:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-04-28 01:48 am UTC
Think There May be a Connection After All... - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 12:34 pm UTC
Re: Think There May be a Connection After All... - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 12:47 pm UTC
Re: Think There May be a Connection After All... - [info]sumire, 2009-04-27 12:58 pm UTC
Re: Think There May be a Connection After All... - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 11:48 pm UTC
Re: Think There May be a Connection After All... - [info]sumire, 2009-04-28 03:26 am UTC
Re: Think There May be a Connection After All... - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-28 03:29 am UTC
Re: Think There May be a Connection After All... - (Anonymous), 2009-04-28 06:33 am UTC

[info]isntitironic
2009-04-26 04:48 pm UTC (link)
I've always thought of your name as pronounced 'KY-toh', and now I realize I can't decide if it's 'KY-toh po-TY-toh' or 'KAY-toh po-TAY-toh'. Please enlighten me!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ghoulsis, 2009-04-26 05:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]twinno, 2009-04-26 07:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghoulsis, 2009-04-26 07:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]twinno, 2009-04-26 07:14 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-04-26 07:24 pm UTC (link)
LS obviously reads these comments and seems to think she's famous, so i thought i'd put her "fame" into a frame of reference, using google to compare how many results were returned. All these names were entered in speech marks (the bits in brackets werent entered).

Lady Sybilla 3,020
Professor Lesley Regan (british doctor) 3,500
Bess meisler (bit part actress) 4,030
Shay Astar (bit part actress) 17,500
Lorna Raver (bit part actress) 41,400
Vyto Ruginis (a bit part actor) 51,000
(the) Swine Flu 912,000
Davis Cameron (oposition leader in the UK) 1,410,000
Charles Manson 1,520,000
Jamie Oliver (chef) 2,500,000
Simon Cowell 4,150,000
Katie Price (topless model AKA jordan) 4,420,000
Osama Bin Laden 5,690,000
Tom Cruise 16,100,000
Jennifer Aniston 20,300,000
Brad Pitt 24,800,000
Rhianna 59,800,000

I did try to find someone or something less famous than Lady syb will less than 3,020 results, but i couldnt.

She's a legend in her own mind.

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to find someone less famous than Lady Syb. Lady Syb's over-inflated ego will self destuct in five seconds.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2009-04-26 07:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-26 08:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-26 10:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-04-26 10:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2009-04-26 11:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-04-27 03:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2009-04-27 10:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_tean, 2009-04-27 12:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_tean, 2009-04-27 01:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]athersgeo, 2009-04-27 01:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-27 07:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 10:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 11:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-28 12:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]insanitys_place, 2009-04-28 12:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vzg, 2009-04-28 09:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]keri, 2009-04-28 09:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]talec, 2009-05-02 03:40 am UTC

[info]jujubee
2009-04-26 08:41 pm UTC (link)
I stopped scrolling down to check the progress on this wank for a few days and it's doubled in size since then. Lady S, never stop wanking!

(Reply to this)


[info]fern_on_fen
2009-04-26 09:58 pm UTC (link)
On the one hand, the fact that she's posted
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<lj-user="caito">') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

On the one hand, the fact that she's posted <lj-user="caito">'s personal information is scary, and some of her behavior makes me think that she's seriously and genuinely mentally unbalanced.

On the other hand...this shit is funny, yo.

It's like a train wreck. Am I going to hell for enjoying this so much?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]fern_on_fen, 2009-04-26 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-26 11:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fern_on_fen, 2009-04-26 11:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yaysunshine, 2009-04-27 03:31 am UTC

[info]caito
2009-04-27 04:21 am UTC (link)
The Russet Noon wikipedia article was picked up by wapedia.mobi (the encyclopedia for mobile devices)... in vandalized form.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]darth_buttocks, 2009-04-27 04:32 am UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-27 11:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]theropicus, 2009-04-27 08:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-27 08:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]theropicus, 2009-04-27 08:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-27 08:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-27 08:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]twinno, 2009-04-27 08:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-27 08:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-27 08:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-27 09:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-27 09:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-27 09:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-27 09:24 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 11:58 am UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-04-28 06:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 08:48 am UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-27 11:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moljn, 2009-04-27 09:03 am UTC
from the soon to probably be deleted PM Wikipedia page
[info]ari_o
2009-04-27 08:56 am UTC (link)
"Google has forgiven him"

Google does absolution now?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: from the soon to probably be deleted PM Wikipedia page - [info]darkecology, 2009-04-27 09:01 am UTC
Re: from the soon to probably be deleted PM Wikipedia page - [info]sheep_n_wolf, 2009-04-27 10:36 am UTC
Re: from the soon to probably be deleted PM Wikipedia page - [info]ghostmaster, 2009-04-27 10:38 am UTC
Re: from the soon to probably be deleted PM Wikipedia page - [info]fern_on_fen, 2009-04-27 06:50 pm UTC
Re: from the soon to probably be deleted PM Wikipedia page - [info]sumire, 2009-04-28 01:48 am UTC

[info]killer_gopher
2009-04-27 08:58 am UTC (link)
FOR THE LOVE OF EVERYTHING just stop with the press releases, wiki articles, and write the damn fanfic. You are not better than any other 16-year-old emo (in your case emu is more appropriate) special snowflake that reeks of entitlement. Sadly, money could buy you a degree on paper, just not common sense. I mean, it lists Russet Moon as 384 pages long. If it is not written, how do you even know this shit? Or is this something you channeled through your Ouija board? Seriously, I want know.

Please, woman shut up long enough to write a paragraph that makes sense to someone other than the fucking voices in your head.

That is all. And yes, I blame the Zima for this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-27 09:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]twinno, 2009-04-27 06:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fern_on_fen, 2009-04-27 06:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 08:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-28 12:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fern_on_fen, 2009-04-28 01:43 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 07:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]killer_gopher, 2009-04-27 10:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 11:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]killer_gopher, 2009-04-28 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-28 12:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-28 12:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]killer_gopher, 2009-04-27 10:36 pm UTC
Google has forgiven him!
[info]realbooted
2009-04-27 10:35 am UTC (link)
It should forgive all of us too

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Google has forgiven him! - [info]ghostmaster, 2009-04-27 10:40 am UTC
Re: Google has forgiven him! - mockygogo, 2009-04-27 11:13 am UTC
Re: Google has forgiven him! - [info]realbooted, 2009-04-27 11:18 am UTC
Re: Google has forgiven him! - mockygogo, 2009-04-27 11:28 am UTC
Re: Google has forgiven him! - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 12:36 pm UTC
Re: Google has forgiven him! - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 12:38 pm UTC
Re: Google has forgiven him! - (Anonymous), 2009-04-28 01:58 am UTC
Re: Google has forgiven him! - [info]sheep_n_wolf, 2009-04-28 06:25 am UTC

[info]poisonyoulove
2009-04-27 10:56 am UTC (link)
Google didn't forgive him. Google knows all our sins, it just doesn't care.
It is the closest we have to a Universal Mind.

Still, someone had to do this:

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-27 11:56 am UTC (link)
Ahahaha, from the Peter David talkpage (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Peter_David):

"Fanfiction has nothing to do with reproducing professionally-produced works and distributing them en masse. Nightscream (talk) 19:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)"

Image

-annemjw

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-27 01:25 pm UTC (link)
Wikipedia, it's not your personal army Sybs. And here I thought she couldn't get any more insane/stupid/lulzy.

(Reply to this)


[info]darth_buttocks
2009-04-27 03:34 pm UTC (link)
It just came to me!

Lady Sybilla is not the Darth Vader of Fandom...

She's the Paris Hilton of Fandom!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]justjenn, 2009-04-27 03:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-04-28 04:47 am UTC

[info]themadscientist
2009-04-27 05:00 pm UTC (link)
This has to be a joke. Or a very cleverly-designed way to profit off of advertising hits.

No one devotes this much insanity to the Internet. No one. Except...

Is Lady S Chancery Stone? Are they BFFs?!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2009-04-27 08:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 11:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep_n_wolf, 2009-04-28 06:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-04-28 02:00 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 10:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-28 12:36 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-28 04:06 am UTC

[info]issendai
2009-04-27 06:04 pm UTC (link)
Here's the Potato Moon Wikipedia page--not the talk page, the actual informational page itself:

-----

I am requesting for one of the more experienced editors to consider starting this article. Below is the latest information:

[edit] Peter David's Potato Moon

Potato Moon is a satire to ridicule a fanfic novel called Russet Noon. Here's the link to Peter David's official website:

http://www.peterdavid.net/index.php/2009/04/20/potato-moon-rising/

And a press release on Google News: http://news.google.com/news?pz=1&q=russet+noon

He also has a new article that fanhistory.com just added, but I noticed you guys have that URL blacklisted, so I won't even send you the link. I didn't want to edit it myself, so I figured I'd add a request for it, since I tried contacting one of Peter David's more frequent editors and haven't received a response yet.

Please consider adding them because Peter David's popularity has skyrocketed thanks to this project and he's back on Google now. According to the Fan History article,

"RaceFail: Peter David was one of the professional authors who came under fire and criticism during Race Fail 2009, most specifically for a blog he posted on February 24, "Soooo...electing Barack Obama was an act of cowardice?" His name was added to the 'Author Shit List' proposed on March 8 by bridgetmkennitt."

And here's one more: http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/34502858.html

Anyways, Google has forgiven him thanks to his new project, Potato Moon. This is his career comeback. I just thought it might be important to mention. He's at the top of Google. Thanks.

Ladysybilla (talk) 00:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

-----

Wow. Way to prove that you totally understand Wikipedia's not for advertising, Sybs.

So, er... was Peter David's site ever blacklisted from Google to begin with? If it wasn't, what in hell do "he's back on Google now" and "Google has forgiven him" mean? It's like she thinks appearing at the top of a Google search isn't just a sign that someone wrote about you recently, it's a grand concatenator of the Opinion of the Internet. You're not a top search? The Internet says you're worthless! You're in the first spot? The Internet validates your existence, little pseudocelebrity!

...Actually, that would explain so much about her.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]fern_on_fen, 2009-04-27 06:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-27 07:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-27 07:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-28 12:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-28 01:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-04-28 01:50 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-28 06:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-04-27 10:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-28 02:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]argylespy, 2009-04-28 09:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2009-04-29 12:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lirazel, 2009-04-29 10:02 pm UTC

[info]ari_o
2009-04-27 07:03 pm UTC (link)
Twilight cake on cakewrecks...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-04-27 07:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-04-28 04:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep_n_wolf, 2009-04-28 06:48 am UTC
In one of the few instances where context actually makes something MORE funny...
(Anonymous)
2009-04-27 08:21 pm UTC (link)
Yes, Nightscream has added Lady S's links to the PAD page, but did anyone else take a look at in what context? They're citations for the following quote:

"David has spoken out about [...] against copyright infringement."

PWNED.

-Laughing Mouse

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Abridgement fail! - (Anonymous), 2009-04-27 08:24 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: OH GOD NO NOT ANOTHER ONE - [info]woodenleg, 2009-04-27 10:22 pm UTC
Re: OH GOD NO NOT ANOTHER ONE - [info]caito, 2009-04-28 12:44 am UTC
Re: OH GOD NO NOT ANOTHER ONE - [info]caito, 2009-04-28 12:39 am UTC
Re: OH GOD NO NOT ANOTHER ONE - [info]jkefka, 2009-04-28 12:41 am UTC

[info]lauchlen
2009-04-27 10:37 pm UTC (link)
Well, I searched for my user name thusly: "lauchlen" and got back about 1,730 results. Then I searched for my real name exactly (first and last) and got 137 results. Should be noted however, that 'lauchlen' is pretty popular and most of the results weren't for me specifically.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lauchlen, 2009-04-27 10:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-28 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-28 12:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2009-04-28 12:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-28 02:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lauchlen, 2009-04-28 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2009-04-28 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lauchlen, 2009-04-28 02:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]theropicus, 2009-04-28 05:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lirazel, 2009-04-29 10:09 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-04-28 01:51 am UTC (link)
LOL@that Wall Street Journal screencap she put on her website. She really doesn't understand the word negative, does she?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-28 02:44 am UTC



Page 14 of 16
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
[12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
>>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map