Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Caito Potato ([info]caito) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2009-05-10 20:19:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:OMGWTF
Entry tags:author entitlement, books that should be burned, can't escape the screencaps, crazy people, enormous clusterfuck, fandom: twilight, far too complicated, heidipology, i don't know my rights, i see stupid people, i wanted to be wanked, i'm just here for the recipes, let's all get along, look how much i don't care, mommy make it stop, not very subtle at all, not you again, oh christ here we go again, plagiarism, reading comprehension whut?, she admitted it!, she's on a mission guys!, the davinci wank, this is the wank that never ends, tv tropes, wankers who will not shut up, we love jf tags, what is wrong with you people?, wikipedia, writers are often pompous douches, yay screencaps!, yummeh foodz

The Russet Doom Saga, Part V
So who's been wondering what's been going on with Lady Sybilla and the Russet Doom Saga? I know I haven't! But here we are regardless.

First there was this May 5 message to FanHistory editor Tikatu on her talk page:

Hi, Tikatu. I noticed you've been the most frequent editor of the Russet Noon article, so I'm sending you an update on the "Blood Roses" image by Charli Siebert. I just received an email from her, informing me that she does not want me to use her image for the cover of the book.

Charli wrote to Sybilla: "Unfortunately, I do not give out permission for use of my work in any way, so you'll have to find another cover for your book."

Charli also added, "All of your advertising and marketing of the book containing the image will need to be removed from any and all publications. This includes all print advertising and websites that display the image. If there are websites that you are aware of that are displaying the book cover in question, it is your responsibility to contact them and inform them that they need to remove the image from their site."

Based on Charli's specific request, I am asking that you please remove the old Russet Noon cover currently on display in the article. And, if it's not too much to ask, please add a note to the article to confirm that Russet Noon will have a new cover image before it gets published. Please let me know if you need me to upload a screencap of Charli's email as proof.

Last part of the update is that Charli and I are in negotiations to have her create a new image exclusively for the new Russet Noon cover.

Thanks very much.

Artistic revolution 07:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Consider also this newly-added apology on the Russet Noon website:
On behalf of AV Paranormal and Russet Noon, we'd like to offer our sincerest apologies to Charli Siebert, the creator of "Blood Roses," the above image. We had used this image for the cover of Russet Noon under the mistaken assumption that it was a royalty-free image. Even though this image will no longer be on the cover of Russet Noon, we are extremely proud to announce that Charli Siebert is in negotiations with Lady Sybilla to design an image exclusively for the cover of Russet Noon. We look forward to revealing the new cover of the novel. Please click on "Blood Roses" to visit Charli Siebert's official site, Unimaginative.org.
As for Wikipedia, it looks like Potato Moon's page is pretty safe from deletion for the moment. The article currently identifies Russet Noon by name, with the explanation, "Stephenie Meyer uses the word "russet" numerous times throughout the Twilight Saga to describe the color of Jacob Black's skin." You will never guess who edited the article to include that superfluous information. The change occurred after this conversational exchange:

Ladysybilla: "Hi, IceCreamEmpress. I was wondering if it would be possible to add a link to the Potato Moon section that acknowledges which fanfic the round robin is satirizing. The entry now only refers to Potato Moon, but it doesn't specify which announcement the round robin is satirizing. The only link listed is to Peter David's blog. Is this okay to do? Thanks."
IceCreamEmpress: "Thanks for your message. It seems to me that the entry has all the sourcing it needs at the moment, but of course if you would like the entry to read differently, you are always free to edit it; be assured that I have no feelings of ownership about it. Enjoy!"

Oh, and how is old PAD's circle jerk parody novel coming er, going? Well, it's up to, like, Part 20, but I haven't read it past the first chapter so I can't tell you whether it's any good.

And now, for funsies! Sybsy's now been namedropped in the Small Name Big Ego article on TVTropes.
Aaaaaand we now have the QUEEN of this trope for Twilight fandom: Lady Sybilla, whom no one had apparently ever even heard of before in the fandom before she became the writer (and attempted publisher) of "tribute sequel" Russet Noon, and convinced the entire internet is made up of one person with a grudge against her after the fandom at large and fandom_wank told her that her understanding of copyright was... flawed at best. She was banned from The Other Wiki after refusing to believe that her "highly controversial" unreleased fanfic wasn't notable enough and continually reinstated its article. Try to read the Russet Doom Saga in all its glory and not boggle.
And for a little added lubrication? Lady Sybilla Apologizes to Stephenie Meyer for Writing Russet Noon. Why yes, that IS another press release, fresh just today! I c&ped it here in case you don't want to contribute to her page views (and she'll probably take it down again as soon as she has another change of universal mind anyway). She's also updated her Twitter for the first time since April as well.

I just returned from a nine-day trip, so I'm playing a bit of catch-up with my supplementary links list and link hub/screencap guide; I appreciate your patience. And you know what else I appreciate? When I got home this morning, you will never guess what I found waiting for me in my mail box. Except that you totally will.

It was lip gloss.

ETA: So I clicked a link back to the Russet Noon site, and found myself in a time warp. It seems Sybilla's reverted to her original format after so long. But before you start thinking she just fuxxored the files, check out the links at the top. She links to: her own Twitter, Comic Mix, Google News, Foforks, Wordpress, her own Myspace, IMDB, Wikipedia, the Wall Street Journal, Twilight Blips, FanHistory, Fanpop, the Small Name Big Ego TvTropes article, Amazon forums, the reupload of her reading the preface on tinypic, Buzznet, ONTD, Fandom Wank, the Twilight Lexicon, and Edward Heart Bella.

Screencaps forthcoming here (thanks ari_o).

Also we may have missed another in-between site version. Did anyone catch a screencap?) You can view the last edit to the Russet Noon site before this latest revamp here, where she had added the "temporary model" for Russet Noon's new cover art.
Below is a temporary model of the new Russet Noon cover image that Charli will be recreating. The copyright information for the artist of this talisman is currently unknown. Hopefully the efficient fandomwankers will help us track down the artist who originally created this talisman so we can give them credit. This is just a sample image of what the final design will look like.
She wants us to do her homework for her. Great.

ETA 2: I'm reasonably certain the Russet_noon twitterer is taking the piss. I quite like the blend of Snacky's and Godwin's Law lobbed our way.

ETA 3: FanHistory has given Lady Sybilla a space to speak her point of view. It's... uhmazing.

ETA 4: She took out her link to the Twilight Lexicon and added a new one to this article from RelateMag.com, which spells the title of the book Russet Moon. Still, I prefer this version of the RelateMag article:
There’s a ‘new’ Twilight words that is dated people to charge alarming waves across the the public. Sure you’ve irrefutably impute to a fraction of fanfiction stories that takes the Twilight psycho we fondness and puts them in bizarre scenes, rewrites parts of the books, adds scenes prospect to be missing. The words is all fustian up to Jacob and what happens after Breaking Dawn. But Lady Sybilla has written an uninjured words entitled Russet Moon and she’s flourishing to advertise it. Some people improvise it is flourishing to be smashing addict fiction. Others imagine it is unconditionally miscarry. To affect the dip on the words button the website.
It's like it went through Babel Fish and crawled back out again, weeping bitterly about its lost messages and implications.



Page 2 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]lady_jafaria
2009-05-10 06:15 pm UTC (link)
FUCKING TVTROPES LINK. I have to go to work and then write six more pages of my paper, not get sucked into a trope vortex.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-05-11 07:28 am UTC

[info]lab_brat
2009-05-10 06:26 pm UTC (link)
I know I had no right to do this,

If you ask me to shut it down, I will do so immediately.

So... she admits she had no right to do that, but then implies she's gonna do it anyway unless specifically asked not to? I'm sure that will win SM over.

(Reply to this)


[info]issendai
2009-05-10 06:42 pm UTC (link)
Love how she's worded her "apology" so that if SMeyer doesn't tell her to stop, it's permission to go on. Mad fun fax, LadySybilla: Only actual, you know, permission is permission. SMeyer has to say it. Not just refrain from smiting you every time you peep.

Now shut the hell up and take your legal insecurity like a big fanficcer.

(Reply to this)


[info]duraniedrama
2009-05-10 06:49 pm UTC (link)
Maybe this was her plan all along--to get SMeyer's attention by pulling this stunt. But since no C&D letters have been forthcoming, now she's groveling and begging for one.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-10 08:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-05-10 08:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 01:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-05-11 07:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]taterbird, 2009-05-11 06:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]deadwood, 2009-05-11 09:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beachlass, 2009-05-12 03:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 01:26 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 01:36 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 01:47 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 09:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-05-11 07:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2009-05-11 11:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-05-11 03:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alcesx2, 2009-05-11 05:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miera_c, 2009-05-11 06:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alcesx2, 2009-05-11 06:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phasmas, 2009-05-11 07:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alcesx2, 2009-05-11 03:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]deadwood, 2009-05-11 09:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alcesx2, 2009-05-11 09:46 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-05-10 07:06 pm UTC (link)
Wait...am I still supposed to hate her? Idgi. She made things right with the artist she plaigirized and apologized to Meyer. She still seems like a fruitcake, which probably won't change because it was probably a part of her personality years before this whole thing started, but at least she seems to have learned her lesson (no matter how very long it took).

I love fresh wank especially when the wankers are still wanky, but I don't feel particularly inclined to throw rotten eggs and jeer at a dead horse.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]keiji_miashin, 2009-05-10 07:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-05-10 07:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-05-11 03:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-05-11 07:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-05-11 08:40 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-10 08:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-05-10 11:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 12:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-05-11 12:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catchester, 2009-05-11 12:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-05-11 12:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2009-05-10 08:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lexin, 2009-05-10 09:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 12:30 am UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-05-12 10:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-05-11 03:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2009-05-11 10:44 am UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-05-10 08:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2009-05-10 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2009-05-10 09:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2009-05-10 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]platedlizard, 2009-05-10 10:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2009-05-11 12:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vzg, 2009-05-11 02:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-10 10:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-10 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-10 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-10 10:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-10 10:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-05-11 12:26 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 08:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 08:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2009-05-11 12:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2009-05-11 07:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 08:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2009-05-11 08:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]reeve, 2009-05-11 03:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 04:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]reeve, 2009-05-11 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2009-05-11 08:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-05-12 10:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2009-05-10 11:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-05-10 11:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-05-12 10:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2009-05-11 02:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vzg, 2009-05-11 02:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-05-11 03:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vzg, 2009-05-11 03:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lissibith, 2009-05-11 11:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 04:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2009-05-11 08:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-11 06:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-12 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-12 02:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-12 03:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-12 03:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tikatu, 2009-05-14 12:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-14 12:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-05-11 07:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-12 09:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-12 09:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2009-05-12 04:49 pm UTC

[info]vitalitat
2009-05-10 07:16 pm UTC (link)
Twenty dollars says her next step is to try and find an e-restraining order against you for your stalking and then make a press release for it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-05-10 09:22 pm UTC

[info]insanitys_place
2009-05-10 07:23 pm UTC (link)
I'm somewhere between laughing and weeping at her "apology," if it can indeed be said to be an apology.


*Waits for the cannon to sound*

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-05-10 08:05 pm UTC (link)
Okay, so, it sounds to me like she's forgoing releasing the thing on her website now, in favor of printing copies to hand out. And I know we've all been screaming this question since, like, the dawn of time and whatnot, but why can't she just put it on ff.net or her website like every other fan out there? I don't get this need to have a physical book. Does she think it makes her fanfic more legitimate than all the other fanfics out there, just because she self published? It doesn't. Besides, if you're only going to print 50 copies, instead of putting it online, it's going to limit the amount of people who will be able to read it. If you put it on the internet, everyone can see it, and it's still free. Seems like if you want your novel to be seen by a lot of people, you'd do the smart thing and put it online.

But then, how often does she do the smart thing?

"First and foremost, I want to apologize to you for having started such an uproar. In all honesty, I never imagined there would be so strong and massive a reaction on the part of Twilight fans all over the Internet."

Also, I think it's hilarious that NOW she believes that SMeyer has been paying attention to her, after all those weeks of declaring that Meyer couldn't care less about what she was doing.

And as much as I want to believe that Meyer's lawyers have been circling this thing like a bunch of sharks, I do think it would be hilarious if Smeyer got this letter and was all, "I have no idea what this girl is talking about....Who is she? What is this book she's trying to print?" It would really put a damper on Sybilla's "I'm sure you know who I am by now" attitude. Also, why should Smeyer believe her when she says she's not going to try to sell it? She doesn't know her.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]the__ivorytower, 2009-05-10 10:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 01:13 am UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-05-10 11:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-05-11 08:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-11 06:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-05-11 08:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-05-11 02:32 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 03:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 03:25 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 03:43 am UTC

[info]eisoj5
2009-05-10 08:26 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, okay, so until now I'd been really good about NEVER EVER getting sucked into TVTropes. :P I had like twenty tabs open from it this morning (was on Big No when my husband woke up and wanted the computer back.) :P

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-05-10 08:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-11 06:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shinysandals, 2009-05-13 12:08 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-10 09:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bienegold, 2009-05-11 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-05-11 02:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bienegold, 2009-05-11 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-05-11 07:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eisoj5, 2009-05-12 04:32 pm UTC

[info]hickorydickory
2009-05-10 08:50 pm UTC (link)
We had used this image for the cover of Russet Noon under the mistaken assumption that it was a royalty-free image.

I was once arrested under the mistaken assumption that it was a free DVD player I carried off.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-10 08:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2009-05-10 11:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hickorydickory, 2009-05-11 01:06 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 06:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 07:43 am UTC
Whoops - [info]urpletastic, 2009-05-11 10:52 am UTC

mockygogo
2009-05-10 08:58 pm UTC (link)
On April 30th, Lady Sybilla sent a letter of apology to Stephenie Meyer. Today, the letter is declassified for the first time since it was sent.

oh lordy lordy, Lordy... that right there is the winnar. It officially cannot get any better than that.

Golf clap round of applause.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-10 09:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]robintcj, 2009-05-10 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miera_c, 2009-05-11 06:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-10 09:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hyeri, 2009-05-10 09:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamer_marie, 2009-05-10 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-11 06:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hyeri, 2009-05-11 07:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-05-10 11:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2009-05-11 07:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]taterbird, 2009-05-11 07:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-05-11 09:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-12 04:53 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-12 09:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deadwood, 2009-05-12 11:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2009-05-11 10:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]persephonelives, 2009-05-12 04:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2009-05-12 04:27 am UTC

[info]faultypremise
2009-05-10 09:02 pm UTC (link)
Oh. My. God.

So sending you more lip gloss for this.

Also, Russet makes me want to go make some potato casserole. Right now.

(Reply to this)


[info]ari_o
2009-05-10 09:11 pm UTC (link)
OMG! ZIMA/SUGITICHI OTP!!!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-05-10 09:20 pm UTC

[info]persona
2009-05-10 09:42 pm UTC (link)
It just keeps going and going and going and...

(Reply to this)


[info]dragonfangirl
2009-05-10 09:45 pm UTC (link)
When I got home this morning, you will never guess what I found waiting for me in my mail box. Except that you totally will.

It was lip gloss.


You should have let us guess.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-10 09:47 pm UTC

[info]lady_ganesh
2009-05-10 09:47 pm UTC (link)
At least you got lip gloss out of it!

(Reply to this)


[info]sumire
2009-05-10 10:05 pm UTC (link)
From Syb's press release:

According to blog reports, Stephenie Meyer's reps at Little, Brown in the U.K. are "well aware" of the novel already (http://twilight-to-breakingdawn.blogspot.com/2009/03/rus ...).

For this reason, Lady Sybilla made a final decision about Russet Noon and left its ultimate fate in Stephenie Meyer's hands. She wrote Ms. Meyer a letter of apology and let her know that she would be willing to shut down the project permanently if she asked her to.

The AV Paranormal team decided to give it a few days until the letter arrived at the New York office of Little, Brown to disclose it. Now, for the first time since the letter was sent on April 30th, 2009...


The blog report comment linked in Syb's press release:

OK the official UK reaction from Stephenie's Site:

"The US branch of Hachette Book Group are well aware of it and their legal team will be taking the necessary steps."

[commenter name]
March 27, 2009 6:03 PM


So, Syb, what was that month's worth of wankery all about, then?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-05-10 11:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 01:07 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 09:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deadwood, 2009-05-11 09:30 pm UTC

[info]_goblin_
2009-05-10 10:25 pm UTC (link)
I actually wailed in horror when I saw this, because every installment of this wank has shown great aptitude for eating my life.

Hmm, it's Sunday, isn't it?

Lady See-Bella is my o_O; I shall not want for wank. She maketh me to lie down in loling; she leadeth me beside myself in mirth.

