Entry tags:

bitter so bitter, crazy people, ding dong the witch is dead, i fought the law and the law boggled, i see stupid people, lying liar that lies, person: turimel, person: victoria bitter, plucky girl detective, stop giving strangers money you idiots, this is the wank that never ends, what the shit is this?

The Not So Triumphant Return of Victoria Bitter, aka thanfiction, part the third
Lost in the comments of the last post, julian_black tells us that idiomagic has spit out the kool-aid.

The evil twin is yesterday's news, people. Now there's an UNDEAD SHAMAN-WIZARD.

Yeah, I'll repeat that: UNDEAD SHAMAN-WIZARD.

I don't even know. Does it top channeling fictional hobbits? You decide.

ETA: HOLD THE PHONE: UNDEAD SHAMAN-WIZARD EMAILS HERE! All personal info redacted, of course. Thanks bacon_lover!

Also, idiomagic would like us to know that She never drank the kool-aid. She was *cue dramatic music* THE MOLE!

I dunno, there's a reason Deep Throat's identity was never revealed...

Reminder: please use male pronouns when referring to VB/thanfiction, and leave the transfail in the other post, thanks.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	tetradecimal 2009-12-29 06:28 pm UTC (link)
	It seems like a pretty widespread belief that if you're using super special powers on an individual, the more information/personal effects/proximity you have that belong to them, the better. See also: voodoo dolls, demon names, touch telepathy, Death Notes. Of course, those same things are also useful for ordinary stalking. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	inalasahl 2009-12-29 07:04 pm UTC (link)
	I think I might have been less creeped out had idiomagic asked for hair clippings or something, rather than personal information on the kids. As it is, though, it still would have made more sense to do something like, "I've been trying to shield, but I'm not sure if it's helping. How can I tell?" (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	tetradecimal 2009-12-29 07:08 pm UTC (link)
	That would creep me out more, but only because I watched that X-Files with the fingernails. And the hair. shudder (Reply to this)(Parent)

	issendai 2009-12-30 09:24 am UTC (link)
	I think that would have been way creepier. It's not hard to learn children's names if you know their parents, but to get hair clippings? That requires close personal contact, forethought, and presumably some time alone with them and a sharp object. Hrrrrr. Now don't think about VB's wish to babysit kids for a couple of hours. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

inalasahl
2010-01-04 08:07 pm UTC (link)

For the purposes of stringing someone along, asking for hair clippings is less creepy, imo. Mostly, because if you actually get them you cannot use them to stalk someone. Also, hopefully, the person is conning you and just sent you their own hair, not actually the hair of children.

If someone actually really truly wanted hair clippings and was trying to get them, it would be a toss-up, I think, as to whether that was more or less creepy than trying to get pictures and addresses of real children.

You just had to remind me, didn't you?

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -