|
|
Caito Potato (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} caito) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} fandom_wank, |
Re: In Which Sybs Begs to Be Unbanned at FanHistory by Attacking the Moderators
Is it a coincidence that Caito herself has admitted to have been editing the Russet Noon article? If Sidewinder is not Caito, or one of Caito's sockpuppets, then what is Caito's username? Are you sure Sidewinder's account is not related to Caito's?
When did I admit to editing the Russet Noon article? FH mods, if you want my IP to compare it to the anon editors' IPs, you can have it, because I did not do that shiz. (I also have the IP address from the emails sent to me from the Russet Noon email address.)
Also, welcome to my seemingly endless stable of sockpuppets,sidewinder.
1. Caito has been editing the Russet Noon article to add a link collection that is openly biased against Russet Noon. 2. Caito is upset that the article now presents a "less wholly negative" perspective.
The way she jumps from my one sentence to both of these conclusions is more amazing that Superman's leaping tall buildings in a single bound.
Now that I have been blocked from editing articles here, Sidewinder steps in edits the article numerous times.
She's a mod there, she can do that. Get over it.
It is perfectly fine to document the negative attention that Russet Noon has received, but why is it that only the user who is trying to balance the article is the one that gets banned?
Including a personal attack on someone and adding their mailing address is not balanced in any sense of the word.
I know I made a mistake by posting Caito's whois information where it didn't belong, but it's not like I tried to add it again after you guys deleted it.
I don't even know what to say to that.
However, if I'm going to be banned from editing the article, then why is it that your biased administrators are still allowed to continue editing it?
Her bias only exists in your head. That doesn't make it real.
Is it a coincidence that Caito herself has admitted to have been editing the Russet Noon article? If Sidewinder is not Caito, or one of Caito's sockpuppets, then what is Caito's username? Are you sure Sidewinder's account is not related to Caito's?
When did I admit to editing the Russet Noon article? FH mods, if you want my IP to compare it to the anon editors' IPs, you can have it, because I did not do that shiz. (I also have the IP address from the emails sent to me from the Russet Noon email address.)
Also, welcome to my seemingly endless stable of sockpuppets,
sidewinder.1. Caito has been editing the Russet Noon article to add a link collection that is openly biased against Russet Noon. 2. Caito is upset that the article now presents a "less wholly negative" perspective.
The way she jumps from my one sentence to both of these conclusions is more amazing that Superman's leaping tall buildings in a single bound.
Now that I have been blocked from editing articles here, Sidewinder steps in edits the article numerous times.
She's a mod there, she can do that. Get over it.
It is perfectly fine to document the negative attention that Russet Noon has received, but why is it that only the user who is trying to balance the article is the one that gets banned?
Including a personal attack on someone and adding their mailing address is not balanced in any sense of the word.
I know I made a mistake by posting Caito's whois information where it didn't belong, but it's not like I tried to add it again after you guys deleted it.
I don't even know what to say to that.
However, if I'm going to be banned from editing the article, then why is it that your biased administrators are still allowed to continue editing it?
Her bias only exists in your head. That doesn't make it real.
Post a comment in response:
