Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Caito Potato ([info]caito) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2009-05-10 20:19:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:OMGWTF
Entry tags:author entitlement, books that should be burned, can't escape the screencaps, crazy people, enormous clusterfuck, fandom: twilight, far too complicated, heidipology, i don't know my rights, i see stupid people, i wanted to be wanked, i'm just here for the recipes, let's all get along, look how much i don't care, mommy make it stop, not very subtle at all, not you again, oh christ here we go again, plagiarism, reading comprehension whut?, she admitted it!, she's on a mission guys!, the davinci wank, this is the wank that never ends, tv tropes, wankers who will not shut up, we love jf tags, what is wrong with you people?, wikipedia, writers are often pompous douches, yay screencaps!, yummeh foodz

The Russet Doom Saga, Part V
So who's been wondering what's been going on with Lady Sybilla and the Russet Doom Saga? I know I haven't! But here we are regardless.

First there was this May 5 message to FanHistory editor Tikatu on her talk page:

Hi, Tikatu. I noticed you've been the most frequent editor of the Russet Noon article, so I'm sending you an update on the "Blood Roses" image by Charli Siebert. I just received an email from her, informing me that she does not want me to use her image for the cover of the book.

Charli wrote to Sybilla: "Unfortunately, I do not give out permission for use of my work in any way, so you'll have to find another cover for your book."

Charli also added, "All of your advertising and marketing of the book containing the image will need to be removed from any and all publications. This includes all print advertising and websites that display the image. If there are websites that you are aware of that are displaying the book cover in question, it is your responsibility to contact them and inform them that they need to remove the image from their site."

Based on Charli's specific request, I am asking that you please remove the old Russet Noon cover currently on display in the article. And, if it's not too much to ask, please add a note to the article to confirm that Russet Noon will have a new cover image before it gets published. Please let me know if you need me to upload a screencap of Charli's email as proof.

Last part of the update is that Charli and I are in negotiations to have her create a new image exclusively for the new Russet Noon cover.

Thanks very much.

Artistic revolution 07:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Consider also this newly-added apology on the Russet Noon website:
On behalf of AV Paranormal and Russet Noon, we'd like to offer our sincerest apologies to Charli Siebert, the creator of "Blood Roses," the above image. We had used this image for the cover of Russet Noon under the mistaken assumption that it was a royalty-free image. Even though this image will no longer be on the cover of Russet Noon, we are extremely proud to announce that Charli Siebert is in negotiations with Lady Sybilla to design an image exclusively for the cover of Russet Noon. We look forward to revealing the new cover of the novel. Please click on "Blood Roses" to visit Charli Siebert's official site, Unimaginative.org.
As for Wikipedia, it looks like Potato Moon's page is pretty safe from deletion for the moment. The article currently identifies Russet Noon by name, with the explanation, "Stephenie Meyer uses the word "russet" numerous times throughout the Twilight Saga to describe the color of Jacob Black's skin." You will never guess who edited the article to include that superfluous information. The change occurred after this conversational exchange:

Ladysybilla: "Hi, IceCreamEmpress. I was wondering if it would be possible to add a link to the Potato Moon section that acknowledges which fanfic the round robin is satirizing. The entry now only refers to Potato Moon, but it doesn't specify which announcement the round robin is satirizing. The only link listed is to Peter David's blog. Is this okay to do? Thanks."
IceCreamEmpress: "Thanks for your message. It seems to me that the entry has all the sourcing it needs at the moment, but of course if you would like the entry to read differently, you are always free to edit it; be assured that I have no feelings of ownership about it. Enjoy!"

Oh, and how is old PAD's circle jerk parody novel coming er, going? Well, it's up to, like, Part 20, but I haven't read it past the first chapter so I can't tell you whether it's any good.

And now, for funsies! Sybsy's now been namedropped in the Small Name Big Ego article on TVTropes.
Aaaaaand we now have the QUEEN of this trope for Twilight fandom: Lady Sybilla, whom no one had apparently ever even heard of before in the fandom before she became the writer (and attempted publisher) of "tribute sequel" Russet Noon, and convinced the entire internet is made up of one person with a grudge against her after the fandom at large and fandom_wank told her that her understanding of copyright was... flawed at best. She was banned from The Other Wiki after refusing to believe that her "highly controversial" unreleased fanfic wasn't notable enough and continually reinstated its article. Try to read the Russet Doom Saga in all its glory and not boggle.
And for a little added lubrication? Lady Sybilla Apologizes to Stephenie Meyer for Writing Russet Noon. Why yes, that IS another press release, fresh just today! I c&ped it here in case you don't want to contribute to her page views (and she'll probably take it down again as soon as she has another change of universal mind anyway). She's also updated her Twitter for the first time since April as well.

I just returned from a nine-day trip, so I'm playing a bit of catch-up with my supplementary links list and link hub/screencap guide; I appreciate your patience. And you know what else I appreciate? When I got home this morning, you will never guess what I found waiting for me in my mail box. Except that you totally will.

It was lip gloss.

ETA: So I clicked a link back to the Russet Noon site, and found myself in a time warp. It seems Sybilla's reverted to her original format after so long. But before you start thinking she just fuxxored the files, check out the links at the top. She links to: her own Twitter, Comic Mix, Google News, Foforks, Wordpress, her own Myspace, IMDB, Wikipedia, the Wall Street Journal, Twilight Blips, FanHistory, Fanpop, the Small Name Big Ego TvTropes article, Amazon forums, the reupload of her reading the preface on tinypic, Buzznet, ONTD, Fandom Wank, the Twilight Lexicon, and Edward Heart Bella.

Screencaps forthcoming here (thanks ari_o).

Also we may have missed another in-between site version. Did anyone catch a screencap?) You can view the last edit to the Russet Noon site before this latest revamp here, where she had added the "temporary model" for Russet Noon's new cover art.
Below is a temporary model of the new Russet Noon cover image that Charli will be recreating. The copyright information for the artist of this talisman is currently unknown. Hopefully the efficient fandomwankers will help us track down the artist who originally created this talisman so we can give them credit. This is just a sample image of what the final design will look like.
She wants us to do her homework for her. Great.

ETA 2: I'm reasonably certain the Russet_noon twitterer is taking the piss. I quite like the blend of Snacky's and Godwin's Law lobbed our way.

ETA 3: FanHistory has given Lady Sybilla a space to speak her point of view. It's... uhmazing.

ETA 4: She took out her link to the Twilight Lexicon and added a new one to this article from RelateMag.com, which spells the title of the book Russet Moon. Still, I prefer this version of the RelateMag article:
There’s a ‘new’ Twilight words that is dated people to charge alarming waves across the the public. Sure you’ve irrefutably impute to a fraction of fanfiction stories that takes the Twilight psycho we fondness and puts them in bizarre scenes, rewrites parts of the books, adds scenes prospect to be missing. The words is all fustian up to Jacob and what happens after Breaking Dawn. But Lady Sybilla has written an uninjured words entitled Russet Moon and she’s flourishing to advertise it. Some people improvise it is flourishing to be smashing addict fiction. Others imagine it is unconditionally miscarry. To affect the dip on the words button the website.
It's like it went through Babel Fish and crawled back out again, weeping bitterly about its lost messages and implications.



Page 3 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>

(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2009-05-11 01:50 am UTC (link)
She has again updated the homepage of her website, with this statement:

"Below is a temporary model of the new Russet Noon cover image that Charli will be recreating. The copyright information for the artist of this talisman is currently unknown. Hopefully the efficient fandomwankers will help us track down the artist who originally created this talisman so we can give them credit."

~Tikatu

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 02:03 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 02:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 02:25 am UTC
Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]issendai, 2009-05-11 02:41 am UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]insanitys_place, 2009-05-11 02:43 am UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 02:52 am UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 05:07 am UTC
link of non-eyestabbing proportions - [info]ari_o, 2009-05-11 06:33 am UTC
Re: link of non-eyestabbing proportions - [info]alcesx2, 2009-05-11 03:31 pm UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]hickorydickory, 2009-05-11 05:44 am UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]jujubee, 2009-05-11 05:48 am UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]_goblin_, 2009-05-11 06:11 am UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]_goblin_, 2009-05-11 06:17 am UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]hickorydickory, 2009-05-11 06:39 am UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]issendai, 2009-05-11 07:02 am UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]hickorydickory, 2009-05-11 07:04 am UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]issendai, 2009-05-11 07:16 am UTC
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually - [info]cesare, 2009-05-13 09:27 am UTC
I'm Spartacus - [info]scarah2, 2009-05-11 03:30 am UTC
Re: I'm Spartacus - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-05-11 08:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-05-11 11:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-05-11 11:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonsong12, 2009-05-11 04:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-05-11 09:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 11:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]deadwood, 2009-05-12 03:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sadisticferret, 2009-05-12 06:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-05-12 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sadisticferret, 2009-05-13 12:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deadwood, 2009-05-13 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2009-05-13 09:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deadwood, 2009-05-13 10:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-12 01:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyvyola, 2009-05-13 07:46 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-05-11 01:59 am UTC (link)
Wow, is her website really ugly, or is it just me? Isn't she a web designer or something like that? It looks so unprofessional and cluttered. It's like my eye doesn't know where to go. I know, I know, look at who we're dealing with, etc.

