Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



dreamworld ([info]dreamworld) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2009-12-01 12:36:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Romance Community Roust
Over on the Dear Author blog, they run a weekly feature where authors can send in their first page for critique. Last Saturday, readers were treated to a doozy [Link text NSFW] labled as a contemporary romance novel where the opening scene consisted of a fifty-six-year-old washed-up boxer receiving a blowjob from an anonymous woman. Comments were mixed, but tended towards the negative. Things began to heat up when the author of the piece showed up in the comments to defend her literary masterpiece.

My beta readers are almost all men: a straight guy from Cheshire, England, a gay man from Manchester, England, and two 30-something hunks from Milan and Brescia in Italy. They’ve allowed me to ask them anything about a man’s sexuality and have given me their opinions. Therefore, I’ve gotten very honest feedback from the male point of view on this scene... But, a comment about Teddy. he represents to me what fascinates us about some men. It explains the popularity of TV characters such as Dexter and House: multi-layered, flawed males who repel even while they interest us.


More back and forth from the commentors, some of whom are published authors results in more butthurt and perceived personal attacks.

And then, at the end, things get really interesting when someone named "kete" shows up, slams the romance genre as a whole, while admitting to never having actually read one, and referring to the author as PM, even though no initials for said author have ever been given. Sock-puppet? Nanny? Concerned beta-reader from Cheshire, England? Who knows? Kete attempts to backpedal but fails miserably in the attempt.

Sadly, Jane has just closed comments, so you'll have to enjoy what's there.


(Post a new comment)


[info]sarracenia
2009-12-01 08:03 pm UTC (link)
After reading that, I'm deeply curious if there are Christian erotic inspirational books where they dwell in loving detail on the sins before the hero gets redeemed.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-01 08:40 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-12-01 09:06 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]damnedfallacy, 2009-12-02 12:02 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]sqbr, 2009-12-02 06:37 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]platedlizard, 2009-12-02 07:44 am UTC
... - [info]amaltheia, 2009-12-02 10:03 am UTC
... - [info]kirsten, 2009-12-03 04:18 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-12-01 09:35 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]come_love_sleep, 2009-12-01 09:48 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-01 10:44 pm UTC
... - [info]white_serpent, 2009-12-02 12:11 am UTC
... - [info]cinnamonical, 2009-12-02 12:41 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-02 12:59 am UTC
... - [info]zara_zero, 2009-12-02 06:12 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-02 06:52 am UTC
... - [info]mechanicaljewel, 2009-12-02 07:47 am UTC
... - [info]risha, 2009-12-02 09:16 am UTC
... - janegray, 2009-12-02 06:03 pm UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-02 09:50 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]inalasahl, 2009-12-02 12:33 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 02:56 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-12-02 03:51 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]taterbird, 2009-12-02 07:35 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]come_love_sleep, 2009-12-02 08:49 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]shinysandals, 2009-12-01 10:20 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]issendai, 2009-12-01 10:26 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]shinysandals, 2009-12-01 10:34 pm UTC
... - [info]wankismyfandom, 2009-12-02 09:50 am UTC
as my mother claims: - [info]ustareth, 2009-12-02 01:27 am UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2009-12-02 01:48 am UTC
... - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-12-02 06:57 am UTC
... - [info]beccastareyes, 2009-12-02 04:51 pm UTC
... - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-12-03 07:09 am UTC
... - [info]tachikoma01, 2009-12-02 05:36 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 02:22 am UTC
... - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 02:26 am UTC
... - [info]shinysandals, 2009-12-02 04:07 am UTC
... - [info]vorpal_blade, 2009-12-02 05:23 am UTC
... - [info]shinysandals, 2009-12-02 04:11 am UTC
... - [info]shinysandals, 2009-12-02 04:13 am UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2009-12-02 03:14 pm UTC
... - [info]brennalarose, 2009-12-02 08:46 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 02:51 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-12-02 03:56 am UTC
... - [info]sharps, 2009-12-03 03:24 am UTC
... - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-12-03 04:27 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]shinysandals, 2009-12-02 04:00 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]duraniedrama, 2009-12-02 04:54 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]worstangel, 2009-12-02 05:35 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]mechanicaljewel, 2009-12-02 07:58 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]pariforma, 2009-12-02 04:57 pm UTC
... - [info]shinysandals, 2009-12-02 07:11 pm UTC
... - [info]mister_terrific, 2009-12-03 01:16 am UTC
... - [info]shinysandals, 2009-12-03 02:13 am UTC
... - [info]baskinglizard, 2009-12-02 07:12 pm UTC
... - [info]pariforma, 2009-12-02 07:16 pm UTC
... - [info]baskinglizard, 2009-12-02 07:21 pm UTC
... - [info]pariforma, 2009-12-02 07:24 pm UTC
... - [info]brennalarose, 2009-12-02 08:51 pm UTC
... - [info]pariforma, 2009-12-02 08:59 pm UTC
... - [info]mister_terrific, 2009-12-03 01:24 am UTC
... - [info]edelweiss, 2009-12-02 11:00 pm UTC
... - [info]brennalarose, 2009-12-02 11:21 pm UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2009-12-03 02:04 am UTC
... - [info]kookaburra, 2009-12-03 03:04 am UTC
... - [info]alana, 2009-12-02 11:34 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]issendai, 2009-12-01 10:40 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]adevyish, 2009-12-01 11:26 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]msmanna, 2009-12-02 12:38 am UTC
... - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-12-02 01:03 am UTC
... - [info]msmanna, 2009-12-02 01:25 am UTC
... - [info]rosehiptea, 2009-12-02 04:52 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 02:48 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-12-02 04:04 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]randomsome1, 2009-12-02 04:27 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]vorpal_blade, 2009-12-02 05:29 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]eleutheria, 2009-12-02 05:44 am UTC
... - [info]adevyish, 2009-12-02 10:32 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]risha, 2009-12-02 06:58 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]aliaras, 2009-12-02 01:34 pm UTC
... - [info]zumie_ashlen, 2009-12-02 01:45 pm UTC
... - [info]talec, 2009-12-26 06:03 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]the_mouse, 2009-12-02 09:52 pm UTC
... - [info]dodge_and_weave, 2009-12-02 10:30 pm UTC
... - [info]the_mouse, 2009-12-03 12:25 am UTC
... - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 11:20 pm UTC
... - [info]the_mouse, 2009-12-03 12:27 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]tsubaki, 2009-12-07 08:17 pm UTC
... - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-08 03:48 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-01 10:44 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]inalasahl, 2009-12-02 12:49 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-02 01:01 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]aliaras, 2009-12-02 04:51 am UTC
... - [info]miera_c, 2009-12-02 05:13 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]iamnotyourmuse, 2009-12-02 05:02 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-02 05:11 am UTC
... - [info]adevyish, 2009-12-02 10:33 am UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2009-12-02 03:19 pm UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-02 09:49 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]goddessleila, 2009-12-02 06:01 am UTC
... - [info]shinysandals, 2009-12-03 01:06 am UTC
... - [info]goddessleila, 2009-12-03 01:52 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]inalasahl, 2009-12-02 12:47 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 02:30 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]becktionary, 2009-12-02 05:30 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]sarracenia, 2009-12-02 02:05 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 02:36 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]caveat_lect0r, 2009-12-02 03:03 am UTC
... - [info]pattypleb, 2009-12-02 06:40 am UTC
... - [info]mechanicaljewel, 2009-12-02 08:04 am UTC
... - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 08:23 am UTC
... - [info]aliaras, 2009-12-02 06:43 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]mechanicaljewel, 2009-12-02 08:02 am UTC
... - [info]researchgrrrl, 2009-12-03 03:01 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]akedhi, 2009-12-02 05:23 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]jyuu, 2009-12-02 06:54 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 08:29 am UTC
... - [info]akedhi, 2009-12-02 04:51 pm UTC
... - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 09:23 pm UTC
... - [info]akedhi, 2009-12-02 09:26 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]caveat_lect0r, 2009-12-02 03:01 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]feenix, 2009-12-02 03:47 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-12-02 04:21 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]eleutheria, 2009-12-02 05:54 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]risha, 2009-12-02 07:32 am UTC
... - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 08:36 am UTC
... - [info]feenix, 2009-12-03 01:50 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]caveat_lect0r, 2009-12-02 10:10 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]shinysandals, 2009-12-03 01:18 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]seanchaigirl, 2009-12-02 06:01 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]caveat_lect0r, 2009-12-02 10:05 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 08:33 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]caveat_lect0r, 2009-12-02 10:06 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]yotz_fen, 2009-12-03 04:50 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]kookaburra, 2009-12-03 08:51 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]caveat_lect0r, 2009-12-04 02:36 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]feenix, 2009-12-02 03:40 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 08:39 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]feenix, 2009-12-02 12:45 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]mcity, 2009-12-02 04:37 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]seanchaigirl, 2009-12-02 05:53 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]lizzypaul, 2009-12-02 08:45 am UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]mister_terrific, 2009-12-02 06:46 pm UTC
Re: tl;dr about Christian Romance - [info]baskinglizard, 2009-12-02 07:16 pm UTC
... - [info]mister_terrific, 2009-12-02 07:49 pm UTC

[info]narcissam
2009-12-01 08:05 pm UTC (link)
Because romance readers are almost all men, huh? ;-)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-01 10:46 pm UTC

[info]lizzypaul
2009-12-01 08:14 pm UTC (link)
Good lord, that was a terrible sex scene.

