Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



ari_o ([info]ari_o) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2010-01-03 03:31:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:author entitlement, boo hoo, can't escape the screencaps, crazy people, dan fogelberg's llamas, doesn't mean what you think it means, entitlement, f_w is serious business, fandom_wank's thoughts on yaoi, fanfic, goddammit you guys be funnier!, grinch, i know it because of my learnings, i see stupid people, look how much i don't care, my education let me show you it, my pretension let me show you it, oppression, otf_wank, otw, persecution, reading comprehension whut?, sockpuppets, someone is wrong on the internet!, suck it up and deal, taking it too seriously, the tags are a lie!, too many fucking tags, wanking inside the house, we love jf tags, we're not allowed to say whore anymore, where's the phosfate is a whore tag?, whores whores and more whores, whores!!!!!!!, writers are often pompous douches, you're all whores!, yuletide means christmas!, yuletide means whores!

Beat your breasts, maidens, and rend your tunics.
There once was an archive for Yuletide
and when it died every other fool cried
stop thief
in erroneous belief
that their fics were about to go worldwide


Background:

Yuletide archived their 2009 fics at the OTW's new "archive of our own" (A3O or AO3). The old Yuletide archive is falling apart and to preserve the stories there the worker bees are planning to bring the old stories over and upload them to the new archive. They haven't done it yet because Yuletide just finished, family likes to see one during the holidays, and exhaustion has set in. Word from on high is that AO3 will do their best to track down authors and let them know about the move and give them the option to have their name removed from the story (orphaning it) or to have the story removed. Removing stories is considered uncool. The Yuletide entry rules explain that the stories submitted are there to be preserved for everyone's enjoyment and ask that you orphan a story instead of having it taken down from the archive.


Set up:

[info]redbrunja doesn't understand why asking about OTW and AO3 on the Yuletide discussion boards is off topic. She fails to understand no matter how carefully it is explained to her that there other places she can discuss AO3 or OTW. She still thinks it should be considered on topic, because she would consider it on topic if she were a mod. This is like a beautiful marriage of a strawman and a slippery slope.

"You know, I am really not pleased about the Yuletide mods' policy of silence about the move to the A03. Especially since they have a policy of silence about their policy of silence."

eta: dammit [info]redbrunja disabled comments, but [info]galateus to the rescue with a screencap here.

[info]franzeska tries to explain the history of wanky issues related to OTW. [info]redbrunja doesn't agree. Whatever. Differing opinions and all is well and good. On we march.

Until [info]merricatk shows up to tell everyone they don't like her and she knows she is basically just dirt under their shoes. I debated about whether or not this was funny. It could go either way. I see her behaviour as monumentally passive aggressive, but ymmv. She posts a hand wringer in her own LJ about how she is always marginalized in every group she ever joins and they just want her stories and never want to be her friends. O_O

[info]merricatk: "I don't care about OTW one way or the other. What I feel strongly about is having my story moved to what seems to be a more public place without my even being informed about it.

I'm trying to limit my fannish activity and make my fiction less public. This move seems to be the antithesis of that.

If looking after my best interests instead of hoping someone else will do it for me makes me a classless jerkass, that's fine with me. I don't see it as anything to be embarrassed about.

[info]wordsofastory: The reason no one has contacted you is because it has not begun. Yuletide 2009 just happened, the mods are still dealing with/recovering from that; there is no current activity going on with the older stories. The movement of old Yuletide stories to the new AO3 archive is a future plan. When it happens, every effort will be made to contact not just you, but all the authors involved.

You're not being left out, because nothing has happened yet. That would be obvious if.


But no one can seem to make [info]merricatk happy about her story being moved to the Yultide comm at AO3. She wants to take it down and doesn't seem to think the rules for the exchange should apply to her now that the archive is changing from one website to another one.

[info]merrycatk wrote one NYR story 5 years ago and that's what she is concerned about. She posts in her lj.

"So, I heard it through the grapevine that all of the yuletide stories are being moved to A3O. I don't move in that circle, so everything I know comes secondhand. I've only ever written one story that's on the yuletide website, a NYR story. It was a whim, and I was still thinking that fandom might work for me.

This was several years ago. There was nothing bad about the experience.

Since then I've come to a few realizations about myself. One of them is, I was born, and will probably die, an outsider. I don't fit. Sometimes, for short periods, with certain groups, I can be part of the in-crowd. But I always ask the wrong questions, the ones nobody else thinks of. I always cause trouble, and I need way too much down time from people, and I'm way, way too needy.

The movers and shakers of fandom don't want to answer my questions, they don't want to be bothered with my moodiness, and they certainly don't want to cater to my needs, which are emotional in nature.

They do want my stories. I've had more than one offer to archive my stories, and I've said yes more than once because of my neediness. I thought the offer to "work with me" on putting my stories online meant they wanted to spend some time with me. What I found out was that except of approving a layout and emailing the stories, I was now extraneous to the whole process. So I've put my stories back in my pocket and am (slowly) posting them on my LJ.

Now the yuletide stories are being moved to what I, in my infinite ignorance, consider to be a potentially more public venue, which I'm not comfortable with. (Why do I see it as being more public? Because it's supposed to be easier to find things there, because it has been so publicized and so has yuletide. Am I wrong about this? Everyone says so.)

It's also being run by movers and shakers--things always are; they're the ones who run things, they have the temperament for it, it's nothing against them. But I'm not comfortable with them. And I'm in a position of either letting them take my story and be quiet while put it wherever they want it--without, so far, them saying a word to me about it; or taking my story back and have people call me names.

Or I can orphan my story by taking my name off of it.

I wish they weren't using the word orphan. It's too poetic, it puts to sharp a point on the abandonment, it makes me feel terrible. I have abandonment issues. Call me a thief for taking my story back and I can deal with it. Say I'm making my story an orphan, I'll cry.

And I wish they weren't telling me again that I can go--just leave the story. Because I already know I'm extraneous, except for the stories.

I'm perfectly aware that I'm completely wrong about all of this, but being told how wrong I am is only going to push me harder into putting this story in my pocket, too. I'm perfectly aware that my feelings--and all this is nothing but my feelings--are indefensible. But I don't like it when the powerful people come and tell me how unreasonable I am not to want to do things their way. Not ask, just tell.

I can live with being disliked, considered a screwball, or an angry, shitty, classless, selfish jerkass, and I can live with people believing the lie that I'm doing this because I hate OTW and/or A3O. I can live with the whole rest of the world considering me irrational."

Most of her friend commiserate. And here is where it gets juicy.

: "I think AO3 defenders are bizarre. They are basically getting behind a group of people who want to academicize and homogenize fanfic. To put it plainly: OTW is a bunch of people who couldn't cut it as 18th century literature junior faculty, so they're basically trying to invent this new "transformative works" field on which to hang their academic ambitions. I firmly believe that these people are trying to use fans to get ahead (a la their rival Laura Hale). They might put a nicer spin on it--protecting fandom, preserving works, creating some big monumental archive that will legitimize fanfiction--but what they're doing is just another example of career-jockeying. Sure, they're not profiting off of AO3--not monetarily. But there are other ways of profiting. So I sort of can't believe that anyone would voluntarily hand over their stuff to AO3. I mean, you're basically saying, "Yes, make me your dissertation project."

[info]tzikeh responds: I could understand if you didn't like, or want to participate in OTW, if your own personal philosophy conflicts with the OTW's philosophy, but you are astoundingly uninformed--and willfully ignorant.

Have you bothered read the Who We Are section of the OTW site? That's a rhetorical question, since the answer is clear. The board is made up of WILDLY successful people--a Professor of Law at Georgetown who clerked for the Supreme Court; a Director of Film Studies and Professor of English at Muhlenberg; an MBA and CPA who worked for the U.S. Senate; and the woman who wrote the open-source code that has been the base for nearly every fannish archive that was created after she wrote it--oh, and a little something called the New York Times best-selling Temeraire series.

Yeah, they're all clearly people who couldn't cut it as 18th-century literature junior faculty."


[info]salvidar_as says "Yes, I've read the OTW site. I'm aware of the resumes of these so-called academics. I'm aware that they haven't produced academically sound or particularly rigorous work (I've read it). I've also read the academic journal. And it's bad. I am not willfully ignorant; these people are hacks."

[info]tzikeh calls SOCKPUPPET!

[info]salvidar_as "What a bizarre little post. I don't really owe you anything--no explanation, no social security number or CV. I don't need a biography to qualify my point of view. I don't think that one post in a person's personal journal qualifies as a "teabagging" movement--did you check your IQ at the door?

What's clear to me--and what's becoming increasingly clear to me--is that you AO3 people are absolutely insane. Everyone is apparently required to get on board the OTW train, and anyone who questions the academic merit of such a project (and yes, there are questions of merit--large ones) is a teabagger or a bully or a sockpuppet. Good job furthering the negative perceptions of the OTW fear-mongering machine. You're making Laura Hale look sane and lucid, and I didn't think that was possible.

I could write a lengthy response as to why OTW's academic journal is, well, kind of a joke (and OTW is regarded as a joke in most academic circles--you probably don't need me to tell you that ... or maybe you do), but I don't think that merritcatk actually intended this post for such purposes. If you want to defend OTW's academic purpose (ha), you have your choice of wank threads already in full swing.

Obviously, if OTW's reputation as a serious academic venture were truly unassailable, we wouldn't be having this conversation, because you wouldn't have to defend the organization against an insignificant, anonymous teabagger like me with my big lies and misinformation. But what I said must have hit a note. Oh my."

[info]tzikeh: I still say sockpuppet is you.

[info]salvidar_as "Okay, good luck defending the organization of scooby doo studies. Bye."


This end does not satisfying [info]tzikeh so she makes a post in her lj. "because she has fucking had it" and the discussion is just about clarifying and not very wanky--although possibly interesting when [info]liviapenn shows up and clarifies a few issues.

OH ETA: [info]melodyclark is here to show us all that even older women like to wank like horny thirteen year olds, but if she doesn't give it a rest I'm worried she's going to go blind, develop hairy palms, AND come down with a raging case of carpal tunnel syndrome.

thanks to [info]inquisition for the heads up.

eta 3.1415 The abyss is looking into us... and it's fucking stupid. :D

bonus lulz: [info]tzikeh point out to me that [info]melodyclark tried to edit her fanlore page.



On January 8, 2010 she edited her page to read:

"Melody does not exist. She is a figment of your imagination. So long and thanks for all the fiche."

It used to say:

"Melody wrote her first fan story in 1978, and started participating fannishly online in the early 90's, as an early member of Virgule. She is still in fandom and her fan fic site is at http://melodyclark.net and also on FanFiction.net[1]. However, in 2009 she announced she would no longer be publishing her fan fiction on the Internet for free, choosing instead to work with print fanzines exclusively. This came after a fan offered a not-completely positive review of her Holmes/Watson story "Akin to Love" which had appeared twenty years before in the print zine No Holds Barred #1.[2] [3] She made a similar online exit in 2007. [4]
Her zines

Melody Clark's Blake's 7 and Wiseguy novels are now published by Mysti Frank (agentwithstyle.com). Judith Proctor publishes the Blake's 7 novels that Judith herself reedited and republished as the initial published version was fraught with errors. Kathy Resch publishes Melody's Dark Shadows Grayson Hall zine as well as the award-winning Fire and Ice issue #1 which Melody co-edited with Kathy. Melody now writes in various other fandoms. In the early 2000s she briefly published fanzines under the name The M Press and distributed them via Mysti Frank. In 2009 she created the Media Fen website with the goal of offering fanzine publishers a location to advertise their zines.[5] "

Amazing someone can flounce over and over and not get it--like a sad rat in a maze who keeps zapping herself instead of avoiding the electrified cheese. Cheese is delicious though.




Page 3 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]mcity
2010-01-04 05:18 am UTC (link)
Since then I've come to a few realizations about myself. One of them is, I was born, and will probably die, an outsider. I don't fit. Sometimes, for short periods, with certain groups, I can be part of the in-crowd. But I always ask the wrong questions, the ones nobody else thinks of. I always cause trouble, and I need way too much down time from people, and I'm way, way too needy.


Come to think of it, Yuletide is the perfect time of year to randomly share what a special snowflake you are.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-01-04 09:49 am UTC
(Bon Jovi, Maverick theme, Billy Idol, The Smiths) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-04 12:36 pm UTC
Re: (Bon Jovi, Maverick theme, Billy Idol, The Smiths) - [info]librarianmouse, 2010-01-05 06:52 am UTC
Re: (Bon Jovi, Maverick theme, Billy Idol, The Smiths) - [info]louifee, 2010-01-05 09:58 am UTC
Re: (Bon Jovi, Maverick theme, Billy Idol, The Smiths) - [info]bisclavret, 2010-01-05 09:33 pm UTC
Re: (Bon Jovi, Maverick theme, Billy Idol, The Smiths) - [info]dana_kujan, 2010-01-05 07:00 am UTC
Re: (Bon Jovi, Maverick theme, Billy Idol, The Smiths) - [info]shayheyred, 2010-01-05 09:00 pm UTC
Re: (Bon Jovi, Maverick theme, Billy Idol, The Smiths) - [info]enrythe8th, 2010-01-06 03:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-04 06:30 pm UTC

[info]comixology
2010-01-04 05:20 am UTC (link)
D:

That is all I can manage after the WTF of that comment about how fandom studies and its ilk are not legitimate courses of study. I'm still trying to get my eyes back into their sockets, they bugged out so far. Holy moley!

(Reply to this)


[info]finchbird
2010-01-04 06:18 am UTC (link)
Both sides of this are coming off as idiots.

I really have nothing else to add to this wank besides the fact I'm so happy three Up fics were written, and one of them had Dug singing bits of Never Gonna Give You Up to Carl. XD

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2010-01-04 07:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shyofmirrors, 2010-01-04 01:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]finchbird, 2010-01-04 05:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaina, 2010-01-04 06:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2010-01-04 10:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]finchbird, 2010-01-05 08:40 am UTC
... - [info]rosehiptea, 2010-01-05 06:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-05 04:18 pm UTC
... - [info]rosehiptea, 2010-01-05 06:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigbigtruck, 2010-01-04 05:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]finchbird, 2010-01-04 05:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moosecharmer, 2010-01-06 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chasethecat, 2010-01-08 07:24 am UTC

[info]inquisition
2010-01-04 07:26 am UTC (link)
So I realize that there are a lot of people in the running, but am I the only one who thinks [info]melodyclark emerges as wank champion here?

From her first spat with nestra over Snacky's law to her another random spat with nestra here about how nestra is a troll (read the link, it is primo author entitlement wank) to her other random spat with nestra here (where she demonstrates that she doesn't know what "locking" means) to her complaining about how she's being ignored by the cool House/Wilson kids, I think if she keeps going, she will totally win.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 07:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]grrliz, 2010-01-04 08:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-04 09:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 09:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]trialia, 2010-01-04 09:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 09:31 am UTC
... - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-04 09:46 am UTC
... - [info]sylvacoer, 2010-01-04 04:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2010-01-04 08:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2010-01-04 09:28 pm UTC
... - [info]louifee, 2010-01-05 10:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2010-01-05 08:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]innocentsmith, 2010-01-04 09:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]christycorr, 2010-01-04 10:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryaminx, 2010-01-05 09:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rodo, 2010-01-04 09:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2010-01-04 09:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rodo, 2010-01-04 09:47 am UTC
... - [info]white_serpent, 2010-01-04 09:58 am UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-04 04:01 pm UTC
... - [info]sharps, 2010-01-04 05:22 pm UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-04 06:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2010-01-04 08:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-04 09:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 09:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-04 09:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sharps, 2010-01-04 01:46 pm UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-01-04 02:59 pm UTC
... - [info]sylvacoer, 2010-01-04 04:52 pm UTC
... - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-01-04 05:12 pm UTC
... - [info]irised, 2010-01-04 10:41 pm UTC
... - tetradecimal, 2010-01-04 03:43 pm UTC
... - [info]castellated, 2010-01-04 08:14 pm UTC
... - [info]irised, 2010-01-04 10:51 pm UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-01-05 01:13 am UTC
... - [info]ingrid, 2010-01-04 05:03 pm UTC
... - [info]sharps, 2010-01-04 05:14 pm UTC
... - [info]white_serpent, 2010-01-05 12:18 am UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-01-05 01:30 am UTC
... - [info]agent_hyatt, 2010-01-05 10:36 pm UTC
... - [info]sharps, 2010-01-06 01:29 am UTC
... - [info]agent_hyatt, 2010-01-06 02:26 am UTC
... - [info]sharps, 2010-01-06 02:37 am UTC
... - [info]waitwut, 2010-01-05 10:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2010-01-06 01:01 am UTC
... - [info]pingin_tango, 2010-01-06 10:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-01-04 09:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 09:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-04 11:59 am UTC
... - [info]rillalola, 2010-01-04 12:04 pm UTC
... - [info]cesare, 2010-01-04 12:44 pm UTC
... - [info]ladyvyola, 2010-01-04 04:27 pm UTC
... - [info]msmanna, 2010-01-04 06:31 pm UTC
... - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-05 12:49 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 08:41 pm UTC
... - [info]cesare, 2010-01-05 12:00 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 12:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigbigtruck, 2010-01-04 05:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kitt_in_socks, 2010-01-05 12:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 12:30 am UTC
... - [info]goblin, 2010-01-05 05:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-04 10:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 10:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparklepuss, 2010-01-04 10:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]inquisition, 2010-01-04 04:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-04 04:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sharps, 2010-01-04 05:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryaminx, 2010-01-05 10:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]becktionary, 2010-01-05 10:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-06 05:28 am UTC
... - [info]becktionary, 2010-01-06 06:05 am UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-06 09:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]trialia, 2010-01-04 09:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-04 09:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2010-01-04 08:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]finchbird, 2010-01-04 05:33 pm UTC
A choice quote from her journal - [info]sharps, 2010-01-04 05:56 pm UTC
Re: A choice quote from her journal - tetradecimal, 2010-01-04 06:16 pm UTC
Re: A choice quote from her journal - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-04 08:03 pm UTC
Re: A choice quote from her journal - tetradecimal, 2010-01-04 08:09 pm UTC
... - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-05 06:47 am UTC
Re: A choice quote from her journal - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-05 12:54 am UTC
Re: A choice quote from her journal - [info]sharps, 2010-01-05 01:03 am UTC
Re: A choice quote from her journal - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-05 01:16 am UTC
... - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-05 01:41 am UTC
... - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-05 01:45 am UTC
... - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-05 01:59 am UTC
... - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-05 02:01 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 02:04 am UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-05 05:24 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 05:36 am UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-05 05:37 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 06:04 am UTC
... - [info]inquisition, 2010-01-05 01:47 am UTC
... - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-05 01:51 am UTC
... - [info]innocentsmith, 2010-01-05 03:10 am UTC
... - [info]moljn, 2010-01-05 09:08 am UTC
... - [info]ihateyouall, 2010-01-08 03:20 am UTC
Re: A choice quote from her journal - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 01:09 am UTC
Re: A choice quote from her journal - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-05 01:14 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 01:23 am UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-05 05:27 am UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-05 10:31 pm UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-05 10:38 pm UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-05 10:41 pm UTC
... - [info]kitt_in_socks, 2010-01-05 02:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2010-01-04 07:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sapote3, 2010-01-04 08:37 pm UTC

[info]blue_penguin
2010-01-04 08:06 am UTC (link)
So with all this stuff about orphans, I'm now picturing merricatk as the Major General from Pirates of Penzance.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]undomielregina, 2010-01-04 08:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-04 09:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-04 09:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lil_miss_stfu, 2010-01-04 04:45 pm UTC

[info]lemonsherry
2010-01-04 08:35 am UTC (link)
merritcatk, I'll catch you in email where sanity prevails and jealous primates don't play politics.

There are so many things wrong with this sentence I don't even know where to start.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 08:46 am UTC

[info]aloysius
2010-01-04 08:40 am UTC (link)
I know it's irrelevant to the fact that they're all needy emo wankers, but are their fics actually any good, then?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 08:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]juliansinger, 2010-01-04 01:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doire, 2010-01-04 02:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]inalasahl, 2010-01-04 05:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryaminx, 2010-01-05 09:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pandonkey, 2010-01-06 05:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2010-01-04 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aloysius, 2010-01-04 09:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]becktionary, 2010-01-04 09:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miggy, 2010-01-05 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]glossing2, 2010-01-06 06:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aloysius, 2010-01-06 10:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]glossing2, 2010-01-06 10:26 pm UTC

[info]chikane
2010-01-04 09:06 am UTC (link)
I love wanks where everyone involved comes across as a raging douchebag.

Whiny special snowflakes VS ANNNNNNGRY supporters using completely fail analogies? Yay!

(Reply to this)


[info]maximuski
2010-01-04 09:44 am UTC (link)
I wish they weren't using the word orphan. It's too poetic, it puts to sharp a point on the abandonment, it makes me feel terrible. I have abandonment issues. Call me a thief for taking my story back and I can deal with it. Say I'm making my story an orphan, I'll cry.

Oh for the love of Christ!!

merricatk seems to be the author of BAWWING FOR DUMMIES

(Reply to this)

Merricat, said Constance, would you like a cup of tea?
[info]asparagirl
2010-01-04 09:56 am UTC (link)
You know, the first thing that came to mind when I saw the name "merricatk" is the protagonist of Shirley Jackson's book "We Have Always Lived in the Castle", Merricat (Mary Katherine) Blackwood.

If you've read that story, I don't have to explain why I then got the shudders when "merricatk" started talking about herself always being an outcast, and why she desperately doesn't want to "orphan" anything...!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Merricat, said Constance, would you like a cup of tea? - [info]innocentsmith, 2010-01-04 09:58 am UTC
Re: Merricat, said Constance, would you like a cup of tea? - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-04 06:20 pm UTC
Re: Merricat, said Constance, would you like a cup of tea? - [info]phosfate, 2010-01-04 09:48 pm UTC
Re: Merricat, said Constance, would you like a cup of tea? - [info]brennalarose, 2010-01-04 11:56 pm UTC
Re: Merricat, said Constance, would you like a cup of tea? - [info]rosehiptea, 2010-01-05 04:58 am UTC

[info]sablemouse
2010-01-04 10:20 am UTC (link)
Whoa, all those tags weren't there yesterday *blinks*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-04 10:43 am UTC

[info]sparklepuss
2010-01-04 11:13 am UTC (link)
Oh, the insanity is strong with this wank! [info]melodyclark barges in on [info]nestra's LJ to yell at her for barging in on merricatk's LJ. Or something. I've lost my Insanity-English dictionary.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-04 03:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-04 03:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparklepuss, 2010-01-04 08:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-05 03:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-04 05:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-04 06:24 pm UTC

[info]cesare
2010-01-04 12:19 pm UTC (link)
It's too bad this FW post is probably just going to feed even more into Merricatk's persecution/martyr weirdness. Surely she posted such an almighty whinge to provoke reaction... sympathy or backlash, it's all just more confetti for her pity party.

I mean, it's just not that big a deal. It's one story. Somehow I doubt anyone would give her a hard time when Yuletide's archive migrates if she just deletes it.

(Reply to this)


[info]rodo
2010-01-04 01:32 pm UTC (link)
[info]redbrunja disabled the comments to her post. Does anybody have screencaps?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]galateus, 2010-01-04 03:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-04 04:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]galateus, 2010-01-04 04:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-04 06:06 pm UTC
... - [info]galateus, 2010-01-04 06:34 pm UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-04 09:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 08:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]galateus, 2010-01-04 04:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 08:44 pm UTC

[info]bacon_lover
2010-01-04 01:57 pm UTC (link)
Anon replying to tzikeh's lj post: you sorry excuse for a fertilized embryo, which made me think of prenatal infant impregnation.

COME ALONG AND RIDE ON A FANTASTIC VOYAGE!

(Reply to this)


[info]jkefka
2010-01-04 02:13 pm UTC (link)
I think we're all missing the point of this wank: When the internet apocalypse comes, where do we store F_W to protect it from the ravening hordes? Clearly we should all pick backup engines and then whine mercilessly at each other until one becomes dominant.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2010-01-04 03:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-05 04:05 pm UTC
Two interesting facts about Yuletide 2009
[info]urpletastic
2010-01-04 03:41 pm UTC (link)
Actually, probably the only two ...

1. Fifteen people requested Henry V slash stories.

2. None of them was me.

Other than that, I have very little apart from wishing [info]melodyclark, who is a friend of a friend, would STFU.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Two interesting facts about Yuletide 2009 - [info]sgaana, 2010-01-05 06:09 am UTC
Re: Two interesting facts about Yuletide 2009 - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 06:14 am UTC
Re: Two interesting facts about Yuletide 2009 - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-05 10:14 am UTC
Re: Two interesting facts about Yuletide 2009 - [info]witty, 2010-01-06 03:32 am UTC
Re: Two interesting facts about Yuletide 2009 - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-06 10:52 am UTC

[info]willywanka
2010-01-04 03:45 pm UTC (link)
I HATE the "new breed" in LJ fandom that has no links to old fandom where we respected other, older writers and didn't resent them.

lol okay.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2010-01-04 03:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]willywanka, 2010-01-04 03:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-04 04:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2010-01-04 04:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaina, 2010-01-04 07:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-05 12:49 am UTC
... - tetradecimal, 2010-01-05 12:56 am UTC
... - [info]innocentsmith, 2010-01-05 10:51 am UTC
... - [info]agent_hyatt, 2010-01-05 11:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]grrliz, 2010-01-05 03:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vito_excalibur, 2010-01-05 05:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-05 07:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-04 03:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-04 03:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]willywanka, 2010-01-04 03:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caoilainn, 2010-01-04 04:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-05 07:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 07:18 am UTC
she is totally fandom cartman. - [info]annaham, 2010-01-06 11:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]witty, 2010-01-04 05:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sharps, 2010-01-04 05:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nestra, 2010-01-05 07:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 07:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-04 05:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-04 06:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gairid, 2010-01-04 10:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ook, 2010-01-05 01:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kermit_the_sock, 2010-01-05 11:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_sun_is_up, 2010-01-06 05:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2010-01-04 07:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lizzypaul, 2010-01-04 08:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2010-01-04 10:12 pm UTC
... - [info]angstymcgoth, 2010-01-05 05:45 am UTC
... - [info]castellated, 2010-01-06 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]monty, 2010-01-05 01:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-01-05 07:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-05 04:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aaron_agonistes, 2010-01-05 09:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lizzypaul, 2010-01-04 08:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2010-01-04 10:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 10:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]urpletastic, 2010-01-06 03:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-01-05 03:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyvyola, 2010-01-05 04:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evanwaters, 2010-01-05 07:04 am UTC

[info]ingrid
2010-01-04 05:34 pm UTC (link)
Rarely have I read posts from people who are so absolutely clueless, yet so utterly convinced they are right.

It's ... embarrassing.

And what's up with melodyclark's backwards Greta Garbo routine? "I want to be left alone, right after I go into multiple public journals and wank like there's no tomorrow?"

I was there during the 'old days'. We had butthurt, jealousy and hypocrisy then too! No, really!

(Reply to this)


[info]hallidae
2010-01-04 06:53 pm UTC (link)
Okay, caught up on the new page of "what the hell?" and all I have to say is: I've got me a nice bat here that has "Self-Awareness" stamped on the side of it (because sometimes, "Clue" bats just aren't enough). Who's with me?

(Reply to this)


[info]castellated
2010-01-04 07:40 pm UTC (link)
I like wanks like this - I barely understand them, know none of those involved, and can actually see both sides to an extent. Why won't OTW (whoever the hell that is) talk about A03 (which I've heard of) if there is a process whereby OTW fics will be transferred to A03? "We're going to do something but not talk about it" is an invitation to wank.

That said, jeez - just opt out, merricatk "my psychological issues should be catered to, by force if necessary." Dude - just opt out.

And tzikeh might want to reconsider her "I don't care if people don't like A03 but I HATE IT WHEN THEY DON'T LIKE IT AND ACTUALLY SAY SO GRRRRRRRRRRRRR!" stance as slightly hypocritical. Again, dude - decaf, please.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lydiabell, 2010-01-04 07:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-04 07:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cereta, 2010-01-04 08:14 pm UTC
... - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2010-01-06 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2010-01-04 08:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lydiabell, 2010-01-05 12:19 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 12:25 am UTC
... - [info]castellated, 2010-01-06 03:02 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 03:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tzikeh, 2010-01-05 05:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lydiabell, 2010-01-05 05:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 05:14 am UTC
... - [info]tzikeh, 2010-01-05 05:20 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 05:37 am UTC
... - [info]tzikeh, 2010-01-05 05:39 am UTC
... - [info]tzikeh, 2010-01-06 02:31 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 03:37 am UTC
... - [info]agent_hyatt, 2010-01-06 02:04 am UTC
... - [info]tzikeh, 2010-01-06 02:12 am UTC
... - [info]becktionary, 2010-01-06 02:13 am UTC
... - [info]phosfate, 2010-01-06 05:36 am UTC
... - [info]tzikeh, 2010-01-06 06:53 am UTC
... - [info]phosfate, 2010-01-06 04:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cereta, 2010-01-04 08:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]inalasahl, 2010-01-04 08:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2010-01-04 11:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]galateus, 2010-01-04 08:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-01-04 09:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]veleda_k, 2010-01-04 09:44 pm UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-04 11:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2010-01-04 11:38 pm UTC
... - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-05 01:02 am UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-05 03:54 am UTC
... - [info]jihadiva, 2010-01-05 04:58 am UTC
... - [info]magnolia_mama, 2010-01-05 03:43 pm UTC
... - [info]jihadiva, 2010-01-05 05:35 pm UTC
... - [info]cesare, 2010-01-06 01:49 am UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-06 03:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tzikeh, 2010-01-06 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-06 03:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tzikeh, 2010-01-06 04:05 am UTC
... - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-06 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2010-01-06 03:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2010-01-06 03:55 am UTC
J'ACCUZZI! - [info]tzikeh, 2010-01-06 04:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mefan, 2010-01-08 07:25 am UTC
That Word Which Is Blocked - [info]inalasahl, 2010-01-06 09:04 am UTC