Also, please don't associate Ralph Fiennes with this nonsense, Sybs. He is way too awesome to be pictured on your page. I'm offended on his behalf.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-05-11 02:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-05-11 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2009-05-11 03:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-05-11 03:05 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 04:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kookaburra, 2009-05-11 10:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2009-05-12 01:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miera_c, 2009-05-11 06:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]keri, 2009-05-11 07:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]boomstickjones, 2009-05-11 07:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adevyish, 2009-05-11 03:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-05-11 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]reeve, 2009-05-11 04:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2009-05-11 08:40 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 09:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-05-11 11:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deadwood, 2009-05-12 03:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]talec, 2009-05-13 12:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 03:48 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 07:09 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-05-11 02:08 am UTC (link)
How much do you want to be that if Stephanie Myer doesn't respond to that "apology" letter, Lady Sybilla claims her book has been endorsed for publication from the actual copyright holder?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 02:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2009-05-11 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]zanne, 2009-05-11 03:35 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-05-11 02:15 am UTC (link)
Also, I'm very curious to know where that cover image for Midnight Sun came from, since I didn't think Smeyer had chosen cover art for the book she hasn't written yet.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]keri, 2009-05-11 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-05-11 07:03 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 07:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]keri, 2009-05-11 07:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-05-11 07:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]keri, 2009-05-11 07:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-05-11 07:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2009-05-11 08:00 am UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-05-12 11:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 07:15 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 07:24 am UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-05-12 11:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]theropicus, 2009-05-16 04:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-05-16 04:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]theropicus, 2009-05-16 05:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-05-16 07:23 am UTC
... - [info]theropicus, 2009-05-16 07:33 am UTC
(no subject) - mockygogo, 2009-05-16 06:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]theropicus, 2009-05-16 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 09:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2009-05-11 11:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-11 07:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2009-05-12 12:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-12 03:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2009-05-12 10:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-05-13 03:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2009-05-13 04:18 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2009-05-14 11:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hyeri, 2009-05-11 07:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]insanitys_place, 2009-05-11 11:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-12 08:39 am UTC

mrs260
2009-05-11 02:17 am UTC (link)
It's probably too late now, with both the kerfuffle and her obvious desire for creator attention, but she's essentially proposing a fanzine. Just go low-rent for the printing and binding. She could even have sold copies without too much fuss if she'd just called it a fanzine.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 02:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2009-05-11 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2009-05-11 05:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 06:32 pm UTC
This is the knitting thread.
[info]negativecosine
2009-05-11 03:08 am UTC (link)
I knew this would get to another post eventually! Does anyone have the grand total of comments on this wankmonster? Because I really, really want a legitimate excuse to knit Sugitchi.

Also, any other wankas who knit/crochet should absolutely kibitz about yarn choice/patterning/etc. (And if I do knit him, I promise to write up a pattern.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]insanitys_place, 2009-05-11 03:13 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]negativecosine, 2009-05-11 03:14 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]jujubee, 2009-05-11 03:15 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]negativecosine, 2009-05-11 03:17 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]jujubee, 2009-05-11 03:18 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]negativecosine, 2009-05-11 03:19 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]kijikun, 2009-05-11 03:33 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]tephra, 2009-05-11 04:19 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]eilisliana, 2009-05-11 03:18 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]artimusdin, 2009-05-11 03:22 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 03:26 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]negativecosine, 2009-05-11 03:28 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]urpletastic, 2009-05-11 08:04 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 08:39 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-05-11 08:45 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]alcesx2, 2009-05-11 03:36 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 06:21 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]sumire, 2009-05-12 12:00 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-12 05:48 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]sumire, 2009-05-12 01:39 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - (Anonymous), 2009-05-12 08:54 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]sumire, 2009-05-12 06:56 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]sumire, 2009-05-12 09:39 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]keri, 2009-05-13 02:48 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]sumire, 2009-05-13 04:21 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]jujubee, 2009-05-13 05:25 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]sumire, 2009-05-13 05:55 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]jujubee, 2009-05-13 05:58 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-05-13 07:44 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]derryderrydown, 2009-05-11 01:33 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-11 07:37 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]waitwut, 2009-05-11 08:35 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]tachikoma01, 2009-05-11 09:26 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]princessstarr, 2009-05-12 06:59 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]derryderrydown, 2009-05-11 03:26 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-11 07:38 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-12 05:43 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]caito, 2009-05-12 05:44 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-12 06:26 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]deadwood, 2009-05-12 06:33 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-12 06:37 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-12 06:35 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]djinnj, 2009-05-12 06:05 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-13 03:07 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]djinnj, 2009-05-13 03:11 am UTC
... - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-13 03:17 am UTC
... - [info]sumire, 2009-05-13 04:00 am UTC
... - [info]caito, 2009-05-13 04:04 am UTC
... - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-13 04:44 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2009-05-13 07:20 pm UTC
... - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-14 04:27 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2009-05-14 06:39 am UTC
... - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-14 04:26 am UTC
... - [info]caito, 2009-05-14 04:29 am UTC
... - [info]sumire, 2009-05-14 06:10 am UTC
... - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-14 07:38 am UTC
... - [info]sumire, 2009-05-14 08:48 am UTC
... - [info]caito, 2009-05-15 02:20 am UTC
... - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-05-15 05:39 am UTC
... - [info]sumire, 2009-05-15 08:33 am UTC
... - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-05-15 09:30 pm UTC
... - [info]theropicus, 2009-05-16 04:33 am UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]sumire, 2009-05-28 12:07 pm UTC
Re: This is the knitting thread. - [info]caito, 2009-05-28 01:09 pm UTC

