Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



ari_o ([info]ari_o) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2010-01-03 03:31:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:author entitlement, boo hoo, can't escape the screencaps, crazy people, dan fogelberg's llamas, doesn't mean what you think it means, entitlement, f_w is serious business, fandom_wank's thoughts on yaoi, fanfic, goddammit you guys be funnier!, grinch, i know it because of my learnings, i see stupid people, look how much i don't care, my education let me show you it, my pretension let me show you it, oppression, otf_wank, otw, persecution, reading comprehension whut?, sockpuppets, someone is wrong on the internet!, suck it up and deal, taking it too seriously, the tags are a lie!, too many fucking tags, wanking inside the house, we love jf tags, we're not allowed to say whore anymore, where's the phosfate is a whore tag?, whores whores and more whores, whores!!!!!!!, writers are often pompous douches, you're all whores!, yuletide means christmas!, yuletide means whores!

Beat your breasts, maidens, and rend your tunics.
There once was an archive for Yuletide
and when it died every other fool cried
stop thief
in erroneous belief
that their fics were about to go worldwide


Background:

Yuletide archived their 2009 fics at the OTW's new "archive of our own" (A3O or AO3). The old Yuletide archive is falling apart and to preserve the stories there the worker bees are planning to bring the old stories over and upload them to the new archive. They haven't done it yet because Yuletide just finished, family likes to see one during the holidays, and exhaustion has set in. Word from on high is that AO3 will do their best to track down authors and let them know about the move and give them the option to have their name removed from the story (orphaning it) or to have the story removed. Removing stories is considered uncool. The Yuletide entry rules explain that the stories submitted are there to be preserved for everyone's enjoyment and ask that you orphan a story instead of having it taken down from the archive.


Set up:

[info]redbrunja doesn't understand why asking about OTW and AO3 on the Yuletide discussion boards is off topic. She fails to understand no matter how carefully it is explained to her that there other places she can discuss AO3 or OTW. She still thinks it should be considered on topic, because she would consider it on topic if she were a mod. This is like a beautiful marriage of a strawman and a slippery slope.

"You know, I am really not pleased about the Yuletide mods' policy of silence about the move to the A03. Especially since they have a policy of silence about their policy of silence."

eta: dammit [info]redbrunja disabled comments, but [info]galateus to the rescue with a screencap here.

[info]franzeska tries to explain the history of wanky issues related to OTW. [info]redbrunja doesn't agree. Whatever. Differing opinions and all is well and good. On we march.

Until [info]merricatk shows up to tell everyone they don't like her and she knows she is basically just dirt under their shoes. I debated about whether or not this was funny. It could go either way. I see her behaviour as monumentally passive aggressive, but ymmv. She posts a hand wringer in her own LJ about how she is always marginalized in every group she ever joins and they just want her stories and never want to be her friends. O_O

[info]merricatk: "I don't care about OTW one way or the other. What I feel strongly about is having my story moved to what seems to be a more public place without my even being informed about it.

I'm trying to limit my fannish activity and make my fiction less public. This move seems to be the antithesis of that.

If looking after my best interests instead of hoping someone else will do it for me makes me a classless jerkass, that's fine with me. I don't see it as anything to be embarrassed about.

[info]wordsofastory: The reason no one has contacted you is because it has not begun. Yuletide 2009 just happened, the mods are still dealing with/recovering from that; there is no current activity going on with the older stories. The movement of old Yuletide stories to the new AO3 archive is a future plan. When it happens, every effort will be made to contact not just you, but all the authors involved.

You're not being left out, because nothing has happened yet. That would be obvious if.


But no one can seem to make [info]merricatk happy about her story being moved to the Yultide comm at AO3. She wants to take it down and doesn't seem to think the rules for the exchange should apply to her now that the archive is changing from one website to another one.

[info]merrycatk wrote one NYR story 5 years ago and that's what she is concerned about. She posts in her lj.

"So, I heard it through the grapevine that all of the yuletide stories are being moved to A3O. I don't move in that circle, so everything I know comes secondhand. I've only ever written one story that's on the yuletide website, a NYR story. It was a whim, and I was still thinking that fandom might work for me.

This was several years ago. There was nothing bad about the experience.

Since then I've come to a few realizations about myself. One of them is, I was born, and will probably die, an outsider. I don't fit. Sometimes, for short periods, with certain groups, I can be part of the in-crowd. But I always ask the wrong questions, the ones nobody else thinks of. I always cause trouble, and I need way too much down time from people, and I'm way, way too needy.

The movers and shakers of fandom don't want to answer my questions, they don't want to be bothered with my moodiness, and they certainly don't want to cater to my needs, which are emotional in nature.

They do want my stories. I've had more than one offer to archive my stories, and I've said yes more than once because of my neediness. I thought the offer to "work with me" on putting my stories online meant they wanted to spend some time with me. What I found out was that except of approving a layout and emailing the stories, I was now extraneous to the whole process. So I've put my stories back in my pocket and am (slowly) posting them on my LJ.

Now the yuletide stories are being moved to what I, in my infinite ignorance, consider to be a potentially more public venue, which I'm not comfortable with. (Why do I see it as being more public? Because it's supposed to be easier to find things there, because it has been so publicized and so has yuletide. Am I wrong about this? Everyone says so.)

It's also being run by movers and shakers--things always are; they're the ones who run things, they have the temperament for it, it's nothing against them. But I'm not comfortable with them. And I'm in a position of either letting them take my story and be quiet while put it wherever they want it--without, so far, them saying a word to me about it; or taking my story back and have people call me names.

Or I can orphan my story by taking my name off of it.

I wish they weren't using the word orphan. It's too poetic, it puts to sharp a point on the abandonment, it makes me feel terrible. I have abandonment issues. Call me a thief for taking my story back and I can deal with it. Say I'm making my story an orphan, I'll cry.

And I wish they weren't telling me again that I can go--just leave the story. Because I already know I'm extraneous, except for the stories.

I'm perfectly aware that I'm completely wrong about all of this, but being told how wrong I am is only going to push me harder into putting this story in my pocket, too. I'm perfectly aware that my feelings--and all this is nothing but my feelings--are indefensible. But I don't like it when the powerful people come and tell me how unreasonable I am not to want to do things their way. Not ask, just tell.

I can live with being disliked, considered a screwball, or an angry, shitty, classless, selfish jerkass, and I can live with people believing the lie that I'm doing this because I hate OTW and/or A3O. I can live with the whole rest of the world considering me irrational."

Most of her friend commiserate. And here is where it gets juicy.

: "I think AO3 defenders are bizarre. They are basically getting behind a group of people who want to academicize and homogenize fanfic. To put it plainly: OTW is a bunch of people who couldn't cut it as 18th century literature junior faculty, so they're basically trying to invent this new "transformative works" field on which to hang their academic ambitions. I firmly believe that these people are trying to use fans to get ahead (a la their rival Laura Hale). They might put a nicer spin on it--protecting fandom, preserving works, creating some big monumental archive that will legitimize fanfiction--but what they're doing is just another example of career-jockeying. Sure, they're not profiting off of AO3--not monetarily. But there are other ways of profiting. So I sort of can't believe that anyone would voluntarily hand over their stuff to AO3. I mean, you're basically saying, "Yes, make me your dissertation project."

[info]tzikeh responds: I could understand if you didn't like, or want to participate in OTW, if your own personal philosophy conflicts with the OTW's philosophy, but you are astoundingly uninformed--and willfully ignorant.

Have you bothered read the Who We Are section of the OTW site? That's a rhetorical question, since the answer is clear. The board is made up of WILDLY successful people--a Professor of Law at Georgetown who clerked for the Supreme Court; a Director of Film Studies and Professor of English at Muhlenberg; an MBA and CPA who worked for the U.S. Senate; and the woman who wrote the open-source code that has been the base for nearly every fannish archive that was created after she wrote it--oh, and a little something called the New York Times best-selling Temeraire series.

Yeah, they're all clearly people who couldn't cut it as 18th-century literature junior faculty."


[info]salvidar_as says "Yes, I've read the OTW site. I'm aware of the resumes of these so-called academics. I'm aware that they haven't produced academically sound or particularly rigorous work (I've read it). I've also read the academic journal. And it's bad. I am not willfully ignorant; these people are hacks."

[info]tzikeh calls SOCKPUPPET!

[info]salvidar_as "What a bizarre little post. I don't really owe you anything--no explanation, no social security number or CV. I don't need a biography to qualify my point of view. I don't think that one post in a person's personal journal qualifies as a "teabagging" movement--did you check your IQ at the door?

What's clear to me--and what's becoming increasingly clear to me--is that you AO3 people are absolutely insane. Everyone is apparently required to get on board the OTW train, and anyone who questions the academic merit of such a project (and yes, there are questions of merit--large ones) is a teabagger or a bully or a sockpuppet. Good job furthering the negative perceptions of the OTW fear-mongering machine. You're making Laura Hale look sane and lucid, and I didn't think that was possible.

I could write a lengthy response as to why OTW's academic journal is, well, kind of a joke (and OTW is regarded as a joke in most academic circles--you probably don't need me to tell you that ... or maybe you do), but I don't think that merritcatk actually intended this post for such purposes. If you want to defend OTW's academic purpose (ha), you have your choice of wank threads already in full swing.

Obviously, if OTW's reputation as a serious academic venture were truly unassailable, we wouldn't be having this conversation, because you wouldn't have to defend the organization against an insignificant, anonymous teabagger like me with my big lies and misinformation. But what I said must have hit a note. Oh my."

[info]tzikeh: I still say sockpuppet is you.

[info]salvidar_as "Okay, good luck defending the organization of scooby doo studies. Bye."


This end does not satisfying [info]tzikeh so she makes a post in her lj. "because she has fucking had it" and the discussion is just about clarifying and not very wanky--although possibly interesting when [info]liviapenn shows up and clarifies a few issues.

OH ETA: [info]melodyclark is here to show us all that even older women like to wank like horny thirteen year olds, but if she doesn't give it a rest I'm worried she's going to go blind, develop hairy palms, AND come down with a raging case of carpal tunnel syndrome.

thanks to [info]inquisition for the heads up.

eta 3.1415 The abyss is looking into us... and it's fucking stupid. :D

bonus lulz: [info]tzikeh point out to me that [info]melodyclark tried to edit her fanlore page.



On January 8, 2010 she edited her page to read:

"Melody does not exist. She is a figment of your imagination. So long and thanks for all the fiche."

It used to say:

"Melody wrote her first fan story in 1978, and started participating fannishly online in the early 90's, as an early member of Virgule. She is still in fandom and her fan fic site is at http://melodyclark.net and also on FanFiction.net[1]. However, in 2009 she announced she would no longer be publishing her fan fiction on the Internet for free, choosing instead to work with print fanzines exclusively. This came after a fan offered a not-completely positive review of her Holmes/Watson story "Akin to Love" which had appeared twenty years before in the print zine No Holds Barred #1.[2] [3] She made a similar online exit in 2007. [4]
Her zines

Melody Clark's Blake's 7 and Wiseguy novels are now published by Mysti Frank (agentwithstyle.com). Judith Proctor publishes the Blake's 7 novels that Judith herself reedited and republished as the initial published version was fraught with errors. Kathy Resch publishes Melody's Dark Shadows Grayson Hall zine as well as the award-winning Fire and Ice issue #1 which Melody co-edited with Kathy. Melody now writes in various other fandoms. In the early 2000s she briefly published fanzines under the name The M Press and distributed them via Mysti Frank. In 2009 she created the Media Fen website with the goal of offering fanzine publishers a location to advertise their zines.[5] "

Amazing someone can flounce over and over and not get it--like a sad rat in a maze who keeps zapping herself instead of avoiding the electrified cheese. Cheese is delicious though.




Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]taichara
2010-01-03 11:56 am UTC (link)
And the migration hasn't even started yet. This is going to be glorious.


Offtopic, but -- bloody icon love <3

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]melandry, 2010-01-03 04:55 pm UTC

[info]smashingstars
2010-01-03 11:59 am UTC (link)
So the blinking text isn't original to salvidar_as' comment. Pity that.

(Reply to this)


[info]angstymcgoth
2010-01-03 12:05 pm UTC (link)
Lingering guilt about not participating in Yuletide: PACIFIED.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-03 04:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ruffwriter, 2010-01-03 06:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-03 07:11 pm UTC
... - [info]plazmah, 2010-01-03 09:28 pm UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-03 09:29 pm UTC
... - [info]amaresu, 2010-01-03 09:29 pm UTC
... - [info]beckyh2112, 2010-01-05 05:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-01-03 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]zorro, 2010-01-04 01:10 am UTC

[info]urpletastic
2010-01-03 12:31 pm UTC (link)
Dear [info]tzikeh - when the horse is dead, you can stop hitting it. Honestly. It isn't going to get up and attack you again.

Actually I quite see why this person doesn't want her fiction moved without her express permission, even given the conditions of the original deal, but she has the right to withdraw it and can exercise that right. Her fury is inverse ratio to her importance in the world; ain't it always the case?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]anarchicq, 2010-01-03 12:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lizbee, 2010-01-03 12:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]anarchicq, 2010-01-03 12:53 pm UTC
... - [info]lizbee, 2010-01-03 12:54 pm UTC
... - [info]anarchicq, 2010-01-03 12:54 pm UTC
... - [info]wankismyfandom, 2010-01-03 03:16 pm UTC
... - tetradecimal, 2010-01-04 03:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sharps, 2010-01-03 07:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-01-03 10:01 pm UTC
... - [info]sharps, 2010-01-03 11:19 pm UTC
... - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-01-06 06:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-01-03 08:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sharps, 2010-01-03 11:56 pm UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-01-04 07:33 am UTC
... - [info]weyrlady, 2010-01-04 11:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankismyfandom, 2010-01-04 03:38 am UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-01-04 07:37 am UTC
... - [info]wankismyfandom, 2010-01-04 08:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2010-01-04 09:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tzikeh, 2010-01-04 06:44 am UTC

