Entry tags:

fandom_wank's thoughts on yaoi, movie wank, pixar, reviews, someone is wrong on the internet!, stop sharing your thoughts, writers are often pompous douches

Wank machine keeps on rollin'
1. Pixar makes incredible, mind-blowing third movie in Toy Story series.
2. Rotten Tomatoes logs over 130 reviews - all positive.
3. Toy Story 3 gets it's first (so far, only) bad reviews.
4. Internet explodes. (Also here.)

The wank seems to be focused on Armond White's review, as he is known for seemingly giving any review that goes against the general consenus. (He inexplicably seems in favour of Transformers 2, for instance.) He also doesn't appear to have actually watched the movie (identifying Hamm as a villain.) His negative review was actually predicted by a number of commenters in this earlier article, asking readers to predict where Toy Story 3 would end up on the Tomatometer rating.

It's all very dramatic, with wank in every corner. But of course, the most important Toy Story-related argument is and always will always be: Buzz/Jessie or Woody/Jessie?*

*Anyone's who's seen the movie will know the right answer to this.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

kookaburra
2010-06-21 02:07 am UTC (link)

Those reviews can be handy though- for instance, I have to be pretty careful about what I watch. Some things can stay with me for YEARS afterwards. If a movie looks like it might be too much for me, I go to one of those super-conservative religious movie review websites where they dissect every possible thing about it that could be objectionable so I can make a better decision about it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

rose_tyler
2010-06-21 02:22 am UTC (link)

I have no problem with him noting, somewhere in the review, that he thought it could be a bit too scary for small children (even if, in doing so, I think he's really underestimating kids). The problem I have, and why I think it's a failtastic review, is that he's judging the quality of the film and the rating he gives it on that. That's irrelevant to the quality of the film.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

chibikaijuu
2010-06-29 09:04 pm UTC (link)

It's useful to know, if you or your kid is sensitive to that sort of thing, but it should have no bearing on the actual review of the film. I also think that people underestimate kids, who often enjoy being scared (to a point) - I know some of my favorite children's films had parts that scared the SHIT out of me as a child, but I still loved them then, and now (and also, the things that disturbed me the most as a kid (and now) were/are not usually the "scary parts" - for example, I loved the boat ride scene in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate factory, but Gene Wilder as Wonka himself scared me so much that to this day I'm kind of freaked out by Wilder).

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Totally OT librarianmouse 2010-06-30 07:05 pm UTC (link)
	I'm still terrified of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. There's a commercial that plays all the time with that stupid "imagination" song, and I have to change the channel every time. Don't get me started on Oompa Loompas. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -