Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



mariem_1 ([info]mariem_1) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2010-02-17 05:03:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:crazy people, doesn't mean what you think it means, fandom: harry potter, i see stupid people, jkr doesn't know harry potter like i do, potter fandom will not be outwanked!, slytherfen, what the shit is this?, whut

James and Lily would make a cup dance on baby Dudley's head, make him cry and lock him in a cupboard
Snapedom issued a new challenge - Bullies and Fathers. This topic was suggested by [info]mary_j_59. She wrote:

What convinces so many people that Snape is a bully by nature, and abusive? And why do people like me - who can see that he actually does bully, and is even abusive on a couple of occasions - insist that, nevertheless, Severus is far more victim than perpetrator, and is neither habitually abusive, nor an habitual bully?

That seems to be the real gulf between the Snape lovers and the Snape haters, and it's a sore point.

And it actually goes along with Snape as a father. I'm sure that those who see Snape as bully would insist that Snape would be an abusive father, whereas I and others see him as struggling to break the chain of abuse -and succeeding. Again, Rowling would like us to see Harry this way, but she never shows us Harry holding back, being sorry, reconsidering his actions - all of which she actually does show us in Severus. So I can't buy the "happy family/Harry as good father" picture she tries to sell us in the epilogue. I can, on the other hand, see Snape as a good father, perhaps most of all because he does have a conscience (however rudimentary - this sets him apart from just about everyone in the Wizarding World) and is not afraid to discipline the children in his care.


[info]sylvanawood added:

I would like to extend this topic to other fathers in the wizarding world. How about James? We know he was a bully, we are being told he was a good father. How do you see it?

How about Remus Lupin who ran away from his responsibility but later totally fell in love with his son?

And Arthur Weasley who is presented as the model father? Some call him hen-pecked, some Molly's eightst child. He certainly seems like the anti-bully. What do you think?

How about Lucius Malfoy? Would Sirius have been a good father or would he have lost interest when the child didn't turn out the way he wanted? Can you think of others?


Snapefen proceeded to answer that Snape was never a bully, that Lucius was a good father and that Arthur, Remus and Harry were bad fathers. [info]pearlette and [info]night_train_fm tried to disagree with that and were told that James and Lily would've abused Dudley, that Dumbledore wanted Harry to be abused by the Dursleys and sent Hagrid to Harry in order to make Harry emotionally dependent on Dumbledore, that the Wesleys are Gryffindor propagandists who forget nothing and learn nothing, that Albus Severus probably thinks that his father hates him because his relatives constantly diss Snape, that Draco is watching out at the Ministry, keeping Hermione's self-righteousness in check (and even JKR doesn't know about that). Never change, Snapefen!

ETA: marionros graced this wank with her loony presence.

ETA 2: sylvanawood thinks we all are stupid and lazy:

Discussing old topics again after a while will often give new ideas, so banning that or rolling your eyes over it is just as silly. We're not one of those communities who are too stupid and lazy to come up with their own stuff and thus find nothing better to do than to mock what others do, after all.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Marionros 1
[info]mariem_1
2010-02-18 07:30 pm UTC (link)
marionros added her special brand of batshit to the wank:

>>>He only got an idea that Harry wasn't the pampered child he thought he was when he saw Harry's memories in OotP.<<<

Just reacting because this is one of my pet peeves.

I get really, really, *really* tired of essays or fanfics where Snape is derided for thinking Harry as pampered and 'finding out that instead of being pampered, the poor lil' orphan is being worked like a house-elf'.
Quite apart from the fact that we never see Harry 'being worked like a house-elf' (Petunia is very houseproud whilst we never see Harry at the Dursleys as loitering in bed, being as filthy and disgusting - four-year old potions ingredients and broken quills in his schooltrunk, eurgh! - as possible), quite apart from that, who says that Harry *isn't* pampered. At *Hogwarts*!!! (which is all Snape cares about, after all)

Let us draw comparisons, for a moment.

James: bespectacled boy who, together with his friend who has a grudge against an all Slytherin family (his own), snubs and ridicules a boy he just met for the very first time on the Hogwarts Express.

Harry: ditto

James: is an incessant rulebreaker who never gets more than a gentle tap on the wrist. The staff is charmed of him and dismiss his rulebreaking with a smile and a 'boys will be boys'.

Harry: ditto. The staff even buys him a broom, allow him - against the rules - as a first year to have a broom at school and allow him - as a first year - on the Quidditch team. Members of the staff are so excited with having the 'famous Harry Potter' among them that they fall off their chair in excitement (Flitwick)

James: ran around with a magical and dangerous Dark Creature (a werewolf)

Harry: in his first year he smuggles a dangerous magical Dragon through the castle (which Draco no doubt told his Head of House)

James: rich boy

Harry: ditto. Yeah, sure, in the Dursley household he wears Dudleys castoffs (the only thing wrong with them is them being too big and they were *Dudleys*, not because they were heinous in any other way. Nothing but the best of quality for Dudley, after all) No threadbare secondhand robes and too-short trouserlegs for Harry born-with-a-silver-spoon-in-his-mouth Potter, after all. Harry might look odd in the muggle world (so what? *every* wizard looks odd in the muggle world. *Young Snape* looked even odder in the muggle world) but he had the best of robes, the best of schoolmaterial, the best of owls and the best of schoolbooks *at Hogwarts*.

James: always had the Marauders around him, so he could attack people three to one.

Harry: always has the other two of the Trio around him, and occasionally his paid thugs (the Twins). Three to one on the Hogwarts express, anyone? Marietta? Umbridge?

James: disliked a particular Slytherin, followed him around with a magical map and tried to kill him with a werewolf. The murder attempt was hushed up by Hogwarts' staff.

Harry: disliked a particular Slytherin, followed him around and nearly killed him with a slicing curse. The near-murder was hushed up.


To make a long story short, could it be, could it *possibly* be that Snape considered Harry pampered because in the world he lived in (Hogwarts) Harry was indeed 'pampered' in a way that was eerily reminiscent of a certain Marauder?

It doesn't matter that Harry never *felt* he was pampered. It doesn't matter that Harry *felt* nobody loved him, or that Snape was a meany, the facts remain that Harry was allowed to be, yes even encouraged to be, a disrespectful scofflaw and a smug, cruel bigot who gleefully punished (or watched being punished) those who he *felt* 'deserved it'.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Marionros 2
[info]mariem_1
2010-02-18 07:32 pm UTC (link)
Not to mention that Harry *behaves* in a way eerily reminiscent of his daddy dearest.

Yes, Harry acts that way for quite different reasons. Yes, James was only interested in *fun* and Harry has Voldemort looming over him (not to mention a manipulative ratbastard called Dumbledore), yes to all that. Harry is not James. That much is certain. But to someone who looks at how Harry *behaves* at Hogwarts, that is very difficult to determine. Harry feels inedequate when he first comes to Hogwarts, and when confronted with someone who feels at home in the WW and chatters away, totally at ease (as Draco did at the robeshop) or being challenged in class to show what he is made off, Harry responds by utterly hating that person.

It's totally believable, because Harry was raised at the Dursleys, where he was constantly told that they were better than him and where he was constantly critized. No wonder that he translates any criticism as 'he hates me' and he only consideres people who actively tell him that *he* is better than *them* as his friend.

Understandable, perhaps, but consider what this looks like. A rich, mediocre student who shows his utter hatred and contempt to student and teacher alike who does not loudly proclaim him to be better than them.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 2
[info]jood
2010-02-18 08:32 pm UTC (link)
OW ow ow my brane ow ow ow ow ow

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 2
[info]julian_black
2010-02-18 10:17 pm UTC (link)
o god dat waz my reeaction too.

brb, gone go sit in the fridgerador n see if mah poor meltid braines will set up agin.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Marionros 2
[info]sylvacoer
2010-02-18 08:55 pm UTC (link)
DDDDD:

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 2
[info]freezer
2010-02-19 01:21 am UTC (link)
Did someone miss the parts where seveeral older characters (Sirius in particular) mention that Harry is ALMOST NOTHING LIKE JAMES?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 2 - [info]izzy_the_hutt, 2010-02-19 10:04 pm UTC
Re: Marionros 2
[info]ari_o
2010-02-19 01:00 am UTC (link)
Does she have to read her books from 200 feet away through a periscope while hanging upside down from a baobob tree to get that perspective?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 2 - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-02-19 01:51 am UTC
Re: Marionros 2
[info]ladyophelia14
2010-02-19 04:47 am UTC (link)
Okay, fine, love Severus, hate Harry, whatever. I'm not about to tell someone how to appreciate and interpret their leisure reading. HOWEVER, anyone who doesn't see the Dursley's as being at least emotionally abusive and neglectful scares teh beejesus out of me. Seriously, are you gonna call your kid a freak?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 2 - [info]argylespy, 2010-02-20 08:31 am UTC
Re: Marionros 2
[info]the_labrat_army
2010-02-19 05:20 am UTC (link)
Oh lololol...It`s like she burned the first five HP books and made seviche of all the pages in the last three that didn`t mention Snape.

James: disliked a particular Slytherin, followed him around with a magical map and tried to kill him with a werewolf. The murder attempt was hushed up by Hogwarts' staff.

Harry: disliked a particular Slytherin, followed him around and nearly killed him with a slicing curse. The near-murder was hushed up.


Crap, I totally read the wrong books. See, in my versions, James didn`t use the Map for Snape, and actually went to the Shrieking Shack to stop a werewolf from killing Snape. Dammit!

And I thought people DID know about what happened between Harry and Draco - wasn`t the whole school talking about it? Thought that was why Harry couldn‘t play in the final Quidditch match.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 2 - [info]the_labrat_army, 2010-02-19 05:23 am UTC
Re: Marionros 2 - [info]sokudoningyou, 2010-02-19 06:19 am UTC
Re: Marionros 2 - [info]the_labrat_army, 2010-02-19 09:18 pm UTC
Re: Marionros 2
[info]uldihaa
2010-02-19 02:07 pm UTC (link)
*WARNING! IMMINENT IMPLOSION OF LOGIC DRIVE! WARNING!*

"Tony! Get us away from this Batshit! Fast!"

"Right!" *floors it (so to speak)*


*Wonders if anyone is gonna get the reference

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Marionros 2
[info]daisymay79
2010-02-21 09:55 am UTC (link)
James: ran around with a magical and dangerous Dark Creature (a werewolf)

Harry: in his first year he smuggles a dangerous magical Dragon through the castle (which Draco no doubt told his Head of House)

Yeah, James, screw you. The moment you realised your best friend had been inflicted with a horrible curse and faced a lifetime of persecution you should have dumped him, not tried to make his lot in life bearable in any way.
Hee for the "dangerous magical dragon" that was oh, all of less than a foot long and presented pretty much no danger to anyone (charring a few of Hagrid's belongings aside). A terrifying beastie that Harry and co helped sort out getting it out of Hogwarts and into a more suitable environment while helping their friend who would almost certainly not have been able to find other employment if he was fired.
Oh James and Harry - what monsters you are.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Marionros 1
[info]snarkhunter
2010-02-18 08:49 pm UTC (link)
...I...

I want to respond, to show how Wrong on the Internet she is, but it's like where do you even start?

Oh, wait. I know.

I start with "it wasn't Harry who was derogatory towards another student on the Hogwarts Express. It was DRACO."

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 1
[info]kitt_in_socks
2010-02-19 12:10 am UTC (link)
IIRC Harry was trying to befriend Draco until he started being a bully (to Ron, right? It's been years since I read it).

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 1 - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-02-19 01:45 am UTC
Re: Marionros 1 - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-02-19 01:49 am UTC
Re: Marionros 1 - [info]iczer6, 2010-02-20 01:21 am UTC
Oh Crap!
[info]teaqueenie
2010-02-18 11:59 pm UTC (link)
For a moment, I agreed with her!!!! I never saw the Dursleys as violently abusive parents. Rotten and neglectful, yes but abusive, not really.

Do these people just make up their "facts" and figure the rest of us agree because we don't argue with idiots?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Oh Crap!
[info]dragonfangirl
2010-02-19 01:47 am UTC (link)
I never saw the Dursleys as violently abusive parents. Rotten and neglectful, yes but abusive, not really.

Locking a kid in a cabinet for extended periods goes beyond neglect into abuse. I'm not arguing in favor of 'violent' abuse, but it still unquestionably crosses the line into abuse.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Oh Crap!
[info]ekaterinv
2010-02-19 01:54 am UTC (link)
Emotional abuse is real abuse. Neglecting a kid is real abuse. Imprisoning a kid in his room and pushing him cold condensed soup through the door is physical abuse. The Dursleys were abusive.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Oh Crap! - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-02-19 03:42 am UTC
Re: Oh Crap! - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-02-19 12:36 pm UTC
Re: Oh Crap! - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2010-02-19 06:35 pm UTC
Re: Oh Crap! - [info]farmercuerden, 2010-02-20 12:39 am UTC
Re: Oh Crap! - [info]becktionary, 2010-02-21 11:40 pm UTC
Re: Oh Crap! - [info]emily_goddess, 2010-02-20 04:22 pm UTC
Re: Oh Crap!
[info]finchbird
2010-02-19 03:49 am UTC (link)
They emotionally abused Harry. It's equally as bad as being violently abusive. End of story.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Oh Crap!
[info]the_labrat_army
2010-02-19 05:26 am UTC (link)
...Well, they weren‘t violently abusive to Dudley, anyway.

Not to Harry, either (if one discounts the time Petunia tried to hit him in the head with a frying pan for scaring Dudley, CoS), but they DID make him work like a house-elf sometimes. Same book.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Oh Crap!
[info]softgraysky
2010-02-19 06:21 am UTC (link)
They may have not been sexually or violently abusive, but they were abusive emotionally, mentally and physically (in withholding adequate food and shelter).

</small>In fact, the Dursleys as characters manage to escape the feeling of "oh god, oh god, how is Harry even *close* to as undamaged as he is, and where were child services? The police? Anyone?" in remembering that HP is a fictional world where everything is a little more dangerous and few things (especially in the first book and scene setter for the mythos: ie: Philosopher's Stone) seem to have consequence. </small>

Eep, sorry for the thoughts on yaoi.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Marionros 1
[info]hydriotaphia
2010-02-19 12:15 am UTC (link)
the only thing wrong with them is them being too big and they were *Dudleys*, not because they were heinous in any other way

Did she miss the part in the FIRST BOOK about Harry's school uniform looking like elephant skin because of Petunia's sub-par dye job?

Wait, let me answer my own question... Of course she did! She's reading The World According to Sev.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Marionros 1
[info]dragonfangirl
2010-02-19 01:51 am UTC (link)
James had a head and a torso.

Harry: ditto

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 1
[info]amy_wolf
2010-02-19 09:03 am UTC (link)
James used to walkd around using his lungs to suck up life-giving oxygen, and spewing out carbon dioxide!

Harry: ditto

(Snape, obviously, has lungs like a rain forest, and leaves the air he breathes more oxygen-rich than it was before he inhaled.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 1 - [info]napalmnacey, 2010-02-19 09:19 am UTC
More connections! - [info]dragonfangirl, 2010-02-19 08:03 pm UTC
Re: Marionros 1 - [info]tofuknight, 2010-02-21 09:56 pm UTC
Re: Marionros 1
[info]veleda_k
2010-02-20 05:27 am UTC (link)
Harry didn't "disliked a particular Slytherin" because he was a bully. He was following Malfoy because he thought Malfoy was planning something evil. Which, as it turns out, he was.

Oh and "bigot"? Please tell me where Harry is bigoted. Was it the part where he insulted Hagrid for being half giant? No, that didn't happen. Or maybe it was when he called the centaurs sub-human? No, that didn't happen either. Is it the part where he called Hermione as racial slur? Oh no wait, that was Draco.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Marionros 1
[info]dragonfangirl
2010-02-20 08:28 am UTC (link)
Harry is a blatant Snapist.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Marionros 1
[info]amy_wolf
2010-02-21 01:57 am UTC (link)
He's bigoted against Slytherin. In the special hard-core Sltherfan sense where anyone who doesn't completely fabricate carefully discern their shiny perfection and deep inner pain, is a bigot. (Snape actually does have deep inner pain, and Harry did notice it, but that doesn't count because he waited until there was actual evidence, and he wasn't completely crushed with remorse that he'd ever thought poorly of Snape in any way. To truly not be prejudiced against Slytherin, you have to see that their angelic perfection.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map