Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



My home planet is dead! ([info]trisandrockets) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2010-02-10 22:01:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:entitlement, fan rage

This is why we can't have nice things and/or Subway
Taken from a mousie on [info]wank_report (with some later additions that I found):



The TV show "Chuck" goes into its pre-Olympic break with an episode that fails to get the titular character together with his spy minder Sarah. The 'shipper universe explodes.

It is supposedly insane on the NBC forums, but I ran across it in TV writer Alan Sepinwall's regular blogging of the show here:

264 comments and counting as of now.

In addition to the oh-so-cliched declarations of shark jumping, posters go back to their fight to get "Chuck" renewed last year, which included buying sandwiches from a show sponsor, Subway. A waste of time, they declare. A travesty! And the failure to support the shippers should result in the shippers boycotting "Chuck" until the show runners respond to their whims! If not, the show will be canceled! That'll show 'em. (Yeah, I don't know either.)

Some choice comments:
i feel dirty after watching that and investing my time for the last few years.
---

worst show ever. read the nbc boards alan... unbelievable. i thought you wrote on Chuck well, but you're way off on this one. JS and JF messed this up big time.
----

When Chuck returns after the Olympics, no one should watch it on air. Rather we should all watch it online at Hulu or any other online service we can find. Failing that, DVR the show and watch it that way.

That way we can send a message to NBC and the producers of the show that we are still interested in the show but we are not prepared to settle for the caliber of show we saw last night. “We’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it anymore”.

If we can bring the number of on air viewers below 1 million, the advertisers will take note. You can count on that. You can also bet the advertisers will be on the phone to NBC and the producers of Chuck. Money talks after all.

If everyone that loves the show were to watch online at Hulu, you can bet NBC would notice that too. We can send a message and still get our Chuck fix.
We need NBC to know that we love the show. We also need for NBC to know that we are disappointed.

----

And the wank is spilling over to npr.org where blogger Linda Holmes (who some of you may know from her previous incarnation as Miss Alli on TWoP) makes the sensible notice that perhaps fans shouldn't try to control the story line, since they don't know what's planned.


The response?
"Linda Holmes, you'd make a horrible politician because your spin is transparent. First, this soap opera style writing is juvenile. Perhaps you wouldn't do anything to be with the man you love, because that's exactly how the producers chose to press that reset button in the season's premiere (grown ups would talk and work things out, not be as immature as these two have been)."

----

my part starts here

Alan Sepinwall then sits down with the Chuck co-creators for a chat, where they say "er, we're in the middle of a storyline here."

195 comments worth of back-and-forth between, and I quote:

"It continues to amaze me how JS just doesn't seem to get it that when you have a show that rides a fine line with ratings that when you go over the top to alienate your fan base on purpose, it could end your show. " and

"It's like a child who is angry at it's parents for not giving it ice cream and lollipops for dinner, and who throws it's vegetables on the ground, kicking and screaming. When there is clearly ice cream in the freezer waiting to be served for dessert. Sigh. Seriously folks. Sigh." ensue.

There's also a lot of "but it's not because we're 'shippers, it's because the characters aren't exactly like they were last season CHANGE THEM BACK" and a bit of "well, you have to be in the payroll of Chuck/NBC if you don't agree with me." (This is my favorite example. Apparently the Eye of Mordor has been attached to Chuck.) And a lot of tl;dr.

TV critic Todd VanDerWeff collects much of the commentary, some choice fan comments, with a bit of laugh-at-the-'shippers himself.

And Jamie Weinman asks the impossible: what do shippers even want?

The NBC boards are indeed crazy right now. I don't even know how to wade in there.

Also, I kind of want a sandwich.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]kylenne
2010-02-11 09:05 am UTC (link)
You know your ship is batfuck insane when Miss Alli is rational and making sense in comparison.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-02-11 04:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyvorkosigan, 2010-02-11 04:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kylenne, 2010-02-11 05:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-02-11 11:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smashingstars, 2010-02-12 06:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyvorkosigan, 2010-02-12 02:39 am UTC

[info]elfshadow
2010-02-11 09:06 am UTC (link)
...Make it all stop. Please?

(Reply to this)


[info]ghostmaster
2010-02-11 09:09 am UTC (link)
Never been more grateful to be a Casey/Chuck shipper.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]havocthecat, 2010-02-11 04:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2010-02-11 09:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ellensmithee, 2010-02-11 10:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2010-02-12 12:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2010-02-12 01:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]makeshyft, 2010-02-12 12:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rganymede, 2010-02-12 03:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryaminx, 2010-02-14 05:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yotz_fen, 2010-02-13 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2010-02-13 09:30 am UTC

[info]freezer
2010-02-11 09:15 am UTC (link)
And here I thought the big kerfluffle would've been over the show blatantly swiping Quantum Leap's shtick moving Chuck away from "adorkable geek with Random Encylopedia Of Everything in his had" and towards "badass superspy who can asspull abilities on demand".



* Admittedly, I draw the above conclusions solely from promos, since I don't watch the show myself.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]southerngaelic, 2010-02-11 09:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]soupspooks, 2010-02-11 11:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadowmonkey, 2010-02-12 01:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]soupspooks, 2010-02-12 08:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the__ivorytower, 2010-02-12 01:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]soupspooks, 2010-02-12 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2010-02-11 10:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aloysius, 2010-02-11 12:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]themadscientist, 2010-02-11 04:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amadi, 2010-02-11 05:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2010-02-11 05:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amadi, 2010-02-11 06:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2010-02-11 08:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amadi, 2010-02-11 08:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadowmonkey, 2010-02-12 01:28 am UTC

[info]the_labrat_army
2010-02-11 09:26 am UTC (link)
It's funny how fans sometimes feel they have a lot more power over the creators than they actually do.
Not that I haven't been guilty of flipping the channel when I'm annoyed with my favourite shows, but seriously, this whole "let's all boycott the show -- then they'll be sorry" thing?

If the entire online Chuck community boycotted, I'll be shocked if the show's ratings even waver. Generally, online fans only make up a tiny percentage of the audience.[/The More You Know]

Unless there actually are a million Chuck fans online...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]adevyish, 2010-02-11 10:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]theelusiven, 2010-02-11 06:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-02-11 11:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2010-02-12 12:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-02-16 08:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2010-02-11 10:09 pm UTC

[info]rekall
2010-02-11 09:27 am UTC (link)
If we can bring the number of on air viewers below 1 million, the advertisers will take note. You can count on that. You can also bet the advertisers will be on the phone to NBC and the producers of Chuck. Money talks after all.

That's a really good way of getting your favourite show cancelled.

No advertisers = no money = cancelled show = replaced by new hit reality show 'THE BACHELOR: IN SPACE'

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]insouciance, 2010-02-11 09:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bienegold, 2010-02-11 09:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_labrat_army, 2010-02-11 10:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bobafeis, 2010-02-11 12:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aurora_84, 2010-02-11 07:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_labrat_army, 2010-02-11 08:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evanwaters, 2010-02-14 03:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sokudoningyou, 2010-02-15 09:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2010-02-11 10:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-02-11 04:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2010-02-11 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-02-11 11:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2010-02-11 01:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lied_ohne_worte, 2010-02-11 11:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]varethane, 2010-02-12 07:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaos_theory, 2010-02-11 08:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]makeshyft, 2010-02-12 12:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]abharding, 2010-02-11 08:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]uldihaa, 2010-02-16 04:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2010-02-11 09:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]msmanna, 2010-02-12 02:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-02-16 08:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sadisticferret, 2010-02-13 11:03 pm UTC

[info]ari_o
2010-02-11 10:31 am UTC (link)
"Linda Holmes, you'd make a horrible politician because your spin is transparent. First, this soap opera style writing is juvenile. Perhaps you wouldn't do anything to be with the man you love, because that's exactly how the producers chose to press that reset button in the season's premiere (grown ups would talk and work things out, not be as immature as these two have been)."


There are many things I would NEVER do to be with the man I love.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]amy_wolf, 2010-02-11 11:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-02-11 07:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alexa, 2010-02-11 07:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-02-11 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alienist, 2010-02-11 09:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kylenne, 2010-02-11 04:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alienist, 2010-02-11 09:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-02-11 11:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2010-02-11 11:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-02-12 04:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_labrat_army, 2010-02-12 08:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-02-12 08:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_labrat_army, 2010-02-12 08:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-02-12 09:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_labrat_army, 2010-02-13 07:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-02-13 07:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_labrat_army, 2010-02-14 11:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-02-14 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2010-02-12 03:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-02-12 09:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amy_wolf, 2010-02-13 06:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uldihaa, 2010-02-16 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]w00b, 2010-02-18 07:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2010-02-18 08:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beejium, 2010-02-13 03:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2010-02-13 03:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]w00b, 2010-02-18 07:29 pm UTC

[info]christycorr
2010-02-11 12:09 pm UTC (link)
Wow, all the pretty that is Brandon Routh (so much pretty) has thoroughly distracted me. I didn't even realise there would be butthurt shipper wank!

...Eh, whatever. *continues to ogle*

Rock on, fandom.

(Reply to this)


[info]duraniedrama
2010-02-11 03:23 pm UTC (link)
Comments at the blog of critic Alan Sepinwall, where Chuck tends to be very popular, accused the show of all the usual sins: betrayal, stupidity, and -- of course -- jumping the shark, an expression that is now so preposterously overused that its very appearance indicates that the discussion in question has already ... well, you know.

Is "jumping the shark" the new Godwin's or something?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]polygamouse, 2010-02-11 03:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-02-11 04:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamnotyourmuse, 2010-02-11 04:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-02-11 07:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2010-02-11 06:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alienist, 2010-02-11 09:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2010-02-12 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-02-11 11:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2010-02-11 11:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]poisonyoulove, 2010-02-12 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edelweiss, 2010-02-12 03:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beejium, 2010-02-13 03:09 am UTC

[info]queencallipygos
2010-02-11 03:56 pm UTC (link)
From the "What do shippers want" link:

On the other hand, here’s what I find weird about ’shipping: it often seems so divorced from any specific goal for the characters.

Shit, it's divorced from LOGIC sometimes. On the old Television Without Pity boards, they used to let posters buy banner ads that could say whatever they wanted. Most people posted tributes to their favorite show. Sometime after Tara was killed, some Tara/Willow shippers bought a couple banner ads -- they had a picture of Tara and used all this sparkly rainbow font, and claimed, "We Won't Watch until you Bring the magic back. Signed, fans of THE MAGIC."

...I had the idea to run a counter-ad: same glittery font, reading "Tara is dead. ACCEPT IT. Signed, fans of MOVING ON."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kylenne, 2010-02-11 04:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]queencallipygos, 2010-02-11 04:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mpoetess, 2010-02-11 04:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kylenne, 2010-02-11 05:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]queencallipygos, 2010-02-12 04:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-02-11 04:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kylenne, 2010-02-11 05:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2010-02-12 01:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2010-02-11 07:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2010-02-11 09:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]so_long42, 2010-02-12 06:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tianxiaode, 2010-02-12 08:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_labrat_army, 2010-02-12 08:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]daisymay79, 2010-02-12 02:54 pm UTC

[info]twinno
2010-02-11 04:54 pm UTC (link)
I was going to read this whole thing, but I'm hungry for a sandwich so I'm going to Subway. Can I get anything for anyone else while I'm there?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-02-11 07:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beachlass, 2010-02-11 08:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2010-02-11 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sequinedlizard, 2010-02-12 01:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]finchbird, 2010-02-12 01:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]keleri, 2010-02-12 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]re_weird, 2010-02-12 05:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]immortal_jedi, 2010-02-12 08:35 am UTC

[info]frequentmouse
2010-02-11 05:58 pm UTC (link)
The shipper replies in the Todd VanDerWeff column are amazing in their utter lack of self-awareness (and yes, bringing horrible revisits to the worst days of BtVS s7 at the TWoP boards, *shudder*): way to make the columnist's point, ladies.

One of them goes to show how myopic their world view is, asserting that everyone always ships OTP for every show they watch: no, thanks. If it's not John/Aeryn, I don't care sufficiently to get offended by someone shipping something else. and Chuck/Sarah is no J/A.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2010-02-11 06:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-02-11 06:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-02-12 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-02-12 02:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadowmonkey, 2010-02-12 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-02-12 02:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-02-12 02:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-02-12 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tarash, 2010-02-12 03:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-02-16 08:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadowmonkey, 2010-02-12 03:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]msmanna, 2010-02-12 02:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2010-02-12 02:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sokudoningyou, 2010-02-15 10:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beejium, 2010-02-13 03:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amy_wolf, 2010-02-13 06:42 am UTC

[info]mcity
2010-02-11 06:24 pm UTC (link)
>an episode that fails to get the titular character together with his spy minder Sarah

And the difference between that and the entire rest of the series is...?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kitt_in_socks, 2010-02-11 06:58 pm UTC

[info]aurora_84
2010-02-11 07:42 pm UTC (link)
OH GOD, THE ENTITLEMENT!

(Reply to this)


[info]alexa
2010-02-11 07:58 pm UTC (link)
There are really people who care this much about Chuck? Personally, it was hardly on my radar and not something I had any feelings on either way, until I saw a commercial for this season with the old "awkward guy makes a 'OOOHwwaAAHHaaaahhH!' sound while waving his hands in a kung-fu-like manner" joke, and it landed in my never watch ever list.

(No offense to anyone who does like the show... but yeah.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jaythenerdkid, 2010-02-13 09:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shutthef_up, 2010-02-14 06:58 pm UTC

[info]chaos_theory
2010-02-11 08:35 pm UTC (link)
"I love Chuck so much that I want it taken off the air. If I can't have it exactly the way I want it exactly when, no one gets to have it at all, god damn it."

I guess we should be happy that all these people are directing their creeper energy at the TV instead of anything...you know...alive.

(Reply to this)

JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME!
[info]snacky
2010-02-11 08:50 pm UTC (link)
I never watch this show, because I don't like it and think it sucks!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]mister_terrific, 2010-02-11 09:17 pm UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]caito, 2010-02-11 11:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alienist, 2010-02-11 09:48 pm UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]jujubee, 2010-02-11 10:57 pm UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]puipui, 2010-02-11 11:36 pm UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]snacky, 2010-02-12 02:19 am UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]agent_hyatt, 2010-02-12 12:10 am UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-02-12 01:46 am UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]sandglass, 2010-02-12 06:13 am UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]crysiana, 2010-02-12 12:23 am UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]veleda_k, 2010-02-12 04:55 am UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]caito, 2010-02-12 05:19 am UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]snarkhunter, 2010-02-12 03:38 pm UTC
Re: JUST TRYING SOMETHING HERE, DON'T MIND ME! - [info]missdaisy, 2010-02-12 05:24 pm UTC

[info]kernelm
2010-02-12 12:07 am UTC (link)
I was actually really annoyed with the giant reset button this season, but honestly I don't know why people are surprised at this point. If you watch Chuck, you should realize he's always going to be an idiot in many ways and he and Sarah will always find ways to not get together. This is like watching South Park and being outraged when Kenny dies.

Disclaimer: We're behind on our shows, so I don't know if something crazy has happened plotwise recently.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]crysiana, 2010-02-12 12:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]veleda_k, 2010-02-12 04:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crysiana, 2010-02-12 05:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sokudoningyou, 2010-02-15 10:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]w00b, 2010-02-18 07:34 pm UTC

[info]greenling
2010-02-12 01:14 am UTC (link)
God I want Subway right now. A footlong meatball with swiss and cucumbers and black olives and honey mustard.

...I've never heard of this show and have nothing useful to say.

(Reply to this)


[info]photosinensis
2010-02-12 01:28 am UTC (link)
Okay, so let me get this straight: you'd rather see the show canceled than not get your pairing written into canon?

Why don't you have a seat right next to the Harmonians? I'm sure y'all will get along just fine.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]deludedvision, 2010-02-12 04:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-02-12 12:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]twinno, 2010-02-12 05:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aewgliriel, 2010-02-13 02:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-02-16 08:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aewgliriel, 2010-02-16 08:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-02-16 08:39 am UTC

[info]finchbird
2010-02-12 01:34 am UTC (link)
Rather we should all watch it online at Hulu

NBC still benefits from people watching their shows on Hulu, idiot.

I want Subway. :(

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2010-02-12 04:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]finchbird, 2010-02-12 06:39 pm UTC

[info]hallidae
2010-02-12 02:39 am UTC (link)
Meh. I quit watching when Lana joined the cast.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]neridne, 2010-02-13 03:32 am UTC

[info]shadowmonkey
2010-02-12 03:10 am UTC (link)
Okay, the internet has failed me. Reading this wank made me think Casey/Cole slash (or even gen) would be kinda awesome. But there appears to be none.

Woe.

(Reply to this)


[info]serafina20
2010-02-12 04:46 am UTC (link)
I think everyone here is missing the real point:

Where's the Chuck/Shaw fic?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]j_crew_guy, 2010-02-12 05:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]neridne, 2010-02-13 03:32 am UTC

[info]coffee_mug
2010-02-12 10:51 am UTC (link)
The really weird thing? This *sort of* makes me want to watch it. Even though I've been burned far too many times by will-they-won't-they canon-esque het pairings.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2010-02-14 02:28 am UTC


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map