All the people who praised her writing style kind of blew my mind. If that was the first page of a fanfic I would hit the back button--and not just because of the lousy blow-job scene, but because of the writing in general.

I know my writing is not that great. I've got a couple first pages that I love, but that I would never let see the light of day because I know my skills are not quite there yet. Now I feel like I should post over there just for the validation. :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smashingstars, 2009-12-02 01:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miera_c, 2009-12-02 05:04 am UTC

[info]anonyrat
2009-12-01 08:15 pm UTC (link)
The ex-world champion boxer-turned-music mogul was enjoying the most fantastic blowjob of his entire fifty-six years.

Is Dan Brown writing this? Jesus.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2009-12-01 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2009-12-01 08:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luxshine, 2009-12-01 09:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fionnabhair, 2009-12-01 09:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2009-12-02 02:21 am UTC
... - [info]fionnabhair, 2009-12-03 08:26 pm UTC
... - [info]cjk, 2009-12-03 08:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smashingstars, 2009-12-02 01:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2009-12-02 02:20 am UTC
... - [info]smashingstars, 2009-12-02 04:19 am UTC
... - [info]puipui, 2009-12-02 12:48 pm UTC
... - [info]rhosyn_du, 2009-12-02 09:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kirsten, 2009-12-02 01:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]risha, 2009-12-02 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-12-02 02:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2009-12-02 02:19 am UTC
... - [info]adevyish, 2009-12-02 10:37 am UTC
... - [info]cjk, 2009-12-02 12:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-12-02 07:11 am UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-12-02 02:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wisdomeagle, 2009-12-02 06:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-12-03 02:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-01 10:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]misachan, 2009-12-02 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]argylespy, 2009-12-02 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2009-12-02 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]argylespy, 2009-12-02 04:12 am UTC
... - [info]hallidae, 2009-12-02 04:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2009-12-02 07:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nursewretched, 2009-12-02 05:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2009-12-02 06:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]come_love_sleep, 2009-12-02 08:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2009-12-03 12:19 am UTC

[info]shinysandals
2009-12-01 08:16 pm UTC (link)
'“Man-heaven” worked for me…but may I suggest “Man-chantment”?'

Well crap, now I'm just looking for an excuse to use that term.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]anarchicq, 2009-12-01 08:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dez_chan, 2009-12-01 09:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparkysrevenge, 2009-12-01 09:27 pm UTC
... - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2009-12-01 10:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]anarchicq, 2009-12-01 10:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-01 10:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2009-12-02 01:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2009-12-02 12:11 am UTC

[info]jupiterpluvius
2009-12-01 08:18 pm UTC (link)
I am so bummed that Jane closed those comments, because I was very proud of my Spunky Girl Detection of the shill comment. "Oh, someone must have called her PM" doesn't fly when, in fact, nobody has called her PM.

That was the shittiest writing ever, and the writer has a real Ch*ncery St*ne complex going. OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE NO SENSE OF HUMOR BECAUSE WE DON'T FIND SLEAZY BLOWJOBS AND INFODUMPS ENCHANTING!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-12-02 05:32 am UTC

tetradecimal
2009-12-01 08:30 pm UTC (link)
Teddy Wilson was in Man-Heaven.

...

BWAAAAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA! AHA! Ha! Aha. Oh, wow.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]anonyrat, 2009-12-01 08:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-12-01 09:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparkysrevenge, 2009-12-01 09:30 pm UTC
... - [info]the__ivorytower, 2009-12-01 09:38 pm UTC
... - [info]magnolia_mama, 2009-12-01 10:11 pm UTC
... - [info]oxfordcomma, 2009-12-02 12:10 am UTC
... - [info]ymfaery, 2009-12-02 12:15 am UTC
... - [info]solesakuma, 2009-12-02 12:16 am UTC
... - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-12-02 07:19 am UTC
... - [info]adevyish, 2009-12-02 10:40 am UTC
... - [info]magnolia_mama, 2009-12-02 01:03 pm UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2009-12-02 01:30 am UTC
... - [info]miraba, 2009-12-02 07:22 am UTC
... - [info]adevyish, 2009-12-02 11:06 am UTC
... - [info]brennalarose, 2009-12-02 09:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-12-01 10:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]goddessleila, 2009-12-02 06:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2009-12-01 08:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dives, 2009-12-01 09:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-01 10:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2009-12-02 12:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2009-12-02 07:52 pm UTC

[info]bobgenghiskhan
2009-12-01 08:39 pm UTC (link)
Eh, the excerpt isn't very good, but there's not enough wank here. The sockpuppets and butthurt were just showing up when Jane closed the comments.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-12-01 10:32 pm UTC

[info]phosfate
2009-12-01 08:56 pm UTC (link)
“Oh baby,” he hummed, slipping mindlessly away from his faith.

I just...what? What? What does that even I don't know...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]randomsome1, 2009-12-01 09:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]willywanka, 2009-12-01 10:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]msmanna, 2009-12-02 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2009-12-02 12:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2009-12-02 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-12-02 07:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-02 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]randomsome1, 2009-12-02 04:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-02 04:39 am UTC
... - [info]randomsome1, 2009-12-02 04:56 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-02 05:12 am UTC
... - [info]randomsome1, 2009-12-02 05:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2009-12-02 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-02 05:12 am UTC
... - [info]plazmah, 2009-12-02 05:15 am UTC
... - [info]poisonyoulove, 2009-12-02 06:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-12-02 07:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-02 08:06 am UTC
(no subject) - janegray, 2009-12-02 06:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyvyola, 2009-12-03 04:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-03 05:30 am UTC
Oh, how I wish comments hadn't been disabled.
[info]varethane
2009-12-01 09:03 pm UTC (link)
Also.

From the author:

My main love scenes are very much like your example, only more so.

....bluh? And, what is with the random italics said author keeps using in her posts?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Oh, how I wish comments hadn't been disabled. - [info]frau_eva, 2009-12-02 02:21 am UTC

[info]magnolia_mama
2009-12-01 09:10 pm UTC (link)
Man, Dear Author has been a real vortex of wank lately.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jujubee, 2009-12-02 09:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2009-12-02 01:18 pm UTC

[info]lab
2009-12-01 09:11 pm UTC (link)
It explains the popularity of TV characters such as Dexter

I alsway thought that Dexter's popularity was explained by Michael C. Hall's hotness.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]xturtle, 2009-12-01 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2009-12-01 11:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]delineated, 2009-12-02 03:35 am UTC

[info]gmth
2009-12-01 09:31 pm UTC (link)
Wow, that's a whole bunch of shitty writing, right there. I mean, "He was lost in a world of wetness and warmth — like a scorching summer day in the middle of July, and he was her favorite freezer pop." Really?

I'm amazed at how many of the commenters are saying they like it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-12-01 09:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]randomsome1, 2009-12-01 09:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2009-12-02 09:14 pm UTC
... - [info]randomsome1, 2009-12-02 09:22 pm UTC
... - [info]brennalarose, 2009-12-02 09:27 pm UTC
... - [info]alana, 2009-12-03 12:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2009-12-01 10:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2009-12-02 12:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bienegold, 2009-12-02 12:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2009-12-02 09:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dives, 2009-12-01 09:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]youngcurmudgeon, 2009-12-02 03:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rani, 2009-12-01 11:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]argylespy, 2009-12-02 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rani, 2009-12-02 05:32 am UTC
... - [info]argylespy, 2009-12-02 05:35 am UTC
... - [info]brennalarose, 2009-12-02 09:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2009-12-02 09:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]misachan, 2009-12-03 12:26 am UTC

[info]rani
2009-12-01 10:43 pm UTC (link)
According to them, Man-Heaven is a real place for all men – gay or straight – and it begins on the tip of their penis.

