Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Erin, the punk nun ([info]sisterelwood) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2010-10-12 00:16:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: *sporfle!*
Entry tags:authors, fandom: doctor who, reviews, writers are often pompous douches

Does everyone know what time it is?
IT'S WHO TIME!!! This report was shamelessly snagged from [info]wank_report. *throws cheese to mousie* I thought it was time for some more author rage. Enjoy!

FYI: I have screencaps of most of this so let me know if anything goes 'missing'.

Author Paul Magrs (as in published, hired-for-money author of real books, thank you) gets the cruelest most entitled review ever written in the history of all humanity. http://unreality-sf.net/reviews/doctorwho/2/findreplace.html

Naturally, Magrs expresses outrage on Twitter. As published authors should always do. http://twitter.com/paulmagrs/status/26729418277 After all, how many books has that guy written? http://twitter.com/paulmagrs/status/26730575254 How many have YOU?

The author of review apologizes. http://brendan-moody.livejournal.com/317662.html

Too late, buddy. Magrs still has chafed butt. http://twitter.com/paulmagrs/status/27030688395 You see, Magrs loves fan dialogues with real fans, but not mean ones. Why can't you be civil like him. http://twitter.com/paulmagrs

Others weigh in.
http://nwhyte.livejournal.com/1550164.html
http://community.livejournal.com/who_anon/10535.html?thread=49908775#t49908775

This report is brought to you by Doctor Who fandom: wanking since 1963.

EDIT: Comments of interest-
http://nwhyte.livejournal.com/1550164.html?thread=6531924#t6531924
Magrs continues to miss the point of reviewers



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]rubymellon
2010-10-12 04:27 pm UTC (link)
Her wikipedia page is so painfully hilarious.

"She is known to have survived the destruction of Gallifrey and the apparent retroactive wiping of the Time Lords from history that took place at the end of the novel The Ancestor Cell."

Of course.

"Iris regenerates at the end of The Scarlet Empress (into a form resembling Jane Fonda in Barbarella)"

Uh-huh.

"some have suggested that it is the Doctor's adventures that are plagiarised from Iris's life, rather than the other way around."

o i c

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2010-10-12 04:53 pm UTC (link)
Daaaaang.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]miss_eponine
2010-10-12 05:08 pm UTC (link)
Wow. That's a lot of special.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]dragonsong12
2010-10-12 05:10 pm UTC (link)
Sounds like somebody edited their own page.

I wonder who the "some" are of that final quote. Mr. Sock and Ms. Puppet?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]uldihaa
2010-10-12 05:34 pm UTC (link)
Random thought:

If Mr. Sock and Ms. Puppet married, would they hyphenate their name?

Mr. and Mrs. Sock-Puppet of Frothyshire!

So Iris is a published Mary Sue?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cheryl_bites
2010-10-12 09:04 pm UTC (link)
No, they would call themselves "Soque-Poupet".

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]fern_on_fen
2010-10-13 02:54 am UTC (link)
Do I detect a Keeping Up Appearances reference?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cheryl_bites
2010-10-13 10:49 am UTC (link)
100%. \o/

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ardath_rekha
2010-10-12 05:24 pm UTC (link)
Of course, telling him he's writing a quasi-canon Mary Sue will just sail right over his head.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cyan_aura
2010-10-12 08:33 pm UTC (link)
just like with regular words, he should look them up in the fandom dictionary, one at a time. Oh wait, first we have to explain what a dictionary is...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]spawn_of_kong
2010-10-12 07:27 pm UTC (link)
All I know about Iris is that she's currently Katy Manning in a spiffy-looking hat.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]cyan_aura
2010-10-12 08:36 pm UTC (link)
the phrase "some have suggested" violates the admonishment against "weasel word" phrases in wikipedia.

I know, why start being sensible now, but just thought I'd mention it. In case, you know, an actual writer wrote that. Or something.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tardiscontrol
2010-10-12 09:10 pm UTC (link)
Oh no he di'int. D:

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]eleutheria
2010-10-13 12:48 am UTC (link)
So only one question remains-- should she be sorted into Sparklypoo or Bitchiwitch?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]uldihaa
2010-10-15 09:32 pm UTC (link)
Well obviously she'd be sorted into... BOTH. At the same time, 'cause she's just that awesome.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]randomsome1
2010-10-16 05:51 pm UTC (link)
Wait--there were epic fannish explosions over Rose's purported Sueness but this is the first time I've heard of Iris McSparkleface?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map