|
|
The BOY whose CHICKEN YOU STOLE!!1 (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} hickorydickory) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} fandom_wank, |
Re: Not Getting It: Ur doin pritty gud, ackchually
It's only legal to use reference material if it's changed to the point that no one can recognize the original material. I know someone who was sued for publishing a drawing of a camera because the photographer who took the photo she used as a reference recognized it as his.
Plus, she used the word "recreating". Which would imply that the original design will be followed very closely.
It's only legal to use reference material if it's changed to the point that no one can recognize the original material. I know someone who was sued for publishing a drawing of a camera because the photographer who took the photo she used as a reference recognized it as his.
Plus, she used the word "recreating". Which would imply that the original design will be followed very closely.
Post a comment in response:
