Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



beejium ([info]beejium) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2010-06-19 01:01:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:fandom_wank's thoughts on yaoi, movie wank, pixar, reviews, someone is wrong on the internet!, stop sharing your thoughts, writers are often pompous douches

Wank machine keeps on rollin'
1. Pixar makes incredible, mind-blowing third movie in Toy Story series.
2. Rotten Tomatoes logs over 130 reviews - all positive.
3. Toy Story 3 gets it's first (so far, only) bad reviews.
4. Internet explodes. (Also here.)

The wank seems to be focused on Armond White's review, as he is known for seemingly giving any review that goes against the general consenus. (He inexplicably seems in favour of Transformers 2, for instance.) He also doesn't appear to have actually watched the movie (identifying Hamm as a villain.) His negative review was actually predicted by a number of commenters in this earlier article, asking readers to predict where Toy Story 3 would end up on the Tomatometer rating.

It's all very dramatic, with wank in every corner. But of course, the most important Toy Story-related argument is and always will always be: Buzz/Jessie or Woody/Jessie?*


*Anyone's who's seen the movie will know the right answer to this.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]drakyndra
2010-06-19 10:32 am UTC (link)
I seem to recall a similar thing happening with The Dark Knight - the forums went nuts over any negative reviews.

Still, TS3 sounds pretty good, and I'll have to go see it when it's out here in Australialand.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ravenbell
2010-06-19 10:11 pm UTC (link)
The actual RT general discussion forums are doing pretty well. Nearly everyone called it that Armond White was going to come in negative. The real surprise was that he had company.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kirsten
2010-06-20 06:31 am UTC (link)
I feel like the only person on the planet who honestly did not enjoy that movie. I was so damn bored.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]rose_tyler
2010-06-20 02:24 pm UTC (link)
Dark Knight? I didn't enjoy it either. On the whole, Nolan's Batman is pretty damn do not want to me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chibikaijuu
2010-06-29 08:59 pm UTC (link)
Really? I mean, I do think it would have been rather boring if it hadn't been for the extremely strong performances from most of the cast, but the performances *were* strong, and I do like Nolan's take on Batman as dark and psychotic but not quite Frank Miller amoral.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map