Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



tetradecimal (tetradecimal) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2009-09-03 06:14:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:bitter so bitter, boo hoo, fandom entitlement, homophobia, oppression, serious business, suck it up and deal, videogames, yay screencaps!

How do you like hat?
We ask, and wank_report provides.

Team Fortress 2 is an online FPS game in which two teams made up of nine different classes attempt to blast each other into comical bloody oblivion. TV Tropes says it best:

"Two corporations erect fortresses 10 yards from each other and then send waves of men to kill each other to steal a briefcase out of the opposing fort's basement."

Now add hats, equipable items that were introduced earlier in the year that change the appearance of a character and serve no other purpose whatsoever. But they're rare drops, man -- you could be on for hours and not see hide nor hair of a precious, precious hat.

The solution to the problem, obviously, was to use an external program like Steamstats, which allows a player to simulate idling without actually having the game running.

Valve's reaction? YOUR HAT PRIVILEGES HAVE BEEN REVOKED. All hats awarded to idlers are removed, while all the non-idlers receive a shiny new hat in the form of an angelic halo. Also, the hat drop rate has been increased.

Cue the splooge.
"Valve, you are becoming something you never were. In the past, you only punished hackers - and rightly so. They harmed the community and made the game frustrating. But idling? Idling hurts no one (except, perhaps, Valve's ego). Idling is responding to an incentive. It's like punishing a donkey for moving when you wave a carrot in its face. "!

"If you are going to stop people from idling, please, TELL us you are going to be monitoring, then let us stop. If that doesn’t stop some people (and I guarantee you it won’t stop some) then punish those who’ve been told! It just feels like you’ve given someone a crappy burrito, then that bloke goes across the street and buys a better burrito (and possibly a sombrero) and eats it in front of you. At the end, you tell him you poisoned that burrito and reward the people content with your crappy burrito."

"The members of this group refuse to heal anyone wearing a halo untill Valve apologises for punishing and villainising idlers with no prior warning"!

"Ive noticed that people with halos get targeted first. I know i go for them first. I refuse to heal people with halos. I grief people with halos."

"All i want is a apology"

And so on. In fact, it's pretty much all anyone's talking about on the TF2 forums.

According to the original wank report, there's also a mod that "changes the halo to a neon sign saying 'FAG.'" But for some mysterious reason, Googling terms like "fag", "mod", and "halo" don't really turn up any useful results, so I'd be grateful if anyone could back that up with a link.

ETA: A picture and video of the mod in action! Truly, this is proof of time well-spent. Thanks, [info]empy.

In conclusion: hats!




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]dragonsong12
2009-09-03 03:48 pm UTC (link)
"Valve's reaction? YOUR HAT PRIVILEGES HAVE BEEN REVOKED. All hats awarded to idlers are removed, while all the non-idlers receive a shiny new hat in the form of an angelic halo. Also, the hat drop rate has been increased."

Oddly, I think this is a brilliant response an entirely fitting with TF2's style...even though it did lead to all this.

But can you really blame them? I mean seriously, how could they possibly enjoy the game without a bonk helmet? Have some sense, valve.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-03 06:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2009-09-03 06:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sneer, 2009-09-03 07:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2009-09-03 08:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]made_by_kali, 2009-09-03 10:51 pm UTC

[info]hypno_jango
2009-09-03 03:52 pm UTC (link)
I saw this yesterday and knew there would be some wank. I think Valve should apologize only when all the fans apologize for not knowing what private means on youtube. (Even when Valve reacted hilariously to that.)

*still crosses fingers for future Pyro's gender uber-wank*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]frk_kake, 2009-09-05 09:54 pm UTC
why doesn't Firefox suggest 'vilifying'?
[info]galateus
2009-09-03 04:03 pm UTC (link)
villainising idlers

My phantom red-pen won't stop twitching.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: why doesn't Firefox suggest 'vilifying'? - [info]lady_jafaria, 2009-09-03 06:50 pm UTC
Re: why doesn't Firefox suggest 'vilifying'? - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-09-04 08:40 am UTC

[info]froggimus_rex
2009-09-03 04:06 pm UTC (link)
Oh, how dare they reward people for doing the right thing and punish others for doing something wrong.

The sheer gall of it. I may develop a case of the vapours.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-09-04 05:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luthe, 2009-09-07 08:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]froggimus_rex, 2009-09-07 12:34 pm UTC

[info]miraba
2009-09-03 04:20 pm UTC (link)
I've been so good about not playing for the past week, but a new hat...

(Reply to this)


[info]chikane
2009-09-03 04:21 pm UTC (link)
WAAAH We were cheating but HOW DARE the company "flag us as cheaters" by not giving us those special hats WAAAH

And this is about ...hats? Come on...

