Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



sablemouse ([info]sablemouse) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
Re: In Which the Moderator Shows She's Rooting for Sybs
I wonder why Sidewinder has no problems with the unfounded accusations against Russet Noon's author in the article. She only resorts to reporting "bias problems" when the article tries to advocate a POV other than Caito's.

I would really, really like to be in your corner. I would. Heck, my blog entry about it pretty much is biased in your direction of wanting to see what would happen if you succeeded in your goal. But comments like this are not helping your cause. While you've been banned from editing pretty much everything but your talk page, you could still have provided links to where she did that. You could have capped specific things in the history of the article that included bias, explained why providing primary source documents was biased... but you didn't. And on a wiki dedicated to documenting the history of fandom, when you provide no documentation and stopped making an effort yourself to be unbiased? That's kind of fail. --Laura 19:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

It is also a really cheap shot at User:Sidewinder who had previously worked towards integrating your information, your position, into the article in a cohesive way. You took some one who was willing to give your perspective a fair hearing, who left in things like "Money will go to charity," and tried to make it as unbiased as possible regarding the ownership of the domain and use of your cover art, and you attacked Sidewinder? Way to cut off your nose to spite your face. --Laura 19:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

If you thought the article was biased, then you could have... you know... followed the advice on the rules and tossed on a {{POV}}, commented on the talk page to explain where you saw the bias and asked us for help to fix that. And you know what? We would have happily done that for you. Just like we tried to do with the Rescue Ranger fans and the people contributing to the AdultFanFiction.Net article]]. We really try hard at what we do. We make mistakes. We learn from them. And we really want to help our contributor base. Seriously, if only you had contacted us and asked! --Laura 19:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map