[info]lizbee
2010-01-03 12:34 pm UTC (link)
If you Google "yuletide", the current archive is the very first result. I'm curious as to how that's any less "public" than AO3, but probably I should stop applying Earth logics.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2010-01-03 03:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sgaana, 2010-01-04 02:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-03 04:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]grrliz, 2010-01-03 04:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]winter, 2010-01-03 05:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]grrliz, 2010-01-03 11:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-03 11:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2010-01-04 02:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kantayra, 2010-01-06 04:22 am UTC

[info]sablemouse
2010-01-03 12:37 pm UTC (link)
I was hoping that someone would write this up so I would know what the heck was going on.

(Reply to this)


[info]christycorr
2010-01-03 12:58 pm UTC (link)
Hee, I've been watching this shitstorm develop from afar since people started wanking at fandomsecrets. Oh, fandom.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]anarchicq, 2010-01-03 01:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]christycorr, 2010-01-03 01:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]anarchicq, 2010-01-03 01:10 pm UTC
... - [info]christycorr, 2010-01-03 01:15 pm UTC
... - [info]anarchicq, 2010-01-03 01:17 pm UTC
... - [info]christycorr, 2010-01-03 01:22 pm UTC
... - [info]anarchicq, 2010-01-03 01:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tarash, 2010-01-03 03:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moljn, 2010-01-03 07:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2010-01-03 09:30 pm UTC
... - [info]moljn, 2010-01-03 10:50 pm UTC
... - [info]seiberwing, 2010-01-04 07:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lissbet, 2010-01-03 09:38 pm UTC
... - [info]moljn, 2010-01-03 10:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aliaras, 2010-01-04 07:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]havocthecat, 2010-01-03 10:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]medie, 2010-01-04 04:53 am UTC
... - [info]havocthecat, 2010-01-04 05:12 am UTC
... - [info]medie, 2010-01-04 05:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-04 05:08 am UTC
... - [info]havocthecat, 2010-01-04 05:13 am UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-04 05:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-03 08:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mary_mac, 2010-01-04 12:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-04 02:49 am UTC
... - [info]mary_mac, 2010-01-04 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]herongale, 2010-01-04 02:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-04 02:50 am UTC
... - [info]thebratqueen, 2010-01-04 06:02 am UTC
... - [info]christycorr, 2010-01-04 09:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amaresu, 2010-01-03 09:39 pm UTC

[info]sparklepuss
2010-01-03 01:40 pm UTC (link)
Get off my lawn, you kids, with your Yuletides and your fandoms I've never heard of! You're too big and you frighten me!

I could write 10 yuletides in one day. That's how much of a writer I am.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-03 01:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ivalice, 2010-01-03 05:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparklepuss, 2010-01-03 06:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ivalice, 2010-01-03 06:09 pm UTC
... - [info]angstymcgoth, 2010-01-03 09:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]havocthecat, 2010-01-03 10:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]glossing2, 2010-01-04 06:21 am UTC
... - [info]lydiabell, 2010-01-04 06:42 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 06:43 am UTC
... - [info]kantayra, 2010-01-06 05:08 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 05:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2010-01-03 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gairid, 2010-01-04 09:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyvorkosigan, 2010-01-03 05:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]witty, 2010-01-03 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mary_mac, 2010-01-04 12:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]herongale, 2010-01-04 02:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]isiscolo, 2010-01-04 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2010-01-04 05:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]biichan, 2010-01-04 05:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thebratqueen, 2010-01-04 05:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kermit_the_sock, 2010-01-05 09:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 10:46 pm UTC

[info]seca
2010-01-03 02:00 pm UTC (link)
All I could think of while reading the write up is how special this snowflake is and how great her despair for being oppressed by life itself.

And now I wonder if she bartends in the dark.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kitt_in_socks, 2010-01-03 02:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kantayra, 2010-01-06 05:11 am UTC

[info]galateus
2010-01-03 03:19 pm UTC (link)
the equivalent of the Teabagging movement against OTW

And suddenly it all makes sense.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]alana, 2010-01-06 04:21 am UTC

[info]kuromitsu
2010-01-03 03:23 pm UTC (link)
Off-topic, but would someone please explain to me the reason for OTW's existence? I'm honestly curious. They come off to me mostly as "We're fandom, hear us roar!" and "Fandom is serious business!" and I don't quite get why there is a need for that. Or maybe it's just me not taking fandom seriously enough (again)? OK, providing an archive is a nice gesture, even though I found it quite unusable.

Also, who the hell are "teabaggers" and why are they so bad? (Hey, I use teabags. When I have no other choice.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2010-01-03 03:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kuromitsu, 2010-01-03 03:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2010-01-03 03:43 pm UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-03 04:04 pm UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-03 04:16 pm UTC
... - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-03 06:36 pm UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-03 06:46 pm UTC
... - [info]pyratejenni, 2010-01-03 09:30 pm UTC
... - [info]littlecloud, 2010-01-04 07:23 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 07:27 am UTC
... - [info]pyratejenni, 2010-01-04 10:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sddalek_inc, 2010-01-03 04:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]immortal_jedi, 2010-01-04 12:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2010-01-03 03:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kuromitsu, 2010-01-03 04:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]msmanna, 2010-01-03 07:39 pm UTC
... - [info]kuromitsu, 2010-01-03 07:47 pm UTC
... - [info]msmanna, 2010-01-03 08:02 pm UTC
... - mrs260, 2010-01-03 09:03 pm UTC
... - [info]lydiabell, 2010-01-04 02:28 am UTC
... - [info]kuromitsu, 2010-01-04 12:50 pm UTC
... - ealusaid, 2010-01-04 03:02 am UTC
... - [info]kuromitsu, 2010-01-04 01:19 pm UTC
... - [info]sequinedlizard, 2010-01-04 03:06 pm UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-04 06:41 pm UTC
... - [info]sequinedlizard, 2010-01-04 06:54 pm UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-04 07:38 pm UTC
... - [info]sequinedlizard, 2010-01-04 10:36 pm UTC
... - [info]harrypotter, 2010-01-05 06:12 pm UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-05 07:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2010-01-04 08:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]willywanka, 2010-01-03 04:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moosecharmer, 2010-01-05 09:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]baruchan, 2010-01-03 04:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]solelyfictional, 2010-01-03 07:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2010-01-03 09:28 pm UTC
... - [info]solelyfictional, 2010-01-03 10:13 pm UTC
... - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2010-01-03 10:22 pm UTC
... - [info]starlady42, 2010-01-05 05:26 am UTC
... - [info]kantayra, 2010-01-06 05:19 am UTC
... - [info]alienist, 2010-01-06 06:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2010-01-03 09:33 pm UTC
... - [info]platedlizard, 2010-01-03 10:14 pm UTC
... - [info]sokudoningyou, 2010-01-06 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2010-01-05 05:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hopefulnebula, 2010-01-03 08:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]argylespy, 2010-01-03 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2010-01-03 10:50 pm UTC
... - [info]msilverstar, 2010-01-03 11:18 pm UTC
... - [info]bacon_lover, 2010-01-04 02:54 am UTC
... - [info]feenix, 2010-01-04 02:12 pm UTC
... - [info]bacon_lover, 2010-01-04 09:46 pm UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2010-01-04 10:55 pm UTC
... - [info]puipui, 2010-01-05 12:52 am UTC
... - tetradecimal, 2010-01-05 01:18 am UTC
... - [info]bacon_lover, 2010-01-05 04:18 am UTC
... - tetradecimal, 2010-01-05 04:36 am UTC
... - [info]sandglass, 2010-01-04 03:30 am UTC
... - [info]simplefaith, 2010-01-04 05:34 am UTC
... - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-04 07:58 am UTC
... - [info]sandglass, 2010-01-04 08:03 am UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2010-01-04 10:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2010-01-04 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kantayra, 2010-01-06 05:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]weyrlady, 2010-01-03 03:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kuromitsu, 2010-01-03 04:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sqbr, 2010-01-03 04:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rodo, 2010-01-03 04:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tarash, 2010-01-04 12:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]agrias, 2010-01-04 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2010-01-04 03:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lexin, 2010-01-04 07:04 pm UTC

[info]willywanka
2010-01-03 04:01 pm UTC (link)
Especially since they have a policy of silence about their policy of silence.

That's because the policy contains such powerful information that it cannot be discussed in comments, emails, IMs, or twitter. They must enter the Cone of Silence!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2010-01-04 04:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 04:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wallflower, 2010-01-04 10:23 am UTC
... - [info]ladyvyola, 2010-01-04 03:56 pm UTC
... - [info]kantayra, 2010-01-06 05:34 am UTC
... - tetradecimal, 2010-01-06 05:36 am UTC

[info]haunted
2010-01-03 04:08 pm UTC (link)
The movers and shakers of fandom don't want to answer my questions, they don't want to be bothered with my moodiness, and they certainly don't want to cater to my needs, which are emotional in nature.

merricatk has a post here written during WarningsFail, where she says fandom is not a safe space and readers have no consideration for writers and people who require warnings should suck it up or whatever, but her last paragraph says her "trigger" is being ignored or left out of discussion of her own work. So I guess she has a history of weird passive-aggressiveness.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rodo, 2010-01-03 04:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sqbr, 2010-01-04 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghoulsis, 2010-01-04 03:09 am UTC
... - [info]sqbr, 2010-01-04 06:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rodo, 2010-01-04 06:07 am UTC
... - [info]sqbr, 2010-01-04 06:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gairid, 2010-01-04 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-03 05:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-03 08:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghoulsis, 2010-01-04 03:10 am UTC
... - [info]bacon_lover, 2010-01-04 10:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]otoselkie, 2010-01-12 11:08 am UTC

[info]lady_ganesh
2010-01-03 04:19 pm UTC (link)
It's utterly amazing how often in fandom I've managed to join a cult.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loquaciousquark, 2010-01-03 09:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-03 10:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyvyola, 2010-01-04 12:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kermit_the_sock, 2010-01-05 10:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-05 05:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kantayra, 2010-01-06 05:39 am UTC
Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi
[info]shyofmirrors
2010-01-03 04:24 pm UTC (link)
I did Yuletide for the first time this year, and one of the things I loved about it was that 99% of the people I encountered through it were nice, sane fans of rare fandoms. As this was my first year, I never experianced the other archive, but from everything I've been able to glean it was horribly broken and the minor breaks of the AO3 archive this year during reveal were nothing compared to what had been. From what I've heard, this archive move is a very good thing. I've hung out a lot in Yuletide's IRC chartroom, so this sudden wrath against AO3/OTW is coming out of the blue for me. I thought everyone agreed the old archive was crap, and the owners of the code have publicly said they need to get the old stuff off there so they can burn the code.

And while you as the author might not want your fic 'more public', your recipient (remember? Yuletide is about writing for other people) might still want to reread the lovely fic you wrote, hence why taking your fic down is considered uncool.

What I'm confused about is how is the centralization of fandom a bad thing? Why is having one archive I can go to to find all the fic I want, one that is better monetered than the Pit I might add, a bad thing? I find OTW a little pretentious yes, but I find most mission statements a little pretentious. Am I missing something?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]limyaael, 2010-01-03 04:32 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]shyofmirrors, 2010-01-03 04:50 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]limyaael, 2010-01-03 05:42 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - ariadne484, 2010-01-03 05:07 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]limyaael, 2010-01-03 05:41 pm UTC
... - [info]brown_betty, 2010-01-04 08:43 am UTC
... - [info]franzeska, 2010-01-04 09:37 am UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]moljn, 2010-01-03 06:46 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-03 08:04 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - age - [info]lasha, 2010-01-03 08:01 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - age - [info]firefly99, 2010-01-03 09:00 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - age - [info]lasha, 2010-01-03 09:25 pm UTC
... - [info]franzeska, 2010-01-04 09:40 am UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - age - [info]risha, 2010-01-03 09:47 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - age - [info]galateus, 2010-01-04 05:30 pm UTC
... - [info]risha, 2010-01-04 07:38 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]kuromitsu, 2010-01-03 09:05 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]notjo, 2010-01-03 10:16 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]christycorr, 2010-01-03 11:59 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]bitca, 2010-01-05 08:27 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]havocthecat, 2010-01-03 10:58 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-01-06 06:38 am UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - ariadne484, 2010-01-04 12:43 am UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]kuromitsu, 2010-01-04 12:59 am UTC
... - ariadne484, 2010-01-04 01:11 am UTC
... - [info]kuromitsu, 2010-01-04 01:32 am UTC
... - tetradecimal, 2010-01-04 04:29 am UTC
... - [info]kuromitsu, 2010-01-04 01:29 pm UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2010-01-04 01:06 am UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]rekall, 2010-01-04 03:37 am UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]becktionary, 2010-01-04 11:48 am UTC
Re: Warning, possible thoughts on Yaoi - [info]phosfate, 2010-01-04 04:52 am UTC

[info]coffee_mug
2010-01-03 04:59 pm UTC (link)
The whole of merrikat's letter/rant thingy just makes me think "stop crying, emo kid".

