|
| |||
|
|
An RP based on a wiki, with an admin of the wiki as a player...what could go wrong? Okay, this was over on SF_Drama already, but the writeup on Wank Report was glorious and had better context. So here it is, courtesy of a mousey and with most of mousey's language intact (I cut some editorial and found some more links): The SCP Foundation is creepypasta that evolved into its own wiki: it's a series of articles presented as the internal documentation of an organization that stores and studies supernatural or otherworldly entities and phenomena. It's got a convincing real-world horror bent and is fairly popular. A while back, a few people decided to start a panfandom livejournal roleplay based on the SCP Foundation. Since there's a fair bit of overlap in audiences, Project SCP immediately garnered good word-of-mouth and a lot of interest on LJ's own RP-oriented anonymous discussion board, Eventually, someone on The anon discussion was pretty calm and constructive, actually, with some talk towards identifying exactly where the problem is, and a bit about the concessions needed to successfully base an RP on an existing work. Even the game's head mod chimed in thanking the anons for their input. And then, a couple days later, project_scp is closed. Naturally, rpanoncomm blames Bright immediately-- Link 2, Link 3. On the same day, Bright's player makes a post to BRPS, bitching about some of the problems people have with him in reverse. It doesn't take long before sockpuppets angered by the death of project_scp show up, Bright starts deleting posts, and the wank reaches its full glory. I recommend this thread, which attempts to explain why players are not supposed to do the mods' jobs, as a highlight. Eventually Bright-mun is banninated, but not before My favorite line: Dude, this guy is taking me back to my childhood. He reminds me of this kid I once argued with that was convinced that it could only be a poem or a song if the words rhymed. And some people still just want to know where the game went. EDIT: Thanks to EDIT 2: And EDIT 3: Some bonus unfunny: a previous hit from darksunlight. Post a comment in response: |
||||||||||||||
|
Privacy Policy -
COPPA Legal Disclaimer - Site Map |