(Reply to this)


[info]snacky
2009-09-03 04:28 pm UTC (link)
TV Tropes says it best

OT, but why is it called TV Tropes when it's not just about tv? I puzzle over this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ladypeyton, 2009-09-03 04:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - pastri_archy, 2009-09-03 04:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-09-03 04:56 pm UTC

[info]miraba
2009-09-03 04:33 pm UTC (link)
Now that I've spent a bit of time going through the thread...
There's an awful lot of "BAW I willing broke the ToS but didn't think they would care!"

(Reply to this)


[info]argylespy
2009-09-03 04:46 pm UTC (link)
It just feels like you’ve given someone a crappy burrito, then that bloke goes across the street and buys a better burrito (and possibly a sombrero) and eats it in front of you. At the end, you tell him you poisoned that burrito and reward the people content with your crappy burrito.

Man, gaming wanks always have the best nonsensical metaphors, it's almost like they try to outdo each other.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2009-09-03 05:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-03 06:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sneer, 2009-09-03 06:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tachikoma01, 2009-09-03 06:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2009-09-03 07:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-09-04 05:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2009-09-04 05:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]angelofstrange, 2009-09-06 08:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]taterbird, 2009-09-03 06:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beachlass, 2009-09-04 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shutthef_up, 2009-09-04 03:30 am UTC

[info]catmoran
2009-09-03 04:51 pm UTC (link)
The solution to the problem, obviously, was to use an external program like Steamstats, which allows a player to simulate idling without actually having the game running.

So... having your character on when the game isn't running helps you to get rare drops?

I am so confused.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-09-03 04:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2009-09-03 05:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]catmoran, 2009-09-03 07:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-09-04 01:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catmoran, 2009-09-04 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-09-07 06:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]farohji, 2009-09-04 04:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catmoran, 2009-09-04 04:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]farohji, 2009-09-04 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aliaras, 2009-09-06 08:43 pm UTC

[info]_goblin_
2009-09-03 05:15 pm UTC (link)
Oh, thank goodness; a wank report I didn't write. I was getting desperate there, man.

LOL, hats. I wanna halo, personally.

(Reply to this)


[info]jkefka
2009-09-03 05:37 pm UTC (link)
I think this is one of the most brilliant anti-exploit maneuvers I've ever seen. It's funny, it's cute, and goddamn it works. The wanking just makes it that much funnier, especially when you stop to consider that this is all over hats in a game where you are usually more concerned with keeping you head on.

Also I game I really want to buy and can't currently afford. Le sigh ><

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hypno_jango, 2009-09-03 05:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2009-09-03 07:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the__ivorytower, 2009-09-03 07:24 pm UTC

[info]empy
2009-09-03 05:41 pm UTC (link)
According to the original wank report, there's also a mod that "changes the halo to a neon sign saying 'FAG.'" But for some mysterious reason, Googling terms like "fag", "mod", and "halo" don't really turn up any useful results, so I'd be grateful if anyone could back that up with a link.

I don't even play the game, but I can never resist an opportunity to be helpful: picture of the modded halo. Bonus clip of it in action here. :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2009-09-03 07:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]empy, 2009-09-03 08:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - janegray, 2009-09-03 08:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]empy, 2009-09-03 09:41 pm UTC

[info]nonners
2009-09-03 05:58 pm UTC (link)
Donkeys? Burritos? Sombreros?

Someone has Mexico on the brain.

(Reply to this)


[info]sneer
2009-09-03 06:17 pm UTC (link)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2009-09-03 06:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sneer, 2009-09-03 06:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2009-09-03 08:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkling, 2009-09-03 08:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-09-04 07:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]portkey, 2009-09-06 08:05 am UTC

[info]meagenimage
2009-09-03 06:29 pm UTC (link)
Weekend TF2 player here with boring background. No thoughts on yaoi, promise.

There's two kinds of unlocks in TF2. Hats are the more recent one, but there's also alternative weapons for each class - which are sometimes new tactical options, and sometimes are an I Win Button against one particular other class.

At first the alt weapons were gained by unlocking Achievements, which only led to servers built specifically around earning Achievement credit instead of playing the damn game. So recently the "persistent weapons" were switched to have a chance of awarding for every twenty minutes spent playing the game.

Predictably enough, this led to players pretending they were playing the game (or "idling") in order to spend less time actually playing the game before earning their precious new weapons.

With this patch, *all* items earned by "idlers" were removed, including weapon unlocks.

Sidenote: there is apparently talk of shooting those who wear Halos first. That'll teach 'em to play the game instead of idling like everyone else, I guess. This in turn inspired some of my more metagame-minded friends to talk about putting Halos on characters like the big guy in front.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tachikoma01, 2009-09-03 06:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2009-09-03 09:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]farohji, 2009-09-04 05:17 am UTC

[info]bacon_lover
2009-09-03 06:40 pm UTC (link)
P.S. I'm simply going to ignore any posts along the lines of "ha, you lost your hats." Yes, I stand to lose half of my hats. No, it's not that big a deal to me.

This post-script came after an exceptionally long tl;dr. I love that this wanker felt the need to write a manifesto, and then e-mail it to Valve, all over something they don't care about. I'd love to see this poster riled up over a just cause; must be impressive.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sneer, 2009-09-03 06:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phasmas, 2009-09-03 08:09 pm UTC

[info]lissibith
2009-09-03 06:51 pm UTC (link)
My first reaction - AH HA HA HA HA CRY ENTITLED IDLERS!

My second reaction - now maybe I'll finally get an effing hat instead of another jar of sniper pee.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]the__ivorytower, 2009-09-03 07:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lissibith, 2009-09-03 07:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the__ivorytower, 2009-09-03 08:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]portkey, 2009-09-06 08:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shinysandals, 2009-09-03 07:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lissibith, 2009-09-03 08:00 pm UTC

[info]the__ivorytower
2009-09-03 07:26 pm UTC (link)
My first thought was, "I lewt teh hat."

My second was, *point* *laugh*

My third was, "I wonder if my boyfriend's Steam account ever earned one of those hats."

Most of the people I know play.

(Reply to this)


[info]hyaenid
2009-09-03 09:33 pm UTC (link)
Everything I want to say about this is really tl;dr, so I won't.

Instead: goddamn, Valve, get the trading system up already; I've got a buyer for my unused medal and I want to stop feeling guilty for having it.

Also, does anyone want one of my Backburners, Sandmen, or Huntsmen, in the somewhat rare case trading actually happens?

(Reply to this)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2009-09-03 09:47 pm UTC (link)
Wow, the stuff you miss when you're playing other things for a few months.

(Reply to this)


[info]ruaki
2009-09-03 10:34 pm UTC (link)
LOL Ragnarok Online players have been dealing with crap like this for years.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-09-04 12:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-09-04 01:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-09-04 07:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-09-04 11:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyofviolets, 2009-09-04 02:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2009-09-04 10:40 am UTC

[info]happyville
2009-09-03 11:15 pm UTC (link)
I should play more games like this instead of Zelda on a N64 emulator over and over again. I live in the past. :(

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sokudoningyou, 2009-09-04 12:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]happyville, 2009-09-04 01:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adevyish, 2009-09-04 01:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]happyville, 2009-09-04 01:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]reeve, 2009-09-04 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]happyville, 2009-09-04 02:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cazrolime, 2009-09-04 07:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]happyville, 2009-09-04 09:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2009-09-05 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fryingpanofdoom, 2009-09-07 07:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2009-09-08 08:02 pm UTC

[info]anonyrat
2009-09-04 01:16 am UTC (link)
I know a guy who idles for hats IRL, and I have had to put up with his hat-related whining for months.

This is going to make LAN parties at his place absolutely unbearable.

But I guess I will put up with it if Valve continues to win the internet on a regular basis like this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]empy, 2009-09-04 09:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]meagenimage, 2009-09-05 06:21 pm UTC

[info]maybebaby
2009-09-04 01:37 am UTC (link)
You know.. I have TF2. But I've never played it because I'm kind of online-game-phobic and scared I'll wind up with a bunch of assholes who'll give me shit for being both a n00b and female. This kind of makes me think I made the right choice. :/

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-09-04 01:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maybebaby, 2009-09-04 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-09-04 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maybebaby, 2009-09-04 02:24 am UTC
LET ME TRY THIS AGAIN. - [info]feenix, 2009-09-04 06:57 am UTC
Re: LET ME TRY THIS AGAIN. - [info]hyaenid, 2009-09-04 08:55 am UTC
Re: LET ME TRY THIS AGAIN. - [info]miraba, 2009-09-05 08:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caeliluminar, 2009-09-04 05:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-09-04 09:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caeliluminar, 2009-09-05 01:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-09-06 09:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caeliluminar, 2009-09-06 03:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-09-07 06:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hypno_jango, 2009-09-04 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maybebaby, 2009-09-04 01:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lissibith, 2009-09-04 03:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maybebaby, 2009-09-04 03:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lissibith, 2009-09-04 05:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maybebaby, 2009-09-04 05:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lissibith, 2009-09-04 06:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maybebaby, 2009-09-05 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ruslan, 2009-09-04 04:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maybebaby, 2009-09-04 04:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hyaenid, 2009-09-04 04:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maybebaby, 2009-09-04 05:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hyaenid, 2009-09-07 11:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]farohji, 2009-09-04 05:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maybebaby, 2009-09-04 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sionja, 2009-09-04 08:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maybebaby, 2009-09-05 01:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]angelofstrange, 2009-09-06 08:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maybebaby, 2009-09-06 12:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]angelan, 2009-09-08 03:52 am UTC


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map