Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Maria the Lost ([info]mariagoner) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-08-08 15:42:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:energetic
Current music:I Fought The Law... And the Law Won!

I AM AN INNOCENT WRONGED!1! ::GASP GASP::
This is a bit of a milestone post for me-- the first time I act as both wank witness at Fandom Wank AND Bukkake victim/perpetrator. This is a pretty small wank, but kind of fun. For one thing, the noble name of Fandom Wank was tossed back and forth several times with increasing acrimony. Not to mention, it's a **classic** case of trigger-happy mods and people who can give it but can't take it at all.



First, a couple of notes. Pretty much every single post was deleted by vengeful mods. Luckily, I have managed to salvage some posts because livejournal e-mails you when someone responds to you. Thus, I've managed to reconstruct a rough outline of posts. What I haven't been able to reconstruct, I've done a summary of.

The wank begins when I first enter into a long Question and Answer session of a Harry Potter RPG that is played out through Live Journal. It's a pretty cool concept, and I've been following and admiring this RPG (Nocturne Alley, http://www.livejournal.com/community/nocturne_alley/) for a while. So I just decided to enter the post at the livejournal community nraged (you can find the only post left at: http://www.livejournal.com/community/nraged/252684.html?page=3 ) and pop off a quick question about Lily Potter and what Snape's (much denied) connection to Lily really was.

mariagoner to Severus Snape:
2003-08-07 19:54 (link)
>>Why in the world, sir, do so many HP fans suffer under the misconception that you were ever in love with Lily Evans in Hogwarts? After all, though she was beautiful, intelligent, good-hearted and brave enough to intercede on your behalf in front of bullies, they should already know that the mere fact that she was muggleborn (or a "mudblood" as you so charmingly put it during the time when she attempted to rescue you from Sirius Black and James Potter-- see HPOTP Snape's Worst Memory) would be enough to stop you from ever considering her as a girlfriend or wife.

>>After all, no matter how wonderful a woman she was, you would NEVER consider her simply due to her ancestry, right? Though it would have been interesting to see what might have happened if you had been a little more open minded. You would probably be happily married with several children by now... and Lily might still be ALIVE. After all, if she weren't with James Potter (with his troublesome tendencies to blunder into bad situations) and instead with you, she might still exist to this day. And Harry Potter, thorn that he is to your side, would not even exist.



This was a mischevious question, I admit. But Snape was practically asking for a question about Lily... he kept denying he had anything to do with her in that RPG. So I thought, he's practically asking to be baited at this point. Let's see what he'll do...

(And I will say, sillier questions were asked in this Q&A. Such as: boxers or briefs? Or what would you put on your sundae cone?)


Severus Snape (or at least his player) responds quickly:
>>potions_master
2003-08-07 20:11 (link)
>>Oh joy. A quasi-intellectual with a penchant for blather. I am simply awash with glee.
>>I suppose I must quote my infuriating yet occasionally-insightful colleague when I say that the human heart knows no houses nor does it see the same prejudices of the mind. Thus, someone of proper stock could very well find affection for a lesser-bred sort, if so inclined. It is also I suspect somehow romantic to indulge in fantasies of love overcoming obstacles, etc., ad nauseum.

>>Attempting to force blame upon me for her demise simply because I did not fawn over her rather than James Potter is really quite rude, not to mention pathetic. Please take your half-witted assumptions elsewhere.


At this point, the mods deleted my thread, and I operate from memory for a couple of posts.

I start teasing Snape about being mean to me when he isn't as bright as he thinks he is either. I talks about the OTP and his revealed past in canon, as well as the fact that his insults in his journal and this Q&A tend to be of the "You're idiotic", "You're an imbecile", "You're rilly rilly dumb" type. I ask Snape if he can't start using a couple of better insults for me. For illustration, I use a couple of funny quotes from Lucius Malfoy (from the same RPG) insulting people in his earlier RPG Q&A and say something like: "It's a sad day when a Malfoy beats you out in taunting someone, Snape." Also, I referenced fandom_wank, and joked that if anyone disagrees with me, I'll take it this thread there.


(This is where I get wanky. I shouldn't have referenced the books directly, and I shouldn't have contrasted the two players and said one was better than the other. But that's weak stuff when someone has just called you a "quasi-intellectual" with "half-witted assumptions." For someone who can dish it, Snape's player fell apart the moment she met criticism.)

(Also, when I mentioned fandom_wank, the mods went **ape-shit** and started accusing me of being deliberately provocative. Specifically, Lucius Malfoy (purestblood) first mentions this, and other mods agree. Since I DON'T want to disappoint them on my shit-stirring proclivities, there was nothing left to do but bring the argument here.)


However, here is also where Lucius Malfoy (purestblood) steps in and whallops me with a verbal two-by-four for getting uppity with Snape:


Malfoy began with some garden variety insults about my parentage. Hey, his ljname is purestblood. Whatever. But things take a nasty turn to the personal when he tell me:
>>a) My question is stupid.
>>b) Ergo, I am stupid.
>>c) Ergo, I really ought to get the hell out of these boards.
>>He also ends up mentioning that since I like fandom_wank so much, I really ought go... masturbate some more? I'm not really sure what the hell he said... but it involved me and this community in a severely compromising position. Ew. Malfoy, you pedophile plagirizer!


I'm startled by the sheer animosity that Malfoy suddenly sports and respond to it, trying to chill things down. Silly me, I thought that if I let everyone know I was just joking around and **not insulting Snape's player at all, just responding to Snape's insults** they'd realize I'm not trying to be a bitch.


I respond to Lucius Malfoy:
>>Okay, breaking character for a minute.

>>All right, player of Lucius Malfoy, why are you suddenly getting so tense and angry with me? I realized that in a lot of posts of this community with Q&A with HP characters, a lot of people were being rather gentle and timid and teasing with their questions. So naturally, I though it would be really interesting to act very haughty, argumentative and distasteful in turn with a character. And who better to lock (genteel!) heads with than our own acid tounged potions master, Severus Snape?

>>Severus (or at least his player) and I were having a fun conversation insulting each other. He calls me an imbecile, I say he ought to make a greater effort to call me an imbecile. No harm done. So why in the world did you suddenly have to intercede and start **personally insulting** me by saying that I was deliberately trying to agitate Snape's player? I never brought HER into the conversation. I was having an IN-CHARACTER CHAT with Severus. We were both being bitches to each other--because we were acting! It was fun. It was all in the spirit of play. And I take offense at the fact that you seem to think I am attacking anyone on these boards.


The Reply of Some Annonymous Mod was:
>>Er, calm down.
>>You weren't really addressing Snape IC, seeing as how as you referenced Order of the Phoenix in your comment to him, which he wouldn't have read seeing as he is a fictional character in said book, so that didn't really make any sense. You also made statements about things that have nothing to do with the game (re: fandom_wank). This is not in-character.

>>Your comment really came off as an attack on the player herself and she took it as such. Criticism is one thing but nonsensical tirades (particularly the type containing statements IN ALL CAPS) just are not on. It's not funny, nor will we percieve it as such, particularly when you invoke the name of Fandom_Wank as if you are actually looking for trouble. That will not inspire anyone to take you seriously, as you are finding out.

>>I suggest you find another way to "play along" with the characters as everyone else here has managed to do, without any trouble at all.
>>Your comments and concerns are being brought to the attention of the moderators of Nraged and N_A.
>>- a player


I thought it was particularly mean when they told me they hated me writing "IN ALL CAPS." Dammnit, they're cramping my STYLE! Not to mention... that's just so petty. And "nonsensical tirades"? As opposed to what, Malfoy's insults about me masturbating? And "invoke the name of Fandom_Wank?" That should be the internet's new insult.