Yeah, though I walk through the valley of TV Tropes, I will fear no time-wastage, for she commands my full attention; her cluelessness and egomania, they astound me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2009-05-10 11:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2009-05-11 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alcesx2, 2009-05-11 05:57 am UTC
O_o
(Anonymous)
2009-05-10 10:39 pm UTC (link)
http://twitter.com/russet_noon

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: O_o - [info]caito, 2009-05-10 10:45 pm UTC
Re: O_o - [info]insanitys_place, 2009-05-10 11:05 pm UTC
Re: O_o - (Anonymous), 2009-05-10 10:56 pm UTC
Re: O_o - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 12:27 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]sisterelwood, 2009-05-10 11:01 pm UTC
Re: O_o - [info]reeve, 2009-05-11 12:23 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]cyndra_falin, 2009-05-11 12:45 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]sarahbug, 2009-05-11 01:29 am UTC
Re: O_o - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 01:37 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]angelofstrange, 2009-05-11 06:53 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]boomstickjones, 2009-05-11 07:13 pm UTC
Re: O_o - [info]angelofstrange, 2009-05-12 12:18 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]boomstickjones, 2009-05-12 12:42 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]sarahbug, 2009-05-12 12:54 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]caito, 2009-05-12 01:08 am UTC
... - [info]sarahbug, 2009-05-12 01:18 am UTC
... - [info]caito, 2009-05-12 01:19 am UTC
... - [info]sarahbug, 2009-05-12 01:29 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]angelofstrange, 2009-05-12 03:09 am UTC
GIP - pastri_archy, 2009-05-11 02:21 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]beejium, 2009-05-11 05:43 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]miyabi, 2009-05-11 07:17 am UTC
Re: O_o - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 08:07 am UTC
Re: O_o - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 08:48 am UTC
Re: O_o - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2009-05-11 11:37 pm UTC

[info]demonbean
2009-05-10 10:58 pm UTC (link)
"I'm sorry my work is so overwhelmingly ~*popular*~ and ~*controversial*~!"

Oy.

(Reply to this)


[info]isntitironic
2009-05-10 11:15 pm UTC (link)
Lady Sybilla Apologizes to Stephenie Meyer for Writing Russet Noon

Hmm...

Lady Sybilla Desperately Hopes Stephenie Meyer Will Give Her Her Blessing To Write Russet Noon, And That Will Show Those Meanies?

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-05-10 11:40 pm UTC (link)
Hmmmm... Sybs was awful quiet while Caito was on vacation. Coincidence or EVIL PLOT?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]littlebittysami, 2009-05-11 12:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-05-11 12:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 12:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2009-05-11 08:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2009-05-11 11:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2009-05-12 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]keri, 2009-05-11 11:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2009-05-12 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]keri, 2009-05-12 01:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-12 12:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2009-05-12 12:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vzg, 2009-05-11 03:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-05-11 03:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-05-11 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mochibuni, 2009-05-11 06:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 06:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mochibuni, 2009-05-11 06:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-05-11 09:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 09:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-05-11 10:27 am UTC
... - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 10:35 am UTC
... - [info]irised, 2009-05-11 10:52 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 04:17 pm UTC
... - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-11 07:07 pm UTC
... - [info]sumire, 2009-05-11 07:22 pm UTC
... - [info]irised, 2009-05-12 12:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-05-11 07:05 pm UTC

[info]cyndra_falin
2009-05-11 12:49 am UTC (link)
I just bought more boxes of popcorn, so I'm set for this latest round.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]catchester, 2009-05-11 01:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]reeve, 2009-05-11 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]angelofstrange, 2009-05-11 07:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deadwood, 2009-05-11 09:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]angelofstrange, 2009-05-12 12:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deadwood, 2009-05-12 12:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]angelofstrange, 2009-05-12 03:08 am UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-05-12 10:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]angelofstrange, 2009-05-12 11:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2009-05-11 02:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catchester, 2009-05-11 03:10 am UTC

[info]darkecology
2009-05-11 12:56 am UTC (link)
OMG I thought it was over. I wonder if Charli Siebert knows that she is in negotiations, or if she just wanted the images removed like she said.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sarahbug, 2009-05-11 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2009-05-11 02:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2009-05-11 10:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-12 03:20 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-05-11 01:44 am UTC (link)
Hachette Book Group: Hey Stephanie, we got a letter from some chick wants to make 50 copies of her fanfic to give away for free. That cool?

Stephanie Meyer: What, she's printing them out at home and stapling them? What's she asking me permission for, how would I know if she did that?

Hachette Book Group: No, I think she wants them to look like real books

Stephanie Meyer: What's wrong with printing and stapling?

Hachette Book Group: We don't know, she's obviously unstable. She's just one person but she thinks she's a publishing house.

Stephanie Meyer: *sigh* Just ignore her, I'm too rich to deal with this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-05-11 06:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-05-11 06:27 am UTC


Page 2 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map