Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Caito Potato ([info]caito) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2009-04-21 18:42:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Prettiful
Entry tags:author entitlement, books that should be burned, can't escape the screencaps, conspiracy theories, crazy people, enormous clusterfuck, entitlement, fandom failures, fandom war, fandom: twilight, hypocrisy, i wanted to be wanked, i'm just here for the recipes, in ur wank - swapping our foodz, internet lawyers, internet psychologist, interrogating from the wrong perspective, look how much i don't care, not good with criticism, not very subtle at all, not you again, oh christ here we go again, omgwtf, oppression, persecution, person: laura hale, plucky girl detective, raised by hyenas, recipes in comments, self-publishing, she admitted it!, she's on a mission guys!, sockpuppets, taking it too seriously, thinks we're fandom police, this is the wank that never ends, this was no chicken, too many fucking tags, wankers who will not shut up, we love jf tags, whut, wikipedia, yay screencaps!, yummeh foodz

The Russet Doom Saga, Part IV
In Part III, we saw what happened when Lady Sybilla tried to tangle with the Twilight Lexicon mods for the last time (they banned her), and watched in awe as Wikipedia users worked "around the clock" to get her Russet Noon article deleted. You can still find "The Wikipedia Wars" linked on the Russet Noon website, but you'll have to scroll down past...

The FanHistory Wars.
A long, long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away....

Artistic revolution (who, for reasons which will become blatantly obvious, is a suspected sockpuppet of Lady Sybilla) edited the shit out of the Russet Noon fanhistory page. Artistic revolution has a pretty one-track mind, it would appear. Or two-track, if you count Lady Sybilla as a separate topic.

In the midst of all those edits, there was no shortage of information about me, Sybilla's own favorite "stalkarazzo." (I know I'm her favorite, she says so herself on the Russet Noon website.) The following information is culled from the Revision as of 00:27, 21 April 2009 version of the page.
Although Caito posted the email text on one of her many Journalfen pages, her only acknowledgment of Sybilla's concerns was: "I'm totally over this email business. I have a spam filter and I intend to use it. If someone wants to continue discussing this shiz, she can do so in the comments like everybody else." Strange reaction given that Caito's Whois record for her site openly discloses her gmail address:
At this point, Artistic revolution somehow thought it was appropriate to include my mailing address and contact information. Yes, in the middle of the article for Russet Noon. But that's not all! She did go on. I bolded my favorite parts!
More recently, Caito provided us with a video example of how the attention-whoring for which she mocks Sybilla is more contagious than a disease. Ironically, while she spends her valuable time making fun of the ''Russet Noon'' author for trying to exploit Stephenie Meyer's popularity, Caito, too, seems to be riding the wave of the ''Russet Noon'' obsession. And she does so quite gracefully. If it weren't for Caito, ''Russet Noon'' would have never achieved taboo status.

... On April 3, 2009, LadySybilla emailed Caito and asked her to stop her "online stalking activities." On this email, Sybilla warned, "If you don't, I will notify as many administrators as I have to until they take action." Sybilla then contacted the Journalfen technical support team to ask how she could contact an administrator in order to report libelous accusations posted by some of their users. But, instead of responding to Sybilla's concerns, the JournalFen support team (if, in fact, there is one) forwarded a copy of the email to Caito. This incident may or may not prompt internet users to wonder about the legitimacy of Journalfen. Is Journalfen an actual company? If it is, who are the tech support staff and/or administrators behind it?

... Judging by the look of things, it won't be Sybilla who will be profiting off of ''Russet Noon'' sales after all. Let's see what happens when Caito and her BFFs at Twilight Lexicon get their hands on a copy of the novel in September.
All that has since been nuked from the actual FanHistory page, and replaced with more evenhanded material. People here at FW went a little flaily for a bit, as a software snafu made it appear as though FH mod Sidewinder had been the one to add my personal info when she'd really just meant to take it down.*

Then the mods brought the hurt down on Artistic revolution, who has been banned from editing the wiki for two whole weeks! She's really sorry, though, guys. Please stop throwing stones at her, and let her catapult boulders at others in peace.

But it's not like Artistic revolution has been the only one tooling with it, either. Some anons got in and tweaked it ever so slightly, like changing the story summary simply to "OH JOHN RINGO NO!" Editing the Russet Noon article is temporarily locked to admins, due to anon vandalizing and a neutrality dispute.

Personal notes:
  1. I do not know what end anyone would hope to achieve by posting my address.
  2. I'm not BFFs or even BFs or even just Fs with the TwiLex mods, but I sure do like them more than I like Lady Sybilla.
  3. I have no clue how I would stand to profit from anything having to do with Russet Noon.
  4. I have no idea who Lee Thomas even is.
*Aside to FanHistory folks: Thanks. I really appreciate what you did. Do me one more solid? I did respond to Lady Sybilla's concerns about my "accusations", but I guess it got lost in the epic wave of comments. Like I said before, Lady Sybilla is welcome to come engage me in comments, but as far as I know she has yet to do so. Muchos gracias.

ETA
: Artistic revolution rides forth on teal deer to appeal to Laura's professionalism.

ETA 2: Laura responds!

ETA 3: The Russet Noon website is now basically a hate shrine dedicated to me and FH mod Sidewinder, complete with Photoshopped screencaps of me interacting with people I've never actually interacted with. Oh, and also my contact information.

You know, I'm starting to get the feeling that she doesn't take criticism very well.

ETA
4: From Artistic revolution's usertalk page:
I'm not interested in antagonizing you. You have been objective, but I still have to insist that Sidewinder, whoever she is, hasn't been. She might not have the same IP address as Caito, but her editing patterns are dubious. I have listed the evidence on my website because I'm blocked from doing so here. If I'm not allowed to edit the article, then at least Sidewinder should also be prevented from tampering with it any further.

All in all, as I said before, I'm not interested in antagonizing you. Based on your reasons for why Wikipedia blacklisted FH, I know you can understand how I feel in regards to Russet Noon. I have seen that your procedures reflect professionalism. This is why I appealed to that.

I sincerely apologized to both you and Tikatu, but never received a reply. At least at Wikipedia they lifted the ban. Sure, they deleted the article, but they were reasonable enough to lift the ban. I'm sorry if the procedure I followed to try to negotiate with you guys was not what you expected.

I would much rather have you delete the Russet Noon article altogether than to continue with this conflict.
Once again, it is not my intention to antagonize you.
So, yeah, Artistic revolution is almost certainly Lady Sybilla.

ETA 5
: The hate shrine is now down from the Russet Noon site. It's been replaced with a paragraph about how "the wars have ceased" and the rest is now ostensibly about the fanfic again.

ETA 4-24 7:22am Tokyo time
: In case anyone was wondering how Lady Sybilla was taking the news about Peter David's community parody-in-progress, here's the reaction from her twitter:
# it's an honor even though it's a satire, because Peter David is a very seasoned writer
4 minutes ago from web

# many fanfic writers of the net will be uniting to write Potato Moon. The creator is comic book author Peter David
4 minutes ago from web

# let's hope this communal novel will inspire many more to come. I'd love to see a serious thriller or drama like this
7 minutes ago from web

# communal novels are a new genre, there are not many of them that I know of. I'm very curious to read Potato Moon.
8 minutes ago from web

# I'm very proud to announce that Russet Noon has inspired a very unique parody, Potato Moon. It's a communal novel
8 minutes ago from web
The Russet Noon website has also changed. It no longer makes mention of any "wars" whatsoever.

ETA 7: "You are invited to read our latest press release, "Lady Sybilla: The Darth Vader of Fandom."* It appears that Russet Noon has already achieved taboo status without having even been released yet. That's what happens when a Darth Vader figure like Lady Sybilla is created. And now she's found a worthy opponent: Peter David."

*That link goes to a c&p in my journal. To view the original (and give LS more hits) click here.

ETA 8: Her tweeting continues, c&ped here.

ETA 9: The first part of Potato Moon is up... I have a FanHistory page now, and actually I kind of like it, especially the graphic and its caption... and yes, my little lolcats, you can has more ONTD.

ETA 10: She just updated the Russet Noon site again (screencapped here), linking to the articles that appeared on Comicmix and IMDB. (Except her IMDB link actually goes here, where you have to scroll down halfway down the page the relevant blurb.)

ETA 11
: Peter David's Potato Moon has its own Wikipedia page! It is a thing of true beauty and you will never, ever guess who started it. But to avoid the situation that occurred the last time she wrote articles on Wikipedia, she's asked another user to edit the Potato Moon article for her. And he is (adding links to the Potato Moon blog entries, at least)! He just wants to know more about who AV Paranormal is. This should go well, I think.

ETA 12: She's linked to something on the Wall Street Journal site now. What the lemonfresh hell?



Page 4 of 16
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
[12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
>>

(Post a new comment)


[info]galletas
2009-04-21 11:13 pm UTC (link)
I can't find this funny anymore. She's posting your personal information. I knew she was crazy, but daaaaaaaaamn.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-21 11:14 pm UTC (link)
It looks like her very own wank report to me. A very poorly done report at that because of all of the false information.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2009-04-22 12:16 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 12:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2009-04-22 12:54 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 01:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2009-04-22 12:58 am UTC
My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon
[info]ari_o
2009-04-21 11:14 pm UTC (link)



Prologue:

Potatoes don't do very much. They just kind of lie there. If you expose them to light they start to turn green--that's chlorophyll, but it's poison because potatoes are nightshades. Deadly nightshades! They also grow those creepy eye things. But every once in a while at noon some potatoes go bad. They grow fur and fangs and for almost sixty whole seconds they are able to rip out the throats of chickens and stoats--if those creatures happen to place their necks limply within tearing range (approximately .2 mm) of the were-potatoes jaws. Jacob was just such a potato with beautiful russet skin and dozens of knobby white eyes.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - [info]darkecology, 2009-04-21 11:18 pm UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - [info]argylespy, 2009-04-21 11:19 pm UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-21 11:23 pm UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-21 11:22 pm UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - (Anonymous), 2009-04-21 11:30 pm UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - [info]wuthers, 2009-04-21 11:31 pm UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - mockygogo, 2009-04-21 11:31 pm UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - [info]tofuknight, 2009-04-21 11:32 pm UTC
chapter two - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-21 11:36 pm UTC
chapter three - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-21 11:44 pm UTC
Re: chapter three - [info]tofuknight, 2009-04-21 11:46 pm UTC
Chapter Four, I think? - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-21 11:59 pm UTC
Chapter Five - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 01:11 am UTC
Re: Chapter Five - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-04-22 01:56 am UTC
Re: Chapter Five - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 03:44 am UTC
Re: Chapter Five - (Anonymous), 2009-04-23 10:58 am UTC
Re: Chapter Five - [info]_goblin_, 2009-04-22 06:23 am UTC
Re: Chapter Five - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 07:12 am UTC
Re: Chapter Five - [info]lexin, 2009-04-23 12:12 am UTC
Re: Chapter Five - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-23 12:53 am UTC
Re: Chapter Five - [info]lexin, 2009-04-23 07:05 pm UTC
Re: Chapter Five - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-23 07:07 pm UTC
Re: Chapter Four, I think? - [info]wankaholic, 2009-04-22 01:12 am UTC
Re: Chapter Four, I think? - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 01:20 am UTC
Re: Chapter Four, I think? - [info]sumire, 2009-04-22 01:45 am UTC
Re: Chapter Four, I think? - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 01:54 am UTC
Re: Chapter Four, I think? - [info]sumire, 2009-04-22 02:53 am UTC
Re: Chapter Four, I think? - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 10:50 am UTC
Re: chapter three - [info]sumire, 2009-04-22 12:17 am UTC
Re: chapter three - [info]lexin, 2009-04-22 12:51 am UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 10:48 am UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - [info]sneer, 2009-04-21 11:54 pm UTC
CHAPTER SIX SIX SIX - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 04:25 am UTC
Re: CHAPTER SIX SIX SIX - (Anonymous), 2009-04-23 11:02 am UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - [info]cyndra_falin, 2009-04-22 05:09 am UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 05:22 am UTC
CHAPTER SEVEN - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 07:03 am UTC
Re: CHAPTER SEVEN - mockygogo, 2009-04-22 08:27 am UTC
Re: CHAPTER SEVEN - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 11:00 am UTC
Re: CHAPTER SEVEN - [info]lukita, 2009-04-22 12:01 pm UTC
Re: CHAPTER SEVEN - [info]charamei, 2009-04-22 02:53 pm UTC
Re: CHAPTER SEVEN - [info]miss_padfoot, 2009-04-22 07:39 pm UTC
Re: CHAPTER SEVEN - [info]cyndra_falin, 2009-04-22 08:12 pm UTC
Re: CHAPTER SEVEN - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 08:58 pm UTC
Re: My tribute to Lady Sybilla's Russet Noon - [info]ladyvyola, 2009-04-22 07:06 pm UTC
CHAPTER EIGHT, EIGHT, I FORGET WHAT EIGHT WAS FOR (part one) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 09:53 pm UTC
CHAPTER EIGHT, EIGHT, I FORGET WHAT EIGHT WAS FOR (part two) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 11:03 pm UTC
Re: CHAPTER EIGHT, EIGHT, I FORGET WHAT EIGHT WAS FOR (part two) - [info]sumire, 2009-04-22 11:43 pm UTC
We've Moved! - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-23 02:44 am UTC
Re: We've Moved! - [info]caito, 2009-04-23 02:46 am UTC
Re: We've Moved! - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-23 03:40 am UTC

[info]astraev
2009-04-21 11:18 pm UTC (link)
Caito, are you okay? I have to go do stupid errands, but otherwise... let me know.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-21 11:51 pm UTC (link)
I love how she's not even remotely getting the concept of fandom wank. Clearly, Caito is writing the reports to share her incredible popularity, in hopes to have some as well! She really is a celebrity, after all. Bet you all are just jealous.

realbooted @ lj

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2009-04-22 03:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moongazingfae, 2009-04-22 05:43 pm UTC

[info]emiweebee
2009-04-21 11:58 pm UTC (link)
So, do we think the YouTubers comment was an intentional pun, or just a happy accident, or...?

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-22 12:00 am UTC (link)
"I'm not interested in antagonizing you. You have been objective, but I still have to insist that Sidewinder, whoever she is, hasn't been. She might not have the same IP address as Caito, but her editing patterns are dubious. I have listed the evidence on my website because I'm blocked from doing so here. If I'm not allowed to edit the article, then at least Sidewinder should also be prevented from tampering with it any further."

HAHAHAHAHAH! If there had been any doubt that Artistic revolution is Lady Sybilla, that confirms it straight from the talk page.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 12:07 am UTC
List of Strange Bedfellows Lady S Has Gotten Us
(Anonymous)
2009-04-22 12:05 am UTC (link)
-SMeyer
-Lee Goldberg
-Twilight Lexicon
-Fan History

You guys, I think I've figured it out! She's trolling for world peace!

(Adrian Veidt jokes in three... two... one...)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: List of Strange Bedfellows Lady S Has Gotten Us - [info]darkecology, 2009-04-22 12:07 am UTC
Re: List of Strange Bedfellows Lady S Has Gotten Us - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 12:15 am UTC
Re: List of Strange Bedfellows Lady S Has Gotten Us - [info]nonnyeve, 2009-04-22 01:10 am UTC
Re: List of Strange Bedfellows Lady S Has Gotten Us - [info]bleachedclouds, 2009-04-22 01:34 am UTC
Re: List of Strange Bedfellows Lady S Has Gotten Us - [info]finchbird, 2009-04-22 02:18 am UTC
Yes, I know how original quote goes... but - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 08:15 am UTC
Re: List of Strange Bedfellows Lady S Has Gotten Us - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 01:09 pm UTC
Re: List of Strange Bedfellows Lady S Has Gotten Us - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-04-28 06:51 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-04-22 12:17 am UTC (link)
........................dude. This has just gone from sort of not funny to scary. I'm seriously sorry she's plastering your info all over her site, Caito. That's just...yeah. That breaks so many rules, it's kind of sickening.

- Racetrack.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lissibith, 2009-04-22 01:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-22 01:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lissibith, 2009-04-22 03:42 pm UTC
Eww...
(Anonymous)
2009-04-22 12:18 am UTC (link)
Wow. Russet Noon's new page is really creepy in a "here is the actual person who is 'hating' on me and where she lives. Quick! Go hate on her!" sort of way. I love how she's making it personal.