[info]catchester
2009-05-11 03:34 am UTC (link)
Hopefully the efficient fandomwankers will help us track down the artist who originally created this talisman so we can give them credit.

I'm sure the original artist would prefer cold, hard cash.

Doh! Forgot she's not keen on buying the rights to what she uses. My mistake.

And Lady Syb, i charge £17.50 ($26.60) per hour if you want to hire me to do your research for you.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-05-11 03:37 am UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-05-11 03:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2009-05-11 03:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catchester, 2009-05-11 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2009-05-11 03:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2009-05-11 03:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkecology, 2009-05-11 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sumire, 2009-05-11 04:31 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 08:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catchester, 2009-05-11 01:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 01:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]catchester, 2009-05-11 04:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 05:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]catchester, 2009-05-11 06:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2009-05-11 08:42 am UTC

[info]aycelcus
2009-05-11 03:48 am UTC (link)
You know, I was trying to decide between corn on the cob and baked potatoes to go with dinner tonight, and now I'm starting to feel like I made the wrong choice!

And the whole artist thing makes me feel skeevy. At least she is stopping from using the rose, but now she's got something else she doesn't know whether its under copyright? *SIGH* She will never learn. Never.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 03:57 am UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-05-11 04:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-11 07:42 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-05-11 03:58 am UTC (link)
I've been checking F_W regularly to see if Sybs has decided to entertain us some more. Thankfully, the Nut in Question does not disappoint.

Seriously...this is my favorite wank right now, and I can't fucking stand Twilight. >.>

hollydb @ livejournal.com

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cyndra_falin, 2009-05-11 05:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]syncopation, 2009-05-12 10:18 pm UTC

[info]beejium
2009-05-11 05:51 am UTC (link)
Hopefully the efficient fandomwankers will help us track down the artist who originally created this talisman so we can give them credit.

I think she's confused about who's doing the wanking here.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-05-11 05:51 am UTC (link)
Hm... I can't publish a book based on characters I ripped off, and I can't use the cover artwork I ripped off, so I'm gonna beg the artish whose work I stole draw a picture of a talisman some one else designed because it's not plagiarism if I switch from 3-dimensional icons to 2-dimensional renderings of said icons.

Also, I don't know how to credit, so I'm not gonna.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 05:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]some_dude, 2009-05-11 07:49 am UTC
Address Blocked Out
(Anonymous)
2009-05-11 06:17 am UTC (link)
So she blots out Stephenie Meyer's publisher's address that is right there on the the publisher's website for anyone to see, but she has no problem broadcasting Caito's address. 0_o

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Address Blocked Out - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 08:32 am UTC
Re: Address Blocked Out - [info]jkefka, 2009-05-11 08:31 pm UTC
Re: Address Blocked Out - [info]beejium, 2009-05-11 08:37 pm UTC

[info]miera_c
2009-05-11 06:34 am UTC (link)
Hopefully the efficient fandomwankers will help us track down the artist who originally created this talisman so we can give them credit.

"fandomwankers" - I do not think that word means what you think it means.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2009-05-11 06:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 06:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miera_c, 2009-05-13 05:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-05-13 08:15 am UTC
twitter
(Anonymous)
2009-05-11 07:07 am UTC (link)
"You're just like those mean girls in high school who married Hitler!"

BRB DYING!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: twitter - [info]darkecology, 2009-05-11 07:18 am UTC
Re: twitter - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 07:28 am UTC
Re: twitter - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 07:45 am UTC
Re: twitter - [info]tiki, 2009-05-11 08:30 pm UTC
Re: twitter - [info]caito, 2009-05-12 12:42 am UTC
Re: twitter - mockygogo, 2009-05-12 11:11 pm UTC
Re: twitter - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-11 07:45 pm UTC
Re: twitter - [info]boomstickjones, 2009-05-11 07:56 pm UTC
Re: twitter - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 08:43 pm UTC
Re: twitter - mockygogo, 2009-05-12 11:12 pm UTC
Re: twitter - [info]sarahbug, 2009-05-11 09:13 pm UTC
Re: twitter - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 11:49 pm UTC

[info]staroverthebay
2009-05-11 08:07 am UTC (link)
[info]caito: the heiress-apparent of [info]cleolinda? Goddamn, this writeup may not be very lulzy, that's only because I can't get my fucking brain around the batshit insanity of it all.

Looks like I'm going to have to look into this whole mess, because wow... I was blissfully unaware.

*sends lipgloss*

(Reply to this)


[info]sisterelwood
2009-05-11 08:11 am UTC (link)
Hopefully the efficient fandomwankers will help us track down the artist who originally created this talisman so we can give them credit.

No. You don't have enough money to pay for my time.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 08:23 pm UTC
More things she stole
[info]ari_o
2009-05-11 08:17 am UTC (link)
I found the Midnight Sun cover at Deviant Art. Those red things are flowers?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: More things she stole - [info]keri, 2009-05-11 08:23 am UTC
Re: More things she stole - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 08:30 am UTC
Re: More things she stole - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 12:20 pm UTC
Re: More things she stole - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 06:15 pm UTC
Re: More things she stole - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 06:35 pm UTC
Re: More things she stole - [info]lirazel, 2009-05-11 07:48 pm UTC
Re: More things she stole - tetradecimal, 2009-05-11 09:10 pm UTC
\o/
[info]misty
2009-05-11 09:53 am UTC (link)
Yaaaaaaay! *dance*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: \o/ - [info]caito, 2009-05-11 09:55 am UTC
Re: \o/ - [info]misty, 2009-05-11 09:58 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-05-11 10:17 am UTC (link)
"Please let me know if you need me to upload a screencap of Charli's email as proof"

*puzzled*

Proof of what, precisely? That Lady Sybilla was stealing a copyrighted image? I don't think other people need that proven to them.

lizzyann

(Reply to this)


[info]lukita
2009-05-11 11:22 am UTC (link)
Dear Lady Crazy Pants,

I found your new cover art.

C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Accessories\Paint.lnk

Yours Truly,
Some Random Artist

(Reply to this)


tetradecimal
2009-05-11 01:12 pm UTC (link)
On behalf of AV Paranormal and Russet Noon, we'd like to offer our sincerest apologies to Charli Siebert, the creator of "Blood Roses," the above image.

Wait, I thought AV Paranormal was Sybilla's imaginotastic make-believe company.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]catchester, 2009-05-11 04:47 pm UTC

[info]daisymay79
2009-05-11 01:22 pm UTC (link)
"I want to assure you that my only intention was to pay tribute to you and your story by turning Jacob into a superhero."
See now I want to read the thing, just incase she turns him into a superhero by giving him the ability to fly and a spandex super-paedo-wolf costume.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-05-11 02:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2009-05-12 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catchester, 2009-05-11 04:51 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-05-11 02:13 pm UTC (link)
I just... *wipes away tear*

It's so beautiful in its crazy!

This wank always makes my day that much better.

-annemjw

(Reply to this)

Hope your Golden Week was wank free at least, Caito.
[info]seca
2009-05-11 02:49 pm UTC (link)
I was hoping the silence was Lady Syb finally giving up. She's like the damn Energizer Bunny of wank with the way she just keeps going. (Though nowhere near as cute.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Completely unrelated - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 06:37 pm UTC
Re: Completely unrelated - (Anonymous), 2009-05-11 06:58 pm UTC
Re: Completely unrelated - [info]seca, 2009-05-12 12:06 am UTC
Re: Completely unrelated - (Anonymous), 2009-05-12 01:47 am UTC

[info]themadscientist
2009-05-11 03:30 pm UTC (link)
Correct me if I'm wrong but we haven't seen a major fauxpology in a while, have we?

Dear SMeyer: I'm sorry even though I am Jacob Black's astral plane wife! I know what I did was wrong but will you pleeeease let me write anyway? I'll even send you a copy with my own drawings so you can realize my genius and make it a REAL sequel!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]daisymay79, 2009-05-11 07:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2009-05-11 08:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-12 03:23 am UTC


Page 3 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map