Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



anarchicq ([info]anarchicq) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2010-10-05 22:58:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:movie wank, reviews

Confused Matthew vs 2001: A Space Odyssey vs Chase vs Confused Matthew
A few months back, the enigmatic Confused Matthew reviewed the classic 2001: A Space Odyssey. The 3 part video review involved a lot of "This ISN'T A FILM! It's an ART PROJECT!" and "Land scape......lands scape.....land scape....I heart HAL.......colours......space foetus."


People respond to his review and Confused Matthew responds in turn and it all goes quite well.

Until Chase posts a nine part video screed in which he takes the review personally and uses one massive tone argument.

Confused Matthew responds. After a two part video response, Confused Matthew posted a video saying he was halting the reviews in fear of indeed becoming too personal.

Until today, when he posted part 3.

Grab the popcorn, sit back, and watch.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]librarianmouse
2010-10-07 05:17 pm UTC (link)
We're mainly arguing about the ending, and whether or not he's still in the dream.

And may I just say, I'm just glad to have gone to a movie where the attractive young woman's main reason for existing was to be smart rather than eye candy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]finchbird
2010-10-08 03:16 am UTC (link)
I think it was Nolan's intention to put enough stuff in the movie to make people argue whether it was all a dream or not.

I'm just glad to have gone to a movie where the attractive young woman's main reason for existing was to be smart rather than eye candy.

This.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]librarianmouse
2010-10-08 06:12 am UTC (link)
I approve of your theory.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map