Deadwood

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-22 12:22 am UTC (link)
I have to believe she must be violating parts of the TOS of her web host. Right? Please?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2009-04-22 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 01:15 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 12:49 am UTC
Why, yes. Yes, she is. - [info]issendai, 2009-04-22 02:03 am UTC
Re: Why, yes. Yes, she is. - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 02:17 am UTC
Re: Why, yes. Yes, she is. - [info]issendai, 2009-04-22 02:40 am UTC
Re: Why, yes. Yes, she is. - [info]shadowmonkey, 2009-04-22 03:19 am UTC
Re: Why, yes. Yes, she is. - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 03:34 am UTC
Re: Why, yes. Yes, she is. - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 03:34 am UTC
Re: Why, yes. Yes, she is. - [info]urpletastic, 2009-04-22 09:31 am UTC
Re: Why, yes. Yes, she is. - [info]merricat, 2009-04-22 03:08 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-04-22 12:29 am UTC (link)
Oh yeah, and has anybody else seen this? (perhaps it's been linked before. Sorry if so.)

Vampotato:
http://criscoh.xanga.com/686269067/item/

It seems fitting, somehow.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]goddessleila, 2009-04-22 04:33 am UTC

[info]shukkhy
2009-04-22 12:33 am UTC (link)
Ahahahaha! Can't! Stop! Laughing! Ahahahaha!

But I really do feel sorry for you, Caito, I hope the release of your name doesn't get you in some kind of trouble.

Still, the stuff she put on her website is ridiculous yet ridiculously hilarious.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-22 12:44 am UTC (link)
I think we should googlebomb #russetnoon until fandom wank is in the number one slot for searches for it

(Reply to this)

Dear Caito,
[info]reeve
2009-04-22 12:49 am UTC (link)
In lieu of sending cookies or Zima to Japan, I made you this. Hope Sugitchi approves:

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Dear Caito, - [info]caito, 2009-04-22 12:56 am UTC
Re: Dear Caito, - pastri_archy, 2009-04-22 03:04 am UTC

[info]cerridwene
2009-04-22 12:56 am UTC (link)
I'm so sending Caito boxes of cookies for putting up with all this crazy. Would send booze but not sure what customs might say about that.

(Reply to this)


[info]jujubee
2009-04-22 01:04 am UTC (link)
Any hopes of contacting her web host? Surely this can get her site shut down. But in the mean time I must go find cookies for Caito. I have to go to the post office tomorrow anyway!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 01:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2009-04-22 02:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-04-22 02:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-04-22 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-04-22 04:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-04-22 04:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-04-22 05:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2009-04-22 05:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-04-22 08:11 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 04:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 01:17 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beejium, 2009-04-22 01:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 01:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beejium, 2009-04-22 02:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-04-22 01:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-22 01:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-04-22 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2009-04-22 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-22 04:25 am UTC

[info]sockpuppeteer
2009-04-22 01:05 am UTC (link)
Honestly, is there anything we can do for you since you seem to be taking the Internet bullet on this one and really have don't nothing wrong.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-22 01:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ilinana, 2009-04-22 01:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-04-22 02:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-22 04:27 am UTC

[info]nonnyeve
2009-04-22 01:09 am UTC (link)
Pfft, and now she's asking for the article to be deleted. That's right, when you can't be smart, hide all evidence you did something stupid.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-04-22 01:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-04-22 01:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadwing, 2009-04-22 02:07 am UTC

[info]anonyrat
2009-04-22 01:10 am UTC (link)
Did...did she call you a PEDOPHILE?

This is so fucking surreal.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-04-22 01:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-04-22 01:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2009-04-22 01:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-04-22 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nonnyeve, 2009-04-22 01:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-04-22 01:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nonnyeve, 2009-04-22 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-04-22 01:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-04-22 01:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-04-22 01:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hickorydickory, 2009-04-22 06:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-04-22 01:53 am UTC

[info]lauchlen
2009-04-22 01:23 am UTC (link)
Oh. Oh. Ohhhh. My angry, Syb has turned it on. There are lines that should NOT be crossed. Holy shit.

I'm going to breathe for a bit because I have never wished for the ability to punch someone through my computer screen more than I do Right Now.

Posting Caito's contact information? Fuckin' eh, Syb, you have gone Way Too Far.

/rant

Partial topic change.

Caito, now that Syb's has so generously provided your contact information, what would you like me to send you? I'm in Canada, so if there's anything from here you like, do let me know.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]shinysandals, 2009-04-22 01:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lauchlen, 2009-04-22 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shinysandals, 2009-04-22 01:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lauchlen, 2009-04-22 02:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]atanvarne, 2009-04-22 03:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2009-04-22 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]atanvarne, 2009-04-22 03:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]randomsome1, 2009-04-22 06:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fern_on_fen, 2009-04-26 08:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2009-04-22 03:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lauchlen, 2009-04-22 04:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lauchlen, 2009-04-22 04:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-04-22 04:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-04-22 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_tean, 2009-04-22 09:04 am UTC
because journal_fen isn't doing well with new accounts - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 11:34 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-04-22 01:23 am UTC (link)
Usually just a lurker, but I thought I'd comment, since the wackjob also lurks here.

Lady Sybilla, No matter the degree to which you have deluded yourself into thinking otherwise, your (poorly) written "preface" is nothing more than fanfiction. Your attitude and complete ignorance (which leaves me to believe that you are far from as educated as you like to claim that you are) of fandom and copyright laws only makes you look foolish, if not utterly insane.

I don't know why you assumed that your fanfiction was somehow different from any other in the Twilight fandom (it isn't) or that you could become a BNF without actually doing anything, but you'll soon learn that copyright infringment is very real, and very much a punishable offense.

(Reply to this)


[info]_goblin_
2009-04-22 01:24 am UTC (link)
Case 1:
1. In complete ignorance of copyright law, burst into publishing in a blaze of self-promotion.
2. Be rude to everyone who politely tries to set you straight on the law.
3. Get your ass handed to you for being clueless.
4. Beg forgiveness in hopes of getting your way.
5. Because you've been nothing but rude, receive zero forgiveness.
6. Bitchily insist you're both persecuted and still right about everything.

Case 2:
1. In complete ignorance of the rules, burst into Wikipedia in a blaze of self-promotion.
2. Be rude to everyone who politely tries to set you straight on the rules.
3. Get your ass handed to you for being clueless.
4. Beg forgiveness in hopes of getting your way.
5. Because you've been nothing but rude, receive zero forgiveness.
6. Bitchily insist you're both persecuted and still right about everything.

Case 3:
1. In complete ignorance of the rules, burst into Fandom History in a blaze of self-promotion.
2. Be rude to everyone who politely tries to set you straight on the rules.
3. Get your ass handed to you for being clueless.
4. Beg forgiveness in hopes of getting your way.
5. Because you've been nothing but rude, receive zero forgiveness.
6. Bitchily insist you're both persecuted and still right about everything.

GLORIANNA, DO YOU SEE A PATTERN HERE?

WHEN THE SAME THINGS KEEP HAPPENING TO YOU, AGAIN AND AGAIN, WITH DIFFERENT PEOPLE, THAT MEANS THE PROBLEM IS YOU--NOT THE REST OF THE WORLD, NOT EVEN CAITO--IT'S YOU. GET HELP, YOU CRAZY BITCH.



*wipes off the spittle* Sorry. I'll go get a mop.



(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2009-04-22 02:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-04-22 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2009-04-22 09:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2009-04-22 03:11 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 11:37 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-24 04:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2009-04-22 03:11 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-04-22 01:25 am UTC (link)
Anyone else notice she spelled "official" wrong on her own damn website?

Screencapping, just in case.

Caito, really, you are a shining example of awesome and may there be a final nail in this wankpire's coffin soon.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-04-22 01:41 am UTC

[info]shukkhy
2009-04-22 01:26 am UTC (link)
I really think the best thing on her website is that she shopped in Lifejournal (yes, LJ!) comments from almost a month ago as a response to things Caito said like yesterday.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]naive_wanderer, 2009-04-22 01:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-04-22 01:51 am UTC


Page 4 of 16
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
[12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
>>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map