|
|
issendai (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} issendai) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} fandom_wank, |
Part II, because no one really appreciates your crazy until you make with the tl;dr
I thought Tikatu said the article was going to be blocked for some time. The only person that seems a little too interested in restoring public access to it is, once again, Sidewinder: "I'm for opening it back up eventually, but first making sure bias problems are addressed so it doesn't just turn into a grudge match and/or ongoing edit war."[4]
I wonder why Sidewinder has no problems with the unfounded accusations against Russet Noon's author in the article. She only resorts to reporting "bias problems" when the article tries to advocate a POV other than Caito's.
Laura, I am appealing to your professionalism. Please analyze the pattern in Sidewinder's contributions. Thanks.
Artistic revolution 16:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)</blockquote>
I thought Tikatu said the article was going to be blocked for some time. The only person that seems a little too interested in restoring public access to it is, once again, Sidewinder: "I'm for opening it back up eventually, but first making sure bias problems are addressed so it doesn't just turn into a grudge match and/or ongoing edit war."[4]
I wonder why Sidewinder has no problems with the unfounded accusations against Russet Noon's author in the article. She only resorts to reporting "bias problems" when the article tries to advocate a POV other than Caito's.
Laura, I am appealing to your professionalism. Please analyze the pattern in Sidewinder's contributions. Thanks.
Artistic revolution 16:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)</blockquote>
Post a comment in response:
