Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



reovu ([info]reovu) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2011-03-27 17:17:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:fandom_wank's thoughts on yaoi, movie wank, omg mock people mock, reviews, stop sharing your thoughts

small but interesting
So Sucker Punch came out this weekend and not only did it Fail To Impress, But it also Didn't perform as expected

People give their thoughts around the internet. Most people hated it along with a very vocal few who liked it.

HOWEVER, being a Zack Snyder movie... This shit blows up over at the Spill community.

For those of you who don't know: Spill.com is an internet based film review community (that recently expanded to video games) that gives podcasts and animated film reviews.

So as usual, a review is posted (review in bad taste with rape, skip if you wish )

Usually reviews get a fair amount of comments within their weekly film reviews. But for some reason this weekend SHIT BLOWS UP about this movie giving heated debates on Why this is a bad movie and you are bad for liking it; or you need to calm down and have a good time.

And it all starts here (I posted the link from page 45 since that's where it all started. you may have to go a few pages down until the wanky stuff finally gets started)

If you're not in the mood to read ALL of the mess here is a breakdown of the community:

. Spill members hate Zack Snyder
. Film Causes debate because his name is on it
. Usually in the community everybody likes to automatically agree with the critics despite not having seen said movie for themselves
. Debates are caused on OMG THE FILM INDUSTRY IS COLLAPSING NOW11!!11, stop liking what I don't like, why Zack Snyder is the devil.. the works.
. Comments criticizing the reviewers on WELL WHAT DID YOU EXPECT FROM THE TRAILER? OMG YOU'RE SO UPTIGHT

Oh and there was also a cute little side wank about the audio podcasts being too long


note:I edited the entry to fix a link and tags and warning suggested by commentor (thanks) 



(Post a new comment)


[info]lady7jane
2011-03-29 12:47 am UTC (link)
I don't know, you might want to put a trigger warning on that review link. They start it right off with some rape jokes and obnoxious laughter.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]reovu
2011-03-29 12:50 am UTC (link)
will do. thanks for telling me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]reovu
2011-03-29 01:10 am UTC (link)
I'm re listening to the podcast now by the way. If you feel there is anything else I should add along the way please let me know.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lady7jane, 2011-03-29 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 01:22 am UTC

[info]hbic_hq
2011-04-04 11:32 pm UTC (link)
Yeah they have a huge problem w/ sexism and tasteless jokes on that site.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lilychan
2011-03-29 01:49 am UTC (link)
The movie itself isn't that bad (I liked the ending, at least) but I just wish it was done better in terms of determining what was fantasy (other than the action sequences) and what was reality.

But all I can say is to this wank: *facepalm*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]notjo
2011-03-29 02:06 am UTC (link)
Oh wow, really? I actually hated the ending! Can you tell me what you liked about it? (No pressure, I'm just excited to talk to someone else who saw the movie.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 02:08 am UTC
Spoilers! - [info]notjo, 2011-03-29 02:11 am UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 02:19 am UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]lilychan, 2011-03-29 02:25 am UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]sadisticferret, 2011-03-29 03:24 am UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]emily_goddess, 2011-03-29 05:09 am UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]jellibean, 2011-04-01 05:43 pm UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]eleutheria, 2011-03-29 10:24 am UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 10:27 am UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]eleutheria, 2011-03-29 10:41 am UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]theladyfeylene, 2011-03-30 09:35 pm UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]puipui, 2011-03-29 07:08 am UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]notjo, 2011-03-29 04:46 pm UTC
Re: Spoilers! - [info]reovu, 2011-03-31 01:10 pm UTC
Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]lilychan, 2011-03-29 02:11 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]notjo, 2011-03-29 02:13 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]lilychan, 2011-03-29 02:20 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 02:25 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 02:35 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]lilychan, 2011-03-29 02:36 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 02:37 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 02:39 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 02:41 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]aruru, 2011-03-29 04:49 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 05:00 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 04:53 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 05:26 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]lilychan, 2011-03-29 02:42 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 02:43 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]wankaholic, 2011-03-29 03:41 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 04:05 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]wankaholic, 2011-03-29 04:13 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 04:16 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 04:51 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 05:01 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 05:04 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 05:27 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]m_butterfly, 2011-03-30 12:27 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-30 12:33 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]beejium, 2011-03-29 05:40 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 05:47 am UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]theladyfeylene, 2011-03-30 09:40 pm UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]notjo, 2011-03-30 09:46 pm UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]theladyfeylene, 2011-03-30 10:47 pm UTC
Re: Spoilers from here on then, I guess! Proceed with caution! - [info]kelschuu, 2011-03-29 06:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2011-03-30 09:30 pm UTC

[info]nibor
2011-03-29 02:10 am UTC (link)
I have mixed thoughts on the movie itself, but I really, really like the soundtrack.

But otherwise this seems like a fairly standard wank where people take reviewers' proclamations as Holy Writ.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2011-03-29 02:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lilychan, 2011-03-29 02:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 02:17 am UTC

[info]feenix
2011-03-29 02:28 am UTC (link)
I saw the trigger warning and immediately cringed. I haven't looked at the comments yet, but I think you may want to prepare to pack up and head to [info]unfunny_fandom.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 02:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2011-03-29 02:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 02:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2011-03-29 02:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 04:14 am UTC

[info]ridureyu
2011-03-29 02:34 am UTC (link)
I have issues with Sucker Punch in general whenever someone claims that it "empowers" women (A strip club? REALLY?), or try to call it a "ceinamtic masterpiece." It's got some cool set pieces, sure (WWII orcs!), but... I just have issues with the rest of it. I'm not gonna kill you if you like it, but yeah.

Now, the thing I DID notice?

The movie is titled "Sucker Punch." The entire film revolves around "you know that cool stuff you saw in the trailers that made you want to see the movie? Well, it's all imaginary, and they're getting lobotomized! Hahahahaha!"

I think the movie is meant to be a sucker punch on the audience. Zack Snyder intended to troll geek culture, and ohhhhhhh, he succeeded. So for that, I salute Mr. Snyder's accomplishment.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]emily_goddess, 2011-03-29 05:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 05:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hadesphoenix, 2011-03-29 11:31 am UTC
(no subject) - janegray, 2011-03-29 12:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hadesphoenix, 2011-03-31 01:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2011-03-30 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-30 09:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2011-03-30 10:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-30 10:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2011-03-30 10:40 pm UTC

[info]white_serpent
2011-03-29 02:41 am UTC (link)
From the comments:

This movie was so bad that I no longer like past Zack Snyder films or even films involving anyone else who was in this movie. Jon Hamm was the best thing about this movie and the only one who showed any level of competent acting, yet even after his minute and a half of screen time in this piece of shit I now hate Mad Men by mere association and I loved Mad Men.

Yes, a perfectly reasonable reaction. Not over the top at all.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 02:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2011-03-29 03:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 03:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catslash, 2011-03-29 05:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 05:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2011-03-30 11:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2011-03-29 03:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2011-03-29 04:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2011-03-29 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2011-03-29 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2011-03-29 04:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2011-03-29 04:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gerorin, 2011-03-29 04:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 05:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gerorin, 2011-03-29 06:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 06:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gerorin, 2011-03-29 06:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 06:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2011-03-29 07:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 07:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2011-03-29 10:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 05:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]galateus, 2011-03-31 02:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2011-03-29 10:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]re_weird, 2011-03-29 11:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2011-03-29 04:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2011-03-29 06:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 06:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]spawn_of_kong, 2011-03-29 09:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2011-03-29 07:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2011-03-29 04:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_sun_is_up, 2011-03-31 01:08 am UTC

[info]ridureyu
2011-03-29 05:23 am UTC (link)
Well, after looking at this wank, I guess I could say that

-OW-

Shot myself in the eye with a toy missile. ow ow ow ow ow ow. It was Iron Man. Ow.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 05:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ridureyu, 2011-03-29 05:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2011-03-29 07:19 am UTC

[info]ashacrone
2011-03-29 09:54 am UTC (link)
See, and now I am so disappointed because this looked to be the most awesome movie ever. But I have a horrific squick towards that kind of thing, and I can see why some people might have such a visceral reaction to what happened to Baby Doll. I suppose it was more or less inevitable- Zack Snyder can put together gorgeous scenes, but no coherent wholes from what I can see.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 10:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashacrone, 2011-03-29 11:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 10:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yolanee, 2011-03-29 02:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gabzillaz, 2011-03-29 04:54 pm UTC

[info]dragonsong12
2011-03-29 02:58 pm UTC (link)
Hey, I'll admit I enjoyed the movie (I want to just cut apart the fantasy scenes and run them all together - zombie nazis? Stone samurai? Giant dragons? I'm so there!) I'll also say the movie was highly problematic, so I simultaneously agree with those who didn't like it.