I was a bit weirded out by the sudden accusations, but attempted to defend myself. Again, I tried to let them know again that I didn't mean to insult **anyone** and that it was all in fun and it was a tit for tat situation. Snape makes fun of me for being a "psuedo-intellectual," I tell him he has corny insults, we both leave smirking at the other. What's the big deal?


My Reply:
>>Okay, going down the list.
>>a) All right, you're correct on one major point. I did shift in and out of character when talking to Snape. I shouldn't have referred to Order of Phoenix-- he is a fictional character in it and obviously doesn't know of it.
>>But, in my defense, a lot of people were specifically referring to Snape's Writer, and giving her comments as well as him. They weren't strictly in character with Snape. Must I be held to a higher standard?

>>b) However, my major question is: Why must a reader passively take abuse from a character? Snape, in character, insulted me as "psuedo-intellectual." I, in turn, wanted to rile him up a little, and turn up my own nose. Think of a collusion of head-strong personalities, rather than a reader simply accepting insults from Snape. I thought the results were fun-- and was disappointed that Snape dismissed me so quickly.
>>So tell me-- why is it okay for Snape to insult me and not okay for me to stand up for myself? Why can't it be in-character for ME to be headstrong and piggish and irritating as well? I thought the results were entertaining and snarky. Jesus, we were just kicking sand into each others eyes for the heck of it. I think it was Lucius' player that made it seem like a big deal.

>>c) The reference to Fandom Wank was just a shout-out to Snape's writer and any regulars who might read it. Nothing more, nothing less. It was just a fun reference to a fun site that is NOT the pit of depravity and pettiness so many people think it is. It wasn't the big deal you seem to be making of it.


The mods at nraged are not appeased. They give me a slightly less than complete explanation for why they hate me so utterly now.


The Mods' reply was:
>>a) Maybe because no one saw fit to become antagonistic?
>>b) You were dismissed because you were seen as antagonistic.
>>c) The reference to fandom_wank was antagonistic as it was inviting trouble.
>>Are you sensing a theme, here?
>The discussion ends now. If you have anything further, send it to snape@nocturnealley.net. This thread will be deleted as it is bothering other people and other players.
>>- Snape's player


So apparently, I am an antagonistic person. No, really I am.


And the final message from the Mods I am sent before they ban my beaded pony butt:
>>intern_alley
2003-08-07 23:43 (link)
>>Bye bye now.
>>Much love,
>>NAM.

Personally I think the "Much love" part was particularly hurtful. I sure didn't *feel* very much love on that board. ::sobs::


I think a particularly vengeful part was when they deleted even my comments to **other members on unrelated topics.** Such as when CamillaBloom asked me:


>camillabloom: 2003-08-07 22:25
>>Forgive me for being so frank; - though this can't really come as a surprise - are you really a woman? And is that what there is '... between me and Professor Snape... '


and I answered something to the point of:
>>Yes. Yes, I am indeed a woman. A teenage girl, to be exist. And what's more, I don't think Snape is all that hot. And he looks far too old in the movies etc. etc. in that vein. I gave a shout out to drag-queens at some point. Drag queens! Who could fail to not be amused?!

And the mods... deleted it. Why? So others would never learn if I was a woman or not? To this day, I'm still not quite sure...


I suppose what I'm most confused about is the fact that there was such a huge double standard about insults at this RPG Q&A with Snape. It was perfectly all right for Snape and Malfoy to bitch and insult when I ask a question, but when I respond back in a teasing manner-- HELL BREAKS LOOSE. Apparently it's all right for them to call me "pathetic," "half-witted," "a quasi-intellectual," and going off on "nonsensical tirades". However, I can't tell Snape that I think he's avoiding my question, and he's not nearly as witty as he thinks he is. And really-- that is the *strongest* insult I used. "You are not nearly as witty as you think you are." And thus, I am banned.

And even that double-standard wouldn't have bothered me so much if they had come out and told me about it. Such as if they told me early on, "Don't talk back to the player characters." However I, because I told Snape he wasn't funny when he was insulting me, got banned within hours of my post. And when I attempted to defend myself and explained that I was only playing around and wasn't being belligerent, they refused to hear my arguments.

