Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



anarchicq ([info]anarchicq) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2010-10-05 22:58:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:movie wank, reviews

Confused Matthew vs 2001: A Space Odyssey vs Chase vs Confused Matthew
A few months back, the enigmatic Confused Matthew reviewed the classic 2001: A Space Odyssey. The 3 part video review involved a lot of "This ISN'T A FILM! It's an ART PROJECT!" and "Land scape......lands scape.....land scape....I heart HAL.......colours......space foetus."


People respond to his review and Confused Matthew responds in turn and it all goes quite well.

Until Chase posts a nine part video screed in which he takes the review personally and uses one massive tone argument.

Confused Matthew responds. After a two part video response, Confused Matthew posted a video saying he was halting the reviews in fear of indeed becoming too personal.

Until today, when he posted part 3.

Grab the popcorn, sit back, and watch.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2010-10-06 06:14 pm UTC (link)
I've often said that the stargate sequence was intended (1) to give the "squares" an idea of what being on drugs was like; (2) to give the ones on drugs a real trip.

As for the stuff in the hotel room, I understood it, but only with the novel for context.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]beccastareyes
2010-10-07 06:27 am UTC (link)
The novel helped a lot with understanding what was going on. I'm told by friends that they understood it more after the sequel.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sylvacoer
2010-10-07 11:33 pm UTC (link)
I understood the movie A LOT more after reading the book... but the last 20 minutes still gives me a headache unless I've had a shot or three. ^^;

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]annathepiper
2010-10-08 06:40 am UTC (link)
Indeed, I only really picked up on a lot of the movie because I'd also read the book.

And, yep! about the end as well. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]castellated
2010-10-12 07:29 pm UTC (link)
I figured, from the perspective of some years, that it was the '60s equivalent of that fucking irritating slow-motion flying-through-the-air "Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon" thing: It was a new special effect and they were infatuated with it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map