So, from my decidedly neutral position, I'm pretty amused at how "discussions" on the internet always devolve into extremes. "IT WAS THE BEST THING EVER AND SHOULD GET ALL THE AWARDS!" "NO, IT WAS THE WORST THING EVER AND EVERYONE INVOLVED NEEDS A PUNCH IN THE FACE!"
THERE IS NO MIDDLE GROUND! THERE IS ONLY ZUUL!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]amaresu, 2011-03-29 09:55 pm UTC
I am disappoint. :(
[info]munchkinott
2011-03-29 03:16 pm UTC (link)
Will it be possible to, one day, have a movie where the girls run the show, blast the crap out of dragons n' mechanical oddities n' suchlike, and the twist ISN'T that the girls are helpless, abused, raped and butchered?

Yeah, I saw the trailer, and thought 'OOH SHINY! Nice girls! Serious weaponry! Huge dragons! YAY!' then winced over the asylum clips in the same trailer. Why must there be a nasty mouthful of rape-abuse culture medicine with female-driven fantasy? It's not like there isn't a market for fantasy without the abuse-survivor connotations. *points at MLP:FiM*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2011-03-29 04:08 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]zumie_ashlen, 2011-03-29 04:29 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]munchkinott, 2011-03-29 06:32 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]zumie_ashlen, 2011-03-29 10:01 pm UTC
Another rec - [info]munchkinott, 2011-03-31 07:26 pm UTC
Re: Another rec - [info]zumie_ashlen, 2011-03-31 10:05 pm UTC
Re: Another rec - [info]munchkinott, 2011-03-31 11:46 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]alcesx2, 2011-03-29 10:54 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]munchkinott, 2011-03-30 12:32 am UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]alcesx2, 2011-03-30 01:21 am UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]munchkinott, 2011-03-31 07:40 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]alcesx2, 2011-03-31 11:55 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]floriatosca, 2011-03-29 09:55 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]zumie_ashlen, 2011-03-29 09:58 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]ihateyouall, 2011-03-29 05:46 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]ihateyouall, 2011-03-29 05:47 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]munchkinott, 2011-03-29 06:51 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]the_sun_is_up, 2011-03-29 07:35 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]kitt_in_socks, 2011-03-29 07:42 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]reovu, 2011-03-29 10:33 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]cinnamonical, 2011-03-30 03:01 am UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]were_lemur, 2011-03-31 05:22 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]ashacrone, 2011-03-30 12:21 pm UTC
Re: I am disappoint. :( - [info]chikane, 2011-03-31 07:57 am UTC

[info]ladyvyola
2011-03-29 03:25 pm UTC (link)
Very spoilery, pretty much positive, reviews and comments in Leupagus's entries on Dreamwidth and Livejournal, for anyone who'd like to hear more.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]imp, 2011-03-29 09:29 pm UTC

[info]xero_sky
2011-03-29 03:38 pm UTC (link)
I spent a while yesterday reading Goons arguing over whether Suckerpunch is a clever commentary on how female empowerment in popular film is actually female exploitation in disguise, made worse because every 'faux empowerment' flick degrades our ability to tell the difference, or if it's simply a shitty film with good effects.

Personally I won't see it, because although I'm down with the samurai robots and nazis, I'm not going to pay cash to see anyone get the icepick treatment.

(Reply to this)


[info]whimsy_chan
2011-03-29 04:40 pm UTC (link)
Can anyone explain to me why all the characters have pet or stripper names? (True story: when I went to the humane association to adopt a kitten, one of the kittens I looked at was named Sweet Pea.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]madelfdisease, 2011-03-29 05:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]whimsy_chan, 2011-03-29 05:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]madelfdisease, 2011-03-29 05:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]whimsy_chan, 2011-03-29 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amaresu, 2011-03-29 10:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]monty, 2011-03-30 01:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amaresu, 2011-03-31 05:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2011-04-01 12:24 am UTC
*spoilers* - [info]madelfdisease, 2011-03-30 04:56 am UTC
Re: *spoilers* - [info]amaresu, 2011-03-31 05:41 pm UTC
Re: *spoilers* - [info]madelfdisease, 2011-03-31 05:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]serafina20, 2011-03-30 12:35 am UTC

[info]gabzillaz
2011-03-29 04:46 pm UTC (link)
Damn o_o

The movie was awful. It's sad because it could have been great :(

I loved the soundtrack, though.

