Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Thennary Nak ([info]seca) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2010-11-25 13:20:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:fandom: supernatural, mom the other kids aren't playing right!, paranoia

Rejeneration Vs. Spnanonhaven
While I await for being able to stuff myself on turkey I have come across a delightful little wank recipe thanks to the anonymice over at the [info]wank_report

You start off with a cryptic LJ entry on rejeneration's personal LJ asking why people are mean on the internet.

You then add anony wondering from spnanonhaven about said LJ entry. Don't worry about the BNF-secret cabals theories mixed in there, it just adds a little extra flavor.

Add ten PMs to people who visited rejeneration's journal without being anon saying, "Looks like you dropped by the journal earlier. Did you find what you were looking for?" Anons should be at least a bit disturbed and/or confused by this.

Then let it stir with the abuse of end notes in rejeneration's next LJ entry over a heated plate of 'talking about anon as if they are all male' with a dose of 'if you read her public post you are stalking her'.

Allow the anon to keep the wank warm. Then allow it to simmer.

As you let it simmer check for evidence of deleted comments in rejeneration's journal entries. While you may not find screen caps there is always copy and paste from tracked posts. When you can confirm the deletion of comments, as well as a side dish of accusations of drumming up page views of the second LJ entry for an LJ idol competition, your wank is ready to serve.

Before serving though you can add tasty little gems of rejeneration's past wanky behavior, which can be found in this old spnanonymous thread. Because nothing tops a wank better than a wanker comparing themselves to Jesus.

Enjoy and happy Turkey Day for those celebrating.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]sorchar
2010-11-26 01:29 am UTC (link)
Wow. I think we need to give thanks for the person who created My Guests - so much wank it will bring us! We'll have an early Wankmas!

(Reply to this)


[info]eldritch
2010-11-26 01:47 am UTC (link)
Could [info]rejeneration get any more condescending? I'm honestly pretty impressed.

(Reply to this)


[info]lasha
2010-11-26 01:57 am UTC (link)
Some more:

http://rejeneration.livejournal.com/252593.html?thread=4649905#t4649905

After reading all that I am still not sure WTF is going on. Stay crazy, SPN fandom and Happy Thanksgiving!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]evanwaters, 2010-11-26 06:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2010-11-29 10:39 pm UTC

[info]groovytastic
2010-11-26 01:58 am UTC (link)
Rejeneration's complaint that purplehaze's argument "makes no sense" is hilarious in light of her own communication problems. But this is what really takes the biscuit:

I am a really nice person. There are people who believe that, and there are people who don't. The people who don't are usually very strange...

(Reply to this)


[info]phosfate
2010-11-26 02:45 am UTC (link)
Man, that is a whole lot of utterly opaque passive aggression, that is.

(Reply to this)


[info]themadscientist
2010-11-26 03:53 am UTC (link)
I have found through several years of observation that the anon behavior in SPN fandom is far, far more terrifying and/or wanktastic than anything they can cook up in the show.

And well, it's Supernatural, so that's a high bar yo.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2010-11-27 04:24 am UTC

[info]els_chan
2010-11-26 04:01 am UTC (link)
So let me see if I understand this correctly.

rejeneration doesn't care about your anonmeme so hard she's going to make two posts about it, message you about it, and fight with you over it on the internet.

...Okay.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]els_chan, 2010-11-26 04:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2010-11-26 01:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2010-11-26 06:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]els_chan, 2010-11-26 07:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2010-11-26 07:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]els_chan, 2010-11-26 07:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-11-27 03:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cyan_aura, 2010-11-26 09:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2010-11-26 09:59 pm UTC
The 12 steps of Pieholics Anonymous - [info]emily_goddess, 2010-11-30 12:46 am UTC
Re: The 12 steps of Pieholics Anonymous - [info]tofuknight, 2010-12-03 04:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]risha, 2010-11-26 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sir_hellsing, 2010-11-28 10:18 pm UTC

[info]lady_ganesh
2010-11-26 04:08 am UTC (link)
Wow. So basically she checked her My Guests and assumed anyone she didn't recognize came from the anon meme? And sent them nasty emails? There's a good way to make friends.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-11-26 09:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-11-26 04:12 pm UTC

[info]evilsqueakers
2010-11-26 04:09 am UTC (link)
I'm confused.

What. The. Fuck. Did I just read?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2010-11-26 07:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-11-26 07:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2010-11-26 07:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-11-26 07:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2010-11-26 07:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-11-26 07:44 am UTC

[info]neuronin
2010-11-26 10:16 am UTC (link)
This recipe tastes like passive-aggressive chicken shawarma. And fruit punch, 'cause I'm drinking fruit punch.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]neuronin, 2010-11-26 10:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2010-11-26 10:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sakanagi, 2010-11-26 10:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2010-11-28 01:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2010-11-27 04:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yattara, 2010-11-26 04:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2010-11-27 12:01 am UTC
(no subject) - ealusaid, 2010-11-26 04:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2010-11-26 04:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]neuronin, 2010-11-26 05:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2010-11-26 07:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2010-11-26 08:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2010-11-26 06:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2010-11-27 04:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2010-11-27 04:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2010-11-27 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]trinity_destler, 2010-11-27 11:09 pm UTC
Obligatory - [info]grenadeofbees, 2010-11-28 11:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2010-11-27 10:30 pm UTC

[info]sakanagi
2010-11-26 11:01 am UTC (link)
This whole thing is perfect. It's been a long time since I last saw someone so batshit.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

OT - [info]ianthefira, 2010-11-26 04:39 pm UTC
Re: OT - [info]sakanagi, 2010-11-27 11:03 am UTC

[info]gerorin
2010-11-26 12:06 pm UTC (link)
I am a really nice person. There are people who believe that, and there are people who don't. The people who don't are usually very strange

Yes. She definitely sounds like a nice person. Like all self-proclaimed Jesus-in-Purgatory. This makes me feel like I wanna friend her so much.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gerorin, 2010-11-26 12:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]derryderrydown, 2010-11-26 01:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2010-11-26 07:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-11-26 09:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2010-11-26 09:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]grenadeofbees, 2010-11-28 11:12 am UTC

[info]twinno
2010-11-26 02:49 pm UTC (link)
[info]rejeneration, if you're reading this - what's with all the footnotes?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2010-11-27 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankaholic, 2010-11-27 01:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gerorin, 2010-11-27 05:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]grenadeofbees, 2010-11-28 11:15 am UTC

[info]ikabod
2010-11-26 03:56 pm UTC (link)
Bzuh? I'm not even sure what these folks are wanking about.

SPN: The fandom that will wank about literally nothing.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2010-11-26 07:59 pm UTC

[info]mochibuni
2010-11-26 09:37 pm UTC (link)
SOUND THE ALARMS! SOMEONE IS READING A PUBLIC ENTRY ON MY JOURNAL!

WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOOOEEEEOOOOOOOO!

(Reply to this)


[info]kitt_in_socks
2010-11-27 02:19 am UTC (link)
"The cut clearly states it's for Idol."

"This was an entry for LJ idol. Think of it as a story. Think of this as a personal tale. Think of it as one person's opinion about something."


Maybe I'm misunderstanding this and she's talking about the second post, but her first one--the one that initially piqued the anonmeme's curiosity--isn't tagged for LJ idol at all.

Is this a new version of "It was a social experiment"? It was a ~story~ that also happens to be "one person's" [read: rejeneration's] opinion and personal tale. Wat.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gerorin, 2010-11-27 05:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2010-11-27 05:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kitt_in_socks, 2010-11-27 05:52 am UTC

[info]feenix
2010-11-27 03:58 am UTC (link)
Oh, SPN fandom. SGA did this years ago with [info]glossing, except with even more panache.

And by that, I meant "confusion."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lasha, 2010-11-29 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2010-11-29 02:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2010-11-29 02:44 am UTC

[info]bubosquared
2010-11-27 04:57 pm UTC (link)
Add ten PMs to people who visited rejeneration's journal without being anon saying, "Looks like you dropped by the journal earlier. Did you find what you were looking for?"

Well. That's not creepty at all. o_O

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2010-11-27 07:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bienegold, 2010-11-27 11:24 pm UTC
You are an evil, evil 'mote! - [info]bubosquared, 2010-11-28 06:42 pm UTC

[info]hot_patootie
2010-11-27 08:39 pm UTC (link)
*insert comment here about why I stay away from Supernatural*

this people are scary :/

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hadesphoenix, 2010-11-28 08:10 pm UTC

[info]trinity_destler
2010-11-27 11:04 pm UTC (link)
She's seriously stunning, so much incoherence. It's like if Derrida got drunk and started wanking. And he had difficulty with reading comprehension. And decided he was Jesus.

(Reply to this)


[info]softgraysky
2010-11-28 07:13 am UTC (link)
You come in here, read around a little and try to piecemeal something comprehensive together from about fifteen minutes of browsing. Suggesting I did or didn't do this or that. That's silly. You know, if you were a friend, and had been for say... oh, five, seven years, you'd know my stance on this and you know it's never changed and you'd _know_ that I was only talking about what I was talking about-- that I was only talking about the ASSHOLES ON THE INTERNET-- THE ANONYMOUS KIND-- WHO TRY TO HURT PEOPLE AND THINK THAT'S FUN. That needs to be branded on foreheads when you come in the door, Jesus, Mary and Joseph.

So, basically if you want to fully understand her posts (and her by extension) you have to have known her for ...seven years? And in real life? Because the only people who don't know her in real life are strange and misinformed?

OH! But all you need to know is that she HATES anonymice and you have to have it BRANDED on your forehead before you are worthy to be in her presence?

So it's either branding or seven years of knowing her IRL to apparently even read her entries. Frankly, those terms are a little too steep.

And she says she's not passive-aggressive. Ho-ly.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ram, 2010-11-28 10:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]la_fono, 2010-11-28 01:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2010-11-28 06:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]castellated, 2010-11-29 06:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]softgraysky, 2010-11-29 11:26 pm UTC

[info]ram
2010-11-28 10:15 am UTC (link)
I am a really nice person

What a fascinating cultural linguistics lesson! Where I come from, there are many (generally gross and universally unfavorable) terms to describe a person exhibiting rejeneration's behavior here. Funnily enough, not a one of them is synonymous with "nice person". Fancy that.

(Reply to this)


[info]grenadeofbees
2010-11-28 11:09 am UTC (link)
And you might have to reach down and grab those little things you call nuts.

OH FUCK SHE KNOWS ABOUT THE BOWL OF WALNUTS I KEEP UNDER MY CHAIR

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cheryl_bites, 2010-11-29 09:00 pm UTC

[info]castellated
2010-11-29 06:09 am UTC (link)
Wow. I haven't even gotten far into the wank yet and I find myself thinking "If a LOT of people on the internet "talk trash" (to use rejeneration's phrase) to you ... maybe it's you?" Everyone hits that kind of thing now and again unless they lurk all the time, but hell. If it's constant, you* gotta ask what you're doing to cause it.

* You being, apparently, anyone but rejeneration.

(Reply to this)


[info]dapperdinosaur
2010-11-29 09:35 pm UTC (link)
Why, oh why, does everyone in the Supernatural fandom have to be crazy?

(Reply to this)



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map