Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



bigi (bigi) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2009-04-25 13:22:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:boo hoo, fandom: harry potter, fanfic, grudgewank, lurk moar, outraged mice, potter fandom will not be outwanked!, raised by hyenas, reviews, squid brains, suck it up and deal, the mice defend her, thinks we're fandom police, wanking inside the house, what the shit is this?

This wank is like an absurdist comedy
Thanks to the mousie who posted this on [info]wank_report.

[info]r_becca starts the Harry/Ginny fic exchange [info]takingitinturns. Things go well for the most part, despite a small kerfluffle during the exchange over reviews.*

As it turns out, that would not be the last review wank this exchange would see.

[info]almond_joyz posts When You Figure Out You, Come Back to Me as a gift to another participant. The fic receives positive reviews until [info]deadwoodpecker adds her two cents in a rather patronizing manner.

Highlights include her telling the author that their fic - a dramatic story - was an absolutely hilarious "absurdist comedy" and then finishing with this:

And that "ending"! To be honest, I've gotten lazy about endings as well. After writing 30 chapters of Yellow Submarine, I pretty much threw in the towel and said "no more." I think that in another month or two - when you aren't so burnt out - you'll probably find that your little story needs a resolution.


[info]almond_joyz responds in a calm fashion, explaining it was not a comedy and that she is happy with the fic as is.

Then three of [info]deadwoodpecker's friends decided to add their critical reviews, one after another, each pointing out the same flaws in the story. [info]birlan even goes so far as to delete a prior positive review to the fic and repost his review pointing out the same flaws his friends did.

Another of [info]deadwoodpecker's friends, [info]mhersheybar, coincidentally decides to post a rant about the right to leave concrit before anyone reacts. In this post, [info]deadwoodpecker decides it would be a good idea to mock the story and [info]almond_joyz shows up to tell her off. Sadly, [info]mhersheybar decided to disable comments but if anyone has a screencap, it would be much appreciated. IIRC it involved [info]deadwoodpecker showing up just to post *gives erotic massage to paralyzed girl* and LOLing about it.

Elsewhere on the internets, Deadwoodpecker and friends are called assholes, [info]almond_joyz flips her shit and [info]deadwoodpecker decides to mock the author and [info]r_becca some more while gearing up for a flounce.

Finally, Deadwoodpecker tries to explain herself. She was just being honest, you guys. And the old guard in H/G is oppressing the newbs.

* I mention the early kerfluffle because [info]deadwoodpecker was suspected of being behind the review, according to her. Edit: Or because it was a rumor going around!

ETA: The plot thickens...?

ETA II: More history! A while back, after [info]deadwoodpecker and her friends swept the H/G awards, [info]almond_joyz decided to hold her own awards.

And thanks to [info]mariem_1 for the files of [info]deadwoodpecker mocking the fic.

ETA III: More history still! [info]deadwoodpecker had a discussion with [info]loony4lupin during the [info]hp_porninthesun fest. This was over the fest rules which [info]deadwoodpecker assumed singled her out personally. [info]loony4lupin is also the person whose fic was mentioned above as having been trashed by an anonymous reviewer with [info]deadwoodpecker being the suspect.

Thanks, mice!


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-27 04:18 pm UTC (link)
I'm curious about the wording to this:

I mention the early kerfluffle because deadwoodpecker was suspected of being behind the review, according to her. It makes it sound like I made it up in my own head, while it was, in fact, coming from here (http://loony4lupin.livejournal.com/44909.html).

-deadwoodpecker

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-29 11:31 am UTC (link)
The entry you're linking to explicitly states that she had never accused you of being the person, or thought you were. In fact, she doesn't even know you. Shooting yourself in the foot, babe.

Someone else must have said it. Though everyone probably just assumed. That's what happens when you wank - get a bad rep. The assumption was not that hard to make considering you shit everywhere you go. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-05-01 08:33 am UTC (link)
Actually, I think if you read the original review that I left to loony's story, you'll find that I never accused loony for blaming me for the flame. Nor did I do so in any magic wankery post. But I did point out that I was blamed by luvscharlie and ragdoll in the comments to loony's post.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2009-04-29 10:28 pm UTC (link)
In which Loony4lupin specifically says she never said she suspected you and that she doesn't know you, yet you feel the need to link her post here at fandom wank. How very nice of you. I hope that drips with the sarcasm intended.

And was it any wonder you were suspected? After all, it certainly rings true with your past behaviour. From calling someone a rubbish writer at Smutty Claus to calling a Wizard Love submission a the shittiest piece of art ever-- really is calling something elephant turds that far outside the scope of your normal behavior? No, it's just not.

You were suspected for a reason... a well founded one. You're a bitch.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-05-01 08:49 am UTC (link)
So because she doesnt kiss ass she is a bitch?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-05-03 07:43 am UTC (link)
She wasn't being called a bitch for not kissing ass. I can respect someone for saying what they think. I can't respect someone who specifically goes over to fest after fest to call names and degrade gifts. She's been involved in three fests.

Fest one: Her comment was taken down when she called someone "a rubbish writer."
Fest two: Her comment was taken down when she called someone's work "the shittiest piece of art" she had ever seen.
Fest three: Is the subject of this entry on Fandom Wank.

She was being called a bitch because she is one.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-05-03 10:21 am UTC (link)
fest three: decided that she was the subject of the rules asking people to refrain from wanking and to behave in a civil manner

fest *four*: is the subject of this entry on Fandom Wank

and there was endless wanking in her personal journal about the mods of the first two fests and begging for attention in between all the fests.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map