|
|
Erin, the punk nun (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} sisterelwood) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} fandom_wank,@ 2010-10-12 00:16:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| Current mood: |  *sporfle!* |
| Entry tags: | authors, fandom: doctor who, reviews, writers are often pompous douches |
Does everyone know what time it is?
IT'S WHO TIME!!! This report was shamelessly snagged from wank_report. *throws cheese to mousie* I thought it was time for some more author rage. Enjoy!
FYI: I have screencaps of most of this so let me know if anything goes 'missing'.
Author Paul Magrs (as in published, hired-for-money author of real books, thank you) gets the cruelest most entitled review ever written in the history of all humanity. http://unreality-sf.net/reviews/doctorw
Naturally, Magrs expresses outrage on Twitter. As published authors should always do. http://twitter.com/paulmagrs/status/267
The author of review apologizes. http://brendan-moody.livejournal.com/31
Too late, buddy. Magrs still has chafed butt. http://twitter.com/paulmagrs/status/270
Others weigh in.
http://nwhyte.livejournal.com/1550164.h
http://community.livejournal.com/who_an
This report is brought to you by Doctor Who fandom: wanking since 1963.
EDIT: Comments of interest-
http://nwhyte.livejournal.com/1550164.h
Magrs continues to miss the point of reviewers