Which is why, good people of fandom wank, I come before you and ask you to render judgement. Was I being wanky here? (Feel free to hide the bitter truth from me.) Were they being wanky here? (Please say yes! My fragile ego need validation!) Or were we sort of wanking... together? ('Cause that's the bestest position of them all!)


(Post a new comment)


[info]daijinryuu
2003-08-08 10:54 pm UTC (link)
LJ-cut is your bestest friend.

(Reply to this)


[info]mariagoner
2003-08-08 10:55 pm UTC (link)
Oh shoot-- this is a LONG-ASS post. If anyone wants to tell me how to use a short-cut and hide some of this post in the front page of Fandom Wank, that would be very helpful.

Please accept my apologies ahead of time. ::blush::

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]daijinryuu
2003-08-08 10:58 pm UTC (link)
<lj-cut text="[insert whatever text here]">

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]daijinryuu
2003-08-08 11:07 pm UTC (link)
Er, that was probably badly worded on my part. Don't put the whole text of the post in the cut tag, just put that right before the part of the post you want cut out.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-08-08 11:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]daijinryuu, 2003-08-09 09:48 am UTC

[info]sagralisse
2003-08-08 11:09 pm UTC (link)
Or, more precisely... <lj-cut text="[insert a small amount of text here]">
[insert a lot of text here]
</lj=cut>

Not that it isn't cute like it is. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-08-08 11:11 pm UTC

[info]mariagoner
2003-08-08 11:15 pm UTC (link)
And because I'm an absent-minded fool... A quicky, hearty set of shout-outs to Horatio and Iczer6 of Fandom Wank, for collectively sponsering my grand journey into the land of Bukkake wonders. They gave me codes. They made my present happiness possible. ::tear:: Thank you. Thank you all. And I'm still expecting you both to comment, you know.

(Reply to this)


[info]delfeus
2003-08-08 11:27 pm UTC (link)
Well, first of all, I must say that I am definitely not unbiased, since I love nocturne_alley, nraged, potions_master and his player. So, forgive me for that.

To me it seems that it's an unspoken rule at nraged that when you're addressing a character, you act like you're speaking to that person. You are speaking to Snape, not his player. That's why I can understand why the players would not like any references to the books. Also, nocturne_alley has been going on for long, long time before OotP came out. The characters have history created for the game and in the game, and although they are now trying to weave OotP into the game [like Tonks] there are limits to what can be taken in. For example, as far as I'm concerned, Snape is gay in the game. Considering he's gay, there's really no use in asking him about Lily.

I really can't be bothered to read all of your post, because to be quite honest, I'm annoyed by it. This is my response to the part that I did bother to read.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mariagoner
2003-08-08 11:42 pm UTC (link)
Oh, don't get me wrong. I agree with you on some of your comments about me being out of it. However, don't you think it's rude to me to not even read most of my post? You'll see I address most of your concerns already, and that I have legitimate complaints of my own.

>>To me it seems that it's an unspoken rule at nraged that when you're addressing a character, you act like you're speaking to that person. You are speaking to Snape, not his player.

But you see-- I didn't KNOW this unspoken rule. At no point in time did a mod pull me over and say-- hey, don't talk back to Snape. Please just accept his answer and move on. No, Snape kept insulting me, I kept being playful and teasing him back-- and then they abruptly banned me without even telling me WHY.

>>Also, nocturne_alley has been going on for long, long time before OotP came out. The characters have history created for the game and in the game, and although they are now trying to weave OotP into the game [like Tonks] there are limits to what can be taken in.

I've already adressed this blunder of mine in the post. I apologized in my second post when Snape's player told me that I shouldn't talk out-of-character to Snape. However, when I then asked why Snape and Lucius kept insulting me when I had told them I was just attempting to play along with their insults, they banned me. Is that fair on their part?


Also, hands up. Who else gets the irony of someone accusing me of being inconsiderate and thoughtless while also saying they couldn't bother to read my full post before complaining about it? As it is, Delfeus, you seem like you skimmed my post, saw I was complaining about someone you liked, and abruptly decided to complain. Do you think that nothing I said about them had value?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pre_madonna, 2003-08-08 11:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-08-08 11:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pre_madonna, 2003-08-09 12:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]raisedbyhyenas, 2003-08-09 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 12:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2003-08-09 09:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]delfeus, 2003-08-09 12:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-08-09 12:12 am UTC

[info]snacky
2003-08-09 12:07 am UTC (link)
Eh. I don't know anything about the RPG, but I've read your whole post and, well, I have to say, can definitely see the mods' point of view here. Sorry.

But you were very wanky, so thumbs up there! ;-)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mariagoner
2003-08-09 12:21 am UTC (link)
I love this community. No matter how badly I act, you never let me down. We're entering the strange regions of meta-meta-wank here, people.

Group hug, everybody!

Still... tell me something, Snacky. I realize I was incorrect about bugging Snape about Lily. I've told this to others before you.

But considering the fact that I didn't know about the whole Lily back-story and later apologized for blundering into the issue, were the mods correct to not accept my apology? Were they correct to ban me without even give me a concrete reason why, or try to understand my own arguments for the Player Character's attacking me w/out warning?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2003-08-09 02:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]swash_my_buckle, 2003-08-09 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-09 02:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 02:41 am UTC

[info]uniquesnowflake
2003-08-09 12:47 am UTC (link)
I can see both sides here, actually.

I don't read LJ RPGs because I think they suck (all of them), and her not having known as much about it before asking (which seems obvious), I can understand mistakenly asking a question. It's wanky to ask early questions, but as a general rule, in fandom, there should be No Stupid Questions.

So, both sides had points and wanks, IMO.

However, I think the person above that said she was whiny for posting it here was pretty wanky, too. At least 50% of all wanks have a person personally involved. Whether or not they are being wanky, starting to fling the vague insults is equally distasteful.

Keeping in mind I don't know Maria, and nor do I follow Noct-whateverthefudge.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2003-08-09 02:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 02:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2003-08-09 03:40 am UTC
*regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat*
[info]raisedbyhyenas
2003-08-09 12:50 am UTC (link)
It's funny how people who found your post boring and long-winded took special care to tell you so in comments that are even MORE even boring and long-winded. I definitely see the wank, in the sense that the people who play these games tend to be chockful of their own importance and uber-snippy in the defense of the sanctity of their pet hobby.

I may not have been able to follow your post, and hell for all I know there may be kernels of truth in the responses, but you know what? I frankly don't care. And thus I say bravo anyway because the meta-wank IS amusing me. *golf-claps*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: *regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat*
[info]uniquesnowflake
2003-08-09 12:54 am UTC (link)
Besides, does it really make you any less snippity if you're being personally snippity to someone while In Character?

Call me weird, but I think it makes you more pathetic.

Keeping in mind I'd say the same thing about ANY RPers. I'm an avid online D&D geek. Planescape, motherfucker, what?!

I just don't see the point in saying "I didn't think this was wanky, therefore I have an opening to insult your character, even though I've already admitted I'm biased".

Besides, I thought it was common courtesy to be at least nice to the newbie, folks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: *regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat* - [info]delfeus, 2003-08-09 01:29 am UTC
Re: *regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat* - [info]shoiryu, 2003-08-09 01:38 am UTC
Re: *regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat* - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 01:43 am UTC
Re: *regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat* - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 01:45 am UTC
Re: *regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat* - [info]cimorene111, 2003-08-09 09:36 pm UTC
Re: *regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat* - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-08-09 02:12 am UTC
Re: *regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat* - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 02:40 am UTC
Re: *regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat* - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-08-09 03:07 am UTC
Re: *regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat* - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 03:10 am UTC
Re: *regards the above comments, dons a rabble-rousing hat* - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-08-09 03:31 am UTC

tintin
2003-08-09 02:06 am UTC (link)
Hullo! I am not a mod NA but I am a player, so don't necessarily take what I'm saying as speaking for the group, but from what I know we were all curious as to why you were so offended. But, yay, we got wanked. *wipes away tear*

(Reply to this)


[info]swash_my_buckle
2003-08-09 02:16 am UTC (link)
For one thing, the noble name of Fandom Wank was tossed back and forth several times with increasing acrimony.

actually, the only person "tossing" the so-called noble name of Wank was yourself, which really came off as looking like you were little more than a troll looking for something to wank about. i don't blame anyone - player or mods - for getting their hackles up over being threatened with wank if they didn't cooperate with whatever it was you were trying to do.

Pretty much every single post was deleted by vengeful mods. Luckily, I have managed to salvage some posts because livejournal e-mails you when someone responds to you

the mods at nraged delete posts when they become volatile and detract from the game. particularly when lengthy diatribes of wounded pride cause threads to collapse, making it difficult to read through the stuff that's actually pertinent and interesting. if you had an issue with a player or anyone else at nraged, is it so hard to take it to e-mail? or is it more fun (and melodramatic) to berate people in public for not playing their game your way?

Thus, I've managed to reconstruct a rough outline of posts. What I haven't been able to reconstruct, I've done a summary of.

and you have quite a future in exaggerated fiction.

i see you saw fit to post snape's reply to you, however you left off your own reply. let's make sure everyone sees that bit, eh?

>>Lily Evans was an acquaintance. That is all you are permitted to know.
>>Have you ever been in love? potions_master 2003-08-07 15:16 (link) Yes.
>>Subsequent questions on this subject will be ignored.

Oh, yes, I see now. You aren't REALLY at all disturbed by being question about Lily Potter. I was wrong all the way, wasn't I?

And also: psuedo-intellectual? Really, professor, you aren't nearly as interesting or nimble-tounged as you believe you are. For instance, both Lucius and Draco Malfoy display far more wit with stunning regularity than you ever do.

For example, retorts of Lucius (from his journal and Q&A session):

[Choice quotes from Looshie on various subjects.]

Some retorts of yours: (From this Q&A):

[Random quotes from Snape.]

Your basic (and repetitive) modus operandi seems to be just to insult people by calling them imbeciles in a variety of ways, as well as threatening to take away house points. Oh so side-splitting, dear professor. You are amusing to read up on-- but as for being witty...Well, I shouldn't be the first to cast stones.

(Well, you did want me to knock the tiara out of your player's hair, didn't you? A little honest criticism never hurt anyone. Also, it would be frankly hilarious if the good people of this board suddenly jumped atop of me and wailed the [censored] out of me for expressing my opinion. Fandom Wank, here I come! )


clearly the only goal you had in mind was to create something that would be possible for you to manipulate into a fandom_wank. you complain that you were merely "acting" when talking with snape and the other characters, yet you continually bring up fandom_wank in your replies which is decidedly OOC as f_w does not exist in the NA universe, but then you complain that the characters weren't IC enough for you? how, exactly, is that in-character when addressing someone fictionally? how is that anything but a blatant attempt to incite some sort of flame war between you and the players and give you the excuse to toddle on over here and wank to your heart's desire? have you really got nothing better to do?

con't next comment.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]swash_my_buckle
2003-08-09 02:17 am UTC (link)
and another thing!

>camillabloom: 2003-08-07 22:25
>>Forgive me for being so frank; - though this can't really come as a surprise - are you really a woman? And is that what there is '... between me and Professor Snape... '


that was a question addressed to Snape, not to you. you assumed it was directed at you because you don't seem to understand how to comment or reply properly in a journal format. your comment was probably deleted because it made you look pretty stupid.

owever I, because I told Snape he wasn't funny when he was insulting me, got banned within hours of my post. And when I attempted to defend myself and explained that I was only playing around and wasn't being belligerent, they refused to hear my arguments.

can you prove that you are banned? did a mod e-mail you and announce that you are banned? i sincerely doubt that you are banned. it does make for a more dramatic telling though, doesn't it? poor little you, banned from big bad nraged by the evil and elitist na mods. wah woe sob moan. sucks to be you, doesn't it?

though i would not blame them if they did ban you simply on the grounds that you are annoying. but thats just me.

from what i saw before the comments were deleted, your arguments didn't make much sense and consisted mainly of you whining about them not being in-character enough to suit you while you rambled incoherently in and out of character, which i don't rightly understand considering that you could not be in-character as you haven't a character to begin with. no one else had any trouble with snape or his responses. he was being his usual horrible, snapey self to everyone else in that q&a and only you seemed offended by it. perhaps because you cannot differentiate or disassociate between yourself and the character addressing you? if that is the case i suggest you stay away from rpg characters if you cannot tell fact from fiction.

you've also left out the bits where someone under the monikers of 'herryluvsdreco' and 'zachnginnygrrrl' joined in the fun and the 'three' of you proceeded to comment repetitively using ever-so-creative spelling and declarations-in-ascii. i wouldn't be surprised if that was the mods' main reason for deleting the whole mess in the first place. it certainly wasn't very pleasant to see imho.

i suggest you find another goal in life, and leave the wanking to the professionals. this was a pathetic attempt at best.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 02:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]swash_my_buckle, 2003-08-09 02:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 02:49 am UTC
Well... - [info]loafing_oaf, 2003-08-09 10:18 pm UTC
Re: Well... - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-10 12:34 am UTC
Re: Well... - [info]loafing_oaf, 2003-08-11 06:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]delfeus, 2003-08-09 02:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 02:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]delfeus, 2003-08-09 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 02:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]swash_my_buckle, 2003-08-09 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]delfeus, 2003-08-09 03:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]swash_my_buckle, 2003-08-09 02:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]swash_my_buckle, 2003-08-09 02:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 02:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]azkaban_bait, 2003-08-09 03:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 03:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-08-09 03:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]azkaban_bait, 2003-08-09 03:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 03:34 am UTC
Re: - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-08-09 03:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]delfeus, 2003-08-09 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]swash_my_buckle, 2003-08-09 03:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]azkaban_bait, 2003-08-09 03:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 04:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2003-08-09 09:41 pm UTC

[info]iczer6
2003-08-09 03:35 am UTC (link)
>>i don't blame anyone - player or mods - for getting their hackles up over being threatened with wank if they didn't cooperate with whatever it was you were trying to do.>>

Yes because we ALL know how simply hideous and torterous it is to be wanked.

Oh the shame, how will you EVER deal with it? Cause it's not it's JUST AN RPG or anything.



Icz

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-08-09 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notapipe, 2003-08-09 06:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-08-09 06:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2003-08-09 06:35 pm UTC

[info]notapipe
2003-08-09 06:37 am UTC (link)
why can't fandom_wank exist in the NA universe? Leaving aside the time-specificity, they can use the net, they could run across f_w.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2003-08-09 09:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]notapipe, 2003-08-10 02:03 am UTC

tintin
2003-08-09 03:05 am UTC (link)
Man, the wank is out of control up there. Please note that the comments above were NOT on NA's behalf.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]uniquesnowflake
2003-08-09 03:09 am UTC (link)
Well, I give you sincere props for being able to disagree completely with the poster and still be mature about it.

Word up, boo.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - tintin, 2003-08-09 03:15 am UTC

[info]notapipe
2003-08-09 06:31 am UTC (link)
Awww, you left out my favorite part: the plebejournal response.

While I DO beleive that the nraged mods can be a little over-zealous at times and far too protective and censorous when they don't need to be, this isn't as bad as you make it out to be.

You start off with a kind of bleh anti-Snape post, boring and hard to get through. Then, when Lucius is mean to you, which is completely IN CHARACTER (a fact you would know all the better if you had checked out the Lucius Q&A), you go off and whinge about people being mean to you, asking a question in the thread (rather than email as you should have) about why Lucius's player hated you so. You do this long silly rebuttal thing, and then have a problem when people aren't down with arguing with you. So yes, you were being wanky.

I think that censorship is a bad thing, and that if they had left things be (except maybe the "Why does Lucius hate me?" post which wasn't really appropriate to the forum) things would have been better (though I doubt it would have given anyone coming across a favorable impression, but that's just my opinion), but they had a reason: it was not really consistent with the point of the thread and just distracting and wanky.

However, I'm amused that YOU posted it to F_W, since I had the uncharitable thought, which I had quickly purged since it was kind of incredible, that you wanted it fandom_wanked to stroke your ego. My bad.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mariagoner
2003-08-10 01:34 am UTC (link)
Call this another WTF on my part.

Did you notice that whenever I referred to myself as an "innocent victim," I was always facetious? Did you notice that the title of this post is "I am an innocent wronged!1! ::gasp gasp:: to intentionally play up the melodramatic hysterics of my post? Did you notice I admitted to being wrong several times and that I APOLOGIZED to the mods? Did you notice I was trying (and failing) to be funny when I asked readers to say who was wanky?

Did you at any point find me claiming I was totally right and and that they were totally bitch-off-their-freaking-rockers wrong? Because even I think everyone in that thread was being a dumbass who needed a good smack to the head-- and that was sort of the conclusion I'd hope you find.

All I wanted to induce in this community was laughter, not **righteous indignation** for me. I have enough rigtheous indignation on my part; I don't need any of YOURS.

(Also-- would everyone stop telling me my English is convoluted? I'm not a person who speaks English all that often-- of course it will be harder for me to write it. I got it the first time.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]notapipe, 2003-08-10 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-08-10 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notapipe, 2003-08-10 02:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-08-10 09:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]triestoohard, 2003-08-10 01:47 pm UTC

[info]irk
2003-08-09 08:21 am UTC (link)
TIP: When you ask someone...

"Do I look wanky?"

and they say...

"Fucking right you do!"

then don't follow up with...

"But look at how mean they were and don't you think I deserve a little more consideration and I don't see why you're disagreeing with me just because the entire point of my post was to paint myself the victim and send f_w off after my cruel attackers like a nest of angry protien-filled hornets!"

because it gets you even stickier than you already were when you walked into this place.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mariagoner
2003-08-10 12:30 am UTC (link)
...

Yes. You're absolutely right.

Because when I wrote this post up and told people that both I and the mods at the RPG were being wanky idjits--

I REALLY MEANT FOR EVERYONE HERE TO FLAME EVERYONE THERE!

No! Really! Everyone, go spam the people at the RPG! Go, good people of the hive vagina! Go!

...

Seriously. Why does the concept of pointing-and-laughing even at yourself not seem applicable in my case? I'm not a person with a grudge; I just wanted to give a laugh, 'tis all.

And thanks, Horatio and Icz, for understanding this much.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]irk, 2003-08-10 07:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-08-10 10:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]irk, 2003-08-11 05:54 am UTC

[info]triestoohard
2003-08-10 02:01 pm UTC (link)
As someone who read all the posts in their original context I've gotta say you came out the victor in terms of wankiness. Simply put you seemed like a troll at the time, and despite your claims that you were making fun of yourself as well as the nraged mods, quotes like this:

This is a pretty small wank, but kind of fun. For one thing, the noble name of Fandom Wank was tossed back and forth several times with increasing acrimony. Not to mention, it's a **classic** case of trigger-happy mods and people who can give it but can't take it at all.

really don't help your case too much. Dude, its a role playing game, that you felt the need to fight with the players in the first place is wanky. But really? Posting it here also, in an attempt to what? get some gratification? That is the best part.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map