The movers and shakers of fandom don't want to answer my questions, they don't want to be bothered with my moodiness, and they certainly don't want to cater to my needs, which are emotional in nature.
Fandom's not a support group, ffs.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]moljn, 2010-01-03 06:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-03 06:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moljn, 2010-01-03 06:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-03 07:07 pm UTC
... - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-04 04:45 am UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2010-01-04 11:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-03 10:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-04 12:08 am UTC
... - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-04 08:07 am UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-05 10:45 pm UTC
... - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-06 08:18 am UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-06 07:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-04 08:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-04 10:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-04 06:05 pm UTC
... - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-04 11:02 pm UTC
... - [info]amalthia, 2010-01-05 08:41 am UTC
... - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-06 08:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2010-01-05 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oddplaces, 2010-12-08 08:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]risha, 2010-01-04 12:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2010-01-05 03:33 am UTC

ariadne484
2010-01-03 05:04 pm UTC (link)
I think I've rarely if ever been so glad about the FW convention of not going from the wank report to jump into the wank; it's pretty much the only thing preventing me from wading in flamethrowers first.

I'm trying to laugh, instead of wading in in fury on behalf of some very hardworking and selfless people. I won't help anything by adding to the tide of wank, right? Right?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]deliciouschaos, 2010-01-03 06:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-03 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - ariadne484, 2010-01-03 07:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]misswitch, 2010-01-04 09:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]herongale, 2010-01-04 02:41 am UTC
(no subject) - ariadne484, 2010-01-04 05:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kantayra, 2010-01-06 06:04 am UTC

[info]cellardoor28
2010-01-03 05:10 pm UTC (link)
Oh lord, I care nothing for the wank but that icon is a thing of beauty.

(Reply to this)


[info]veleda_k
2010-01-03 05:41 pm UTC (link)
Maybe I'm just stupid, but I see this in terms of two simple facts. One, we agreed to host our fics on the Yuletide archive and not remove them. Two, the Yuletide archive is moving. I don't see how fact two negates fact one.

And, you know, I'm fine with AO3, but I wouldn't call it more widely known that the main Yuletide website. I didn't even know people could actually post to it until Yuletide.

Lastly, I don't care where you stand, merrikat needs to get over herself right fucking now. "Waaaaahhhhhh! I can't orphan my fic because I am a sensitive special soul! Waaaaahhhhhh! Nobody likes me or ever will like me but they should! Waaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!" I am officially for AO3 on the basis that merrikat hates it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - ariadne484, 2010-01-03 07:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]msilverstar, 2010-01-03 11:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dana_kujan, 2010-01-04 02:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]msilverstar, 2010-01-04 02:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrbimble, 2010-01-04 05:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oddplaces, 2010-01-17 03:37 am UTC

[info]ivalice
2010-01-03 05:46 pm UTC (link)
They do want my stories. I've had more than one offer to archive my stories, and I've said yes more than once because of my neediness. I thought the offer to "work with me" on putting my stories online meant they wanted to spend some time with me.
Wow, hello, second hand embarrassment.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]deliciouschaos, 2010-01-03 06:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oddplaces, 2010-12-08 08:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moljn, 2010-01-03 06:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]reeve, 2010-01-03 09:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moljn, 2010-01-03 11:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]zorro, 2010-01-04 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2010-01-04 03:50 am UTC
... - [info]tangentialone, 2010-01-04 03:50 am UTC
... - [info]reeve, 2010-01-04 03:38 pm UTC
... - [info]lian, 2010-01-05 03:26 am UTC
... - [info]reeve, 2010-01-05 04:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amalthia, 2010-01-05 08:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waitwut, 2010-01-05 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shutthef_up, 2010-01-03 07:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ivalice, 2010-01-03 08:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2010-01-03 10:52 pm UTC
... - [info]beachlass, 2010-01-04 12:54 am UTC
... - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2010-01-04 01:46 am UTC
... - [info]beachlass, 2010-01-04 03:11 am UTC
... - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2010-01-04 12:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-04 06:09 pm UTC
... - [info]sokudoningyou, 2010-01-06 04:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-04 04:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2010-01-05 03:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2010-01-03 09:34 pm UTC

[info]caoilainn
2010-01-03 05:56 pm UTC (link)
lol, liviapenn! This could become awesome. Happy New Year!

(Reply to this)


[info]duraniedrama
2010-01-03 06:20 pm UTC (link)
Can somebody fill me in on what exactly this "Yuletide" thingy is in the first place? I gather it's a fanfic thing that happens around the holiday season, but what is it exactly? A bunch of fics about Christmas? A fanfic gift exchange? Why is this such a big honkin' deal in the first place, particularly with the apparent need to preserve every single fic in it for all time?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-03 06:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarracenia, 2010-01-03 07:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankismyfandom, 2010-01-04 04:26 am UTC
... - [info]hermitsoul, 2010-01-04 05:46 am UTC
... - [info]kylenne, 2010-01-04 06:30 am UTC
... - [info]hermitsoul, 2010-01-04 06:54 am UTC
... - [info]wankismyfandom, 2010-01-04 07:24 am UTC
... - [info]hermitsoul, 2010-01-04 07:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gabzillaz, 2010-01-07 12:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]forevagreeneart, 2010-01-26 03:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2010-01-03 06:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-03 06:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2010-01-03 07:13 pm UTC
... - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-03 07:33 pm UTC
... - [info]cjk, 2010-01-03 07:41 pm UTC
... - [info]inquisition, 2010-01-03 08:08 pm UTC
... - [info]waltraute, 2010-01-03 09:13 pm UTC
... - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-01-03 10:09 pm UTC
... - [info]havocthecat, 2010-01-03 11:03 pm UTC
... - [info]herongale, 2010-01-04 02:47 am UTC
... - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-04 08:15 am UTC
... - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-04 06:11 pm UTC
... - [info]phosfate, 2010-01-06 05:03 pm UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-06 07:38 pm UTC
... - [info]beckyh2112, 2010-01-05 06:55 am UTC
... - [info]quinctia, 2010-01-05 07:27 am UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-06 03:50 pm UTC
... - [info]sgaana, 2010-01-04 03:15 am UTC
... - [info]meril, 2010-01-04 01:52 am UTC
... - [info]telesilla, 2010-01-04 06:53 am UTC
... - [info]lydiabell, 2010-01-04 07:03 am UTC
... - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-04 06:14 pm UTC
... - [info]lydiabell, 2010-01-04 06:27 pm UTC
... - [info]lovelyzelda, 2010-01-04 10:53 am UTC
... - [info]becktionary, 2010-01-04 12:03 pm UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-04 06:52 pm UTC
... - [info]veleda_k, 2010-01-04 09:31 pm UTC
... - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-05 03:40 pm UTC
... - [info]veleda_k, 2010-01-05 06:30 pm UTC
... - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-06 03:10 am UTC
... - [info]phosfate, 2010-01-06 05:02 pm UTC
... - tetradecimal, 2010-01-06 05:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dwib, 2010-01-03 06:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]winter, 2010-01-03 07:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-03 07:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lian, 2010-01-03 08:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]winter, 2010-01-03 08:58 pm UTC
... - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-04 03:49 am UTC
... - [info]cinnamonical, 2010-01-03 09:43 pm UTC
... - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-04 03:52 am UTC
... - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-01-03 10:10 pm UTC
... - [info]trialia, 2010-01-04 08:03 am UTC
... - [info]brown_betty, 2010-01-04 08:57 am UTC
... - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-01-04 09:42 am UTC
... - [info]cereta, 2010-01-03 11:42 pm UTC
... - [info]shyofmirrors, 2010-01-04 02:27 am UTC
... - [info]winter, 2010-01-04 09:08 am UTC
... - [info]shyofmirrors, 2010-01-04 12:58 pm UTC
... - [info]winter, 2010-01-04 01:04 pm UTC
... - [info]shyofmirrors, 2010-01-04 01:11 pm UTC
... - [info]winter, 2010-01-04 02:57 pm UTC
... - [info]shyofmirrors, 2010-01-04 10:36 pm UTC
... - [info]sgaana, 2010-01-04 03:17 am UTC
... - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-04 03:47 am UTC
... - [info]coffee_mug, 2010-01-05 03:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]esther_a, 2010-01-03 08:41 pm UTC
... - [info]winter, 2010-01-03 08:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stinksap, 2010-01-04 04:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2010-01-04 09:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jood, 2010-01-04 11:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gabzillaz, 2010-01-07 12:54 am UTC

[info]kiltslave
2010-01-03 06:26 pm UTC (link)
Aaah, I was just having a fannish conversation about the yuletide/AO3 wank last night.

*pops popcorn and sits back to enjoy the wank*

(Reply to this)


[info]caoilainn
2010-01-03 06:29 pm UTC (link)
I kind of feel bad about laughing at Merricatk - she clearly has issues, but the passive aggressive hand-wringing really is quite beautiful. wow. And people agree with her, wow. Both sides are pretty wanky, imo. Crazy times.

(Reply to this)


[info]sneer
2010-01-03 06:29 pm UTC (link)
Dear merrikat:

You have used up the entire world's supply of passive-aggressive whining on one post. There is none left. Don't you know there's a war on?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kiltslave, 2010-01-03 06:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_linnet, 2010-01-03 09:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-03 10:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]herongale, 2010-01-04 02:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]souris, 2010-01-04 05:29 pm UTC


Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map