|
| |||
|
|
The PR devils are at it again! Lifted in part from the anonymice at wank_report, with some added batshittery gleaned from links around my flist: The SPN J2 tinhats may not have quite reached the same level of insanity as their Domlijah counterparts just yet, but they're trying desperately to win the crown. Jared Padalecki and Jensen Ackles were guests at Asylum 2009 this weekend. They both brought their girlfriends (Genevieve Cortese and Danneel Harris, respectively), which prompted a lot of fury, misery, and handwringing right there (and this is just a tiny, tiny sampling-- spn_gossip is dripping with girlfriend hate), but more importantly, according to some reports Jensen mentioned that he's getting his own place (he and Jared spent the last year or so sharing a house), and said he loved Danneel and that they had recently adopted a dog together. Nothing particularly shocking or incendiary, unless your entire world view is shaped by the idea that Jared and Jensen are aggressively gay, deeply in love, and being forbidden from coming out by an evil PR empire (sound familiar)? But if that's your world view, well. Let's look at a sampling, shall we? First, we have 131408, the comm created to be a "safe place" for J2 tinhats (the name refers to the clothing shout-out Jensen and Jared supposedly gave their faithful--again, sound familiar?). ala-tariel doesn't understand how anyone can be upset by such obvious damage control (screencap in case of deletion):Come on girls!!! Don't be like that. What they did at the Asylum were merely damage controls. They had to keep anything back in line; that Jensen is actually dating D, there's no Jared/Jensen. vipersunjoy explains that PR is slavishy following the J2 tinhat community and forcing Jensen and Jared to modify their behavior accordingly:Jensen never attends D's events. Not onceJensen is also lying about the dog and anyone who reported that Jensen said he loved Daneel is merely a lying Daneel fan. prism2me wonders what the faithful's next course of action should be (screencap):Well, after being smacked in the faces by the PR play at Asylum, what happens next? Do we go on live journal lockdown or what? What is it about this smaill portion of fandom that is making the PR folks nervous? Granted, we're not the reporter that had to check mortgage facts, but was the fandom squee about this loud enough to wake up Hollywood?and goes on to explain: It seems like everytime we get some news that they are together, the PR hits the fan. It's like clockwork, and you can almost anticipate it. griva-x agrees:I've started follwoing this *circus* closely only last summer (oh, the happy days! :)) but already for these months I see an amazing *pattern* how every pic/piece of news that proves J2 are real, is followed by a pic of *gf* etc etc...Rumors are easy to plant in inet, some people believe *anything*, just like they believe anything they tell us on TV... Grow a brain already, if you dont trust your gut and dont see what's under your nose! (this is not directed at you, it's just an exclamation I have been repeating recently when my blood started to boil after the Oz and Aylum).And susannaheanes, whom you may remember from such wanks as We can't help being batshit! Jensen Ackles made us that way! and SPN Fandom: daring to choose insanity as a way of life and who apparently wants nothing more desperately than to become the new MsAllegro, single-handedly keeping Jensen and Jared alive with her love and light, also believes that her and her friend's posts and comments on the subject are having a huge, direct effect on Jared and Jensen's lives:I think in light of what happened, it might be good to lockdown. I'd rather go underground if it will take pressure off of the boys. Obviously a lot of their stress comes from what is on the Internet about them. There's a reason Jared said, "I hate the Internet." This makes me so sad I can't even. jameserin thinks the whole thing is just one more proof that Jensen and Jared are a couple and wishes people would use common sense and realize that everything Jensen and Jared actually do and say in public is a meticulously constructed lie (screencap of post with both comments). She also helpfully provides a list of the weekend's contradictions which somehow prove this to be true (screencap and page 2)Of course our very own susannaheanes has a bit more crazy to impart, explaining Jensen and Jared owe her the truth so she can support them properly, and that if they don't want to admit they're gay, they should least stop lying about being straight (this is actually closer to sane than I think we've ever seen from her, though the batshit shines through loud and clear through all the protestations, particularly in light of her comments that if Jensen and Jared aren't gay and a couple, their friendship proves they are homophobes who are oppressing gay people) (screencap):Personally? This is just my opinion so please just take it as that, but I think they're happiest when they're together; and this is based on the preponderance of the evidence. And I don't think anyone should place limits on that - except them. Where EVER those limits are. Only Jensen & Jared know what those are. But there are those of us out here who would kind of like to know, if only to SUPPORT THEM. We don't need details, but we'd really, REALLY like the truth. I mean, the girls are awesome, and all that - but if the girls are just friends and not girlfriends - GREAT. WE'LL STILL SUPPORT THEM. WE'LL SUPPORT ALL FOUR OF YOU. HONESTLY. There's a lot more, on 131408, spn_gossip, and various tinhat LJs, but that's all the crazy I can deal with for one day.As a special wank_report unfunny bonus, ETA: I forgot natiyachan's Discussion of Epic Gay Love, filled with so much crazy I'm not sure where to begin, though I particularly love the old-school photo analysis, and the comments are even more batshit than the original post (screencap and page 2)ETA, pt. 2: Did you know that writing wank reports with multiple links counts as stalking? And that posting crazy under your real name means you should have automatic immunity from being wanked, and reposting what someone said under their own name using that name is malicious outing like what happened to coffeeandink? Now you do. ETA, pt. 3: susannaheanes makes an appearance to fundamentally misunderstand FW's purpose and once again insist that wanking her is somehow breaking a comm rule, Added screencaps now since I'm going to have spotty net access for a day or two; just ignore if nothing gets flocked. Quotes without linked caps are comments included in the last linked cap. Post a comment in response: |
||||||||||||||
|
Privacy Policy -
COPPA Legal Disclaimer - Site Map |