(Reply to this)


[info]murriness
2011-03-29 07:37 pm UTC (link)
It's when they start complaining about the length of the reivew for the movie they are complaining about that things begin to get silly.

Saw Sucker Punch last night. It was okay, had incredible effects but not much else. I don't regret seeing it. I just thought there would be more to it. Really, for me, it was just an interesting role to see Emily Browning play. For some reason, in my mind, she is still Violet from Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate events.

(Reply to this)


[info]hallidae
2011-03-29 08:17 pm UTC (link)
I don't think I'll be seeing this one. My parents went to see it last night, and when I asked my mother whether it was any good or not, she told me that with my brain (mental disorder), it would likely make me puke in the theater. She usually trusts me to make my own decisions about what I can and can't watch, so the fact that she thought it necessary to actually warn me off this time means it's probably a big ol' triggery mess.

(Reply to this)


[info]imp
2011-03-29 09:18 pm UTC (link)
Goddamn I am conflicted on this movie.

On one hand, I liked how the overarching message was that you could control your own destiny, and the theme of women working together and helping eachother be strong and realize their potential and how they deserved freedom. I thought it was interesting how there was a contrast between the worlds where they were forced to fight as victims and use their attackers' expecations against them and the ones where they were completely powerful and in charge, and didn't have to fear being treated any differently. Even the skimpy costumes were worn confidently, instead of self-consciously like the lingerie in the burlesque world, and they were treated as entirely gender neutral in fights. The cutesy nicknames, which were condescending and icky coming from the people who worked in the burlesque world, sounded affectionate and sisterly when the girls talked to eachother, and (ignoring the fact that they all were probably supposed to be symbolic constructs in Baby's mind) though they weren't all really fleshed out much as characters, I would've liked to know more about them.

But on the other... SO MUCH attempted rape scenes, to the point where it seemed gratuitous. Christ, you could've done it once or twice and we would've got the message, which I don't even think was a necessary message in the FIRST place. I get that things like that happen, and that it's not like we should pretend it never ever does (especially in a corrupt 1950s mental institute), but it was kind of skeevy and left a bad taste in my mouth.

So... I guess I'm somewhere in the middle. I guess I liked it (particularly the imaginary fight sequences), and I have a genuine interest in the characters which I guess is my code for "please let there be Sweet Pea/Babydoll femmeslash out there", but it was definitely flawed, and there are DEFINITELY trigger warnings. It's not a happy movie.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mochibuni, 2011-04-05 01:24 am UTC

[info]re_weird
2011-03-29 11:33 pm UTC (link)
So have I told you all my thoughts on yaoi personal verdict on Sucker Punch yet?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2011-03-30 12:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]finchbird, 2011-03-31 12:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]re_weird, 2011-03-31 12:51 am UTC
Spoiler stuff
[info]r_a_black
2011-03-30 08:16 am UTC (link)
Okay, I need someone to just throw spoilers my way since it doesn't seem I'll be watching this one but I still want to be clear on the whole rape thing.

So they end up getting raped at the end and there are tons of attempted rapes throughout the film? Is that what happens?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Spoiler stuff - [info]kelschuu, 2011-03-30 09:02 am UTC

[info]napalmnacey
2011-03-30 11:23 am UTC (link)
I'm glad I read this wank. The wank itselt isn't really here-nor-there, but now I can avoid a movie that would have be clawing my face off in triggered PTSD fear five minutes in.

Seriously, fuck Zack Snyder, fuck 300, and fuck Watchmen. I'm going to watch Xanadu or Up or Lazytown or a thousand different stupid fun things that don't involve innocent, vulnerable pretty girls being raped.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]were_lemur, 2011-03-31 05:30 pm UTC

[info]were_lemur
2011-03-31 05:34 pm UTC (link)
Comment by Oneiric D 8 hours ago
I did find it not boring exactly but unexciting.


LOLwut?

Babydoll learns about sacrifice. The entire situation started because she turned her stepdad away without considering he would prey on her sister. In the end she realizes she must be willing to sacrifice herself.

Remember, ladies, it's SELFISH to fight off your rapist.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]theladyfeylene, 2011-03-31 06:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]verlaine, 2011-04-01 04:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mochibuni, 2011-04-05 01:26 am UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map