It's like Narnia.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2009-12-01 10:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rani, 2009-12-01 11:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yanderelove, 2009-12-01 11:36 pm UTC
... - [info]alana, 2009-12-03 12:19 am UTC
... - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2009-12-03 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2009-12-03 06:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]delarina, 2009-12-02 03:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]randomsome1, 2009-12-02 04:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2009-12-02 01:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - janegray, 2009-12-02 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mister_terrific, 2009-12-02 06:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2009-12-03 02:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]risha, 2009-12-02 07:53 pm UTC

[info]willywanka
2009-12-01 10:43 pm UTC (link)
The ex-world champion boxer-turned-music mogul

ALL PRAISE THE BACK BUTTON.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2009-12-01 10:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2009-12-02 09:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tsubaki, 2009-12-07 08:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]agilebrit, 2009-12-03 03:12 am UTC

[info]panthea
2009-12-01 11:32 pm UTC (link)
Man, if you're gonna open your novel with a blowjob scene, let Christopher Brookmyre show you how it's done. (Well, more of a dissertation on blowjobs than the actual act itself. But still. All hail the Brookmyre.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]miraba, 2009-12-01 11:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2009-12-02 12:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2009-12-06 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2009-12-06 04:20 pm UTC

[info]yanderelove
2009-12-01 11:34 pm UTC (link)
It is probably terrible that all I can think is "hey I'm from Cheshire, England! And my dad grew up in Manchester! And half my family is from Milan!! Golly gosh."

That being said I'm imagining a stereotypical straight Manchester man admitting to reading a romance novel and it is amusing me to no end.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]alienist, 2009-12-02 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2009-12-02 03:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bienegold, 2009-12-02 04:29 am UTC
... - [info]seanchaigirl, 2009-12-02 06:19 am UTC
... - [info]bienegold, 2009-12-02 06:20 am UTC
... - [info]littlest_lurker, 2009-12-02 07:53 am UTC
... - [info]bienegold, 2009-12-02 07:56 am UTC

[info]singe
2009-12-02 01:45 am UTC (link)
Hmmm, there was someone named 'Kete' in the LOTR fandom (years ago) and these two Ketes sound similar.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ms_hypocrite, 2009-12-02 10:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-12-02 03:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ms_hypocrite, 2009-12-02 08:05 pm UTC
... - [info]sumire, 2009-12-03 08:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2009-12-02 07:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ms_hypocrite, 2009-12-02 08:07 pm UTC

[info]sparklepuss
2009-12-02 05:26 am UTC (link)
This story is the first in a 4-book series I’ve written.

Are we sure this isn't Chancery Stone?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-12-02 05:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparklepuss, 2009-12-02 05:40 am UTC

[info]pattypleb
2009-12-02 07:04 am UTC (link)
I'm not feeling the urge to read the wank, so anyone want to give me the odds that at least two of her beta readers are actually twelve-year-old girls?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]oddplaces, 2009-12-14 07:40 am UTC

[info]platedlizard
2009-12-02 09:55 am UTC (link)
Surprised this made it and not Jane's RWA membership application being being turned down.

(Reply to this)


[info]honorh
2009-12-02 10:44 am UTC (link)
Why would you have gay men beta your het romance? I mean, sure, a gay man who's also a grammar whiz can help you clean up your writing style, but if you're writing for the het romance market, you're essentially writing for straight women, who are not gay men. Wouldn't it be better to get a straight woman's opinion on whether the romance works? And who cares how hunky your gay betas are!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2009-12-02 05:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2009-12-02 05:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2009-12-02 07:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2009-12-03 12:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_jafaria, 2009-12-03 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]agilebrit, 2009-12-03 08:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2009-12-06 06:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]agilebrit, 2009-12-06 07:15 am UTC
(no subject) - redwarrior, 2009-12-04 01:50 am UTC

[info]shadowmonkey
2009-12-02 02:46 pm UTC (link)
I... why are there people in the comments saying it is well written? O.o

I like this author. Four books, "a top NY editor", and a blindness to criticism.... she's got the Stones to go far.

F_W wise at least. :D

(Reply to this)


[info]mister_terrific
2009-12-02 06:51 pm UTC (link)
On a side note, the other day [info]kamiki_seto and I were in the grocery checkout line when I spotted the latest issue of Cosmo. The cover was breathlessly proclaiming "The One Thing Men Really Want--Over 70 Percent Say This!" or some such.

"I wonder what it is?" I asked.

"Oh hell, I can tell you. The same thing they always want. Head."

I love my wife, I really do.

(This of course led to the recitation of a certain scene in the woefully-underloved movie Sneakers.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]shinysandals, 2009-12-02 07:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - redwarrior, 2009-12-04 01:52 am UTC

[info]sumire
2009-12-03 07:52 pm UTC (link)
Judging from the URL, that post was originally drafted with the title "First Page: Unnamed YA Urban Fantasy 2." Boy, and they thought a 60-year-old sleaze getting a blowjob was an inappropriate opening for a Contemporary Romance...

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map