[info]sticks
2010-01-04 08:21 pm UTC (link)
I can't find the "who we are" page, which is a shame, because I want to bake cookies for the GU law prof involved in this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]galateus, 2010-01-04 08:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sticks, 2010-01-04 08:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aloysius, 2010-01-04 08:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nights_mistress, 2010-01-04 10:55 pm UTC

[info]castellated
2010-01-04 08:25 pm UTC (link)
From melodyclark's "discussion" in merricatk's journal post - You people all get involved in metafandom nonsense which I do not.

This is her not getting involved, then, I take it? Cuz she sucks at it. Anyone care to count up her posts?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-04 08:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 09:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2010-01-04 10:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 10:17 pm UTC
... - [info]juliansinger, 2010-01-04 11:38 pm UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 12:10 am UTC
... - [info]msmanna, 2010-01-05 02:04 am UTC
... - [info]castellated, 2010-01-06 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-06 03:15 am UTC

[info]jupiterpluvius
2010-01-04 10:00 pm UTC (link)
I am really confused by this whole thing. If you don't like the way your fanfic is being archived, withdraw it from the archive, yes? HOW DO THESE PEOPLE MANAGE TO REMEMBER WHICH ORDER THE SHOES AND SOCKS GO ON IN?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-04 10:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sgtgeorgecarter, 2010-01-04 10:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilan, 2010-01-04 11:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sgtgeorgecarter, 2010-01-04 11:16 pm UTC
... - [info]juliansinger, 2010-01-04 11:41 pm UTC
... - [info]sgtgeorgecarter, 2010-01-04 11:55 pm UTC
... - [info]sapote3, 2010-01-05 12:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2010-01-05 01:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sgtgeorgecarter, 2010-01-05 03:24 am UTC
... - [info]cesare, 2010-01-05 04:30 am UTC

(Deleted post)
... - [info]juliansinger, 2010-01-05 05:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]juliansinger, 2010-01-05 05:39 am UTC
... - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2010-01-05 08:20 pm UTC
... - [info]franzeska, 2010-01-05 09:43 pm UTC

[info]sabinelagrande
2010-01-05 01:04 am UTC (link)
It is 2010! Why are people still surprised by the existence of academic studies of fanfiction?! Can they even hear us back there in 1992?!

[/soapbox]

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2010-01-05 01:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ancarett, 2010-01-05 01:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sabinelagrande, 2010-01-05 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ancarett, 2010-01-05 01:54 am UTC
... - [info]sabinelagrande, 2010-01-05 01:57 am UTC
... - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-05 02:41 am UTC
... - [info]sabinelagrande, 2010-01-05 02:43 am UTC
... - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-01-05 03:52 am UTC
... - [info]carmarthen, 2010-01-05 10:28 am UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-05 10:55 pm UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 02:00 am UTC
... - [info]ancarett, 2010-01-05 04:21 am UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-05 10:56 pm UTC
... - ariadne484, 2010-01-05 03:58 pm UTC
... - [info]ari_o, 2010-01-05 10:56 pm UTC
... - [info]monty, 2010-01-05 03:40 am UTC
... - [info]ancarett, 2010-01-05 04:22 am UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-05 10:59 pm UTC
... - [info]witty, 2010-01-06 03:49 am UTC
... - [info]tofuknight, 2010-01-06 07:13 pm UTC
... - [info]anonyrat, 2010-01-05 05:27 am UTC
... - [info]becktionary, 2010-01-05 05:49 am UTC
... - [info]monty, 2010-01-05 06:25 am UTC
... - [info]becktionary, 2010-01-05 06:27 am UTC
... - [info]rosehiptea, 2010-01-05 07:50 am UTC
... - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-01-05 11:04 am UTC
... - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-01-05 04:25 pm UTC
... - [info]agent_hyatt, 2010-01-06 02:16 am UTC
... - [info]ladyvyola, 2010-01-05 04:15 am UTC
... - [info]ancarett, 2010-01-05 04:24 am UTC
... - [info]ladyvyola, 2010-01-05 07:25 am UTC
... - [info]ancarett, 2010-01-05 04:51 pm UTC
... - [info]ladyvyola, 2010-01-06 03:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-01-05 04:14 am UTC



Page 3 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map